Technical Papers
Dec 22, 2020

Probabilistic Seismic Loading Considerations for the Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Volumetric Settlements in the Free Field

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 3

Abstract

Engineers have long integrated predicted volumetric strains in liquefied soils to predict free-field, postliquefaction settlements. These free-field settlements have commonly been used to define a lower bound estimate of settlements beneath structures or embankments. Semiempirical methods for predicting volumetric strains during liquefaction require characterization of the seismic loading impacting the soil. The way in which probabilistic estimates of seismic loading is characterized can significantly impact the predicted postliquefaction settlements. This study evaluates three potential approaches for characterizing probabilistic seismic loading and their impact on the computed free-field, postliquefaction volumetric settlement hazard. The pseudo-probabilistic approach, which is arguably the most common approach in engineering practice in the US, shows considerable bias in its predicted volumetric settlements, including an average underprediction of settlement equal to 38% when compared to a fully probabilistic approach at a return period of 2,475 years. A simple linear relationship to correct pseudo-probabilistic estimates of free-field, postliquefaction volumetric settlements at return periods of 475 and 2,475 years for two common semiempirical volumetric strain models is presented.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availabilty Statement

The data developed and used in this study are available upon written request to the lead author.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by a Federal Highway Administration Transportation Pooled Fund Study [Award No. TPF-5(296), with participation from Utah, Alaska, Connecticut, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and South Carolina state DOTs]. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support. However, the conclusions and opinions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsors.

