Technical Papers
Oct 25, 2018

Undrained Shear Behavior of Low-Plasticity Intermediate Soils Subjected to Simulated Tube-Sampling Disturbance

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper presents a laboratory investigation of the influence of simulated tube-sampling disturbance on lightly overconsolidated intermediate soils by varying their plasticity and degree of sampling disturbance. Samples consisting of varying proportions of kaolin and silica silt that produce five plasticity indexes of 0%, 4%, 9%, 16%, and 32%, are mixed as slurry and then consolidated to an overconsolidation ratio of 1.8. All specimens are tested in a stress-path triaxial cell using the ideal sampling approach (ISA), which involves applying undrained shearing with axial strain cycles of ±0.5%, ±1.0%, and ±3.0%, corresponding to three different degrees of tube-sampling disturbance. The results show systematic trends in the soil response with decreasing plasticity to the induced ISA disturbance. At the same degree of ISA disturbance, the subsequently measured undrained shear strength for the low-plasticity soils increases compared with the reference undisturbed specimen and the percent change increases with decreasing plasticity. This is significantly different from the reported findings from ISA testing of clays, indicating that intermediate soils and clays can have contrastingly different responses to sample disturbance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was primarily supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Nos. CMMI-1436793 and CMMI-1436617. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

References

Andresen, A., and P. Kolstad. 1979. “The NGI 54-mm samplers for undisturbed sampling of clays and representative sampling of coarser materials.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Soil Sampling, 1–9. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
ASTM. 2015a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015b. Standard practice for thin-walled tube sampling of fine-grained soils for geotechnical purposes. ASTM D1587/D1587M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015c. Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM D4767-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baligh, M. M. 1985. “Strain path method.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (9): 1108–1136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:9(1108).
Baligh, M. M., A. S. Azzouz, and C. T. Chin. 1987. “Disturbances due to ‘ideal’ tube sampling.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (7): 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:7(739).
Berre, T. 1982. “Triaxial testing at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.” Geotech. Test. J. 5 (1/2): 3–17.
Bjerrum, L. 1973. “Problems of soil mechanics and construction on soft clays.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 111–159. London: ISSMFE.
Brandon, T. L., J. M. Duncan, and A. T. Rose. 2006. “Drained and undrained strength interpretation for low-plasticity silts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(250).
Carroll, R. 2013. “The engineering behavior of Irish silts.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. College Dublin.
Carroll, R., and M. Long. 2017. “Sample disturbance effects in silt.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001749.
Clayton, C. R. I., A. Siddique, and R. J. Hopper. 1998. “Effects of sampler design on tube sampling disturbance—Numerical and analytical investigations.” Géotechnique 48 (6): 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.6.847.
DeJong, J. T., C. P. Krage, B. A. Albin, and D. J. DeGroot. 2018. “A work based framework for sample quality evaluation of low plasticity soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (10): 04018074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001941.
Donohue, S., and M. Long. 2010. “Assessment of sample quality in soft clay using shear wave velocity and suction measurements.” Géotechnique 60 (11): 883–889. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.T.007.3741.
Fleming, L. N., and J. M. Duncan. 1990. “Stress-deformation characteristics of Alaskan silt.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (3): 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:3(377).
Germaine, J. T., and C. C. Ladd. 1988. “Triaxial testing of saturated cohesive soils: SOA paper.” In Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock: ASTM STP 977, 421–459. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Hight, D. W. 1998. “Soil characterization: The importance of structure and anisotropy.” In Proc., 38th Rankine Lecture. London: British Geotechnical Society.
Hight, D. W. 2003. “Sampling effects in soft clay: An update on Ladd and Lambe (1963).” In Soil behavior and soft ground construction, 86–122. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hight, D. W., R. Böese, A. P. Butcher, C. R. I. Clayton, and P. R. Smith. 1992. “Disturbance of Bothkennar clay prior to laboratory testing.” Géotechnique 42 (2): 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.199.
Hight, D. W., and S. Leroueil. 2003. “Characterisation of soils for engineering purposes.” In Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, 255–360. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Hoeg, K., R. Dyvik, and G. Sandbaekken. 2000. “Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (7): 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:7(606).
Hvorslev, M. J. 1949. “Subsurface exploration and sampling of soils for civil engineering purposes.” In Waterways experiment station. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Corps of Engineers.
Karlsrud, K., T. Lunne, and K. Brattlien. 1996. “Improved CPTU interpretations based on block samples.” In Proc., Nordic Geotechnical Conf., 199–217. Reykjavík, Iceland: Icelandic Geotechnical Society.
Krage, C. P., J. T. DeJong, D. J. DeGroot, A. M. Dyer, and W. G. Lukas. 2015. “Applicability of clay-based sample disturbance criteria to intermediate soils.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Geotechnical Society.
Ladd, C. C., and D. J. DeGroot. 2003. “Recommended practice for soft ground site characterization: Arthur Casagrande lecture.” In Proc., 12th Panamerican Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 1–63. Essen, Germany: Glückauf GmbH.
