Technical Papers
Oct 10, 2019

Experimental Study of Structural Response of Lined-Corrugated HDPE Pipe Subjected to Normal Fault

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 12

Abstract

Buried lined-corrugated high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes have been applied to transport sewage for decades. During its service life, a pipe of this kind could suffer from differential ground motion as a result of various geohazards (e.g., differential settlement induced by tunneling, basement excavations, changes in water table). However, studies of this kind of behavior of thermoplastic sewers have largely been absent in the pipe research literature. A full-scale test was conducted to investigate the structural response of 600-mm diameter lined-corrugated HDPE pipe subjected to differential ground movements associated with a normal fault having dip angle of 90°. This normal fault was simulated in a facility called the Split Box, where half of the floor of the test pit rests on screw jacks that allow it to be lowered in a stepwise process. Strain gauges and optical fibers were used to measure strains in the longitudinal and circumferential directions on the inner or outer surfaces of the pipe. Vertical displacement and cross-section distortion of the pipe were monitored using digital images analyzed using particle image velocimetry (PIV). Test results show that pipe strains were distributed nonlinearly around the pipe cross sections, especially for those measured proximal to the fault. Maximum pipe diameter changes were also observed at pipe cross sections close to the fault. The test results were compared with two current calculation approaches (i.e., the three-beam method and the Kappa method) and it is found that these two methods both overestimated peak bending strains in the pipe relative to those observed in the test.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to the financial support from the Chinese Government Scholarship Program (Grant No. 201606090144), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Colleges, and Universities in Jiangsu Province Plans to Graduate Research and Innovation (Grant No. KYLX_0144), and the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (Grant No. YBJJ1632). The experiment was funded by a Discovery and Infrastructure Operating Grants to Dr. Moore from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, respectively.

