Technical Notes
Jul 19, 2019

Drained Peak and Residual Interface Shear Strengths of Fine-Grained Soils for Pipeline Geotechnics

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 10

Abstract

This study presents the results of interface torsional ring shear tests conducted at intermediate normal stress levels that are usually prevalent at soil–pipeline interfaces under near-shore conditions. Four normally consolidated soils of different plasticity and five solid surfaces with diverse roughness were utilized in this single-stage shear testing program. The drained peak and residual soil and interface shear strengths were measured and compared with the relevant data available in literature. The analyses and interpretation of the study results revealed that the drained peak and residual interface efficiencies (i.e., the ratio between soil and interface friction angles) are almost equal. These efficiencies can be estimated using one simple correlation that is valid regardless of the effective normal stress range. The correlation helps in the preliminary estimation of pipe–fine-grained soil shearing resistance when the beta (or effective stress) approach is adopted.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The funding provided by the Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF), Qatar, under Project No. NPRP 5-488-2-194, for this research work is deeply appreciated.

References

ASTM. 2000. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Boukpeti, N., and D. J. White. 2017. “Interface shear box tests for assessing axial pipe-soil resistance.” Géotechnique 67 (1): 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.112.
Cathie, D. N., C. Jaeck, J. C. Ballard, and J. F. Wintgens. 2005. “Pipeline geotechnics–State-of-the-art.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on the Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 95–114. Perth, WA: Taylor & Francis.
Eid, H. T., R. S. Amarasinghe, K. H. Rabie, and D. Wijewickreme. 2015. “Residual shear strength of fine-grained soils and soil–solid interfaces at low effective normal stresses.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (2): 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0019.
Eid, H. T., and K. H. Rabie. 2017. “Fully softened shear strength for soil slope stability analyses.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (1): 04016023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000651.
Eid, H. T., K. H. Rabie, and D. Wijewickreme. 2016. “Drained residual shear strength at effective normal stresses relevant to soil slope stability analyses.” Eng. Geol. 204 (Apr): 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.003.
Farshad, F. F., T. C. Pesacreta, J. D. Garber, and S. R. Bikki. 2001. “A comparison of surface roughness of pipes as measured by two profilometers and atomic force microscopy.” Scanning 23 (4): 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950230404.
Feligha, M., F. Hammoud, M. Belachia, and M. S. Nouaouria. 2016. “Experimental investigation of frictional behavior between cohesive soils and solid materials using direct shear apparatus.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 34 (2): 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9966-5.
Fishman, K. L., and S. Pal. 1994. “Further study of geomembrane/cohesive soil interface shear behavior.” Geotext. Geomembr. 13 (9): 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90011-6.
Ganesan, S., M. Kuo, and M. Bolton. 2014. “Influence on pipeline interface friction measured in direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 37 (1): 20130008. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20130008.
Gibson, R., and D. Henkel. 1954. “Influence of duration of tests at constant rate of strain on measured drained strength.” Géotechnique 4 (1): 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1954.4.1.6.
Hammoud, F., and A. Boumekik. 2006. “Experimental study of the behaviour of interfacial shearing between cohesive soils and solid materials at large displacement.” Asian J. Civ. Eng. 7 (1): 63–80.
Hill, A. J., D. J. White, D. A. S. Bruton, T. Langford, V. Meyer, R. Jewell, and J-C. Ballard. 2012. “A new framework for axial pipe–soil resistance, illustrated by a range of marine clay datasets.” In Proc., 7th Int. Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Conf., 367–377. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Jardine, R., and F. C. Chow. 1996. New design method for offshore piles. MTD 96/103. London: Marine Technology Directorate.
Jewell, R. J., and J-C. Ballard. 2011. “Axial pipe–soil interaction—A suggested framework.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Richardson, TX: Offshore Technology Conference.
Lehane, B. M., and R. J. Jardine. 1992. “Residual strength characteristics of Bothkennar clay.” Géotechnique 42 (2): 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.363.
Lemos, L. J. L., and P. R. Vaughan. 2000. “Clay-interface shear resistance.” Géotechnique 50 (1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.55.
Lupini, J. F., A. E. Skinner, and P. R. Vaughan. 1981. “The drained residual strength of cohesive soils.” Géotechnique 31 (2): 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1981.31.2.181.
Meehan, C. L., T. L. Brandon, and J. M. Duncan. 2007. “Measuring drained residual strengths in the Bromhead ring shear.” Geotech. Test. J. 30 (6): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101017.
Najjar, S. S., R. B. Gilbert, E. A. Liedtke, and B. McCarron. 2003. “Tilt table test for interface shear resistance between flowlines and soils.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 22nd Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 859–866. Cancun, Mexico: ASME.
Oliphant, J., and A. Maconochie. 2007. “The axial resistance of buried and unburied pipelines.” In Proc., 6th Int. Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Conf., 125–132. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Ramsey, N., R. J. Jardine, B. M. Lehane, and A. M. Ridley. 1998. “A review of soil–steel interface testing with the ring-shear apparatus.” In Proc., Offshore Site Investigation and Behaviour Conf., 237–258. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Saldivar, E. E., and R. J. Jardine. 2005. “Application of an effective stress design method to concrete pile driven in Mexico City clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (6): 1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-062.
Skempton, A. W. 1985. “Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory.” Géotechnique 35 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.1.3.
Stark, T. D., and H. T. Eid. 1993. “Modified Bromhead ring shear apparatus.” Geotech. Test. J. 16 (1): 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10272J.
Stark, T. D., and H. T. Eid. 1994. “Drained residual strength of cohesive soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (5): 856–871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:5(856).
Stark, T. D., and H. T. Eid. 1997. “Slope stability analyses in stiff fissured clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (4): 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(335).
Subba Rao, K. S., M. M. Allam, and R. G. Robinson. 1998. “Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 131 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/igeng.1998.30112.
Subba Rao, K. S., M. M. Allam, and R. G. Robinson. 2000. “Drained shear strength of fine-grained soil–solid surface interfaces.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 143 (2): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2000.143.2.75.
Tika-Vassilikos, T. 1991. “The clay-on-steel ring shear tests and their implications for displacement piles.” Geotech. Test. J. 14 (4): 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10214J.
Tsubakihara, Y., H. Kishida, and T. Nishiyama. 1993. “Friction between cohesive soil and steel.” Soils Found. 33 (2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_145.
White, D. J., M. D. Bolton, S. A. Ganesan, D. Bruton, J-C. Ballard, and T. Langford. 2011. “SAFEBUCK JIP: Observations from model testing of axial pipe–soil interaction on soft natural clays.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Richardson, TX: Offshore Technology Conference.
White, D. J., M. E. Campbell, N. P. Boylan, and M. F. Bransby. 2012. “A new framework for axial pipe–soil interaction, illustrated by shear box tests on carbonate soils.” In Proc., 7th Int. Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Conf., 379–387. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
White, D. J., and D. N. Cathie. 2011. “Geotechnics for subsea pipelines.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 87–123. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
White, D. J., and M. F. Randolph. 2007. “Seabed characterization and models for pipeline–soil interaction.” In Proc., 17th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., 758–769. Cupertino, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145Issue 10October 2019

History

Received: Jun 19, 2018
Accepted: Apr 24, 2019
Published online: Jul 19, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hisham T. Eid, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Nasser M. Al-Nohmi [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. Email: [email protected]
Dharma Wijewickreme, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]
Ruslan S. Amarasinghe [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share