Technical Papers
Mar 18, 2020

Smooth Nonlinear Hysteresis Model for Coupled Biaxial Soil-Pipe Interaction in Sandy Soils

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 6

Abstract

Pipelines as infrastructure components are very vulnerable to geohazard-induced ground deformation and failure. Soil–pipe interaction (SPI) thus is very important for the assessment and design of resilient pipeline systems. Previous work on SPI modeling has been based on crude assumptions, such as representation of the soil as uncoupled three-dimensional bilinear springs, and quasi-static loading conditions. This paper proposes a simplified macroelement designed to capture the effects of dynamic SPI in cohesionless soils subjected to arbitrary loading normal to the pipeline axis. First, we present the development of a uniaxial hysteresis model that can capture the smooth nonlinear reaction force-relative displacement curves (FDCs) of SPI problems. Using the unscented Kalman filter, we derived the model parameter κ that controls the smoothness of transition zone from linear to plastic using published empirical and experimental data. We extended this uniaxial model to biaxial loading effects, and showed that the macroelement can capture effects such as pinching and shear–dilation coupling. The model input parameters were calibrated using finite-element (FE) analyses validated by experiments. The FDCs of the biaxial model were verified by comparison with FE and smoothed-particle hydrodynamic (SPH) simulations for different loading patterns: cyclic uniaxial, 0-shaped, 8-shaped, and transient loading. Accounting for smooth nonlinearity, hysteresis, pinching, and coupling effects, the proposed biaxial macroelement showed good agreement with FE and SPH analyses, while maintaining the computational efficiency and simplicity of beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation models, as well as a small number of input parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Vietnam Education Foundation Fellowship and the Hellwig Graduate Fellowship of the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Caltech.

