Technical Papers
Sep 23, 2020

Analytical CPTU Models Applied to Sensitive Clay at Dover, New Hampshire

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 12

Abstract

Two analytical models for interpreting piezocone penetration tests (CPTUs) in soft sensitive Presumpscot clay were applied to in situ and laboratory results from a highway embankment project in Dover, New Hampshire. A closed-form limit plasticity solution provided the effective stress friction angle at both peak strength (ϕ1) and maximum obliquity (ϕ2) from the total cone resistance (qt) and pore-water pressure (u2) readings. A hybrid cavity expansion–critical state model provides undrained rigidity index (IR), undrained shear strength (su), and four profiles of yield stress ratio (YSR) with depth. The interpreted CPTU results compared favorably with independent benchmark values obtained from field vane shear tests and laboratory index, triaxial compression, and consolidation tests. As a supplement to soil behavior charts, an alternate means of identifying sensitive clays from regular insensitive clays is presented.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data and models generated or used during the study are available from the authors by request, including the CPTU, VST, consolidation, index, and triaxial results.

Acknowledgments

The first author thanks ConeTec Group for supporting in situ research activities at Georgia Tech. The second author is grateful for the funding and support provided by the New Hampshire Department of Transportation for the experimental work at the Dover-Newington project.

References

Abuhajar, O., M. H. El Naggar, M. Hesham, and T. Newson. 2010. “Review of available methods for evaluation of soil sensitivity for seismic design.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 9. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. Science and Technology.
Agaiby, S. S. 2018. “Advancements in the interpretation of seismic piezocone tests in clays and other geomaterials.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Agaiby, S. S., and P. W. Mayne. 2018. “Interpretation of piezocone penetration and dissipation tests in sensitive Leda clay at Gloucester test site.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (12): 1781–1794. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0388.
Agaiby, S. S., and P. W. Mayne. 2019. “CPT evaluation of yield stress profiles in soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (12): 04019104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002164.
Bjerrum, L., and N. E. Simons. 1960. “Comparison of shear strength characteristics of normally-consolidated clays.” In Proc., Research Conf. on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, 711–726. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Burns, S. E., and P. W. Mayne. 1998. “Monotonic and dilatory porewater pressures during piezocone dissipation tests in clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (6): 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-062.
Burns, S. E., and P. W. Mayne. 2002. “Analytical cavity expansion-critical state model for piezocone dissipation in fine-grained soils.” Soil Found. 42 (2): 131–137.
Casey, B. 2014. “The consolidation and strength behavior of mechanically compressed fine-grained sediments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Casey, B., J. T. Germaine, and R. T. Reynolds. 2015. “The strength behavior of resedimented Presumpscot clay and a comparison with intact behavior.” In Proc., 2nd Symp. on the Presumpscot Formation: Advances in Geotechnical, Geologic, and Construction Practice, edited by M. E. Landon and C. Nickerson. Portland, ME: Univ. of Maine. https://umaine.edu/presumpscot-symposium/2015-symposium-proceedings/.
Chandler, R. J. 1988. “The in-situ measurement of undrained shear strength of clays using the field vane.” In Vane shear strength testing in soils: Field and laboratory studies, edited by A. Richards, 13–44. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Chen, B. S.-Y., and P. W. Mayne. 1996. “Statistical relationships between piezocone measurements and stress history of clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (3): 488–498. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-070.
DeGroot, D. J., M. E. Landon, and S. E. Poirier. 2019. “Geology and engineering properties of sensitive Boston Blue Clay at Newbury, Massachusetts.” AIMS Geosci. 5 (3): 412–447. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.412.
DeGroot, D. J., and A. J. Lutenegger. 2003. “Geology and engineering properties of Connecticut Valley varved clay.” In Vol. 1 of Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils, 695–724. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
