Centrifuge Modeling of Variable-Rate Cone Penetration in Low-Plasticity Silts
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 11
Abstract
The effects of soil plasticity and penetration rate on cone penetration resistance in low-plasticity fine-grained soils are evaluated. A series of centrifuge tests with in-flight variable rate cone penetration soundings was performed on models of four slurry deposited mixtures of nonplastic silica silt and kaolin clay (0%, 2.5%, 5%, and 20% kaolin by dry mass) with plasticity indices ranging from 0 to 6. Cone penetration resistances for an effective overburden stress of 100 kPa ranged from 26 to 40 MPa (260 to 400 atm) in the nonplastic silica silt to 0.4–1.8 MPa (4–18 atm) in the silt-clay mixture with a plasticity index of 6. The addition of a small amount of clay (as little as 2.5% by dry mass) to nonplastic silt resulted in an order of magnitude decrease in drained penetration resistance. Faster penetration rates produced partially drained and undrained conditions, with negative excess pore pressures developing in the nonplastic silica silt and positive excess pore pressures developing in the mixtures with 5% and 20% kaolin.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Portions of the work presented herein were derived from studies supported by the California Department of Water Resources (Contract No. 4600009751) and the National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. CMMI-1138203 and CMMI-1300518). Support for the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) centrifuge facility at UC Davis was also provided by the National Science Foundation (Award No. CMMI-1520581). Any opinions, findings, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of either organization. Steven Haugaard performed the one-dimensional compression tests presented herein. Mohammad Khosravi, Dan Wilson, and the staff of the Center for Geotechnical Modeling at UC Davis supported the experimental design and execution of the centrifuge model tests presented herein. The authors are grateful for the aforementioned assistance and support.
References
Bolton, M. D., M. W. Gui, J. Garnier, J. F. Corte, G. Bagge, J. Laue, and R. Renzi. 1999. “Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand.” Géotechnique 49 (4): 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.543.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Chow, S. H., B. Bienen, and M. F. Randolph. 2018. “Rapid penetration of piezocones in sand.” In Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, 213–219. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press.
Chung, S. F., M. F. Randolph, and J. A. Schneider. 2006. “Effect of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance in clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1188).
DeJong, J. T., and M. Randolph. 2012. “Influence of partial consolidation during cone penetration on estimated soil behavior type and pore pressure dissipation measurements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (7): 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000646.
DeJong, J. T., N. J. Yafrate, and D. J. DeGroot. 2011. “Evaluation of undrained shear strength using full-flow penetrometers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (1): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000393.
Haugaard, S., A. B. Price, J. T. DeJong, and R. W. Boulanger. 2018. “One-dimensional compression testing for low-plasticity silts.” DesignSafe-CI. Accessed July 6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17603/DS2839G.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Jaeger, R. A., J. T. DeJong, R. W. Boulanger, H. E. Low, and M. F. Randolph. 2010. “Variable penetration rate CPT in an intermediate soil.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, 2–50. Huntington Beach, CA: CPT’10 Organizing Committee.
Krage, C. P., A. B. Price, W. G. Lukas, J. T. DeJong, D. J. DeGroot, and R. W. Boulanger. Forthcoming. “Slurry deposition method of low plasticity intermediate soils for laboratory element testing.” Geotech. Test. J.
Kutter, B. L. 1995. “Recent advances in centrifuge modeling of seismic shaking.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri-Rolla.
Lunne, T., J. M. Powell, and P. K. Robertson. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: CRC Press.
Price, A. B. 2018. “Cyclic strength and cone penetration resistance for mixtures of silica silt and kaolin.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Price, A. B., R. W. Boulanger, and J. T. DeJong. 2018a. “Centrifuge modeling of variable rate cone penetration in low-plasticity silts.” Design-Safe-CI. Accessed July 6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17603/DS2J67J.
Price, A. B., J. T. DeJong, and R. W. Boulanger. 2017. “Cyclic loading response of silt with multiple loading events.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (10): 04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001759.
Price, A. B., J. T. DeJong, and R. W. Boulanger. 2018b. “Direct simple shear testing for silica silt and kaolin mixtures.” Design-Safe-CI. Accessed July 6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17603/DS2SQ30.
Randolph, M. F. 2004. “Characterisation of soft sediments for offshore applications.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. Geotechnical Geophysical Site Characterization, ISC-2, 209–232. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Randolph, M. F., and S. Hope. 2004. “Effect of cone velocity on cone resistance and excess pore pressures.” In Proc., IS Osaka-Engineering Practice and Performance of Soft Deposits, 147–152. Osaka, Japan: Yodogawa Kogisha.
Robertson, P. K. 1990. “Soil classification using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 27 (1): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-014.
Santamarina, J. C., and G. C. Cho. 2004. “Soil behaviour: The role of particle shape.” In Vol. 1 of Advances in geotechnical engineering: The Skempton conference, 604–617. London: Thomas Telford.
Schneider, J. A., B. M. Lehane, and F. Schnaid. 2007. “Velocity effects on piezocone measurements in normally and over consolidated clays.” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech. 7 (2): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2007.070202.
Schneider, J. A., M. F. Randolph, P. W. Mayne, and N. R. Ramsey. 2008. “Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalized piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (11): 1569–1586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:11(1569).
Silva, M. F. 2005. “Numerical and physical model of rate effects in soil penetration.” Ph.D. dissertation, Engineering Dept., King’s College, Univ. of Cambridge.
Silva, M. F., D. J. White, and M. D. Bolton. 2006. “An analytical study of the effect of penetration rate on piezocone tests in clay.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 30 (6): 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.490.
Suzuki, Y., and B. M. Lehane. 2014. “Rate dependence of qc in two clayey sands.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, 411–418. Delft, Netherlands: International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing.
White, D. J., C. Gaudin, N. Boylan, and H. Zhou. 2010. “Interpretation of T-bar penetrometer tests at shallow embedment and in very soft soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (2): 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-096.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 15, 2018
Accepted: May 16, 2019
Published online: Aug 28, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 28, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.