Technical Papers
Jul 6, 2020

Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. I: Centrifuge Experiments

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 9

Abstract

This article is the first of two companion papers studying the effect of overburden pressure on the liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of four centrifuge tests were conducted simulating a 5-m layer of this sand having two different relative densities, and subjected to overburden effective pressures of ~100 and 600 kPa (1 and 6 atm). The objective was to study the pore pressure response of the soil to base acceleration under low and high pressure, including evaluation of the overburden pressure factor Kσ for idealized field drainage conditions. The sand layer had a bottom impervious and a top pervious boundary, approximating a common field situation. A novel experimental technique was developed using a dry lead shot layer to provide the necessary high level of pressure. The performances of the sand layer under low and high confining pressure were compared in terms of times histories and profiles of excess pore pressures, cyclic stress ratios (CSR), and cyclic shear strains γc, with some of the parameters determined using system identification. It was found that pore pressure dissipation started earlier at shallower depths, and that partial drainage was more significant in the 6-atm than in the 1-atm tests. Field overburden pressure correction factors at 6 atm, Kσ, obtained from the centrifuge tests for (ru)max=0.8 in 10 cycles of shaking and including the partial drainage effect, were found to be higher than 1.0 for both Dr=45% and 80% This is different from the usual laboratory undrained Kσ<1 based on cyclic triaxial and simple shear laboratory tests and reflected in the current state of practice. The discrepancy is related to the more significant effect of partial drainage and deviation from the undrained assumption at the higher confining pressure for the field drainage and other conditions of these centrifuge tests.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the RPI geotechnical centrifuge technical staff for their help in the project and the preparation of this paper. Professor Mourad Zeghal helped with the system identification of records, which is most appreciated. The research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1545026, and by NYU Abu Dhabi; this support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abdoun, T., M. A. Gonzalez, S. Thevanayagam, R. Dobry, A. Elgamal, M. Zeghal, and U. El Shamy. 2013. “Centrifuge and large-scale modeling of seismic pore pressures in sands: Cyclic strain interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000821.
Abdoun, T., M. Ni, R. Dobry, A. Marr, K. Zehtab, and W. El-Sekelly. 2020. “Pore pressure and Kσ evaluation at high overburden pressure under field drainage conditions. II: Additional interpretation and analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002302.
Adalier, K., A. W. Elgamal, and G. R. Martin. 1998. “Foundation liquefaction countermeasures for earth embankments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (6): 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(500).
Adalier, K., and M. K. Sharp. 2004. “Embankment dam on liquefiable foundation—Dynamic behavior and densification remediation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (11): 1214–1224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:11(1214).
Anderson, J. D. 2007. Fundamentals of aerodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Andrus, R. D., and K. H. Stokoe II. 2000. “Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
Boulanger, R. W. 2003. “High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1071).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2004. “State normalization of penetration resistance and the effect of overburden stress on liquefaction resistance.” In Proc., 11th SDEE and 3rd ICEGE, Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test–based liquefaction–triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Boulanger, R. W., D. W. Wilson, and I. M. Idriss. 2011. “Examination and reevalaution of SPT-based liquefaction triggering case histories.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (8): 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000668.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, A. Der Kiureghian, K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder Jr., R. E. Kayen, and R. E. Moss. 2004. “Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1314–1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2015. “Cyclic shear strain needed for liquefaction triggering and assessment of overburden pressure factor Kσ.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (11): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001342.
Elgamal, A. W., M. Zeghal, V. Taboada, and R. Dobry. 1996. “Analysis of site liquefaction and lateral spreading using centrifuge testing records.” Soils Found. 36 (2): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_111.
Elgamal, A. W., M. Zeghal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. I: evaluation of site dynamic properties.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 121 (4): 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(350).
El Ghoraiby, M. A., H. Park, and M. T. Manzari. 2017. LEAP 2017: Soil characterization and element tests for Ottawa F65 sand. Washington, DC: George Washington Univ.
El-Sekelly, W., T. Abdoun, and R. Dobry. 2012. “Soil characterization in centrifuge models through measurement of shear wave velocities using bender elements.” In Proc., GeoCongress: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, 2037–2047. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412138.