DeGroot, D. J., and A. J. Lutenegger. 2005. “Characterization by sampling and in-situ testing—Connecticut valley varved clay.” Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 27 (3–4): 107–120.
DeJong, J. T., N. J. Yafrate, and D. J. DeGroot. 2011. “Evaluation of undrained shear strength using full-flow penetrometers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (1): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000393.
Demers, D., and S. Leroueil. 2002. “Evaluation of preconsolidation pressure and the OCR from piezocone tests of clay deposits in Quebec.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (1): 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-071.
Devin, S. C., and T. C. Sandford. 2000. “Shear strength of sensitive clay slopes in Maine.” In Geo-Denver 2000: Slope Stability 2000, Geotechnical Special Publication 101, edited by D. V. Griffiths, G. A. Fenton, and T. R. Martin, 114–128. Reston, VA: ASCE.
DiBuö, B., M. D′Ignazio, J. Selãnpaã, T. Länsivaara, and P. W. Mayne. 2019. “Yield stress evaluation of Finnish clays based on analytical CPTu models.” Can. Geotech. J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0427.
D’Ignazio, M., T. Lunne, K. H. Andersen, S. Yang, B. DiBuo, and T. Länsivaara. 2019. “Estimation of preconsolidation stress of clays from piezocone by means of high-quality calibration data.” AIMS Geosci. 5 (2): 104–116. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.2.104.
Eslami, A., and B. H. Fellenius. 1997. “Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories.” Can. Geotech. J. 34 (6): 886–904. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-056.
Finno, R. J., S. L. Gassman, and M. Calvello. 2000. “NGES at Northwestern University.” In National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites, Geotechnical Special Publication 93, edited by J. Benoît and A. J. Lutenegger, 130–159. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Getchell, A. 2013. “Geotechnical test embankment on soft marine clay in Newington-Dover, NH.” M.S. thesis, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of New Hampshire.
Getchell, A., J. R. Blair, A. J. Santamaria, and J. Benoît. 2015. “Settlement analysis using the dilatometer: Embankment over soft marine clay deposit in Dover, New Hampshire.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Flat Dilatometer (DMT’15). Rome: Studio Prof. Marchetti. https://www.marchetti-dmt.it/conference/dmt15/papers%20DMT%202015%20(pdf)/35.pdf#page=1.
Getchell, A., A. Santamaria, and J. Benoît. 2014. Geotechnical test embankment, Dover, New Hampshire. Concord, NH: NHDOT.
Hackney, G. A., D. J. Cunliffe, and J. W. R. Dawes. 2019. “Yield stress relationships from CPTu for Brisbane Holocene clay.” In Proc., 13th Australia-New Zealand Conf. on Geomechanics, 147–152. Sydney, Australia: Australia Geomechanics Society. http://www.issmge.org.
Hardison, M. A., and M. L. Landon. 2015. Correlation of engineering parameters of the Presumpscot formation to SCPTU. Augusta, ME: MaineDOT.
Hight, D. W., M. A. Paul, B. F. Barras, D. F. T. Nash, P. R. Smith, R. J. Jardine, and D. H. Edwards. 2003. “The characterisation of the Bothkennar clay.” In Vol. 1 of Characterization & engineering properties of natural soils, 543–597. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Jefferies, M. G., and M. P. Davies. 1993. “Use of CPTu to estimate equivalent SPT N60.” Geotech. Test. J. 16 (4): 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10286J.
Karlsrud, K., T. Lunne, D. A. Kort, and S. Strandvik. 2005. “CPTu correlations for clays.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 16th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering (ICSMGE), 693–702. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Keaveny, J. M., and J. K. Mitchell. 1986. “Strength of fine-grained soils using the piezocone.” In Use of In-Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication 6, edited by S. P. Clemence, 668–690. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Knappett, J. A., and R. F. Craig. 2012. Craig′s soil mechanics. 8th ed. London: Spon Press.
Konrad, J.-M., and K. T. Law. 1987. “Preconsolidation pressure from piezocone tests in marine clays.” Géotechnique 37 (2): 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.2.177.
Ladd, C. C. 1972. “Test embankment on sensitive clay.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., ASCE Specialty Conf. on Earth and Earth-Supported Structures, 101–128. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ladd, C. C., and D. J. DeGroot. 2003. “Recommended practice for soft ground site characterization.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Soil & Rock America 2003, 3–57. Essen, Germany: Vertag Glückauf.
