Technical Papers
Oct 10, 2018

Effects of Interface Roughness, Particle Geometry, and Gradation on the Sand–Steel Interface Friction Angle

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 12

Abstract

Determination of interface shear strength is crucial in the design of many geotechnical structures. To study the effect of interface roughness, particle geometry (size and shape), and sand gradation on the interface friction angle, direct interface shear tests were performed for 10 sands with varying particle sizes, shapes, and gradations and four steel surfaces with different levels of rusting. When sheared along the same interface, the interface friction angle was greater for sands with smaller particle sizes and more angular or elongated particle shapes. For a given sand, the interface friction angle increases with increasing surface roughness. For sands with uniform particle size, a unique relationship was found between the normalized surface roughness and the ratio of the sand–steel critical-state interface friction angle to the internal critical-state friction angle of the sand. Given the same surface roughness and mean particle size, smaller critical-state interface friction angles were mobilized for graded sands than for sands with uniform particle sizes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1562538. The authors are very grateful for this support. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors are thankful to Mehdi Marashi for his assistance with the surface roughness measurements.

References

Alawneh, A. S., A. I. H. Malkawi, and H. Al-Deeky. 1999. “Tension tests on smooth and rough model piles in dry sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 746–753. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-104.
ASTM. 2011a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011b. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM D3080/D3080M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bareither, C. A., C. H. Benson, and T. B. Edil. 2008. “Comparison of shear strength of sand backfills measured in small-scale and large-scale direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (9): 1224–1236. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-058.
Basu, P., D. Loukidis, M. Prezzi, and R. Salgado. 2011. “Analysis of shaft resistance of jacked piles in sands.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 35 (15): 1605–1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.968.
CUR (Civil Engineering Research and Codes). 2001. Bearing capacity of steel pipe piles. [In Dutch.] Gouda, Netherlands: CUR.
Dai, G., R. Salgado, W. Gong, and M. Zhu. 2017. “The effect of sidewall roughness on the shaft resistance of rock-socketed piles.” Acta Geotech. 12 (2): 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0470-8.
Dejong, J. T., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2006. “Microscale observation and modeling of soil-structure interface behavior using particle image velocimetry.” Soil Found. 46 (1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.15.
Dietz, M. S., and M. L. Lings. 2004. “An improved direct shear apparatus for sand.” Géotechnique 54 (4): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.4.245.
Dietz, M. S., and M. L. Lings. 2006. “Postpeak strength of interfaces in a stress-dilatancy framework.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (11): 1474–1484. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1474).
Dove, J. E., and J. D. Frost. 1999. “Peak friction behavior of smooth geomembrane-particle interfaces.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (7): 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:7(544).
Edil, T. B., P. J. Bosscher, and A. J. Sundberg. 2006. “Soil-structure interface shear transfer behavior.” In Proc., Geomechanics II: Testing, Modeling, and Simulation, 528–543. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Eid, H. T., R. S. Amarasinghe, K. H. Rabie, and D. Wijewickreme. 2015. “Residual shear strength of fine-grained soils and soil-solid interfaces at low effective normal stresses.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (2): 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0019.
Fioravante, V. 2002. “On the shaft friction modelling of non-displacement piles in sand.” Soils Found. 42 (2): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.42.2_23.
Fioravante, V., L. Guerra, and M. B. Jamiolkowski. 2010. “On the shaft capacity of non-displacement piles in sand from centrifuge tests.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, 763–768. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Foye, K. C., G. G. Abou-Jaoude, M. Prezzi, and R. Salgado. 2009. “Resistance factors for use in load and resistance factor design of driven pipe piles in sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:1(1).
Frost, J. D., J. T. DeJong, and M. Recalde. 2002. “Shear failure behavior of granular-continuum interfaces.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 69 (17): 2029–2048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00075-9.
Frost, J. D., G. L. Hebeler, T. M. Evans, and J. T. DeJong. 2004. “Interface behavior of granular soils.” In Engineering, construction, and operations in challenging environments, 65–72. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Fuggle, A. R. 2011. “Geomaterial gradation influences on interface shear behavior.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Gavin, K. G., D. J. P. Igoe, and L. Kirwan. 2013. “The effect of ageing on the axial capacity of piles in sand.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 166 (2): 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.12.00064.
Han, F., J. Lim, R. Salgado, M. Prezzi, and M. Zaheer. 2016. Load and resistance factor design of bridge foundations accounting for pile group–soil interaction. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Han, F., M. Prezzi, R. Salgado, and M. Zaheer. 2017a. “Axial resistance of closed-ended steel-pipe piles driven in multilayered soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (3): 04016102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001589.
Han, F., R. Salgado, and M. Prezzi. 2018. “Numerical and experimental study of axially loaded non-displacement piles in sand.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Deep Foundations and Ground Improvement, 221–229. Hawthorne, NJ: Deep Foundations Institute.
Han, F., R. Salgado, M. Prezzi, and J. Lim. 2017b. “Shaft and base resistance of non-displacement piles in sand.” Comput. Geotech. 83 (Mar): 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.11.006.
Hebeler, G. L., A. Martinez, and J. D. Frost. 2016. “Shear zone evolution of granular soils in contact with conventional and textured CPT friction sleeves.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0767-6.
Ho, T. Y. K., R. J. Jardine, and N. Anh-Minh. 2011. “Large-displacement interface shear between steel and granular media.” Géotechnique 61 (3): 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.086.
Iskander, M. 2011. Behavior of pipe piles in sand. Berlin: Springer.
Jardine, R., F. Chow, R. Overy, J. Standing, and S. Jamie. 2005. ICP design methods for driven piles in sands and clays. London: Thomas Telford.
Jardine, R. J., B. M. Lehane, and S. J. Everton. 1993. “Friction coefficients for piles in sands and silts.” In Proc., Offshore Site Investigation and Foundation Behaviour, 661–677. Netherlands: Society for Underwater Technology.
