TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 3, 2011

Detection of Flood-Prone Areas Using Digital Elevation Models

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 10

Abstract

The availability of new technologies for the measurement of surface elevation has addressed the lack of high-resolution elevation data, which has led to an increase in the attraction of automated procedures based on digital elevation models (DEMs) for hydrological applications, including the delineation of floodplains. In particular, the exposure to flooding may be delineated quite well by adopting a modified topographic index (TIm) computed from a DEM. The comparison of TIm and flood inundation maps (obtained from hydraulic simulations) shows that the portion of a basin exposed to flood inundation is generally characterized by a TIm higher than a given threshold, τ (e.g., equal to 2.89 for DEMs with cell size of 20 m). This allows the development of a simple procedure for the identification of flood-prone areas that requires only two parameters for the calibration: the threshold τ and the exponent of TIm. Because the modified topographic index is sensitive to the spatial resolution of the DEM, the optimal scale of representation for the performance of the method is investigated. The procedure is tested on the Arno River Basin by using the existing documentation of flood inundations produced by the Arno River Basin Authority for calibration and validation. This approach is applied on 11 subcatchments with areas ranging from 489–6,929km2 utilizing DEMs of different resolutions with cell sizes ranging from 20–720 m. Results show that the proposed procedure may help in the delineation of flood-prone areas, especially in basins with marked topography. The method is sensitive to the DEM resolution, but a cell size of 100m is sufficient for good performance for the catchments investigated here. The procedure is also tested by adopting DEMs from different sources, such as the shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) DEM, ASTER global DEM (GDEM), and national elevation data. This experiment highlights the reliability of the SRTM DEM for the delineation of flood-prone areas. A useful relationship between model parameters and the reference scale of the DEM was also obtained, providing a strategy for the application of this method in different contexts. The use of the modified topographic index should not be considered as an alternative to standard hydrological-hydraulic simulations for flood mapping, but it may represent a useful and rapid tool for a preliminary delineation of flooding areas in ungauged basins and in areas where expensive and time-consuming hydrological-hydraulic simulations are not affordable or economically convenient.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