Larsson, R., and M. Mulabdić. 1991. Piezocone tests in clay. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish Geotechnical Institute.
L′Heureux, J.-S., A. Locat, S. Leroueil, D. Demers, and J. Locat. 2014. “Landslides in sensitive clays.” In Vol. 46 of Advances in natural & technological hazards research, 416. London: Springer.
Locat, A., S. Leroueil, P. Locat, D. Demers, D. Robitaille, and G. Lefebvre. 2012. “In-situ characterization of the Saint Jude landslide, Quebec.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Geotechnical & Geophysical Site Characterization, 507–514. London: Taylor & Francis.
Locat, J., G. Lefebvre, and G. Ballivy. 1984. “Mineralogy, chemistry, and physical properties interrelationships of some sensitive clays from Eastern Canada.” Can. Geotech. J. 21 (3): 530–540.
Long, M., J. S. L′Heureux, and B. K. F. Bache. 2019. “Site characterization and some examples from large scale testing at the Klett quick clay research site.” AIMS Geosciences 5 (3): 344–389. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.344.
Low, H. E., T. Lunne, K. H. Andersen, M. A. Sjursen, X. Li, and M. F. Randolph. 2010. “Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays.” Géotechnique 60 (11): 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.017.
Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: CRC Press.
Mayne, P. W. 1980. “Cam-clay predictions of undrained shear strength.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 106 (11): 1219–1242.
Mayne, P. W. 1991. “Determination of OCR in clays by piezocone tests using cavity expansion and critical state concepts.” Soils Found. 31 (2): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.31.2_65.
Mayne, P. W. 2005. “Keynote: Integrated ground behavior: In-situ and lab tests.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS Lyon’03), 155–177. London: Taylor & Francis.
Mayne, P. W. 2007. NCHRP synthesis 368: Cone penetration testing. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mayne, P. W. 2008. “Piezocone profiling of clays for maritime site investigations.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 11th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conf.: Geotechnics in Maritime Engineering, 333–350. Gdansk, Poland: Polish Committee on Geotechnics.
Mayne, P. W. 2016. “Evaluating effective stress parameters and undrained shear strengths of soft-firm clays from CPTu and DMT.” Aust. Geomech. J. 51 (4): 27–55.
Mayne, P. W., S. S. Agaiby, and D. Dasenbrock. 2020. “Piezocone identification of organic clays and peats.” In GeoCongress 2020: Modeling, Geomaterials, and Site Characterization, Geotechnical Special Publication 317, edited by J. P. Hambleton, R. Makhnenko, and A. S. Budge, 541–549. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mayne, P. W., and S.S. Agaiby. 2019. “Profiling yield stress and identification of soft organic clays using piezocone tests.” In Proc., 16th Pan American Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, (Geotechnical Engineering in the XXI Century, Mexican Society of Geotechnical Engineering Cancun), 220–227. Rotterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/STAL190043.
Mayne, P. W., M. R. Coop, S. Springman, A.-B. Huang, and J. Zornberg. 2009. “Geomaterial behavior and testing.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 17th ICSMGE, 2777–2872. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Mayne, P. W., J. Greig, and S. Agaiby. 2018. “Evaluating CPTu in sensitive Haney clay using a modified SCE-CSSM solution.” In Proc., 71st Canadian Geotechnical Conf.: GeoEdmonton. Ottawa: Canadian Geotechnical Society. http://members.cgs.ca/conferences/GeoEdmonton/papers/geo2018Paper279.pdf.
Mayne, P. W., and J. K. Mitchell. 1988. “Profiling OCR in clays by field vane.” Can. Geotech. J. 25 (1): 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1139/t88-015.
Mayne, P. W., P. Paniagua, J.-S. L’Heureux, A. Lindgård, and A. Emdal. 2019. “Analytical CPTu model for sensitive clay at Tiller-Flotten site, Norway.” In Proc., XVII European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Geotechnical Engineering Foundation of the Future. Reykjavik, Iceland: Icelandic Geotechnical Society. http://www.issmge.org.
Mayne, P. W., and J. Peuchen. 2012. “Unit weight trends with cone resistance in soft to firm clays.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization: Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Site Characterization ISC-4, 903–910. London: CRC Press.
Mayne, P. W., and P. G. Swanson. 1981. “The critical-state pore pressure parameter from consolidated undrained shear tests.” In Laboratory shear strength of soil, 410–430. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Mitchell, J. K. 1976. Fundamentals of soil behavior. New York: Wiley.
