Technical Papers
May 25, 2021

Practical Considerations Regarding the Probability of Liquefaction in Engineering Design

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 8

Abstract

Engineering practitioners have widely adopted probabilistic methods for estimating liquefaction triggering hazards. Unfortunately, incorrect application of these methods has become commonly accepted in the United States and throughout many parts of the world. In this paper, we describe two specific incorrect applications of probabilistic liquefaction triggering prediction models that are commonly used in engineering practice: (1) improper parametric uncertainty characterization when using the models, and (2) the application of a conservative factor of safety thresholds to deterministic cyclic resistance ratio boundaries. These two practices and their implications are discussed, and illustrative examples and figures are presented. We also discuss the apparent inconsistencies in what constitutes an acceptable risk for liquefaction hazards and other significant geotechnical hazards, such as slope stability. We demonstrate the need to collectively consider the likelihoods of all aspects of liquefaction hazard problems—susceptibility, initiation, and effects—when calculating and considering liquefaction risk. Finally, we point to the concept and framework of performance-based earthquake engineering as a logical and objective path forward for dealing with the challenges raised in this study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data developed and used in this study are available upon reasonable request made to the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Mr. Nicholas Harman (South Carolina DOT, Columbia, South Carolina) for his discussion and suggestions, which have greatly augmented this work. We also thank Dr. Jorge Meneses (RMA Group, Inc., San Diego, California) for his informal review of our manuscript and his helpful comments. We also acknowledge and thank the anonymous reviewers whose constructive review comments greatly improved the paper.

