Abstract

The performance of Çark Canal in the 1999 M=7.5 Kocaeli earthquake was evaluated using common liquefaction vulnerability index (LVI) methods, a nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) method, and a Newmark sliding block method to examine possible factors contributing to why different analysis approaches often overestimate liquefaction effects in interbedded deposits. The characterization of the interbedded fluvial stratum based on cone penetration test (CPT) data utilized an inverse filtering procedure to correct CPT data for thin-layer and transition zone effects. Common LVIs computed using the measured and inverse-filtered CPT data with a site-specific fines content calibration showed that the combination of these two steps reduced the LVIs by 30%–50% for this site and seismic loading. Two-dimensional NDAs were performed using stochastic realizations for the interbedded stratum and the PM4Sand and PM4Silt constitutive models for the sandlike and claylike portions, respectively. Computed deformations were evaluated for their sensitivity to stochastic model parameters, the cyclic strength assigned to the sandlike soils, the undrained shear strengths assigned to the claylike soils, the level of shaking, and other input parameters. Newmark sliding block analyses were performed with different allowances for the influence of interbedding on the composite strength of the interbedded stratum. The differences between results obtained with these analysis methods, along with those presented by others, provided insights into how the various factors can contribute to an overestimation of ground deformations in interbedded deposits of sands, silts, and clays.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support of the National Science Foundation (Award No. CMMI-1635398) and California Department of Water Resources (Contract No. 4600009523) for different aspects of the work presented herein. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of these organizations. The authors also thank T. Leslie Youd, Jonathan Bray, Rodolfo Sancio, and Brady Cox for their helpful discussions regarding Çark Canal.

