TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 16, 2010

Sensitivity Analysis for an Infiltration-Runoff Model with Parameter Uncertainty

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 9

Abstract

Evaluation of the uncertainty effect of input parameters on model outputs is presented. HYDROL-INF, an infiltration-runoff model for layered soils, is used for simulating infiltration and surface runoff. The predictive uncertainty related to the modeling is evaluated. Specifically, a three-step procedure is implemented for sensitivity analysis of the model. The first step involves application of the local sensitivity analysis to gain a qualitative ranking of the whole set of input parameters for different model outputs with a relatively low computational cost. In the second step, the first-order second moment (FOSM) method is used to obtain the most sensitive parameters to the output from the parameters identified by the local sensitivity analysis. Third, the robust and computationally efficient Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) is conducted to overcome the nonlinearity problem for estimating the uncertainty of the model. Furthermore, the proposed methodology is applied to a three-layer soil system with varying permeability under unsteady rainfall. The soil system consists of loamy sand, sandy loam, and clay loam. The model outputs considered herein include cumulative infiltration and runoff. Dissimilar lists of crucial parameters are identified by using the FOSM and FAST methods. It is found that the combination of different soil layers and rainfall conditions have significant influences on the variance contribution of individual parameters to the total variance of the model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank M. Levent Kavvas and Miguel A. Mariño for their helpful suggestions. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. NNSFC50739003) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C. (1957). The lognormal distribution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Baalousha, H., and Kongeter, J. (2006). “Stochastic modelling and risk analysis of groundwater pollution using FORM coupled with automatic differentiation.” Adv. Water Resour., 29, 1815–1832.
Beven, K., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1), 11–29.
Carsel, R. F., and Parrish, R. S. (1988). “Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics.” Water Resour. Res., 24(5), 755–769.
Chen, Z. -Q., Govindaraju, R. S., and Kavvas, M. L. (1994). “Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations for a really heterogeneous fields: Development of models.” Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 523–533.
Chu, X., and Mariño, M. A. (2005). “Determination of ponding condition and infiltration into layered soils under unsteady rainfall.” J. Hydrol., 313(3–4), 195–207.
Chu, X., and Mariño, M. A. (2006). “Simulation of infiltration and surface runoff—A Windows-based hydrologic modeling system HYDROL-INF.” Proc., 2006 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, R. Graham, ed., 1–8.
Cloke, H. L., Pappenberger, F., and Renaud, J. -P. (2008). “Multi-method global sensitivity analysis (MMGSA) for modelling flfloodplain hydrological processes.” Hydrolog. Process., 22, 1660–1674.
Cukier, R. I., Fortuin, C. M., Shuler, K. E., Petschek, A. G., and Schaibly, I. H. (1973). “Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I. Theory.” J. Chem. Phys., 59, 3873–3878.
Cukier, R. I., Levine, H. B., and Shuler, K. E. (1978). “Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems.” J. Comput. Phys., 26, 1–42.
Cukier, R. I., Schaibly, J. H., and Shuler, K. E. (1975). “Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. III. Analysis of the approximations.” J. Chem. Phys., 63(3), 1140–1149.
Dagan, G., and Bresler, E. (1983). “Unsaturated flow in spatially variable fields. 1. Derivation of models of infiltration and redistribution.” Water Resour. Res., 19(2), 413–420.
Francos, A., Elorza, F. J., Bouraoui, F., Bidoglio, G., and Galbiati, L. (2003). “Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: Understanding the model behaviour in hydrological studies at the catchment scale.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 79(2), 205–218.
Haan, C. T. (1977). Stochastic methods in hydrology, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
Haan, P. K., and Skaggs, R. W. (2003). “Effect of parameter uncertainty on DRAINMOD predictions: I. Hydrology and yield.” Trans. ASAE, 46(44), 1061–1067.
Hossain, F., Anagnostou, E. N., and Bagtzoglou, A. C. (2006). “On Latin hypercube sampling for efficient uncertainty estimation of satellite rainfall observations in flood prediction.” Comput. Geosci., 32, 776–792.
Iman, R. L., and Conover, W. J. (1980). “Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment.” Commun. Stat: Theory Meth., A9(17), 1749–1842.
Kuczera, G., and Prent, E. (1998). “Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: The metropolis algorithm.” J. Hydrol., 211, 69–85.