References

ALA (American Lifeline Alliance). 2001. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Washington, DC: ALA.
Almahakeri, M., A. Fam, and I. D. Moore. 2013. “Longitudinal bending and failure of GFRP pipes buried in dense sand under relative ground movement.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (5): 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000340.
ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems: Committee on gas and liquid fuel lifelines. New York: ASCE.
ASTM. 2011. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013. Standard specification for polyethylene (PE) large diameter profile wall sewer and drain pipe. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard practice for use of distributed optical fiber sensing systems for monitoring the impact of ground movements during tunnel and utility construction on existing underground utilities. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Brachman, R. W. I., I. D. Moore, and S. M. Munro. 2008. “Compaction effects on strains within profiled thermoplastic pipes.” Geosynthetics Int. 15 (2): 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2008.15.2.7210.1680/gein.2008.15.2.72.
Bransby, M. F., E. L. Nahas, E. Turner, and M. C. R. Davies. 2007. “The interaction of reverse faults with flexible continuous pipelines.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 7 (3): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2007.070302.
Chan, P. D. S., and R. C. K. Wong. 2004. “Performance evaluation of a buried steel pipe in a moving slope: A case study.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (5): 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-035.
Chua, K. M. 1986. “Time-dependent interaction of soil and flexible pipe.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Dhar, A. S., I. D. Moore, and T. J. McGrath. 2004. “Two-dimensional analyses of thermoplastic culvert deformations and strains.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:2(199).
Erami, M. H., M. Miyajima, and S. Kaneko. 2012. “Soil-pipe interaction of fault crossing segmented buried ductile iron pipelines subjected to dip faultings.” J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. Ser. A1 (Struct. Eng. Earthquake Eng.(SE/EE)) 68 (4): I_781–I_789.
Jaky, J. 1948. “Pressure in silos.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 103–107. New York: Springer.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, and G. P. Kouretzis. 2007. “Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (3): 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.08.00110.1016/j.soildyn.2006.08.001.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, G. P. Kouretzis, and V. Gkesouli. 2011. “An analytical method for strength verification of buried steel pipelines at normal fault crossings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (11): 1452–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.01210.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.012.
Klar, A., I. Dromy, and R. Linker. 2014. “Monitoring tunneling induced ground displacements using distributed fiber-optic sensing.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 40: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.09.01110.1016/j.tust.2013.09.011.
Li, H., N. Xue, X. Li, and Z. Li. 2012. “An in-situ experimental study on buried pipelines with internal pressure subject to a simulated reverse-slip fault movement.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering(15WCEE). Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sísmica.
Marshall, A. M., A. Klar, and R. J. Mair. 2010. “Tunneling beneath buried pipes: View of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (12): 1664–1672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000390.
Mohamad, H., P. J. Bennett, K. Soga, R. J. Mair, and K. Bowers. 2010. “Behaviour of an old masonry tunnel due to tunnelling induced ground settlement.” Geotechnique 60 (12): 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.07410.1680/geot.8.P.074.
Moore, I. D. 1995. “Three dimensional response of deeply buried profiled polyethylene pipe.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1514: 49–58.
Moore, I. D., and F. Hu. 1996. “Linear viscoelastic modelling of profiled high density polyethylene pipe.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 23 (2): 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-044.
Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall. 1975. “Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement.” In Proc., US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ni, P. 2016. “Nonlinear soil-structure interaction for buried pressure pipes under differential ground motion.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ.
Ni, P., I. D. Moore, and W. A. Take. 2017. “Distributed fibre optic sensing of strains on buried full-scale PVC pipelines crossing a normal fault.” Géotechnique 68 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.161.
O’Rourke, M., V. Gadicherla, and T. Abdoun. 2005. “Centrifuge modeling of PGD response of buried pipe.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 4 (1): 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-005-0025-8.
O’Rourke, M. J. 1989. “Approximate analysis procedures for permanent ground deformation effects on buried pipelines.” In Proc., 2nd U.S. Japan Workshop on Liquefaction, Large Ground Deformation and Their Effects on Lifelines, 336–347. New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
O’Rourke, M. J., and X. Liu. 2012. Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines. MCEER-12-MN04 Monograph. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Univ. at Buffalo.
O’Rourke, T. D. 2010. “Geohazards and large, geographically distributed systems.” Geotechnique 60 (7): 505–543. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.7.505.
Saiyar, M. 2011. Behaviour of buried pipelines subject to normal faulting. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ.
Saiyar, M., P. Ni, W. A. Take, and I. D. Moore. 2016. “Response of pipelines of differing flexural stiffness to normal faulting.” Géotechnique 66 (4): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.14.P.17510.1680/jgeot.14.P.175.
Sim, W. W., I. Towhata, and S. Yamada. 2012. “One-g shaking-table experiments on buried pipelines crossing a strike-slip fault.” Géotechnique 62 (12): 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.14210.1680/geot.10.P.142.
Takagi, N., K. Shimamura, and N. Nishio. 1984. “Buried pipe responses to adjacent ground movements associated with tunneling and excavations.” In Proc., 3rd International Conf. on Ground Movements and Structures Cardiff, edited by J. D. Geddes, 9–12. London: Pentech Press.
Tognon, A. R., R. Kerry Rowe, and R. W. Brachman. 1999. “Evaluation of side wall friction for a buried pipe testing facility.” Geotext. Geomembr. 17 (4): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(99)00004-7.
Trautmann, C. H. 1983. “Behavior of pipe in dry sand under lateral and uplift loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Cornell Univ.
Trautmann, C. H., and T. D. O’Rourke. 1983. Load-displacement characteristics of a buried pipe affected by permanent earthquake ground movements. BRAB. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Trifonov, O. V., and V. P. Cherniy. 2012. “Elastoplastic stress-strain analysis of buried steel pipelines subjected to fault displacements with account for service loads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 33 (1): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.00110.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.001.
Vorster, T. E. B. 2005. “The effects of tunnelling on buried pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering, Cambridge Univ.
Wang, F., Y. J. Du, and X. M. Yang. 2015. “Physical modeling on ground responses to tunneling in sand considering the existence of HDPE pipes.” ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 38 (1): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140031.
Wang, L. R. L., and Y. H. Yeh. 1985. “A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 13 (1): 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.429013010910.1002/eqe.4290130109.
Wang, Y., and I. D. Moore. 2014. “Simplified design equations for joints in buried flexible pipes based on the Hetényi solutions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (3): 04013020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000993.
Wang, Y., J. W. Shi, and C. W. W. Ng. 2011. “Numerical modeling of tunneling effect on buried pipelines.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (7): 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-024.
Weerasekara, L., and D. Wijewickreme. 2008. “Mobilization of soil loads on buried, polyethylene natural gas pipelines subject to relative axial displacements.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (9): 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-043.
White, D., C. Cheuk, and M. Bolton. 2008. “The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand.” Géotechnique 58 (10): 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.369210.1680/geot.2008.3692.
White, D. J., W. A. Take, and M. D. Bolton. 2003. “Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry.” Géotechnique 53 (7): 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.61910.1680/geot.2003.53.7.619.
Wijewickreme, D., H. Karimian, and D. Honegger. 2009. “Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to relative axial soil movement.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (7): 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-019.
Xie, X., M. D. Symans, M. J. O’Rourke, T. H. Abdoun, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2013. “Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to normal faulting: A case study.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (2): 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.400013710.1193/1.4000137.
Yoshizaki, K., T. D. O’Rourke, and M. Hamada. 2003. “Large scale experiments of buried steel pipelines with elbows subjected to permanent ground deformation.” Struct. Eng./Earthquake Eng. 20 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceseee.20.1s.
Zhang, C., and I. D. Moore. 1997a. “Nonlinear mechanical response of high density polyethylene. Part I: Experimental investigation and model evaluation.” Polym. Eng. Sci. 37 (2): 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.11683.
Zhang, C., and I. D. Moore. 1997b. “Nonlinear mechanical response of high density polyethylene. Part II: Uniaxial constitutive modeling.” Polym. Eng. Sci. 37 (2): 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.11684.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145Issue 12December 2019

History

Received: Oct 10, 2018
Accepted: Aug 9, 2019
Published online: Oct 10, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 10, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assitant Professor, School of Science, North Univ. of China, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030051, China; formerly, Visiting Student, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen’s—Royal Military College of Canada, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-298X. Email: [email protected]
Ian D. Moore, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Infrastructure Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen’s—Royal Military College of Canada, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. Email: [email protected]
Haitao Lan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering and GeoEngineering Centre at Queen’s—Royal Military College of Canada, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share