Behavior of a Monopod Bucket Foundation Subjected to Combined Moment and Horizontal Loads in Silty Sand
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 5
Abstract
Korea has started to build wind farms in the Yellow Sea, with the seabed consisting of a thick silty sand deposit. It is therefore important to understand the behavior of potential foundations of wind turbines. This paper reports results from a series of model tests undertaken to provide insight into the behavior of a bucket foundation subjected to monotonic horizontal and moment loading in silty sand. The tests were carried out at 70g in a beam centrifuge. The silty sand materials were cored directly from a wind farm site of Yellow Sea. The considered dimensions of the model bucket foundation and loading conditions represented those for a 3 MW wind turbine. The windward and leeward side, and inside and outside, of the model bucket was instrumented with 13 pressure transducers to obtain information in regards to soil-bucket interactions. The horizontal capacity or failure load increased with decreasing loading height due to decreasing induced moment at the load reference point (LRP). A horizontal-moment failure envelope was proposed calibrating against centrifuge test data. A loading rate 20 times faster augmented the horizontal failure load by 1.5 times. This was a consequence of dilation-induced excess pore water pressure. With the drainage valve on the lid shut, the soil inside the bucket was in tension and suction prevailed. The leeward outside of the skirt experienced significantly higher pressure, and that increased with the angle of rotation. Suction inside the skirt and resistance on the leeward outside dominate the capacity of the bucket foundation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by (1) Hyundai Engineering and Construction; (2) a University of Western Australia (UWA) Research Collaboration Award (RCA); and (3) the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20183010025540). The fourth author is an Australian Research Council (ARC) Future Fellow and is supported by the ARC Project FT190100735. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge lab support personnel at KOCED Geotechnical Centrifuge Center at KAIST.
References
Achmus, M., C. T. Akdag, and K. Thieken. 2013. “Load-bearing behavior of suction bucket foundations in sand.” Appl. Ocean Res. 43 (Oct): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2013.09.001.
Alessandrini, V., and G. Lebois. 2007. “A case study of using very large skirt can for self-installing platform foundations.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/18688-MS.
ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. ASTM D1557. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2478. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Byrne, B. W. 2000. “Investigations of suction caissons in dense sand.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Oxford.
Byrne, B. W., and G. T. Houlsby. 1999. “Drained behaviour of suction caisson foundations on very dense sand.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/10994-MS.
Byrne, B. W., and G. T. Houlsby. 2002. “Experimental investigations of response of suction caissons to transient vertical loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (11): 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:11(926).
Byrne, B. W., and G. T. Houlsby. 2003. “Foundations for offshore wind turbines.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 361 (1813): 2909–2930. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2003.1286.
Byrne, B. W., F. Villalobos, G. T. Houlsby, and C. M. Martin. 2003. “Laboratory testing of shallow skirted foundations in sand.” In Proc., BGA Int. Conf. on Foundations: Innovations, Observations, Design and Practice. London: Thomas Telford.
Choo, Y. W., D. J. Kim, S. Kim, J. H. Kim, D. S. Kim, S. H. Jee, and J. H. Choi. 2012. “Centrifuge tests of monopod and tripod bucket foundations for offshore wind turbine tower.” Proc., 1st Asian Workshop, Asiafuge 2012. London: International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Chow, S. H., A. Diambra, C. D. O’Loughlin, C. Gaudin, and M. F. Randolph. 2020. “Consolidation effects on monotonic and cyclic capacity of plate anchors in sand.” Géotechnique 70 (8): 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.TI.017.
Fan, S., B. Bienen, and M. F. Randolph. 2019. “Centrifuge study on effect of installation method on lateral response of monopiles in sand.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 21 (1): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.19.00013.
Finnie, I. M. S., and M. F. Randolph. 1994. “Punch-through and liquefaction induced failure of shallow foundations on calcareous sediments.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Offshore Structures, 217–230. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Foglia, A., L. B. Ibsen, G. Nicolai, and L. V. Andersen. 2014. “Observation on bucket foundations under cyclic loading in dense saturated sand.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, edited by C. Gaudin and D. White, 667–673. London: Taylor and Francis.
