Technical Papers
Oct 8, 2020

Fragility Functions for Liquefaction-Induced Ground Failure

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 12

Abstract

The predicted severity of liquefaction manifested at the ground surface is a popular and pragmatic proxy of damage potential for infrastructure. Toward this end, the liquefaction potential index (LPI) and similar models are commonly used, and often codified, to predict surface manifestations on level ground. These predictions typically use deterministic thresholds from the literature—obtained via calibration on case-history data—to classify the expected manifestation. While widely adopted, such thresholds obscure the uncertainty of expected outcomes and are incompatible with probabilistic frameworks. Proposed thresholds are also intimately tied to the liquefaction analytics used to compute them and to the methodology used to select them, each of which can conflict with forward applications, leading to erroneous predictions. Accordingly, using 15,223 case histories from 24 earthquakes, this study develops fragility functions that probabilistically predict surficial manifestations of liquefaction using triggering and manifestation models popular in practice. Deterministic workflows are easily extended by selecting appropriate fragility coefficients; options are provided for six cone penetration test (CPT)–based triggering models, one CPT-inversion filter, three manifestation models, and three manifestation severities. The model application is demonstrated by predicting (1) liquefaction manifestations in Christchurch, New Zealand, resulting from an Alpine Fault earthquake, wherein a logic-tree is used to ensemble predictions from 18 models, and (2) the return period of liquefaction manifestations in the South-of-Downtown (SODO) district of Seattle, wherein predictions are compared to historical observations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated during the study are available from the corresponding author, including Tables 4 and 5 as well as all data associated with the Canterbury case-history dataset. In addition, all calculations demonstrated in this study, including CPT processing, may be performed using Horizon (Geyin and Maurer 2020), a freely available open-source program developed by the authors.

Acknowledgments

The presented study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (Grant No. CMMI-1751216), USGS (Grant No. G18AP-00006), and Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (Grant No. 1132-NCTRBM). However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF, USGS, or PEER.