References

Baker, J. W., and M. Faber. 2008. “Liquefaction risk assessment using geostatistics to account for soil spatial variability.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(14).
Bazzurro, P., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. “Ground motion amplification in nonlinear soil sites with uncertain properties.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 (5): 2027. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050186.
Bilge, H. T., and K. O. Cetin. 2007. “Field performance case histories for the assessment of cyclically-induced reconsolidation (volumetric) settlements.” Accessed January 4, 2007. http://www.ce.metu.edu.tr/∼onder/publications/PIB-NO59.zip.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test-based liquefaction-triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California–Davis.
Bray, J., M. Cubrinovski, J. Zupan, and M. Taylor. 2014. “Liquefaction effects on buildings in the central business district of Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1193/022113EQS043M.
Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2017. “6th Ishihara lecture: Simplified procedure for estimating liquefaction-induced building settlement.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 102 (Nov): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.026.
Bullock, Z., Z. Karimi, S. Dashti, K. Porter, A. Liel, and K. W. Franke. 2019. “A physics-informed semi-empirical probabilistic model for the settlement of shallow-founded structures on liquefiable ground.” Géotechnique 69 (5): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.174.
Cetin, K. O., H. T. Bilge, J. Wu, A. M. Kammerer, and R. B. Seed. 2009a. “Probabilistic model for the assessment of cyclically induced reconsolidation (volumetric) settlements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (3): 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:3(387).
Cetin, K. O., H. T. Bilge, J. Wu, A. M. Kammerer, and R. B. Seed. 2009b. “Probabilistic models for cyclic straining of saturated clean sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (3): 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:3(371).
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, A. Der Kiureghian, K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder Jr., R. E. Kayen, and R. E. S. Moss. 2004. “SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1314–1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.PEER News, April 1–3, 2000.
Dashti, S., J. D. Bray, J. M. Pestana, M. F. Riemer, and D. Wilson. 2010a. “Centrifuge testing to evaluate and mitigate liquefaction-induced building settlement mechanisms.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (7): 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000306.
Dashti, S., J. D. Bray, J. M. Pestana, M. F. Riemer, and D. Wilson. 2010b. “Mechanisms of seismically-induced settlement of buildings with shallow foundations on liquefiable soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000179.
Deierlein, G. G., H. Krawinkler, and C. A. Cornell. 2003. “A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 2003 Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Ekstrom, L. T., and K. W. Franke. 2016. “Simplified procedure for the performance-based prediction of lateral spread displacements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (7): 04016028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001440.
Elgamal, A., Z. Yang, and E. Parra. 2002. “Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (4): 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2.
Ferdosi, B., M. James, and M. Aubertin. 2015. “Numerical simulations of seismic and post-seismic behavior of tailings.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (1): 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0345.
Franke, K. W., and S. L. Kramer. 2014. “Procedure for the empirical evaluation of lateral spread displacement hazard curves.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (1): 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000969.
Franke, K. W., R. T. Mayfield, and A. D. Wright. 2014a. “Simplified uniform hazard liquefaction analysis for bridges.” Trans. Res. Rec. 2407 (1): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.3141/2407-05.
Franke, K. W., A. D. Wright, and L. T. Ekstrom. 2014b. “Comparative study between two performance-based liquefaction triggering models for the standard penetration test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (5): 04014010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001094.
Franke, K. W., L. T. Ekstrom, K. J. Ulmer, L. Astorga, and B. Error. 2016. Simplified standard penetration test performance-based assessment of liquefaction and effects. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT.
Huang, Y.-M. 2008. “Performance-based design and evaluation for liquefaction-related seismic hazards.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
IBC (International Building Code). 2018. 2018 International building code. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K., and M. Yoshimine. 1992. “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 32 (1): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.173.
Juang, C. H., J. Ching, and Z. Luo. 2013a. “Assessing SPT-based probabilistic models for liquefaction potential evaluation: A ten-year update.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 7 (3): 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.778117.
Juang, C. H., J. Ching, L. Wang, S. Khoshnevisan, and C. S. Ku. 2013b. “Simplified procedure fore estimation of liquefaction-induced settlement and site-specific probabilistic settlement exceedance curve using cone penetration test (CPT).” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (10): 1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0410.
Juang, C. H., K. Li, Y. Fang, Z. Liu, and E. H. Khor. 2008. “Simplified procedure for developing joint distribution of amax and Mw for probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (8): 1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1050).
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kramer, S. L., Y. M. Huang, and M. W. Greenfield. 2014. “Performance-based assessment of liquefaction hazards.” In Geotechnics for catastrophic flooding events, 17–26. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
Kramer, S. L., and R. T. Mayfield. 2007. “Return period of soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7): 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(802).
Ku, C. S., D. H. Lee, and J. H. Wu. 2004. “Evaluation of soil liquefaction in the Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake using CPT.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (9–10): 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.06.009.
Lee, K. L., and A. Albaisa. 1974. “Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 100 (4): 387–406.
Lu, C. C., J. H. Hwang, C. H. Juang, C. S. Ku, and Z. Luo. 2009. “Framework for assessing probability of exceeding a specified liquefaction-induced settlement at a given site in a given exposure time.” Eng. Geol. 108 (1–2): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.013.
Marrone, J., F. Ostadan, R. Youngs, and J. Itemizer. 2003. “Probabilistic liquefaction hazard evaluation: Method and application.” In Proc., 17th Int. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 17). Raleigh, NC: International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology.
Mayfield, R. T., S. L. Kramer, and Y. M. Huang. 2010. “Simplified approximation procedure for performance-based evaluation of liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000191.
NCREE (National Center for Research in Earthquake Engineering). 2000. Reconnaissance report of the geotechnical hazards caused by Chi-Chi earthquake. [In Chinese.]. Taipei, Taiwan: NCREE.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2000. “Documenting incidents of ground failure resulting from the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake.” Accessed April 15, 2016. http://peer.berkeley/edu/publications/turkey/adapazari/.
Rathje, E. M., and G. Saygili. 2008. “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the sliding displacement of slopes: Scalar and vector approaches.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (6): 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(804).
Rathje, E. M., and G. Saygili. 2011. “Estimating fully probabilistic seismic sliding displacements of slopes from a pseudoprobabilistic approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (3): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000431.
Sancio, R. B. 2003. “Ground failure and building performance in Adapazari, Turkey.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Berkeley.
Shamoto, Y., J. M. Zhang, and K. Tokimatsu. 1998. “Methods for evaluating residual post-liquefaction ground settlement and horizontal displacement.” Soils Found. 38 (1): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.Special_69.
Skempton, A. W., and D. H. MacDonald. 1956. “The allowable settlements of buildings.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 5 (6): 727–768. https://doi.org/10.1680/ipeds.1956.12202.
Stewart, J. P., K. Afshari, and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2014. Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Stewart, J. P., A. H. Liu, and Y. Choi. 2003. “Amplification factors for spectral acceleration in tectonically active regions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 (7): 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020049.
Tokimatsu, K., and H. B. Seed. 1984. Simplified procedures of the evaluation of settlements in clean sand. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Tokimatsu, K., and H. B. Seed. 1987. “Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (8): 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:8(861).
Tsukamoto, Y., K. Ishihara, and S. Sawada. 2004. “Settlement of silty sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 44 (5): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.44.5_135.
Ulmer, K. J., and K. W. Franke. 2016. “Modified performance-based liquefaction triggering procedure using liquefaction loading parameter maps.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 04015089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001421.
Ulmer, K. J., K. W. Franke, and B. Peterson. 2015. “Seismic hazard curves for the probability of liquefaction.” In Proc., IFCEE 2015, 1308–1317. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479087.118.
USGS. 2020. Unified hazard tool.” Accessed November 19, 2020. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/.
Wu, J., and R. B. Seed. 2004. “Estimating of liquefaction-induced ground settlement (case studies).” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Zhang, G., P. K. Robertson, and R. W. I. Brachman. 2002. “Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (5): 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-047.
Ziotopoulou, K., and R. W. Boulanger. 2013. “Numerical modeling issues in predicting post-liquefaction reconsolidation strains and settlements.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Urban Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: Center for Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: Jun 17, 2020
Accepted: Oct 20, 2020
Published online: Dec 22, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 22, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin W. Franke, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Project Engineer, Gerhart Cole Inc., 7657 S Holden St., Midvale, UT 84047. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4534-2226. Email: [email protected]
Braden M. Error, M.ASCE [email protected]
Staff Engineer, Architecture, Engineering, Construction, Operations, and Management, 756 E Winchester St. #400, Murray, UT 84107. Email: [email protected]
Jingwen He, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. Email: [email protected]
Consultant Engineer, Factory Mutual Global, 1333 N California Blvd., Walnut Creek, CA 94596. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-208X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share