Garnier, J., C. Gaudin, S. M. Springman, P. J. Culligan, D. Goodings, D. Konig, B. Kutter, R. Phillips, M. F. Randolph, and L. Thorel. 2007. “Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech 7 (3): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2007.070301.
Head, K. H. 2006. Manual of soil laboratory testing. London: Whittles Publishing.
Houlsby, G. T., and B. W. Byrne. 2000. “Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines and anemometer masts.” Wind Eng. 24 (4): 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1260/0309524001495611.
Houlsby, G. T., L. B. Ibsen, and B. W. Byrne. 2005. “Suction caissons for wind turbines.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 75–93. London: Taylor & Francis.
Houlsby, G. T., R. B. Kelly, J. Huxtable, and B. W. Byrne. 2006. “Field trials of suction caissons in sand for offshore wind turbine foundations.” Géotechnique 56 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.3.
Hung, L. C., and S. R. Kim. 2012. “Evaluation of vertical and horizontal bearing capacities of bucket foundations in clay.” Ocean Eng. 52 (Oct): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.06.001.
Ibsen, L. B., K. A. Larsen, and A. Barari. 2014. “Calibration of failure criteria for bucket foundations on drained sand under general loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (7): 04014033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000995.
Kelly, R. B., G. T. Houlsby, and B. W. Byrne. 2006. “A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay.” Géotechnique 56 (9): 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.617.
Kim, D. J., Y. W. Choo, J. H. Kim, S. Kim, and D. S. Kim. 2014. “Investigation of monotonic and cyclic behavior of tripod suction bucket foundations for offshore wind towers using centrifuge modeling.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (5): 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001083.
Kim, D. S., N. R. Kim, Y. W. Choo, and G. C. Cho. 2013. “A newly developed state-of-the-art geotechnical centrifuge in South Korea.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (1): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1350-5.
Kim, J. H., Y. W. Choo, D. J. Kim, and D. S. Kim. 2015. “Miniature cone tip resistance on sand in centrifuge.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 0401509. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001425.
Kourkoulis, R. S., P. C. Lekkakis, F. M. Gelagoti, and A. M. Kaynia. 2014. “Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines subjected to wave and earthquake loading: Effect of soil–foundation interface.” Géotechnique 64 (3): 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.179.
Larsen, K. A., L. B. Ibsen, and A. Barari. 2013. “Modified expression for the failure criterion of bucket foundations subjected to combined loading.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (12): 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0308.
LeBlanc, C., G. T. Houlsby, and B. W. Byrne. 2010. “Response of stiff piles in sand to long term cyclic loading.” Géotechnique 60 (2): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.7.00196.
Schofield, A. N. 1980. “Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations.” Géotechnique 30 (3): 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.227.
Tran, M. N., and M. F. Randolph. 2008. “Variation of suction pressure during caisson installation in sand.” Géotechnique 58 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.1.1.
Villalobos, F. A., B. W. Byrne, and G. T. Houlsby. 2009. “An experimental study of the drained study of the drained capacity of suction caisson foundations under monotonic loading for offshore applications.” Soils Found. 49 (3): 477–488. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.49.477.
Yamamuro, J. A., A. E. Abrantes, and P. V. Lade. 2011. “Effect of strain rate on the stress-strain behavior of sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (12): 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000542.
Zhu, B., B. W. Byrne, and G. T. Housby. 2013. “Long term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng. 139 (1): 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000738.
Zhu, B., D. Q. Kong, R. P. Chen, L. G. Kong, and Y. M. Chen. 2011. “Installation and lateral loading tests of suction caissons in silt.” Canadian Geotech. J. 48 (7): 1070–1084. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-021.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 19, 2019
Accepted: Jan 25, 2021
Published online: Mar 13, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 13, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.