Technical Notes
Mar 31, 2021

Empirical Probability Distribution Models for Soil-Layer Thicknesses of Liquefiable Ground

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 6

Abstract

Probability distribution models (PDMs) of variables are cornerstones in the performance-based earthquake engineering framework. For liquefiable ground in earthquake-prone regions, the liquefiable layer often is sandwiched between nonliquefiable layers. However, PDMs for thicknesses of these soil layers, particularly the nonliquefiable crust and the liquefiable layer, are not yet well established. To fill this gap, this study leveraged field case history data from different regions to develop empirical PDMs for the soil-layer thicknesses of liquefiable ground. Seventeen probability density functions (PDFs) were examined to identify the appropriate ones that well characterize the thickness uncertainties. It was found that the lognormal PDF is an appropriate choice for either thickness variable at either region of interest. Means and standard deviations of the established PDMs for different regions, such as China, Japan, New Zealand, and the US, were tabulated for the expedience of implementation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplemental Materials. The code for developing the probability distribution models are available from the author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study is partially from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 52008155) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Nos. 2018M640448 and 2019T120380). The author gratefully acknowledges the scholars who collected and provided the SPT- and CPT-based field case history data in their publications, which were the cornerstone for the present study. Special thanks are given to Dr. Zeyu Wang for an insightful discussion. The author also greatly appreciates the constructive comments by the anonymous reviewers.