References

Baecher, G. B., and J. T. Christian. 2003. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. 1st ed, 618. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Baker, J. W., and M. Faber. 2008. “Liquefaction risk assessment using geostatistics to account for soil spatial variability.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(14).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test-based liquefaction-triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Bradley, B. A., M. Cubrinovski, and J. J. M. Haskell. 2011. “Probabilistic pseudo-static analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (10): 1414–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.018.
Brandenberg, S. J., P. Kahighandi, J. Zhang, Y. Huo, and M. Zhao. 2011. “Fragility functions for bridges in liquefaction-induced lateral spreads.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 683–717. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3610248.
Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2017. “6th Ishihara lecture: Simplified procedure for estimating liquefaction-induced building settlement.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 102 (Nov): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.026.
Bullock, Z., Z. Karimi, S. Dashti, K. Porter, A. Liel, and K. W. Franke. 2019. “A physics-informed semi-empirical probabilistic model for the settlement of shallow-founded structures on liquefiable ground.” Géotechnique 69 (5): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.174.
Cetin, K. O., A. Der Kiureghian, and R. B. Seed. 2002. “Probabilistic models for the triggering of seismic soil liquefaction.” Struct. Saf. 24 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00036-X.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, A. Der Kiureghian, K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, R. E. Kayen, and R. E. S. Moss. 2004. “SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1314–1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
Ekstrom, L. T., and K. W. Franke. 2016. “Simplified procedure for the performance-based prediction of lateral spread displacements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (7): 04016028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001440.
Franke, K. W. 2011. “A performance-based model for the computation of kinematic pile response due to lateral spread and its application on select bridges damaged during the M7.6 earthquake in the Limon Province, Costa Rica.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ.
Franke, K. W., and S. L. Kramer. 2014. “A procedure for the empirical evaluation of lateral spread displacement hazard curves.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (1): 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000969.
Juang, C. H., C. Jianye, and L. Zhe. 2013. “Assessing SPT-based probabilistic models for liquefaction potential evaluation: A 10-year update.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 7 (3): 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.778117.
Juang, C. H., D. K. Li, S. Y. Fang, Z. Liu, and E. H. Khor. 2008. “Simplified procedure for developing joint distribution of amax and Mw for probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (8): 1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1050).
Juang, C. H., H. Yuan, D.-H. Lee, and P.-S. Lin. 2003. “Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (1): 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:1(66).
Kayen, R., R. E. S. Moss, E. M. Thompson, R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, A. Der Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tokimatsu. 2013. “Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 119 (3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kramer, S. L. 2008. “Performance-based earthquake engineering: Opportunities and implications for geotechnical engineering practice.” In Proc., GEESD IV, GSP 181, 1–32. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kramer, S. L., and R. T. Mayfield. 2007. “Return period of soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7): 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(802).
Ku, C.-S., C. H. Juang, C.-W. Chang, and J. Ching. 2012. “Probabilistic version of the Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction evaluation: Development and application.” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-085.
Lai, S.-Y., W.-J. Chang, and P. S. Lin. 2006. “Logistic regression model for evaluating soil liquefaction probability using CPT data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (6): 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(694).
Ledezma, C., and J. D. Bray. 2010. “Probabilistic performance-based procedure to evaluate pile foundations at sites with liquefaction-induced lateral displacement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (3): 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000226.
Liao, S. S. C., D. Veneziano, and R. V. Whitman. 1988. “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.” J. Geotech. Eng. 114 (4): 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:4(389).
Marrone, J., F. Ostadan, R. Youngs, and J. Itemizer. 2003. “Probabilistic liquefaction hazard evaluation: Method and application.” In Proc., 17th Int. Conf. Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (Smart 17), Paper No. M02-1. Raleigh, NC: International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology.
Mayfield, R. T., S. L. Kramer, and Y.-M. Huang. 2010. “Simplified approximation procedure for performance-based evaluation of liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000191.
Moss, R. E. S., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, A. Der Kiureghian, and K. O. Cetin. 2006. “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
Rathje, E. M., and G. Saygili. 2011. “Estimating fully probabilistic seismic sliding displacements of slopes from a pseudoprobabilistic approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (3): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000431.
Rathje, E. M., Y. Wang, P. Stafford, G. Antonakos, and G. Saygili. 2014. “Probabilistic assessment of the seismic performance of slopes.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (3): 1071–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9485-9.
Saye, S. R., S. M. Olson, and K. W. Franke. Forthcoming. “A common-origin approach to assess level-ground liquefaction triggering in all CPT-compatible soils using ΔQ.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
Saygili, G., and E. M. Rathje. 2008. “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the sliding displacement of slopes: Scalar and vector approaches.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (6): 790–803. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(790).
Taylor, D. W. 1937. “Stability of earth slopes.” J. Boston Soc. Civ. Eng. 24 (3): 197–247.
Travasarou, T., J. D. Bray, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2004. “A probabilistic methodology for assessing seismic slope displacements.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2326. Tokyo: International Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Ulmer, K. J., and K. W. Franke. 2016. “Modified performance-based liquefaction triggering procedure using liquefaction loading parameter maps.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 04015089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001421.
Ulmer, K. J., K. W. Franke, and B. D. Peterson. 2015. “Seismic hazard curves for the probability of liquefaction.” In Proc., 2015 Int. Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Youd, T. L., and S. K. Noble. 1997. “Liquefaction criteria based on statistical and probabilistic analyses.” In Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, 201–205. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 8August 2021

History

Received: Jun 24, 2020
Accepted: Mar 15, 2021
Published online: May 25, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 25, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin W. Franke, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., 430J Engineering Bldg., Provo, UT 84602 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2230d Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, Urbana, IL 61801. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-0719. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Energy-Based Liquefaction Triggering Model, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11402, 149, 11, (2023).
  • Residual Strength of Liquefied Soil: The Effect of Induced Partial Saturation, Geotechnical Testing Journal, 10.1520/GTJ20210217, 45, 4, (20210217), (2022).
  • CPT-based fully probabilistic seismic liquefaction potential assessment to reduce uncertainty: Integrating XGBoost algorithm with Bayesian theorem, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104868, 149, (104868), (2022).
  • Depth-consistent models for probabilistic liquefaction potential assessment based on shear wave velocity, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 10.1007/s10064-022-02754-4, 81, 6, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share