Technical Papers
Jun 11, 2020

Prediction, Performance, and Uncertainty in Dynamic Pile Load Testing as Informed by Direct Measurements from an Instrumented Becker Penetration Test

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 8

Abstract

Dynamic load testing and signal matching is commonplace for pile capacity verification but can be subject to nonuniqueness and uncertainty. Whether this uncertainty may be reduced with additional measurements requires further study. The instrumented Becker penetration test (iBPT) configured as a reusable test pile provides direct measurements of the dynamic response at the pile base and shaft. The distribution of static shaft friction in tension also is measured. This paper examined the sensitivity and potential improvements of such measurements in signal matching techniques. Different solution procedures were devised to analyze the same impact events, but incorporating static and dynamic iBPT measurements to varying degrees. The results suggest that whereas predictions of total ultimate capacity from signal matching generally are robust, differentiation of shaft versus base capacity may be more uncertain. Despite the nonunique solutions, dynamic predictions of shaft capacity agree reasonably well with static measurements.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the funding and support provided by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) of the California Department of Water Resources. The support and collaboration of Tom Shantz of Caltrans and Jim Benson of Great West Drilling also is appreciated. The assistance of UC Davis graduate students Alex Sturm and Anthony Rossiter for their help in collecting the data also is greatly appreciated.

References

Alvarez, C., and A. M. Klesney. 2013. Report on: Measurements and analysis on Becker penetration tests silver lake reservoir complex storage replacement headworks reservoir project Los Angeles department of water and power. Cleveland: GRL Engineers.
Alvarez, C., B. Zuckerman, and J. Lemke. 2006. “Dynamic pile analysis using CAPWAP and multiple sensors.” In Proc., GeoCongress 2006: Geotechnical Engineering in the Information Technology Age. Reston, VA: ASCE.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 1993. RP2A: Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms. Washington, DC: API.
Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 1994. Site 1 summary report for Caltrans indicator pile test program on the I-880 replacement project. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 1995. Site 2 summary report for Caltrans indicator pile test program on the I-880 replacement project. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2001. Los Gatos creek overflow, pile field acceptance criteria, pile dynamic analysis, and load test results: Test piles at Bents 3 and 6. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
DeJong, J. T., M. Ghafghazi, A. P. Sturm, D. W. Wilson, J. den Dulk, R. J. Armstrong, A. Perez, and C. A. Davis. 2017. “Instrumented Becker penetration test: Equipment, operation, and performance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001717.
Fellenius, B. H. 1988. “Variation of CAPWAP results as a function of the operator.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on the Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles, 814–825. Vancouver, BC: BiTech Publishers.
Ghafghazi, M., J. T. DeJong, A. P. Sturm, and C. E. Temple. 2017a. “Instrumented Becker penetration test: The application of SPT and iBPT for liquefaction assessment in gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001718.
Ghafghazi, M., J. T. DeJong, and D. W. Wilson. 2017b. “Evaluation of Becker penetration test interpretation methods for liquefaction assessment in gravelly soils.” Canadian Geotech. J. 54 (9): 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0413.
Goble, G. G., and F. Rausche. 1976. Wave equation analysis of pile driving, WEAP program. Washington, DC: US DOT, Federal Highway Administration.
Harder, L. F., Jr., and H. B. Seed. 1986. Determination of penetration resistance for coarse-grained soils using the Becker hammer drill. Berkeley, CA: College of Engineering, Univ. of California.
Holloway, D. M., G. W. Cloug, and A. S. Vesic. 1979. “A rational procedure for evaluating the behavior of impact-driven piles.” In Behavior of deep foundations, edited by R. Lundgren, 335–357. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Kuei, C. K., M. Ghafghazi, and J. T. DeJong. 2017a. “Pile driving mechanics at the tip as informed by direct measurements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001746.
Kuei, C. K., A. M. Rossiter, A. P. Sturm, J. T. DeJong, D. W. Wilson, and M. Ghafghazi. 2017b. “An instrumented Becker penetration test for estimation of soil penetration resistance and pile capacity in gravelly soils.” In Proc., Geotechnical Frontiers 2017. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lehane, B. M., R. J. Jardine, and R. Frank. 1993. “Mechanisms of shaft friction in sand from instrumented pile tests.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:1(19).
Masouleh, S. F., and K. Fakharian. 2008. “Verification of signal matching analysis of pile driving using finite difference based continuum numerical method.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 6 (3): 174–183.
Middendorp, P. 2004. “Thirty years of experience with the wave equation solution based on the method of characteristics.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on the Application of Stress Wave Theory to Piles. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Middendorp, P., and C. van Zandwijk. 1985. “Accuracy and reliability of dynamic pile testing techniques.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Behavior of offshore structures (BOSS). Amsterdam, NY: Elsevier.
Randolph, M. F. 1990. “Analysis of the dynamics of pile driving.” In Developments in soil mechanics IV: Advanced geotechnical analyses, edited by P. K. Banerjee and R. Butterfield. London: Elsevier Applied Science.
Randolph, M. F. 2003. “Science and empiricism in pile foundation design.” Géotechnique 53 (10): 847–875. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.10.847.
Rausche, F. 1983. CAPWAP analysis using the characteristics approach. Philadelphia: Pile Dynamics Inc.
Rausche, F., G. G. Goble, and E. Likins. 1985. “Dynamic determination of pile capacity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 111 (3): 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(367).
Rausche, F., G. Likins, L. Liang, and M. Hussein. 2010. “Static and dynamic models for CAPWAP signal matching.” In Proc., Art of Foundation Engineering Practice, 534–553. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Salgado, R., D. Loukidis, G. Abou-Jaoude, and Y. Zhang. 2015. “The role of soil stiffness non-linearity in 1D pile driving simulations.” Géotechnique 65 (3): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.124.
Sturm, A., K. Kuei, J. DeJong, A. Thurairajah, R. Olivera, and M. Ghafghazi. 2017. “Comparison of Becker penetration test interpretation methods in characterization of gravelly soils.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Performance-based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (PBD-III). London: ISSMGE.
Sy, A. 1993. “Energy measurements and correlations of the standard penetration test (SPT) and the Becker penetration test (BPT).” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Colombia.
Sy, A., and R. G. Campanella. 1994. “Becker and standard penetration tests (BPTSPT) correlations with consideration of casing friction.” Can. Geotech. J. 31 (3): 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-042.
Thurairajah, A. 2013. “Reusable instrumented test pile for improved pile design in granular soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Tran, K. T., M. McVay, R. Herrera, and P. Lai. 2012a. “Estimating static tip resistance of driven piles with bottom pile instrumentation.” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (4): 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-001.
Tran, K. T., M. McVay, R. Herrera, and P. Lai. 2012b. “Estimation of nonlinear static skin friction on multiple pile segments using the measured hammer impact response at the top and bottom of the pile.” Comput. Geotech. 41 (Apr): 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.11.004.
Tran, K. T., S. J. Wasman, M. McVay, and R. Herrera. 2017. “Capacity evaluation of voided driven piles using embedded data collectors.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (10): 1397–1407. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0008.
van Hamme, V., J. W. Jansz, H. Bomer, and D. Arentsen. 1974. “Hydroblok and improved pile driving analysis.” De Ingenieur 86 (18): 345–352.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Aug 26, 2019
Accepted: Feb 11, 2020
Published online: Jun 11, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 11, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

K. C. Kuei, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-955X. Email: [email protected]
M. Ghafghazi, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share