Monotonic, Cyclic, and Postcyclic Responses of an Alluvial Plastic Silt Deposit
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 3
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic response of a medium stiff, plastic, lightly-overconsolidated, alluvial clayey silt deposit. The laboratory investigation is performed on natural, intact, and reconstituted specimens derived from high-quality samples to establish the role of the stress history and soil fabric on cyclic resistance, excess pore pressure generation, and postcyclic behavior. The results of cone penetration tests (CPTs), vane shear tests (VSTs), and downhole and crosshole geophysical tests are used to compare the monotonic, stress-controlled direct simple shear (DSS) test data and interpret differences in the cyclic response of natural and reconstituted specimens. Constant-volume, stress-controlled cyclic tests indicate that the naturally-overconsolidated (OC), artificially normally-consolidated (NC), and reconstituted OC silt exhibit the cyclic mobility-type failure mechanism. The cyclic resistance of the intact, natural silt was determined to be sensitive to overconsolidation, with greater pore pressure generation potential observed in the NC silt for the same loading conditions. Despite significantly denser conditions, the reconstituted OC silt specimens exhibited a cyclic resistance approximately 44% lower than the natural, intact OC specimens at the cyclic resistance ratio corresponding to 15 cycles of loading. The magnitudes of postcyclic volumetric strain in the natural, intact specimens were independent of the overconsolidation ratio (OCR) and depended on the maximum excess pore pressure generated during cyclic shear. Strain-controlled cyclic DSS tests were used to identify the cyclic threshold shear strain, , to generate residual excess pore pressure, which is approximately 0.012% in the naturally OC silt, and the cyclic degradation indices for various shear strain amplitudes. The various stress- and strain-controlled cyclic response of this natural silt deposit are compared to similar plastic soils reported in the literature to provide a well-characterized soil deposit for reference by geotechnical practitioners.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All of the data presented in this study appears in the figures of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship of this work by the Cascadia Lifelines Program (CLiP) and its members, with special thanks to member agency, Port of Portland. The research presented within this work was made possible by the vision and leadership of Tom Wharton, P.E. (OR) of the Port of Portland, who encouraged and facilitated this work. The authors were also supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No: CMMI 1663654) on related work during the course of these experiments. Thanks are due to the following Oregon State University professional faculty, staff, and students who engaged in discussions and/or assisted with various portions of, or related to, the overall project: T. Matthew Evans, Anne Trehu, James Batti, Aleyna Donaldson, Erick Moreno-Rangel, and Ali Dadashi. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments served to improve this manuscript.
References
Andrus, R. D., N. P. Mohanan, P. Piratheepan, B. S. Ellis, and T. L. Holzer. 2007. “Predicting shear-wave velocity from cone penetration resistance.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 1454. New York: Springer.
Armstrong, R. J., and E. J. Malvick. 2016. “Practical considerations in the use of liquefaction susceptibility criteria.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1941–1950. https://doi.org/10.1193/071114EQS100R.
ASTM. 2014. Standard practices for preserving and transporting soil samples. ASTM D4220. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for consolidated undrained direct simple shear testing of fine grain soils. ASTM D6528. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for consolidated undrained cyclic direct simple shear test under constant volume with load control or displacement control. ASTM D8296. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Becker, D. E., J. H. A. Crooks, K. Been, and M. G. Jefferies. 1987. “Work as a criterion for determining in situ and yield stresses in clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 24 (4): 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-070.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, S. Bastin, M. Stringer, M. Jacka, S. van Ballegooy, M. Riemer, and R. Wentz. 2020. “Characterization of silty soil thin layering and groundwater conditions for liquefaction assessment.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (2): 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0287.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, M. Riemer, and M. E. Stringer. 2018. “Laboratory-based characterization of shallow silty soils in southwest Christchurch.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Jul): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.046.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2006. “Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (11): 1413–1426. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1413).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2007. “Evaluation of cyclic softening in silts and clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (6): 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(641).
Bray, J. D., and R. B. Sancio. 2006. “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1165).
