TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 14, 2009

Selecting Flow Frequency Distributions for Designing a Small Low-Head Dam Removal Cofferdam

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 9

Abstract

One of the first steps in removing a dam is the construction of a cofferdam so that demolition activities can proceed safely. The time necessary for removing a small low-head dam is often on the order of a few months. To minimize the cofferdam construction cost, these dams are generally removed during the low flow months of the year. Therefore, design of cofferdams should be based on river flow series during the dam removal period, rather than the entire year. In this study, available hourly and daily average records at the recently removed Marmot Dam on the Sandy River, Oregon are analyzed for four dam removal periods, varying from 1 to 4 months (July through October). L -moment ratio diagrams and probability plot correlation coefficients are used to select log-Pearson Type 3 and two- and three-parameter lognormal probability distribution functions for representing at-site maximum flow series. From a hydrologic engineering consideration, the analysis suggests an optimal dam removal period of 3 months (July through September). An estimate of flow on the basis of annual maximum series is an order of magnitude higher, which would result in an uneconomical design of the cofferdam.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Data used in this study were obtained from USGS by Ms. Rebecca Hall, formerly with ENSR. The writer acknowledges Ms. Hall’s review of data for quality control and quality assurance for a project supervised by Mr. Chick Sweeney, UNSPECIFIEDNational Hydraulic Engineering Program Manager. Ms. Kim Anderson graciously reviewed the manuscript and provided valuable editorial comments and suggestions for its improvements.

References

Bednarek, A. T. (2001). “Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 27, 803–814.
Beyer, P. J. (2002). “Dialogue on dam removal: Introduction.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38, 1509–1510.
Chang, H. H. (2008). “Case study of fluvial modeling of river responses to dam removal.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(3), 295–302.
Chen, Y. D., Huang, G., Shao, G., and Xu, C. -Y. (2006). “Regional analysis of low flow using L-moments for Dongjiang basin, South China.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 51(6), 1051–1064.
Cui, Y. (2007). “Examining the dynamics of grain size distributions of gravel/sand deposits in the Sandy River, Oregon with a numerical model.” River Res. Appl., 23, 732–751.
Cui, Y., Parker, G., Braudrick, C., Dietrich, W., and Cluer, B. (2006). “Dam removal express assessment models (DREAM). Part 2: Sample runs/sensitivity tests.” J. Hydraul. Res., 44(3), 308–323.
Doyle, M. W., Stanley, E. H., and Harbor, J. M. (2003a). “Channel adjustment following two dam removals in Wisconsin.” Water Resour. Res., 39(1), 1011.
Doyle, M. W., Stanley, E. H., Harbor, J. M., and Grant, G. S. (2003b). “Dam removal in the United States: Emerging needs for science and policy.” EOS (Wash. D.C.), 84, 29–33.
Eslamian, S. S., and Feizi, H. (2007). “Maximum monthly rainfall analysis using L-moments for an arid region in Isfahan province, Iran.” J. Clim., 46(4), 494–503.
Gonzalez, J., and Valdes, J. B. (2008). “A regional monthly precipitation simulation model based on an L-moment smoothed statistical regionalization approach.” J. Hydrol., 348, 27–39.
Gregory, S., Li, H., and Li, J. (2002). “The conceptual basis for ecological responses to dam removal.” BioScience, 52, 713–723.
Griffis, V. W., and Stedinger, J. R. (2007). “Log-Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in flood frequency analysis. I: Distribution characteristics.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(5), 482–491.
Hart, D. D., et al. (2002). “Dam removal: Challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration.” BioScience, 52, 669–681.
Hart, D. D., and Poff, N. L. (2002). “A special section on dam removal and river restoration.” BioScience, 52, 653–655.
Hosking, J. R. M., and Wallis, J. R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis: An approach based on L-moments, Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, U.K.
Kroll, C. N., and Vogel, R. M. (2002). “Probability distribution of low streamflow series in the United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(2), 137–146.
Landers, J. (2004). “River renaissance.” Civ. Eng., 73(7), 52–59.
Major, J. J., et al. (2008). “Initial fluvial response to the removal of Oregon’s Marmot Dam.” EOS (Wash. D.C.), 89(27), 241–242.
McCuen, R. H., and Beighley, R. E. (2003). “Seasonal flow frequency analysis.” J. Hydrol., 279, 43–56.
McMahon, T. A., Vogel, R. M., Peel, M. C., and Pegram, G. S. (2007). “Global streamflows. Part 1: Characteristics of annual streamflows.” J. Hydrol., 347, 243–259.
National Park Service (2005). Elwha river ecosystem implementation, final environmental impact statement, U.S. Dept. of Interior, Washington, D.C.
Pandey, M. D., van Gelder, O. H. A. J. M., and Vrijling, J. K. (2001). “Assessment of an L -Kurtosis-based criterion for quantile estimation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(4), 284–292.
Pohl, M. M. (2002). “Bringing down our dams: Trends in American dam removal rationales.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38, 1511–1532.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1989). Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1993). “Frequency analysis of extreme events.” Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 18.1–18.66.
Task Committee. (1997). Guidelines for retirement of dams and hydroelectric facilities, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Tung, Y. -K., Yen, B. -C., and Melching, C. S. (2005). Hydrosystems engineering reliability assessment and risk analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
USGS. (2003). Water resources data: Water year 2003, USGS, Washington, D.C.
Vogel, R. M., and Fennessey, N. M. (1993). “L moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams.” Water Resour. Res., 29(6), 1745–1752.
Vogel, R. M., Thomas, W. O., and McMahon, T. A. (1993). “Flood-flow frequency model selection in Southwest United States.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 119(3), 353–366.
Vogel, R. M., and Wilson, I. (1996). “Probability distribution of annual maximum, mean, and minimum streamflows in the United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1(2), 69–76.
Vogel, R. W., and McMartin, D. E. (1991). “Probability plot goodness-of-fit and skewness estimation procedures for the Pearson type 3 distribution.” Water Resour. Res., 27(12), 3149–3158.
Weiler, K., Walter, M. T., Walter, M. F., Brooks, E. S., and Scott, C. A. (2000). “Seasonal risk analysis for floodplains in the Delaware river basin.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 126(5), 320–329.
Yue, S., and Hashino, M. (2007). “Probability distribution of annual, seasonal, and monthly precipitation in Japan.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 52(5), 863–877.
Yue, S., and Pilon, P. (2005). “Probability distribution type of Canadian annual minimum streamflow.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 50(3), 427–438.
Yue, S., and Wang, C. Y. (2004). “Possible regional probability distribution type of Canadian annual streamflow by L-moments.” Water Resour. Manage., 18, 425–438.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14Issue 9September 2009
Pages: 935 - 943

History

Received: May 21, 2008
Accepted: Jan 27, 2009
Published online: Aug 14, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Liaqat A. Khan [email protected]
Senior Technical Specialist, AECOM Environment, 9521 Willows Rd. NE, Redmond, WA 98052. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share