Ladd, C. C., and T. W. Lambe. 1963. “The strength of ‘undisturbed’ clay determined from undrained tests. Laboratory shear testing of soils.” In Proc., Symp. on Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils: ASTM STP 361, 342–371. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Lade, P. V., C. D. Liggio Jr., and J. A. Yamamuro. 1998. “Effects of non-plastic fines on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 21 (4): 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11373J.
Landon, M. M., D. J. DeGroot, and T. C. Sheahan. 2007. “Non-destructive sample quality assessment of a soft clay using shear wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (1): 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(424).
La Rochelle, P., J. Sarrailh, F. Tavenas, M. Roy, and S. Leroueil. 1981. “Causes of sampling disturbance and design of a new sampler for sensitive soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 18 (1): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1139/t81-006.
Lefebvre, G., and C. Poulin. 1979. “A new method of sampling in sensitive clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 16 (1): 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1139/t79-019.
Long, M. 2001. “Discussion of Hoeg et al. ‘Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens’.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (11): 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:11(991).
Long, M. 2006. “Sample disturbance effects on medium plasticity clay/silt.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 159 (2): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2006.159.2.99.
Long, M. 2007. “Engineering characterization of estuarine silts.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 40 (2): 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/05-061.
Long, M., G. Gudjonsson, S. Donohue, and K. Hagberg. 2010. “Engineering characterization of Norwegian glaciomarine silt.” Eng. Geol. 110 (3–4): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.11.002.
Lukas, W. G., D. J. DeGroot, G. Zhang, J. T. DeJong, and C. P. Krage. 2017. “Influence of laboratory simulated tube sampling disturbance on undrained shear behavior of a low plasticity synthetic intermediate soil.” In Proc., 19th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. London: ISSMFE.
Lunne, T., T. Berre, K. H. Andersen, S. Strandvik, and M. Sjursen. 2006. “Effects of sample disturbance and consolidation procedures on measured shear strength of soft marine Norwegian clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 43 (7): 726–750. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-040.
Lunne, T., T. Berre, and S. Strandvik. 1997. “Sample disturbance effects in soft low plastic Norwegian clay.” In Proc., Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics, 81–102. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Menzies, B. K. 1988. “A computer controlled hydraulic triaxial testing system.” Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, edited by Robert T. Donaghe, Ronald C. Chaney, and Marshall L. Silver, 82–94. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Mesri, G., and T. M. Hayat. 1993. “The coefficient of earth pressure at rest.” Can. Geotech. J. 30 (4): 647–666. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-056.
Poirier, S. E., and D. J. DeGroot. 2010. “Development of a portable probe for field and laboratory measurement of low to medium values of soil suction.” Geotech. Testing J. 33 (3): 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102557.
Sandven, R. 2003. “Geotechnical properties of a natural silt deposit obtained from field and laboratory tests.” In Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, 1121–1148. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Santagata, M. C., and J. T. Germaine. 2002. “Sampling disturbance effects in normally consolidated clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (12): 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:12(997).
Santagata, M. C., and J. T. Germaine. 2005. “Effect of OCR on sampling disturbance of cohesive soils and evaluation of laboratory reconsolidation procedures.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (2): 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-104.
Santagata, M. C., J. V. Sinfield, and J. T. Germaine. 2006. “Laboratory simulation of field sampling: Comparison with ideal sampling and field data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (3): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:3(351).
Shiwakoti, D. R., H. Tanaka, M. Tanaka, and O. Mishima. 2000. “A study on small strain shear modulus of undisturbed soft marine clays.” In Proc., 10th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., 455–460. Mountain View, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
Siddique, A., C. R. I. Clayton, and R. J. Hopper. 1999. “The effects of varying centerline tube sampling disturbance on the behavior of reconstituted clay.” Geotech. Test. J. 22 (3): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11115J.
Skempton, A., and V. Sowa. 1963. “The behavior of saturated clays during sampling and testing.” Geotechnique 13 (4): 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1963.13.4.269.
Tanaka, H., P. Sharma, T. Tsuchida, and M. Tanaka. 1996. “Comparative study on sample quality using several types of samplers.” Soils Found. 36 (2): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_57.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Wang, S., R. Luna, and R. Stephenson. 2011. “A slurry consolidation approach to reconstitute low-plasticity silt specimens for laboratory triaxial testing.” Geotech. Test. J. 34 (4): 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103529.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145Issue 1January 2019

History

Received: Dec 12, 2017
Accepted: May 17, 2018
Published online: Oct 25, 2018
Published in print: Jan 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 25, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William G. Lukas, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Geotechnical Engineer, GEI Consultants, Inc., 400 Unicorn Park Dr., Woburn, MA 01801. Email: [email protected]
Don J. DeGroot, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Sc.D.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Jason T. DeJong, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]
Christopher P. Krage, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Project Professional, GEI Consultants, Inc., 2868 Prospect Park Dr., Suite 310, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670. Email: [email protected]
Guoping Zhang, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share