Lassabatere, L., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Ugalde, J. M. S., Cuenca, R., Braud, I., and Haverkamp, R. (2006). “Beerkan estimation of soil transfer parameters through infiltration experiments—BEST.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 521–532.
Leij, F. J., Sciortino, A., Haverkamp, R., and Ugalde, J. M. S. (2007). “Aggregation of vertical flow in the vadose zone with auto- and cross-correlated hydraulic properties.” J. Hydrol., 338(1–2), 96–112.
McCuen, R. H. (1985). Statistical methods for engineers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
McKay, M. D. (1988). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using a statistical sample of input values.” Uncertainty analysis, Y. Ronen, ed., CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 145–186.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
McRae, G. J., Tilden, J. W., and Seinfeld, J. H. (1982). “Global sensitivity analysis—A computational implementation of the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST).” Comput. Chem. Eng., 6(1), 15–25.
Melching, C. S., and Yoon, C. G. (1996). “Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic river.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 122(2), 105–113.
Morgan, M. G., and Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Morris, M. D. (1991). “Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments.” Technometrics, 33(2), 161–174.
Revol, P., Clothier, B. E., Mailhol, J. -C., and Vauclin, M. (1997). “Infiltration from a surface point source and drip irrigation. 2. An approximate time-dependent solution for wet-front position.” Water Resour. Res., 33(8), 1869–1874.
Rodriguez-Camino, E., and Avissar, R. (1998). “Comparison of three land-surface schemes with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST).” Tellus Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 50(3), 313–332.
Russo, D., and Bresler, E. (1982). “A univariate versus a multivariate parameter distribution in a stochastic conceptual analysis of unsaturated flow.” Water Resour. Res., 18, 483–488.
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M., eds. (2000). Sensitivity analysis, Wiley, New York.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Chan, K. P. S. (1999). “A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output.” Technometrics, 41, 39–56.
Smith, S. P., and Jain, A. K. (1988). “A test to determine the multivariate normality of a dataset.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 10(5), 757–761.
Sobieraj, J. A., Elsenbeer, H., and Cameron, G. (2004). “Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity.” Catena, 55, 49–77.
Sobol, I. (1994). A primer for the Monte Carlo method, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Tarantola, S., Gatelli, D., and Mara, T. A. (2006). “Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(6), 717–727.
Tyagi, A., and Haan, C. T. (2001). “Uncertainty analysis using corrected first-order approximation method.” Water Resour. Res., 37(6), 1847–1858.
van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., and Srinivasan, R. (2006). “A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models.” J. Hydrol., 324, 10–23.
Wriedt, G., and Rode, M. (2006). “Investigation of parameter uncertainty and identifiability of the model WaSiM-ETH.” Advances in Geosciences, 9, 145–150.
Xu, C., and Gertner, G. Z. (2008). “A general first-order global sensitivity analysis method.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93, 1060–1071.
Yen, B. C., Cheng, S. -T., and Melching, C. S. (1986). “First order reliability analysis.” Stochastic and risk analysis in hydraulic engineering, B. C. Yen, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo., 1–36.
Yevjevich, V. (1972). Probability and statistics in hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
Yu, P. -S., Yang, T. -Ch., and Chen, S. -J. (2001). “Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model.” J. Hydrol., 244, 43–59.
Zeleke, T. B., and Si, B. C. (2005). “Scaling relationships between saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil physical properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 1691–1702.
Zhang, H., Haan, C. T., and Nofziger, D. L. (1993). “An approach to estimating uncertainties in modeling transport of solutes through soils.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 12(1–2), 35–50.
Zhang, Z. F., Ward, A. L., and Gee, G. W. (2002). “Estimating field-scale hydraulic parameters of heterogeneous soils using a combination of parameter scaling and inverse methods.” Rep. No. PNNL-14109, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Wash.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15Issue 9September 2010
Pages: 671 - 679

History

Received: Feb 27, 2009
Accepted: Mar 2, 2010
Published online: Mar 16, 2010
Published in print: Sep 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China; and Visiting Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Xuefeng Chu, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State Univ., Dept. 2470, P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050. E-mail: [email protected]
Guangming Tan [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share