Technical Papers
Sep 9, 2022

Use of Combined Static and Dynamic Testing to Quantify the Participation of Particles in Stress Transmission

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 11

Abstract

A number of research studies have recognized that not all particles in a sand specimen are active in stress transmission, particularly in the case of gap-graded soils. This has implications for the use of the global void ratio (e), and variables/parameters that depend upon e, to predict the influence of the state on the mechanical behavior of gap-graded soils. This study explores the possibility of comparing the shear stiffness determined in dynamic wave propagation tests (Gdyn) with stiffness values determined in small-strain probes (Gsta) to assess the extent to which all the particles in a specimen are actively engaged in stress transmission. The idea is initially developed using three-dimensional discrete element method simulations and considering ideal specimens. The practical application of this approach is then tested in a series of drained triaxial compression tests. The numerical studies considered both specimens with continuous, linear particle size distributions as well as gap-graded soils. The results show that the ratio Gsta/Gdyn may be associated with the ratio between the bulk density calculated considering only the stress transmitting particles, ρm, and the bulk density calculated considering all particles, ρ. The ratio ρm/ρ is determined by the proportion of inactive particles, which varies with the proportion by mass of finer particles in the soil (Ffiner) for gap-graded soils. The relationship between Gsta/Gdyn(e) and Ffiner enables a qualitative assessment of the proportion of inactive particles. The corresponding experimental test results show a similar but weaker correlation between the ratio of Gsta/Gdyn and Ffiner, this weaker correlation may be attributed to the differences between the simulations and the experimental conditions. However, despite the challenges with experimental implementation, the data presented here support the idea that it may be possible to qualitatively estimate the proportion by volume/mass of inactive particles in physical samples by comparing the stiffness results of static and dynamic testing.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all of the data presented here are available from the second author upon request.

Acknowledgments

All simulations were carried out using the high-performance computing (HPC) facilities at Imperial College London. All experiments were conducted in Imperial College London labs with the help of the technical team [Steve Ackerley, Prash (Prashant) Hirani, Stef Karapanagiotidis and Graham Keefe]. Ms. Camelia Dominguez helped to quantify the specimen uniformity experimentally. Deyun Liu’s doctoral research is funded by the China Scholarship Council (201908060057) and an Imperial College Dixon Scholarship.

