Frequency Analysis Incorporating a Decision Support System for Hydroclimatic Variables
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 11
Abstract
Statistical criteria used to evaluate the best distribution fit give large weights to the center of distributions. This is, however, not consistent with the objective of frequency analysis which is to estimate the quantiles with large return periods. In this study, the usefulness of a recently proposed decision support system (DSS), which defines the class of distributions prior to a model selection practice with respect to tail behavior of sample data, was investigated using three large hydroclimatic databases [Reference Hydrometric Basin Network (RHBN), precipitation, and UNESCO]. According to the DSS, although a considerable majority of RHBN flood sample data belonged to Class C (regularly varying distributions), a slight and great majority of UNESCO discharge as well as annual precipitation sample data, respectively, belonged to Class D (subexponential distributions). This difference in classification is attributed to the nature of studied variables: RHBN sample data represent extreme events with heavy tails (Class C), whereas UNESCO and especially precipitation sample data come from relatively lighter tailed processes and therefore belong mostly to Class D distributions. The impact of classification on model selection was the largest for the RHBN and the smallest for precipitation sample data. This confirms that discriminating between classes of competing models prior to model selection is critical when the sample data come from extreme events. Observed inconsistency in model selection for the RHBN database resulted in an underestimation of quantiles in more than 2/3 of the cases regardless of class of distributions. For the UNESCO and precipitation data, however, inappropriate model selection resulted equally in over- and under-estimation in Class C, whereas it resulted in underestimation of quantiles in Class D in the majority of observed inconsistencies. It can be concluded that an inappropriate model selection due to choosing a wrong class of distributions leads, in the majority of cases, to an underestimation of the quantity of the variable under study which is associated with a higher socioeconomy risk compared to that corresponding to an overestimation of a specific quantile. It was also observed that model selection using Bayesian Information Criterion (compared to Akaike Information Criterion) is more consistent with tail behavior of the natural processes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Akaike, H. (1970). “Stastistical predictor identification.” Ann. Statis. Math., 22, 203–217.
Akaike, H. (1976). “Canonical correlation analysis of time series and the use of an information criterion.” Systems identification, R. K. Mehra and D. G. Lainiotie, eds. Academic, New York, 27–96.
Akaike, H. (1977). “On entropy maximisation principle.” Proc., Symp. on Applications of Statistics, P. R. Krishnaiah, ed., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–47.
Almpanidis, G., and Kotropoulos, C. (2008). “Phonemic segmentation using the generalised Gamma distribution and small sample Bayesian information criterion.” Speech Commun., 50(1), 38–55.
Beirlant, J., de Wet, T., and Goegebeur, Y. (2006). “A goodness-of-fit statistic for Pareto-type behavior.” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 186, 99–116.
Bobée, B., and Ashkar, F. (2001). The Gamma family and derived distributions applied in hydrology, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo.
Cahill, A. T. (2003). “Significance of AIC differences for precipitation intensity distributions.” Adv. Water Resour., 26, 457–464.
Champernowne, D. (1953). “A model of income distribution.” Econom. J., 63, 318–351.
Douglas, E. M., Vogel, R. M., and Kroll, C. N. (2000). “Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: Impact of spatial correlation.” J. Hydrol., 240, 90–105.
Ehsanzadeh, E., El Adlouni, S., and Bobée, B. (2009). “Frequency analysis incorporating a decision support system (DSS).” Internal Rep., Hydro-Quebec, Quebec.
El Adlouni, S., Bobée, B., and Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (2008). “On the tails of extreme event distributions in hydrology.” J. Hydrol., 355(1–4), 16–33.
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., and Mikosch, T. (2003). Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance, applications of mathematics, Vol. 33, Springer, New York.
Hannan, E. J., and Quinn, B. G. (1979). “The determination of the order of an autoregression.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 41, 190–195.
Harvey, K. D., Pilon, P. J., and Yuzyk, T. R. (1999). “Canada’s reference hydrometric basin network (RHBN). Partnerships in water resources management.” Proc., CWRA 51st Annual Conf., Nova Scotia, Canada.
Hill, B. M. (1975). “A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution.” Ann. Stat., 3, 1163–1174.
Hyfran-Plus Software. (2008). INRS, Quebec, ⟨http://www.wrpllc.com/books/hyfran.html0⟩ (March 2009).
Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods, Griffin, London.
Mandelbrot, B. (1997). Fractales, Hasard et Finances, Flamarion, Coll. Champs, Paris.
Mandelbrot, B. (2003). “Multifractal power law distributions: Negative and critical dimensions and other ‘anomalies,’ explained by a simple example.” J. Stat. Phys., 110(3–6), 739–774.
Mann, H. B. (1945). “Nonparametric tests against trend.” Econometrica, 13, 245–259.
Mann, H. B., and Whitney, D. R. (1947). “On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other.” Ann. Math. Stat., 18, 50–60.
Mutua, F. M. (1994). “The use of the Akaike information criterion in the identification of an optimum flood frequency model.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 39, 235–244.
Otomo, T., Nakagawa, T., and Akaike, H. (1972). “Statistical approach to computer control of cement rotary kiln.” Automatica, 8, 35–48.
Otsu, K., Horigome, M., and Kitagawa, G. (1976). “On the prediction and stochastic control of ship’s motion.” Proc., 2nd IFAC/IFAP Symp., M. Pitkin, J. J. Roche, and T. J. Williams, eds., Washington, D.C.
Pilon, P. J., and Kuylenstierna, J. K. (2000). “Pristine river basins and relevant hydrological indices: Essential ingredients for climate-change studies.” WMO Bulletin, 49(3), 248–255.
Sakamoto, Y., and Akaike, H. (1977). “Analysis of cross-classified data by AIC.” Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 30B, 1–30.
Salas, J. P., Delleur, J. W., Yevjevich, V., and Lane, W. L. (1980). Applied modeling of hydrology time series, Water Resources, Fort Collins, Colo.
Schwarz, G. (1978). “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat., 6, 461–464.
Tanabe, K. (1974). “Statistical regularisation of a noisy ill-conditioned system of linear equations by Akaike information criterion.” Research Memo No. 60, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
Turcotte, D. L. (1997). Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wald, A., and Wolfowitz, J. (1943). “An exact test for randomness in the nonparametric case based on serial correlation.” Ann. Math. Stat., 14, 378–388.
Weakliem, D. (1999). “A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection.” Sociolog. Methods Res., 27(3), 359–397.
Werner, T., and Upper, C. (2002). “Time variation in the tail behaviour of bund futures returns.” Working Paper No. 199, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). “Individual comparisons by ranking methods.” Biometrics, 1, 80–83.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15 • Issue 11 • November 2010
Pages: 869 - 881
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 13, 2009
Accepted: Apr 28, 2010
Published online: Oct 15, 2010
Published in print: Nov 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.