Preservation of Watershed Regime for Low-Impact Development through Detention
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 1
Abstract
Low-impact development (LID) allows for greater development potential with less environmental impacts using on-site distributed storm-water controls that achieve a good balance among conservation, growth, ecosystem protection, and public safety. The qualitative statement of the ultimate goal for LID can serve as guidance for engineering designs, but it is inadequate for comparison and selection among the innovative alternatives. This paper presents an innovative method by which the long-term runoff statistics are employed as the basis to quantify the impact of the development on the watershed hydrologic regime. In this study, the standard LID detention volume is defined by the storm-water storage volume required to preserve the predevelopment mean and standard deviation for runoff volume population. Consequently, a detention basin is considered oversized if the after-detention runoff volume population has a lower mean flow while the undersized counterpart produces a mean runoff volume higher than that under the predevelopment condition. This simple but quantifiable method is very useful for detention alternative comparisons, and can serve as a guide to retrofit an existing detention basin, according to the proposed LID initiative.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Booth, D. B. (1990). “Stream-channel incision following drainage basin urbanization.” Water Resour. Bull., 26, 407–417.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1998). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
EPA Report. (1983). “Results of the nationwide urban runoff program.” Final Rep. No. NTIS PB84-185545, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
EPA Report. (2006). “Low impact development methods.” Rep. No. EPA440/5-87-001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
EPA Report. (2007). “Reducing stormwater costs through low impact development (LID) strategies and practices.” Rep. No. EPA 841-F-07-006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Guo, J. C. Y. (2002). “Overflow risk of storm water BMP basin design.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(6), 428–434.
Guo, J. C. Y., and Cheng, Y. C. J. (2008). “Retrofit storm-water detention basin for low-impact development.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(6), 872–876.
Guo, J. C. Y., and Urbonas, B. (1996). “Maximized retention volume determined by runoff capture rate.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 122(1), 33–39.
Guo, J. C. Y., and Urbonas, B. (2002). “Runoff capture and delivery curves for storm-water quality control designs.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 128(3), 208–215.
LID-Hydro Analysis. (1999). Low-impact development hydrologic analysis, Dept. of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning Division, Prince George’s County, Md.
LID-Practice. (2003). The practice of low impact development, U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, D.C.
LID-Strategy. (1999). Low-impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach, Dept. of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning Division, Prince George’s County, Md.
Roesner, L., Urbonas, B., and Guo, J. C. Y. (1996). “Hydrology for optimal sizing of urban runoff treatment control system.” Water Qual. Int., 1, 30–33.
USWDCM. (2001). Urban storm water design criteria manual, Vol. 1–3, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 12, 2008
Accepted: May 6, 2009
Published online: May 8, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.