References

AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Authority). 2016 “Strong Ground Motion Database of Turkey.” Accessed October 1, 2016. http://kyhdata.deprem.gov.tr.
Ahmadi, M. M., and P. K. Robertson. 2005. “Thin-layer effects on the CPT qc measurement.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (5): 1302–1317. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-036.
Ambraseys, N., P. Smit, R. Sigbjornsson, P. Suhadolc, and B. Margaris. 2002. Internet-site for European strong-motion data. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Research-Directorate General, Environment and Climate Programme.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, M. Riemer, and M. E. Stringer. 2018. “Laboratory-based characterization of shallow silty soils in southwest Christchurch.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Jul): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.046.
Boulanger, R. W., and J. T. DeJong. 2018. “Inverse filtering procedure to correct cone penetration data for thin-layer and transition effects.” In Proc., Cone Penetration Testing 2018, edited by H. Pisano and Peuchen, 25–44. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2015. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Boulanger, R. W., D. M. Moug, S. K. Munter, A. B. Price, and J. T. DeJong. 2016. “Evaluating liquefaction and lateral spreading in interbedded sand, silt, and clay deposits using the cone penetrometer.” In Vol. 5 of Geotechnical and geophysical site characterisation, edited by B. M. Lehane, H. Acosta-Martinez, and R. Kelly. Sydney, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society.
Boulanger, R. W., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2017. PM4Sand (version 3.1): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Boulanger, R. W., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2018. PM4Silt (version 1): A silt plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Bray, J. D., et al. 2000. “Damage patterns and foundation performance in Adapazari.” Supplement, Earthquake Spectra 16 (S1): 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586152.
Bray, J. D., and T. Travasarou. 2007. “Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4): 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(381).
Carle, S. F. 1999. T-PROGS: Transition probability geostatistical software version 2.1. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Chu, D. B., J. P. Stewart, T. L. Youd, and B. L. Chu. 2006. “Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in near-fault regions during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (12): 1549–1565. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1549).
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K., and M. Yoshimine. 1992. “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 32 (1): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.173.
Iwasaki, T., F. Tatsuoka, K. Tokida, and S. Yasuda. 1978. “A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Microzonation for Safer Construction—Research and Application. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, M. Cubrinovski, and B. A. Bradley. 2014. “Evaluation of the liquefaction potential index for assessing liquefaction hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (7): 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001117.
Mo, P.-Q., A. M. Marshall, and H.-S. Yu. 2017. “Interpretation of cone penetration test data in layered soils using cavity expansion analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (1): 04016084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001577.
Montgomery, J., and R. W. Boulanger. 2016. “Effects of spatial variability on liquefaction-induced settlement and lateral spreading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (1): 04016086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001584.
Munter, S. K., R. W. Boulanger, C. P. Krage, and J. T. DeJong. 2017. “Evaluation of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading procedures for interbedded deposits: Çark Canal in the 1999 M7.5 Kocaeli earthquake.” In Geotechnical frontiers 2017, seismic performance and liquefaction, geotechnical special publication no. 281, edited by T. L. Brandon and R. J. Valentine, 254–266. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Olson, S. M., and C. I. Johnson. 2008. “Analyzing liquefaction-induced lateral spreads using strength ratios.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (8): 1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1035).
Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests: A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-065.
Spencer, E. 1967. “A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces.” Geotechnique 17 (1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1967.17.1.11.
Tokimatsu, K., and Y. Asaka. 1998. “Effects of liquefaction-induced ground displacements on pile performance in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake.” Soils Found. 38: 163–177. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.Special_163.
Tonkin & Taylor. 2015. Canterbury earthquake sequence: Increased liquefaction vulnerability assessment methodology. Wellington, New Zealand: Earthquake Commission.
Tonkin & Taylor. 2016. Practical implications of increased liquefaction vulnerability. Wellington, New Zealand: Earthquake Commission.
van Ballegooy, S., P. Malan, V. Lacrosse, M. E. Jacka, M. Cubrinovski, J. D. Bray, T. D. O. O’Rourke, S. A. Crawford, and H. Cowan. 2014. “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1193/031813EQS070M.
Vreugdenhil, R., R. Davis, and J. Berrill. 1994. “Interpretation of cone penetration results in multilayered soils.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 18 (9): 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610180902.
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1991. “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89).
Wotherspoon, L., R. Orense, R. Green, B. Bradley, B. Cox, and C. Wood. 2013. “Analysis of liquefaction characteristics at Christchurch strong motion stations.” In Proc., New Zealand–Japan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction during Recent Large-Scale Earthquakes. Auckland, New Zealand: Univ. of Aukland.
Youd, T. L., K. O. Cetin, J. D. Bray, R. B. Seed, H. T. Durgunoglu, and A. Onalp. 2000. “Geotechnical site investigation at selected lateral spread sites.” Accessed July 22, 2018. https://apps.peer.berkeley.edu/publications/turkey/adapazari/phase4/index.html.
Youd, T. L., D. W. DeDen, J. D. Bray, R. Sancio, K. O. Cetin, and T. M. Gerber. 2009. “Zero-displacement lateral spreads, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (1): 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:1(46).
Youd, T. L., C. M. Hansen, and S. F. Bartlett. 2002. “Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (12): 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:12(1007).
Youd, T. L., et al. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (4): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
Zhang, G., P. K. Robertson, and R. W. I. Brachman. 2002. “Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (5): 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-047.
Zhang, G., P. K. Robertson, and R. W. I. Brachman. 2004. “Estimating liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using the standard penetration test or cone penetration test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(861).
Ziotopoulou, K., and R. W. Boulanger. 2016. “Plasticity modeling of liquefaction effects under sloping ground and irregular cyclic loading conditions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 84: 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.013.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Sep 3, 2018
Accepted: Feb 6, 2019
Published online: Jul 9, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 9, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-901X. Email: [email protected]
Sean K. Munter [email protected]
Staff Engineer, GeoPentech, 5251 California Ave., Suite 210, Irvine, CA 92617. Email: [email protected]
Christopher P. Krage, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-4336 [email protected]
Project Professional, GEI Consultants, 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 310, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-4336. Email: [email protected]
Jason T. DeJong, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share