References

ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2005. Seismic guidelines for water pipelines. R80.01.01. Washington, DC: ALA.
Ancheta, T. D., et al. 2013. PEER NGA-WEST2 database. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
ASCE. 1984. “Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems.” In Committee on gas and liquid fuel lifelines, technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Asimaki, D., J. Garcia-Suarez, D. Kusanovic, K. Nguyen, and E. E. Seylabi. 2019. “Next generation reduced order models for soil-structure interaction.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Rome: CRC Press.
Audibert, J. M., and K. J. Nyman. 1977. “Soil restraint against horizontal motion of pipes.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (10): 1119–1142.
Ayoubi, P., D. Asimaki, and K. Mohammdi. 2018. “Basin effects in strong ground motion: A case study from the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake.” In Proc., Geotechnical Special Publication, 288–296. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baber, T. T., and M. N. Noori. 1985. “Random vibration of degrading, pinching systems.” J. Eng. Mech. 111 (8): 1010–1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010).
Bouc, R. 1971. “Modele mathematique d’hysteresis.” Acustica 21 (1): 16–25.
Bransby, M., T. Newson, P. Brunning, and M. Davies. 2001. “Numerical and centrifuge modeling of the upheaval resistance of buried pipelines.” In Proc. OMAE. New York: ASME.
Burnett, A. J. 2015. “Investigation of full scale horizontal pipe-soil interaction and large strain behaviour of sand.” MASc thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Eurocode 8, part 4: Silos, tanks and pipelines. CEN EN1998-4. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). 2018. The world factbook 2018. Washington, DC: CIA.
Daiyan, N. 2013. “Investigating soil/pipeline interaction during oblique relative movements.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland.
Dickin, E. A. 1994. “Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in sand.” Soils Found. 34 (2): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.34.2_41.
Di Prisco, C., and A. Galli. 2006. “Soil-pipe interaction under monotonic and cyclic loads: Experimental and numerical modelling.” In Vol. 35 of Proc., 1st Euromediterranean Symp. on Advances in Geomaterials and Structures, 755–760. Paris: Commission Universitaire pour le Developpement.
Finch, M. 1999. “Upheaval buckling and floatation of rigid pipelines: The influence of recent geotechnical research on the current state of the art.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/10713-MS.
Guo, P. 2005. “Numerical modeling of pipe-soil interaction under oblique loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (2): 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(260).
Guo, P. J., and D. F. E. Stolle. 2005. “Lateral pipe-soil interaction in sand with reference to scale effect.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (3): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(338).
Hallquist, J. O. 2006. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Hallquist, J. O. et al. 2016. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Honegger, D., and D. Nyman. 2004. Guidelines for the seismic design and assessment of natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines. Arlington, VA: Pipeline Research Council International.
Hsu, T.-W. 1996. “Soil restraint against oblique motion of pipelines in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (1): 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-034.
Hsu, T.-W., Y.-J. Chen, and C.-Y. Wu. 2001. “Soil friction restraint of oblique pipelines in loose sand.” J. Transp. Eng. 127 (1): 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(82).
Hurley, S., and R. Phillips. 1999. Large scale modelling of pipeline/soil interaction under lateral loading. St. John’s, NF: C-CORE, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland.
Joshi, S., A. Prashant, A. Deb, and S. K. Jain. 2011. “Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (7): 930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003.
Jung, J. K., T. D. O’Rourke, and C. Argyrou. 2016. “Multi-directional force–displacement response of underground pipe in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (11): 1763–1781. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0059.
Karimian, H., D. Wijewickreme, and D. Honegger. 2006. “Full-scale laboratory testing to assess methods for reduction of soil loads on buried pipes subject to transverse ground movement.” In Vol. 1 of Proc 6th Int. Pipeline Conf., 91–99. New York: ASME.
Kouretzis, G. P., D. K. Karamitros, and S. W. Sloan. 2015. “Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to ground surface settlement and heave.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (8): 1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0332.
Liu, M., and G. Liu. 2010. “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): An overview and recent developments.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 17 (1): 25–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7.
Liu, X., H. Zhang, Y. Han, M. Xia, and W. Zheng. 2016. “A semi-empirical model for peak strain prediction of buried X80 steel pipelines under compression and bending at strike-slip fault crossings.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 32 (May): 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.054.
Nguyen, K. T., and D. Asimaki. 2018. “A modified uniaxial Bouc-Wen model for the simulation of transverse lateral pipe-cohesionless soil interaction.” In Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V, 25–36. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481479.003.
Nyman, K. J. 1984. “Soil response against oblique motion of pipes.” J. Transp. Eng. 110 (2): 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1984)110:2(190).
Olson, N. 2009. “Soil performance for large scale soil-pipeline tests.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ.
O’Rourke, M. J., and K. El Hmadi. 1988. “Analysis of continuous buried pipelines for seismic wave effects.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 16 (6): 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160611.
O’Rourke, M. J., and X. Liu. 1999. Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
O’Rourke, T. 2010. “Geohazards and large, geographically distributed systems.” Géotechnique 60 (7): 505–543. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.7.505.
Psyrras, N. K., and A. G. Sextos. 2018. “Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking: A review.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 106 (Mar): 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.020.
Robert, D. J., K. Soga, T. D. O’Rourke, and T. Sakanoue. 2016. “Lateral load-displacement behavior of pipelines in unsaturated sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (11): 04016060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001504.
Robert, D. J., and N. I. Thusyanthan. 2015. “Numerical and experimental study of uplift mobilization of buried pipelines in sands.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 6 (1): 04014009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000179.
Sakurai, A., and T. Takahashi. 1969. “Dynamic stresses of underground pipelines during earthquakes.” In Proc., 4th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 81–95. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Shinozuka, M., and T. Koike. 1979. Estimation of structural strains in underground lifeline pipes. New York: Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ.
Simon, D. 2006. Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Smith, C. E. 2018. “Near-term pipeline plans nearly double, future slows.” Oil Gas J. 116 (2): 72–82.
Trautmann, C. 1983. “Behavior of pipe in dry sand under lateral and uplift loading.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ.
Varun, and D. Assimaki. 2012. “A generalized hysteresis model for biaxial response of pile foundations in sands.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 32 (1): 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.004.
Wang, C.-H., and S.-Y. Chang. 2007. “Development and validation of a generalized biaxial hysteresis model.” J. Eng. Mech. 133 (2): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:2(141).
Wen, Y.-K. 1976. “Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 102 (2): 249–263.
Yan, K., J. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Liao, and Z. Wu. 2018. “Seismic responses of deep buried pipeline under non-uniform excitations from large scale shaking table test.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.036.
Yimsiri, S., K. Soga, K. Yoshizaki, G. R. Dasari, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2004. “Lateral and upward soil-pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(830).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 6June 2020

History

Received: Jan 2, 2019
Accepted: Oct 30, 2019
Published online: Mar 18, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D Candidate, Dept. of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5761-3156. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Domniki Asimaki, Sc.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share