El-Sekelly, W., V. Mercado, T. Abdoun, M. Zeghal, and H. El-Ganainy. 2013. “Bender elements and system identification for estimation of Vs.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 13 (4): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.13.00004.
El-Sekelly, W., A. Tessari, and T. Abdoun. 2014. “Shear wave velocity measurement in the centrifuge using bender elements.” Geotech. Test. J. 37 (4): 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20130189.
Gillette, D. 2013. “Liquefaction issues for dam safety—Bureau of Reclamation.” In Proc., Presentation in One-Day Workshop, Committee on State of the Art and Practice in Earthquake Induced Soil Liquefaction Assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
González, L. 2002. “Study of effect of high confining stress on the development of soil liquefaction using centrifuge modeling.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Harder, L. F., Jr. 1988. “Use of penetration tests to determine the cyclic loading resistance of gravelly soils during earthquake shaking.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California.
Hardin, B. O., and F. E. Richart Jr. 1963. “Elastic wave velocities in granular soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89 (1): 33–65.
Hynes, M. E., R. S. Olsen, and D. E. Yule. 1999. “Influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, 145–152. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Idriss, I. M. 1990. “Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes.” In Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symp., 273–290. Vancouver, Canada: BiTech.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2006. “Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2010. SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Kutter, B. L. 1992. “Dynamic centrifuge modeling of geotechnical structures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1336: 24–30.
Montgomery, J., R. W. Boulanger, and L. F. Harder Jr. 2012. Examination of the Kσ overburden correction factor on liquefaction resistance. Davis, CA: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
National Academies. 2017. State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences: A Report of the National Academies, Committee on State of the Art and Practice in Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Schnabel, P. B., J. Lysmer, and H. B. Seed. 1972. SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Seed, H. B. 1983. “Earthquake-resistant design of earth dams.” In Proc., Seismic Design of Earth Dams and Caverns. Philadelphia: ASCE.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. “Analyses of ground motions at Union Bay, Seattle during earthquakes and distant nuclear blasts.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 60 (1): 125–136.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273.
Seed, R. B., and L. F. Harder Jr. 1990. “SPT-based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength.” In Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symp. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Steedman, R. S., R. H. Ledbetter, and M. E. Hynes. 2000. “The influence of high confining stress on the cyclic behavior of saturated sand.” In Proc., Soil Dynamics and Liquefaction, 35–57. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40520%28295%294.
Tan, T. S., and R. F. Scott. 1985. “Centrifuge scaling considerations for fluid-particle systems.” Géotecnique 35 (4): 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.461.
Taylor, R. N. 1995. “Centrifuges in modelling: Principles and scale effects.” Chap. 2 in Geotechnical centrifuge technology, edited by R. N. Taylor, 19–33. London: Blackie Academic and Professional.
Vaid, Y. P., and S. Sivathayalan. 1996. “Static and cyclic liquefaction potential of Fraser Delta sand in simple shear and triaxial tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (2): 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-007.
Vaid, Y. P., and J. Thomas. 1995. “Liquefaction and postliquefaction behavior of sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (2): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:2(163).
Youd, T. L., and I. M. Idriss. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10): 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817).
Zeghal, M., A. W. Elgamal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(363).
Zimmaro, P., et al. 2019. “Next-generation liquefaction database.” Next-Gener. Liquefaction Consortium. https://doi.org/10.21222/C2J040.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: May 16, 2019
Accepted: Mar 5, 2020
Published online: Jul 6, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 6, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. Ni
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th St., JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180.
T. Abdoun, M.ASCE
Iovino Chair Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th St., JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180.
R. Dobry, M.ASCE
Institute Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th St., JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180.
K. Zehtab
R&D Engineering Manager, Geocomp, 125 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720.
A. Marr, F.ASCE
Chief Executive Officer, Geocomp and GeoTesting Express, 125 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720.
Lecturer, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Mansoura Univ., Mansoura 35516, Egypt; Research Scientist, New York Univ. Abu Dhabi, P.O. Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-646X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share