Murray, R. F., and J. Benoît. 1995. “Evaluation of the Wissa piezocone in a marine clay deposit.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT'95, 239–244. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish Geotechnical Society. http://www.usucger.org.
Ouyang, Z., and P. W. Mayne. 2019. “Modified NTH method for assessing effective friction angle of normally consolidated and overconsolidated clays from piezocone tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 04019067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002112.
Paniagua, P., M. D′Ignazio, J.-S. L′Heureux, T. Lunne, and K. Karlsrud. 2019. “CPTu correlations for Norwegian clays: An update.” AIMS Geosci. 5 (2): 82–103. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.2.82.
Powell, J. J. M., and T. Lunne. 2005. “A comparison of different sized piezocones in UK clays.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., ICSMGE, 729–734. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Robertson, P. K. 1990. “Soil classification using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 27 (1): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-014.
Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-065.
Robertson, P. K., and K. Cabal. 2015. Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering. 6th ed. Signal Hill, CA: Gregg Drilling.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Roche, J., S. Rabasca, and J. Benoît. 2008. “In-situ testing of soft sensitive marine clay for a landfill expansion study.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization (ISC-3), 517–522. London: Taylor & Francis.
Sahdi, F., C. Gaudin, and D. J. White. 2013. “Strength properties of ultra-soft kaolin.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (4): 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0236.
Sandven, R., A. Gylland, A. Montafia, K. Kasim, A. A. Pfaffhuber, and M. Long. 2016. “In situ detection of sensitive clays–Part II: Results.” In Proc., 17th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting: Challenges in Nordic Geotechnics. Reykjavik, Iceland: Icelandic Geotechnical Society.
Santamaria, A., N. Bradley, and J. Benoît. 2015. “Strength change investigation of the Presumpscot clay formation.” In Proc., 2nd Symp. on the Presumpscot Formation: Advances in Geotechnical, Geologic, and Construction Practice, edited by M. E. Landon and C. Nickerson. Portland, ME: Univ. of Maine. https://umaine.edu/presumpscot-symposium/call-for-abstracts/.
Schneider, J. A., J. N. Hotstream, P. W. Mayne, and M. F. Randolph. 2012. “Comparing Q-F and Q-Δu2/σv0 soil classification charts.” Géotech. Lett. 2 (4): 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.12.00044.
Schneider, J. A., M. F. Randolph, P. W. Mayne, and N. R. Ramsey. 2008. “Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalized piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (11): 1569–1586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:11(1569).
Schofield, A. N., and C. P. Wroth. 1968. Critical state soil mechanics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Senneset, K., R. Sandven, and N. Janbu. 1989. “Evalution of soil parameters from piezocone tests.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1135: 24–37.
Shahri, A. A., A. Malehmir, and C. Juhlin. 2015. “Soil classification based on piezocone data.” Eng. Geol. 189 (1): 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.022.
Thompson, W. B. 1987. “The Presumpscot formation in Southwestern Maine.” In Proc., Geologic and Geotechnical Characteristics of the Presumpscot Formation, 22. Augusta, ME: Maine Geological Survey. https://umaine.edu/presumpscot-symposium/.
Valsson, S. M. 2016. “Detecting quick clay with CPTu.” In Proc., 17th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting: Challenges in Nordic Geotechnics. Reykjavik, Iceland: Icelandic Geotechnical Society.
Vesić, A. S. 1977. Design of pile foundations. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Whittle, A. J., T. Sutabutr, J. T. Germaine, and A. Varney. 2001. “Prediction and interpretation of pore pressure dissipation for a tapered piezoprobe.” Géotechnique 51 (7): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.7.601.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Sep 11, 2019
Accepted: Jun 18, 2020
Published online: Sep 23, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332-0355 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3030-8124. Email: [email protected]
Jean Benoît, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Hampshire, 33 Academic Way, Durham, NH 03824. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share