References

Ahmadi, M., T. Shire, A. Mehdizadeh, and M. Disfani. 2020. “DEM modelling to assess internal stability of gap-graded assemblies of spherical particles under various relative densities, fine contents and gap ratios.” Comput. Geotech. 126 (Oct): 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103710.
Altuhafi, F., C. O’Sullivan, and I. Cavarretta. 2012. “Analysis of an image-based method to quantify the size and shape of sand particles.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1290–1307. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000855.
Altuhafi, F. N., M. R. Coop, and V. N. Georgiannou. 2016. “Effect of particle shape on the mechanical behavior of natural sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (12): 04016071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001569.
Carraro, J., H. Antonio, M. Prezzi, and R. Salgado. 2009. “Shear strength and stiffness of sands containing plastic or nonplastic fines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (9): 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:9(1167).
Carraro, J. A. H., P. Bandini, and R. Salgado. 2003. “Liquefaction resistance of clean and nonplastic silty sands based on cone penetration resistance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (11): 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:11(965).
Carrera, A., M. Coop, and R. Lancellotta. 2011. “Influence of grading on the mechanical behaviour of Stava tailings.” Géotechnique 61 (11): 935–946. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.009.
Chang, C. S., A. Misra, and S. S. Sundaram. 1991. “Properties of granular packings under low amplitude cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 10 (4): 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(91)90034-W.
Cuccovillo, T., and M. R. Coop. 1997. “The measurement of local axial strains in triaxial tests using LVDTs.” Géotechnique 47 (1): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.1.167.
Cundall, P. A. 1988. “Computer simulations of dense sphere assemblies.” In Vol. 20 of Studies in applied mechanics, 113–123. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
de Frias Lopez, R., J. Silfwerbrand, D. Jelagin, and B. Birgisson. 2016. “Force transmission and soil fabric of binary granular mixtures.” Géotechnique 66 (7): 578–583. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.14.P.199.
Dominguez-Quintans, C., V. Santiago Quinteros, J. A. H. Carraro, L. Zdravkovic, and R. J. Jardine. 2019. “Quality assessment of a new in-mould slurry deposition method for triaxial specimen reconstitution of clean and silty sands.” In Vol. 92 of Proc., E3S Web of Conf. 92 (6): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199202010.
Dutta, T. T. 2019. “Effects of grain characteristics on the anisotropic mechanical properties evaluated by elastic waves.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Tokyo.
Emery, J. J., W. D. L. Finn, and K. W. Lee. 1973. “Uniformity of saturated sand specimens.” In Evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Gong, J., X. Wang, L. Li, and Z. Nie. 2019. “DEM study of the effect of fines content on the small-strain stiffness of gap-graded soils.” Comput. Geotech. 112 (Aug): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.04.008.
Goudarzy, M., V. Magnanimo, D. König, and T. Schanz. 2020. “Anisotropic stress state and small strain stiffness in granular materials: RC experiments and DEM simulations.” Meccanica 55 (10): 1869–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01229-8.
Hardin, B. O., and F. E. Richart Jr. 1963. “Elastic wave velocities in granular soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89 (1): 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000493.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351.
Kuwano, R., and R. J. Jardine. 2002. “On the applicability of cross-anisotropic elasticity to granular materials at very small strains.” Géotechnique 52 (10): 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.10.727.
Lade, P. V., C. D. Liggio, and J. A. Yamamuro. 1998. “Effects of non-plastic fines on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 21 (4): 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11373J.
Lings, M. L. 2001. “Drained and undrained anisotropic elastic stiffness parameters.” Géotechnique 51 (6): 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.6.555.
Liu, D., T. Morimoto, J. A. H. Carraro, and C. O’Sullivan. 2022. “A semi-empirical re-evaluation of the influence of state on elastic stiffness in granular materials.” Granular Matter 24 (2): 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-022-01215-9.
Liu, D., C. O’Sullivan, and J. A. H. Carraro. 2021a. “Influence of particle size distribution on the proportion of stress-transmitting particles and implications for measures of soil state.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (3): 4020182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002466.
Liu, D., C. O’Sullivan, and J. A. H. Carraro. 2021b. “The influence of particle size distribution on the stress distribution in granular materials.” Géotechnique 0 (0): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.21.00127.
Mitchell, J. K., and K. Soga. 1976. Fundamentals of soil behavior, 422. New York: Wiley.
Nguyen, H., and C. O’Sullivan. 2019. “Linking macro-scale yielding and micro-scale response.” In Vol. 92 of Proc., E3S Web of Conf., 14008. London: EDP Sciences.
Ni, Q., T. S. Tan, G. R. Dasari, and D. W. Hight. 2004. “Contribution of fines to the compressive strength of mixed soils.” Géotechnique 54 (9): 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.9.561.
Otsubo, M. 2016. “Particle scale analysis of soil stiffness and elastic wave propagation.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London.
Otsubo, M., R. Kuwano, C. O’Sullivan, and T. Shire. 2021. “Using geophysical data to quantify stress transmission in gap-graded granular materials.” Géotechnique 72 (7): 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.334.
Otsubo, M., C. O’Sullivan, S. Ackerley, and D. Parker. 2019. “Selecting an appropriate shear plate configuration to measure elastic wave velocities.” Geotech. Test. J. 43 (6): 1519–1540. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20180146.
Plimpton, S. 1995. “Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics.” J. Comput. Phys. 117 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039.
Salgado, R., P. Bandini, and A. Karim. 2000. “Shear strength and stiffness of silty sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (5): 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(451).
Shen, C. K. 1977. “The effect of fines on liquefaction of sands.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 381–385. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Shire, T., C. O’Sullivan, K. J. Hanley, and R. J. Fannin. 2014. “Fabric and effective stress distribution in internally unstable soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (12): 04014072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001184.
Shirley, D. J., and L. D. Hampton. 1978. “Shear-wave measurements in laboratory sediments.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63 (2): 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381760.
Sufian, A., M. Artigaut, T. Shire, and C. O’Sullivan. 2021. “Influence of fabric on stress distribution in gap-graded soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (5): 4021016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002487.
Sympatec. 2008. Windox–operating instructions; Release 5.4. 1.0. Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany: Sympatec.
Tastan, E. O., and J. A. H. Carraro. 2013. “A new slurry-based method of preparation of hollow cylinder specimens of clean and silty sands.” Geotech. Test. J. 36 (6): 20130056. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20130056.
Thevanayagam, S. 2000. “Liquefaction potential and undrained fragility of silty soils.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–8. Auckland, New Zeland: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Wichtmann, T., M. A. Navarrete Hernández, and T. Triantafyllidis. 2015. “On the influence of a non-cohesive fines content on small strain stiffness, modulus degradation and damping of quartz sand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 69 (Feb): 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.017.
Yang, J., and X. Liu. 2016. “Shear wave velocity and stiffness of sand: The role of non-plastic fines.” Géotechnique 66 (6): 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.205.
Yang, J., X. Liu, M. M. Rahman, R. Lo, M. Goudarzy, and T. Schanz. 2018. “Shear wave velocity and stiffness of sand: The role of non-plastic fines.” Géotechnique 68 (10): 931–934. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.D.006.
Yang, J., and X. D. Luo. 2015. “Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 84 (Nov): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.001.
Yang, J., L. M. Wei, and B. B. Dai. 2015. “State variables for silty sands: Global void ratio or skeleton void ratio?” Soils Found. 55 (1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.12.008.
Yin, Z. Y., J. Zhao, and P. Y. Hicher. 2014. “A micromechanics-based model for sand-silt mixtures.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 (6): 1350–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.027.
Youd, T. L. 1973. “Factors controlling maximum and minimum densities of sands.” In Evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Zuo, L., and B. A. Baudet. 2015. “Determination of the transitional fines content of sand-non plastic fines mixtures.” Soils Found. 55 (1): 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.12.017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Dec 10, 2021
Accepted: Jun 9, 2022
Published online: Sep 9, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 9, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9355-793X
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0935-1910. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4648-3859

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Study on the determination mechanism of the compression wave velocity of soil-rock mixture considering the effect of soil-rock interface, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105300, 156, (105300), (2023).
  • Evaluation of soil fabric using elastic waves during load-unload, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.004, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share