Chang, N. Y., S. T. Yey, and L. P. Kaufman. 1982. “Liquefaction potential of clean and silty sands.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Earthquake Microzonation Conf., 1018–1032. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Chu, D. B., J. P. Stewart, R. W. Boulanger, and P. S. Lin. 2008. “Cyclic softening of low-plasticity clay and its effect on seismic foundation performance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (11): 1595–1608. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:11(1595).
Cubrinovski, M., A. Rhodes, N. Ntritsos, and S. van Ballegooy. 2019. “System response of liquefiable deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013.
Dahl, K., R. W. Boulanger, and J. T. DeJong. 2018. “Trends in experimental data of intermediate soils for evaluating dynamic strength.” In Proc., 11th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Los Angeles: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Dahl, K. R., J. T. DeJong, R. W. Boulanger, R. Pyke, and D. Wahl. 2014. “Characterization of an alluvial silt and clay deposit for monotonic, cyclic, and post-cyclic behavior.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (4): 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0057.
DeJong, J. T., C. P. Krage, B. M. Albin, and D. J. DeGroot. 2018. “Work-based framework for sample quality evaluation of low plasticity soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (10): 04018074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001941.
Dobry, R., R. S. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell. 1982. Vol. 138 of Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method, 150. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
Donaldson, A. M. 2019. “Characterization of the small-strain stiffness of soils at an in situ liquefaction test site.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ.
Dyvik, R., T. Berre, S. Lacasse, and B. Raadim. 1987. “Comparison of truly undrained and constant volume direct simple shear tests.” Géotechnique 37 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.3.
Dyvik, R., R. Dobry, G. E. Thomas, and W. G. Pierce. 1984. Influence of consolidation shear stresses and relative density on threshold strain and pore pressure during cyclic straining of saturated sands. Washington, DC: USACE.
Evarts, R. C., J. E. O’Connor, and C. M. Cannon. 2016. Geologic map of the Sauvie Island quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington, 1–34. Washington, DC: USGS.
GeoMotions. 2000. D-MOD2000–A nonlinear computer program for seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, earthfill dams, and solid waste landfills. Lacey, WA: Limited Liability Company.
Hashash, Y. M. A. 2009. DEEPSOIL V 3.7, tutorial and user manual. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Hossain, A. M., R. D. Andrus, and W. M. Camp III. 2013. “Correcting liquefaction resistance of unsaturated soil using wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (2): 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000770.
Hsu, C. C., and M. Vucetic. 2006. “Threshold shear strain for cyclic pore-water pressure in cohesive soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (10): 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:10(1325).
Ichii, K., and T. Mikami. 2018. “Cyclic threshold shear strain in pore water pressure generation in clay in situ samples.” Soils Found. 58 (3): 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.01.005.
Idriss, I. M. 1999. An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential.. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes: Monograph MNO-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Idriss, I. M., R. Dobry, and R. D. Singh. 1978. “Nonlinear behavior of soft clays during cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 104 (12): 1427–1447.
Karakan, E., N. Tanrinian, and A. Sezer. 2019. “Cyclic undrained behavior and post liquefaction settlement of a nonplastic silt.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 120 (May): 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.040.
Khosravi, A., and J. S. McCartney. 2011. “Resonant column test for unsaturated soils with suction-saturation control.” Geotech. Test. J. 34 (6): 1–10.
Koester, J. P. 1994. “The influence of fines type and content on cyclic strength.” In Ground failures under seismic conditions, 17–33. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ladd, C. C. 1991. “Stability evaluation during staged construction.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (4): 540–615. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:4(540).
Landon, M. E., C. Marchetti, and D. J. DeGroot. 2018. “Constant rate of strain consolidation testing of saturated cohesive soils without back pressure saturation.” Geotech. Test. J. 41 (2): 20170030. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170030.
Lee, J. S., and J. C. Santamarina. 2005. “Bender elements: Performance and signal interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (9): 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1063).
Lefebvre, G., and D. LeBouef. 1987. “Rate effects and cyclic loading of sensitive clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 113 (5): 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:5(476).