Kishida, H., M. Uesugi, and H. Kishida. 1987. “Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus.” Géotechnique 37 (1): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.45.
Lee, J., M. Prezzi, and R. Salgado. 2011. “Experimental investigation of the combined load response of model piles driven in sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 34 (6): 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103269.
Lehane, B. M., J. A. Schneider, and X. Xu. 2005. “The UWA-05 method for prediction of axial capacity of driven piles in sand.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 683–689. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Maccarini, M. 1993. “A comparison of direct shear box tests with triaxial compression tests for a residual soil.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 11 (2): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00423336.
Martinez, A., and J. D. Frost. 2017. “The influence of surface roughness form on the strength of sand–structure interfaces.” Géotech. Lett. 7 (1): 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00169.
Mortara, G., A. Mangiola, and V. N. Ghionna. 2007. “Cyclic shear stress degradation and post-cyclic behaviour from sand: Steel interface direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 44 (7): 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-019.
Paikowsky, S. G., C. M. Player, and P. J. Connors. 1995. “A dual interface apparatus for testing unrestricted friction of soil along solid surfaces.” ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 18 (2): 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10320J.
Porcino, D., V. Fioravante, V. Ghionna, and S. Pedroni. 2003. “Interface behavior of sands from constant normal stiffness direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 26 (3): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11308J.
Poulos, H. G. 1989. “Pile behaviour—Theory and application.” Géotechnique 39 (3): 365–415. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1989.39.3.365.
Quinteros, V. S., R. Dyvik, and N. Mortensen. 2017. “Interface friction angle soil-on-steel from ring shear tests on offshore north sea sands.” In Proc., Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, 358–367. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Randolph, M. F. 2003. “Science and empiricism in pile foundation design.” Géotechnique 53 (10): 847–875. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.10.847.
Reddy, E. S., D. N. Chapman, and V. V. R. N. Sastry. 2000. “Direct shear interface test for shaft capacity of piles in sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 23 (2): 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11044J.
Rowe, P. W. 1969. “The relation between the shear strength of sands in triaxial compression, plane strain and direct shear.” Géotechnique 19 (1): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1969.19.1.75.
Sakleshpur, V. A., M. Prezzi, R. Salgado, N. Z. Siddiki, and Y. S. Choi. 2017. “Large-scale direct shear testing of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base over weak subgrade.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1321419.
Salgado, R. 2008. The engineering of foundations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Salgado, R., P. Bandini, and A. Karim. 2000. “Shear strength and stiffness of silty sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (5): 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(451).
Salgado, R., F. Han, and M. Prezzi. 2017. “Axial resistance of non-displacement piles and pile groups in sand.” Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 51 (4): 35–46.
Salgado, R., S. I. Woo, and D. Kim. 2011. Development of load and resistance factor design for ultimate and serviceability limit states of transportation structure foundations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Simoni, A., and G. T. Houlsby. 2006. “The direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand–gravel mixtures.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24 (3): 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-004-5832-6.
Strahler, A. W., J. J. Walters, and A. W. Stuedlein. 2016. “Frictional resistance of closely spaced steel reinforcement strips used in MSE walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (8): 04016030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001492.
Stuedlein, A. W., and P. Arduino. 2013. Behavior of drilled shafts with high-strength reinforcement and casing. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State Univ.
Tabucanon, J. T., D. W. Airey, and H. G. Poulos. 1995. “Pile skin friction in sand from constant normal stiffness test.” Geotech. Test. J. 18 (3): 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11004J.
Tehrani, F. S., F. Han, R. Salgado, and M. Prezzi. 2017. “Laboratory study of the effect of pile surface roughness on the response of soil and non-displacement piles.” In Proc., Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, 256–264. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Tehrani, F. S., F. Han, R. Salgado, M. Prezzi, R. D. Tovar, and A. G. Castro. 2016. “Effect of surface roughness on the shaft resistance of non-displacement piles embedded in sand.” Géotechnique 66 (5): 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.007.
Thurairajah, A. 1962. “Some shear properties of kaolin and of sand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge.
Tovar-Valencia, R. D., A. C. Galvis-Castro, R. Salgado, and M. Prezzi. 2017. “Effect of surface roughness on the shaft resistance of displacement model piles in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (3): 04017120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001828.
Uesugi, M., and H. Kishida. 1986. “Frictional resistance at yield between dry sand and mild steel.” Soils Found. 26 (4): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.4_139.
Vangla, P., and M. Latha Gali. 2016. “Effect of particle size of sand and surface asperities of reinforcement on their interface shear behaviour.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (3): 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.11.002.
Wadell, H. 1932. “Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles.” J. Geol. 40 (5): 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/623964.
Wadell, H. 1933. “Sphericity and roundness of rock particles.” J. Geol. 41 (3): 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/624040.
Yoshimi, Y., and T. Kishida. 1981. “A ring torsion apparatus for evaluating friction between soil and metal surfaces.” Geotech. Test. J. 4 (4): 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10783J.
Zheng, J., and R. D. Hryciw. 2015. “Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness and surface roughness by computational geometry.” Géotechnique 65 (6): 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.192.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144Issue 12December 2018

History

Received: Oct 17, 2017
Accepted: Jul 12, 2018
Published online: Oct 10, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Mar 10, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Associate, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-2778. Email: [email protected]
Eshan Ganju, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Rodrigo Salgado, F.ASCE [email protected]
Charles Pankow Professor in Civil Engineering, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Monica Prezzi, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor of Civil Engineering, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share