References

Ahmadi, M. M., and P. K. Robertson. 2005. “Thin-layer effects on the CPT qc measurement.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (5): 1302–1317. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-036.
AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). 2001. Recommendations for design of building foundations. Tokyo: AIJ.
Anselin, L. 1995. “Local indicators of spatial association—LISA.” Geogr. Anal. 27 (2): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
Baker, J. W. 2015. “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
Boulanger, R. W., and J. T. DeJong. 2018. “Inverse filtering procedure to correct cone penetration data for thin-layer and transition effects.” In Proc., Cone Penetration Testing 2018, 25–44. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., M. Khosravi, B. R. Cox, and J. T. DeJong. 2018. “Liquefaction evaluation for an interbedded soil deposit: St. Teresa’s School, Christchurch, New Zealand.” In Proc., IACGE 2018 Geotechnical and Seismic Research and Practices for Sustainability. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482049.066.
Bradley, B. A. 2010. “Epistemic uncertainties in component fragility functions.” Earthquake Spectra 26 (1): 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3281681.
Bradley, B. A. 2014. “Site-specific and spatially-distributed ground-motion intensity estimation in the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 61–62 (2014): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.025.
Bradley, B. A., S. E. Bae, V. Polak, R. L. Lee, E. M. Thomson, and K. Tarbali. 2017a. “Ground motion simulations of great earthquakes on the alpine fault: Effect of hypocenter location and comparison with empirical modelling.” N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 60 (3): 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2017.1297313.
Bradley, B. A., S. Savarimuthu, D. Lagrava, J. Huang, J. Motha, V. Polak, and S. Bae. 2017b. “SeisFinder: A web application for extraction of data from computationally-intensive earthquake resilience calculations.” In Proc., SCEC Annual Meeting. Los Angeles: Southern California Earthquake Center.
Brandenberg, S. J., et al. 2020. “Next-generation liquefaction database.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (2): 939–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020902477.
Bray, J. D., et al. 2001. Some observations of the geotechnical aspects of the February 28, 2001, Nisqually earthquake in Olympia, South Seattle, and Tacoma, Washington. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Brennan, A. J., and S. P. Madabhushi. 2005. “Liquefaction and drainage in stratified soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (7): 876–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:7(876).
Buck, J. R., M. M. Daniel, and A. C. Singer. 2002. Computer explorations in signals and systems using MATLAB. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chen, Q., C. Wang, and C. H. Juang. 2016. “CPT-based evaluation of liquefaction potential accounting for soil spatial variability at multiple levels.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001402.
Chleborad, A. F., and R. L. Schuster. 1990. Ground failure associated with the Puget Sound region earthquakes of April 13, 1949, and April 29, 1965. Washington, DC: USGS.
Cochran, U. A., K. J. Clark, J. D. Howarth, G. P. Biasi, R. M. Langridge, P. Villamor, K. R. Berryman, and M. J. Vandergoes. 2017. “A plate boundary earthquake record from a wetland adjacent to the Alpine Fault in New Zealand refines hazard estimates.” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 464 (Apr): 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.02.026.
Cramer, C. H., et al. 2017. “St. Louis area earthquake hazards mapping project: Seismic and liquefaction hazard maps.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 88 (1): 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160028.
Cramer, C. H., M. S. Dhar, and D. Arellano. 2018. “Update of the urban seismic and liquefaction hazard maps for Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee: Liquefaction probability curves and 2015 hazard maps.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 89 (2): 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170139.
Cramer, C. H., G. J. Rix, and K. Tucker. 2008. “Probabilistic liquefaction hazard maps for Memphis, Tennessee.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 79 (3): 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.3.416.
Cubrinovski, M., A. Rhodes, N. Ntritsos, and S. van Ballegooy. 2019. “System response of liquefiable deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013.
Davis, E., B. Atwater, J. Crider, and C. Garrison-Laney. 2019. “Seattle liquefaction features along the Duwamish waterway, Washington.” In Proc., Seismological Society of America Annual Meeting, Albany, CA: Seismological Society of America.
Diaconis, P., and B. Efron. 1983. “Computer intensive methods in statistics.” Sci. Am. 248 (5): 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0583-116.
Esri (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2020. “‘World street map’ [basemap]. Scale not given. ‘World street map’.” Accessed March 25, 2020. https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/World_Street_Map/MapServer.
Fiegel, G. L., and B. L. Kutter. 1994. “Liquefaction mechanism for layered soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 120 (4): 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:4(737).
Gathro, J. D., B. Bwambale, R. D. Andrus, and T. Heidari. 2018. “Liquefaction probability curves for three surficial sand deposits near Charleston, South Carolina.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Liquefaction Triggering, Consequences, and Mitigation, 374–383. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Geyin, M., A. J. Baird, and B. W. Maurer. 2020. “Field assessment of liquefaction prediction models based on geotechnical vs. geospatial data, with lessons for each.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (3): 1386–1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899951.