Leong, E., and Z. Cheng. 2016. “Effects of confining pressure and degree of saturation on wave velocities of soils.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (6): D4016013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000727.
Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell. 2001. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Spon Press.
Matasovic, N. 1993. “Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Matasovic, N. 2006. “D-MOD_2–A computer program for seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, earthfill dams, and solid waste landfills.” In User’s manual. Lacey, WA: GeoMotions.
Matasovic, N., and M. Vucetic. 1995. “Generalized cyclic degradation–pore pressure generation model for clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (1): 33–42.
Mayne, P. W. 2007. Cone penetration testing, 368. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mortezaie, A., and M. Vucetic. 2016. “Threshold shear strains for cyclic degradation and cyclic pore water pressure generation in two clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (5): 04016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001461.
Ohara, S., and H. Matsuda. 1988. “Study on settlement of saturated clay layer induced by cyclic shear.” Soils Found. 28 (3): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.28.3_103.
Okamura, M., and K. Noguchi. 2009. “Liquefaction resistance of unsaturated non-plastic silt.” Soils Found. 49 (2): 221–229. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.49.221.
Polito, C. P., and J. R. Martin II. 2001. “Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (5): 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408).
Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-065.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Sanin, M. V. 2010. “Cyclic shear loading response of Fraser River Delta silt.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Sanin, M. V., and D. Wijewickreme. 2006. “Cyclic shear response of channel-fill Fraser River Delta silt.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (9): 854–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.006.
Sanin, M. V., and D. Wijewickreme. 2011. “Cyclic shear response of undisturbed and reconstituted Fraser River Silt.” In Proc., Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conf. Richmond, BC, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Seed, H. B., I. M. Idriss, F. Makdisi, and N. Banerjee. 1975. Representation of irregular stress time histories by equivalent uniform stress series in liquefaction analyses. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California at Berkeley.
Sheahan, T. C., C. C. Ladd, and J. T. Germaine. 1996. “Rate-dependent undrained shear behavior of saturated clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 122 (2): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(99).
Simpson, D. C., and T. M. Evans. 2016. “Behavioral thresholds in mixtures of sand and kaolinite clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001391.
Singh, S. 1994. “Liquefaction characteristics of silts.” In Ground failures under seismic conditions, 105–116. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Soysa, A. N. 2015. “Monotonic and cyclic shear loading response of natural silts.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Tabata, K., and M. Vucetic. 2010. “Threshold shear strain for cyclic degradation of three clays.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 12. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Troncoso, J. H., and R. Verdugo. 1985. “Silt content and dynamic behavior of tailings sands.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1311–1314. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Tsai, C. C., L. H. Mejia, and P. Meymand. 2014. “A strain-based procedure to estimate strength softening in saturated clays during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 66 (Nov): 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.07.003.
Vaid, Y. P. 1994. “Liquefaction of silty soils.” In Ground failures under seismic conditions, 1–16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Verma, P. 2019. “Monotonic and cyclic shear loading response of natural silts from British Columbia, Canada.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1991. “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89).
Wang, L. B., and J. D. Frost. 2004. “Dissipated strain energy method for determining preconsolidation pressure.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (4): 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-013.
Wijewickreme, D., and M. Sanin. 2010. “Postcyclic reconsolidation strains in low-plastic Fraser River Silt due to dissipation of excess pore-water pressures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (10): 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000349.
Wijewickreme, D., and A. Soysa. 2016. “Stress–strain pattern–based criterion to assess cyclic shear resistance of soil from laboratory element tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (9): 1460–1473. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0499.
Wijewickreme, D., A. Soysa, and P. Verma. 2017. “Response of natural fine-grained soils for seismic design practice: A collection of research findings from British Columbia, Canada.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Wijewickreme, D., A. Soysa, and P. Verma. 2019. “Response of natural fine-grained soils for seismic design practice: A collection of research findings from British Columbia, Canada.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.053.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147 • Issue 3 • March 2021
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 11, 2020
Accepted: Oct 19, 2020
Published online: Dec 17, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 17, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.