References

Ashford, S. A., T. Juirnarongrit, T. Sugano, and M. Hamada. 2006. “Soil–pile response to blast-induced lateral spreading. I: Field test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(152).
Aydan, Ö., R. Ulusay, M. Hamada, and D. Beetham. 2012. “Geotechnical aspects of the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes, New Zealand, and geotechnical damage to structures and lifelines.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 71 (4): 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-012-0435-6.
Barbato, M., Q. Gu, and J. P. Conte. 2010. “Probabilistic push-over analysis of structural and soil-structure systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (11): 1330–1341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000231.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Bradley, B. A. 2013. “A critical examination of seismic response uncertainty analysis in earthquake engineering.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (11): 1717–1729. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2331.
Brandenberg, S. J., R. W. Boulanger, B. L. Kutter, and D. Chang. 2005. “Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1378).
Brandenberg, S. J., P. Kashighandi, J. Zhang, Y. Huo, and M. Zhao. 2011a. “Fragility functions for bridges in liquefaction-induced lateral spreads.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 683–717. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3610248.
Brandenberg, S. J., J. Zhang, P. Kashighandi, Y. Huo, and M. Zhao. 2011b. Demand fragility surfaces for bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, R. E. S. Moss, A. Der Kiureghian, K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, Jr., and R. E. Kayen. 2000. Field case histories for SPT-based in situ liquefaction potential evaluation.. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Ching, J., and K.-K. Phoon. 2020. “Constructing a site-specific multivariate probability distribution using sparse, incomplete, and spatially variable (MUSIC-X) data.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (7): 04020061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001779.
Ching, J., K. A. Porter, and J. L. Beck. 2009. “Propagating uncertainties for loss estimation in performance-based earthquake engineering using moment matching.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 5 (3): 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470701298323.
Cousineau, D., S. Brown, and A. Heathcote. 2004. “Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages.” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36 (4): 742–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206555.
Cox, B. R., et al. 2013. “Liquefaction at strong motion stations and in Urayasu City during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.” Supplement, Earthquake Spectra 29 (S1): 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000110.
Ebeido, A., A. Elgamal, K. Tokimatsu, and A. Abe. 2019. “Pile and pile-group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in four large-scale shake-table experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 04019080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002142.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2015. “Light gray canvas.” Accessed November 13, 2015. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=979c6cc89af9449cbeb5342a439c6a76.
Green, R. A., M. Cubrinovski, B. Cox, C. Wood, L. Wotherspoon, B. Bradley, and B. Maurer. 2014. “Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 canterbury earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1193/030713EQS066M.
Haskell, J. J. M., S. P. G. Madabhushi, M. Cubrinovski, and A. Winkley. 2013. “Lateral spreading-induced abutment rotation in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake: Observations and analysis.” Géotechnique 63 (15): 1310–1327. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.174.
Iwasaki, T., K. Tokida, and F. Tatsuoka. 1981. “Soil liquefaction potential evaluation with use of the simplified procedure.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri.
Johnson, N. L., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. 1994. Continuous univariate distributions. Vol. 1: Applied probability and statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Jones, A., S. Kramer, and P. Arduino. 2002. Estimation of uncertainty in geotechnical properties for performance-based earthquake engineering. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Juang, C. H., J. Ching, Z. Luo, and C.-S. Ku. 2012. “New models for probability of liquefaction using standard penetration tests based on an updated database of case histories.” Eng. Geol. 133–134: 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.02.015.
Khoshnevisan, S., H. Juang, Y. G. Zhou, and W. Gong. 2015. “Probabilistic assessment of liquefaction-induced lateral spreads using CPT—Focusing on the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Eng. Geol. 192: 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.001.
Kramer, S. L., and R. T. Mayfield. 2007. “Return period of soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7): 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(802).
Kulhawy, F. H., K. K. Phoon, and Y. Wang. 2012. “Reliability-based design of foundations—A modern view.” In Geotechnical engineering state of the art and practice, 102–121. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lacasse, S., and F. Nadim. 1996. “Uncertainties in characterising soil properties.” In Uncertainty in the geologic environment: From theory to practice, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 58, edited by C. D. Shackleford, P. P. Nelson, and M. J. S. Roth. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ledezma, C., and J. D. Bray. 2010. “Probabilistic performance-based procedure to evaluate pile foundations at sites with liquefaction-induced lateral displacement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (3): 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000226.
Liu, X., R. Wang, and J.-M. Zhang. 2018. “Centrifuge shaking table tests on 4×4 pile groups in liquefiable ground.” Acta Geotech. 13 (6): 1405–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0699-5.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, M. Cubrinovski, and B. A. Bradley. 2014. “Evaluation of the liquefaction potential index for assessing liquefaction hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (7): 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001117.
Moehle, J., and G. G. Deierlein. 2004. “A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999a. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999b. “Evaluation of geotechnical property variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-039.
Qiu, Z., A. Ebeido, A. Almutairi, J. Lu, A. Elgamal, P. B. Shing, and G. Martin. 2020. “Aspects of bridge-ground seismic response and liquefaction-induced deformations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (4): 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3244.
Rollins, K. M., T. M. Gerber, J. D. Lane, and S. A. Ashford. 2005. “Lateral resistance of a full-scale pile group in liquefied sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (1): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:1(115).
Seed, H. B., K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, and R. M. Chung. 1984. The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research.
Straub, D., and I. Papaioannou. 2015. “Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (3): 04014134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000839.
Su, L., H.-P. Wan, Y. Li, and X.-Z. Ling. 2018. “Soil-pile-quay wall system with liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: Experimental investigation, numerical simulation, and global sensitivity analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (11): 04018087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001977.
Tang, L., X. Ling, X. Zhang, L. Su, C. Liu, and H. Li. 2015. “Response of a RC pile behind quay wall to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: A shake-table investigation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 76: 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.015.
Tang, W. H., and A. Ang. 2007. Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Wang, R., P. Fu, and J.-M. Zhang. 2016. “Finite element model for piles in liquefiable ground.” Comput. Geotech. 72: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.10.009.
Wang, X., B. Ji, and A. Ye. 2020. “Seismic behavior of pile-group-supported bridges in liquefiable soils with crusts subjected to potential scour: Insights from shake-table tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (5): 04020030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002250.
Wang, X., F. Luo, Z. Su, and A. Ye. 2017a. “Efficient finite-element model for seismic response estimation of piles and soils in liquefied and laterally spreading ground considering shear localization.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (6): 06016039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000835.
Wang, X., A. Shafieezadeh, and A. Ye. 2018. “Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (1): 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0199-2.
Wang, X., A. Ye, and B. Ji. 2019a. “Fragility-based sensitivity analysis on the seismic performance of pile-group-supported bridges in liquefiable ground undergoing scour potentials.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109427.
Wang, X., A. Ye, Y. Shang, and L. Zhou. 2019b. “Shake-table investigation of scoured RC pile-group-supported bridges in liquefiable and nonliquefiable soils.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (11): 1217–1237. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3186.
Wang, Y., C. Fu, and K. Huang. 2017b. “Probabilistic assessment of liquefiable soil thickness considering spatial variability and model and parameter uncertainties.” Géotechnique 67 (3): 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.219.
Wang, Z., and A. Shafieezadeh. 2020. “Highly efficient Bayesian updating using metamodels: An adaptive Kriging-based approach.” Struct. Saf. 84: 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101915.
Xiang, N., X. Chen, and M. S. Alam. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic fragility and loss analysis of concrete bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy-steel coupled reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 207: 110229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110229.
Xie, Y., J. Zhang, and Y. Huo. 2018. “Simplified drift demand prediction of bridges under liquefaction-induced lateral spreading.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (8): 04018053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001266.
Yoshida, N., T. Tazoh, K. Wakamatsu, S. Yasuda, I. Towhata, H. Nakazawa, and H. Kiku. 2007. “Causes of Showa Bridge collapse in the 1964 Niigata earthquake based on eyewitness testimony.” Soils Found. 47 (6): 1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.1075.
Zhang, X., L. Tang, X. Ling, and A. Chan. 2020. “Critical buckling load of pile in liquefied soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 135: 106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106197.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: Jul 19, 2020
Accepted: Feb 23, 2021
Published online: Mar 31, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 31, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210024, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-4328. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share