Geyin, M., and B. W. Maurer. 2019. “An analysis of liquefaction-induced free-field ground settlement using 1,000+ case-histories: Observations vs. state-of-practice predictions.” In Geo-Congress 2019: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Geotechnical Special Publication 308, edited by C. L. Meehan, S. Kumar, M. A. Pando, and J. T. Coe, 489–498. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Geyin, M., and B. W. Maurer. 2020. Horizon: CPT-based liquefaction risk assessment and decision software. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Goda, K., G. M. Atkinson, J. A. Hunter, H. Crow, and D. Motazedian. 2011. “Probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis for four Canadian cities.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (1): 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100094.
Green, R. A., et al. 2020. “Liquefaction hazard of the Groningen region of the Netherlands due to induced seismicity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (8): 04020068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002286.
Green, R. A., J. J. Bommer, A. Rodriguez-Marek, B. W. Maurer, P. J. Stafford, B. Edwards, P. P. Kruiver, G. De Lange, and J. Van Elk. 2019. “Addressing limitations in existing ‘simplified’ liquefaction triggering evaluation procedures: Application to induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (8): 4539–4557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0489-3.
Green, R. A., M. Cubrinovski, B. Cox, C. Wood, L. Wotherspoon, B. Bradley, and B. Maurer. 2014. “Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1193/030713EQS066M.
Hayati, H., and R. D. Andrus. 2008. “Liquefaction potential map of Charleston, South Carolina based on the 1886 earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (6): 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(815).
Holzer, T. L. 2008. “Probabilistic liquefaction hazard mapping.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, 1–32. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Holzer, T. L., M. J. Bennett, T. E. Noce, A. Padovani, and J. C. Tinsley, III. 2006. “Liquefaction hazard mapping with LPI in the greater Oakland, California, area.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (3): 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2218591.
Holzer, T. L., T. E. Noce, M. J. Bennett, J. C. Tinsley, III, and L. I. Rosenburg. 2005. “Liquefaction at Oceano, California, during the 2003 San Simeon earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 (6): 2396–2411. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050078.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes: Monograph MNO-12, 261. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. 1985. “Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 321–376. San Francisco: CNC Press.
Iwasaki, T., T. Arakawa, and K. Tokida. 1984. “Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 3 (1): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5.
Iwasaki, T., F. Tatsuoka, K. Tokida, and S. A. Yasuda. 1978. “Practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Microzonation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Juang, C. H., S. H. Yang, H. Yuan, and S. Y. Fang. 2005. “Liquefaction in the Chi-Chi earthquake-effect of fines and capping non-liquefiable layers.” Soils Found. 45 (6): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.89.
Kang, G. C., J. W. Chung, and J. D. Rogers. 2004. “Re-calibrating the thresholds for the classification of liquefaction potential index based on the 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu earthquake.” Eng. Geol. 169 (Feb): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.012.
Kramer, S. L., and R. T. Mayfield. 2007. “Return period of soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7): 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(802).
Kwak, D. Y., J. P. Stewart, S. J. Brandenberg, and A. Mikami. 2016. “Characterization of seismic levee fragility using field performance data.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (1): 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1193/030414EQS035M.
Land Information New Zealand. 2020. “‘Topographic Data’ [basemap]. Scale not given. ‘Topographic data’.” Accessed March 25, 2020. https://data.linz.govt.nz/data/category/topographic.
Lee, D. H., C. S. Ku, and H. Yuan. 2003. “A study of liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan.” Eng. Geol. 71 (1–2): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00128-5.
Lenz, A. J., and L. G. Baise. 2007. “Spatial variability of liquefaction potential in regional mapping using CPT and SPT data.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (7): 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.11.005.
Luna, R., and J. D. Frost. 2000. “Treasure Island’s spatial liquefaction evaluation.” In National geotechnical experimentation sites. Geotechnical Special Publication 93, 306–320. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784404843.ch15.
Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. M. Powell. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Blackie Academic and Professional.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, M. Cubrinovski, and B. A. Bradley. 2014a. “Assessment of aging correction factors for liquefaction resistance at sites of recurrent liquefaction.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. West Lafayette, IN: Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, M. Cubrinovski, and B. A. Bradley. 2014b. “Evaluation of the liquefaction potential index for assessing liquefaction hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (7): 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001117.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, M. Cubrinovski, and B. A. Bradley. 2015a. “Assessment of CPT-based methods for liquefaction evaluation in a liquefaction potential index framework.” Géotechnique 65 (5): 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP.15.P.007.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, M. Cubrinovski, and B. A. Bradley. 2015b. “Fines-content effects on liquefaction hazard evaluation for infrastructure during the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand earthquake sequence.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 76 (Sep): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.028.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, and O. D. S. Taylor. 2015c. “Moving towards an improved index for assessing liquefaction hazard: Lessons from historical data.” Soils Found. 55 (4): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.010.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, S. van Ballegooy, and L. Wotherspoon. 2019. “Development of region-specific soil behavior type index correlations for evaluating liquefaction hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 117 (Feb): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.059.
Moss, R. E. S. 2003. “CPT-based probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction initiation.” Ph.D., Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Moss, R. E. S., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, A. Der Kiureghian, and K. O. Cetin. 2006. “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
NRC (National Research Council). 2016. “Committee on earthquake induced soil liquefaction assessment.” In State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NZGD (New Zealand Geotechnical Database). 2019. “New Zealand geotechnical database.” Accessed November 17, 2019. https://www.nzgd.org.nz/.
Özener, P., K. Özaydin, and M. Berilgen. 2008. “Numerical and physical modeling of liquefaction mechanisms in layered sands.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975%28318%2970.
Papathanassiou, G., A. Mantovani, G. Tarabisu, D. Rapti, and R. Caputo. 2015. “Assessment of liquefaction potential for two liquefaction prone areas considering the May 20, 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquake.” Eng. Geol. 189 (Apr): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.02.002.
Petersen, M. D., et al. 2008. Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. Washington, DC: USGS.
Porter, K. 2019. A beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk, 119. Boulder, CO: Univ. of Colorado Boulder.
Rashidian, V., and D. T. Gillins. 2018. “Modification of the liquefaction potential index to consider the topography in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Eng. Geol. 232 (Jan): 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.010.
Rix, G. J., and S. Romero. 2001. Liquefaction susceptibility mapping in Memphis/Shelby County, TN. Washington, DC: USGS.
Robertson, P. K. 2011. “Automated software detection of CPT transition zones.” Geotech. News 29 (2): 33.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Tonkin & Taylor. 2013. Liquefaction vulnerability study. Christchurch, NZ: Tonkin & Taylor.
Toprak, S., and T. Holzer. 2003. “Liquefaction potential index: Field assessment.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (4): 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(315).
Treadwell, D. D. 1976. “The influence of gravity, prestress, compressibility, and layering on soil resistance to static penetration.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California at Berkeley.
USGS. 2019. “Unified hazard tool.” Accessed November 17, 2019. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/.
van Ballegooy, S., S. C. Cox, C. Thurlow, H. K. Rutter, T. Reynolds, G. Harrington, J. Fraser, and T. Smith. 2014a. Median water table elevation in Christchurch and surrounding area after the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake: Version 2. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: GNS Science.
van Ballegooy, S., R. A. Green, J. Lees, F. Wentz, and B. W. Maurer. 2015. “Assessment of various CPT based liquefaction severity index frameworks relative to the Ishihara (1985) H1-H2 boundary curves.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 79 (Dec): 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.015.
van Ballegooy, S., P. Malan, V. Lacrosse, M. E. Jacka, M. Cubrinovski, J. D. Bray, T. D. O’Rourke, S. A. Crawford, and H. Cowan. 2014b. “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1193/031813EQS070M.
van der Linden, T. I., D. A. De Lange, and M. Korff. 2018. “Cone penetration testing in thinly inter-layered soils.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 171 (3): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.17.00061.
Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 2019. “Washington geologic information portal.” Accessed November 17, 2019. https://geologyportal.dnr.wa.gov/.
Yost, K. M., B. R. Cox, L. Wotherspoon, R. W. Boulanger, S. van Ballegooy, and M. Cubrinovski. 2019. “In situ investigation of false-positive liquefaction sites in Christchurch, New Zealand: Palinurus road case history.” In Geo-Congress 2019: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Geotechnical Special Publication 308, edited by C. L. Meehan, S. Kumar, M. A. Pando, and J. T. Coe, 436–451. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Youd, T. L., et al. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10): 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
Zhang, G., P. K. Robertson, and R. Brachman. 2002. “Estimating liquefaction induced ground settlements from CPT.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (5): 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-047.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Sep 27, 2019
Accepted: Jul 27, 2020
Published online: Oct 8, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 8, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mertcan Geyin, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. Email: [email protected]
Brett W. Maurer, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share