S. M. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR) under the grant PRIN CoFin2007 entitled “Relations between Hydrological Processes, Climate, and Physical Attributes of the Landscape at the Regional and Basin Scales.” The authors acknowledge the support of the Arno River Basin Authority, which provided the digital elevation data. Finally, the authors would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Arno River Basin Authority. (2002). “Progetto di piano stralcio per l’assetto idrogeologico—Relazione.” Firenze, 331 (in Italian).
Beven, K. J., and Kirkby, M. J. (1979). “A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology.” Hydrolog. Sci. Bull., 24(1), 43–69.
Calende, G., Mancini, C. P., and Volpi, E. (2005). “Distribution of the extreme peak floods of the Tiber River from the XV century.” Adv. Water Resour., 28(6), 615–625.
Caporali, E., Rinaldi, M., and Casagli, N. (2005). “The Arno River floods.” Giornale di Geologia Applicata, 1, 177–192.
Cutter, S. L., and Emrich, C. (2005). “Are natural hazards and disaster losses in U.S. increasing?” EOS, 86(41), 381.
Committee on FEMA Flood Maps, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources/Mapping Science Committee, and National Research Council. (2009). Mapping the zone: Improving flood map accuracy, National Academies, Washington, DC, 136.
Ehlschlaeger, C. (1989). “Using the AT search algorithm to develop hydrologic models from digital elevation data.” Proc., Int. Geographic Information Systems (IGIS) Symp., U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Baltimore, 275–281.
Fowler, A. M., and Hennessy, K. J. (1995). “Potential impacts of global warming on the frequency and magnitude of heavy precipitation.” Nat. Hazards, 11(3), 283–303.
Gallant, J. C., and Dowling, T. I. (2003). “A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas.” Water Resour. Res., 39(12), 1347–1359.
Hailea, A. T., and Rientjes, T. H. M. (2005). “Effects of lidar DEM resolution in flood modelling: Model senstitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa.” Proc., ISPRS Workshop Laser Scanning, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Beijing.
Holmgren, P. (1994). “Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: An empirical evaluation.” Hydrol. Processes, 8(4), 327–334.
Horritt, M. S. (2000). “Calibration and validation of a two-dimensional finite element flood flow model using satellite radar imagery.” Water Resour. Res., 36(11), 3279–3291.
Horritt, M. S., and Bates, P. D. (2002). “Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 268(1–4), 87–99.
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., and Guevara, E. (2008). “Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4.” 〈http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org〉.
Kirkby, M. J. (1975). “Hydrograph modelling strategies.” Progress in physical and human geography, R. F. Peel, M. D. Chisholm, and P. Haggett, eds., Heinemann, London, 69–90.
Manfreda, S., Sole, A., and Fiorentino, M. (2007). “Valutazione del pericolo di allagamento sul territorio nazionale mediante un approccio di tipo geomorfologico.” L’Acqua, 4, 43–54 (in Italian).
Manfreda, S., Sole, A., and Fiorentino, M. (2008). “Can the basin morphology alone provide an insight on floodplain delineation?” On flood recovery innovation and response, WIT, Southampton, UK, 47–56.
Marks, K., and Bates, P. (2000). “Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models.” Hydrol. Processes, 14(11–12), 2109–2122.
Martini, P., Carniello, L., and Avanzi, C. (2004). “Two dimensional modelling of flood flows and suspended sediment transport: The case of the Brenta River, Veneto (Italy).” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4(1), 165–181.
McBratney, A. B., Mendonca Santos, M. L., and Minasny, B. (2003). “On digital soil mapping.” Geoderma, 117(1–2), 3–52.
Mendicino, G., and Sole, A. (1997). “The information content theory for the estimate of topographic index distribution used in TOPMODEL.” Hydrol. Processes, 11(9), 1099–1114.
Meneguzzo, F., et al. (2004). “Sensitivity of meteorological high-resolution numerical simulations of the biggest floods occurred over the Arno River Basin, Italy, in the 20th century.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 288(1–2), 37–56.
Milly, P. C. D., Wetherald, R. T., Dunne, K. A., and Delworth, T. L. (2002). “Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate.” Nature, 415, 514–517.
Nardi, F., Vivoni, E. R., and Grimaldi, S. (2006). “Investigating a floodplain scaling relation using a hydrogeomorphic delineation method.” Water Resour. Res., 42(9), W09409.
Oliveri, E., Noto, L. V., La Loggia, G., and Calabrò, P. (1999). “Fuzzy analysis and GIS for flooding risk map.” Proc., Int. Water Resources Engineering Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Penning-Rowsell, E. C., and Tunstall, S. M. (1996). “Risks and resources: Defining and managing the floodplain.” Floodplain processes, M. G. Anderson, D. E. Walling, and P. D. Bates, eds., Wiley, Chichester, UK, 493–533.
Petak, W. J. (1985). “Emergency management: A challenge for public administration.” Publ. Admin. Rev., 45, 3–7.
Quinn, P., Beven, K., and Lamb, R. (1995). “The ln(a/tanB) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framework.” Hydrol. Processes, 9(2), 161–182.
Romanowicz, R., and Beven, K. J. (1998). “Dynamic real-time prediction of flood inundation probabilities.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 43(2), 181–196.
Sanders, B. F. (2007). “Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(8), 1831–1843.
Sorensen, R., Zinko, U., and Seibert, J. (2006). “On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: Evaluation of different methods based on field observations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10(1), 101–112.
Surian, N., and Rinaldi, M. (2003). “Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy.” Geomorphology, 50(4), 307–326.
Tate, E. C., Olivera, F., and Maidment, D. R. (2002). “Creating a terrain model for floodplain mapping.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(2), 100–108.
Western, A. W., Grayson, R. B., and Blöschl, G. (2002). “Scaling of soil moisture: A hydrologic perspective.” Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 30(1), 149–180.
Werner, M. G. F., Hunter, N. M., and Bates, P. D. (2005). “Identifiability of distributed floodplain roughness values in flood extent estimation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 314(1–4), 139–157.
Williams, W. A., Jensen, M. E., Winne, J. C., and Redmond, R. L. (2000). “An automated technique for delineating and characterizing valley-bottom settings.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 64(1), 105–114.
Wolock, D. M., and Price, C. V. (1994). “Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model.” Water Resour. Res., 30(11), 3041–3052.
Zhang, W., and Montgomery, D. R. (1994). “Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1019–1028.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 16Issue 10October 2011
Pages: 781 - 790

History

Received: May 11, 2010
Accepted: Dec 29, 2010
Published online: Jan 3, 2011
Published in print: Oct 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Salvatore Manfreda [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Fisica dell’Ambiente, Univ. degli Studi della Basilicata, via dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, Potenza, 85100, Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Margherita Di Leo
Ph.D. Student, Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Fisica dell’Ambiente, Univ. degli Studi della Basilicata, via dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, Potenza, 85100, Italy.
Aurelia Sole
Full Professor, Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Fisica dell’Ambiente, Univ. degli Studi della Basilicata, via dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, Potenza, 85100, Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share