Technical Papers
Jul 19, 2016

Densification of Granular Soils Using Conventional and Drained Timber Displacement Piles

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 12

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a full-scale field test program of driven timber displacement piles for the purpose of densification of loose, potentially liquefiable sands and silty sands. Both conventional and experimental timber piles fitted with prefabricated drains to help densify contractive soils during pile installation were assessed in this study. The piles were installed in groups with center-to-center spacing of two to five pile head diameters. Measurements of cone penetration tests (CPTs) revealed the variation of postinstallation increases in penetration resistance with decreases in pile spacing. Additionally, long-term measurements showed that pile spacing–dependent reductions in cone penetration resistance following installation can occur, which have been attributed to relaxation of horizontal stresses. Rough relationships between the average area replacement ratio and change in corrected cone tip resistance were developed. Pre- and postimprovement standard penetration tests conducted in each of the treated zones confirmed the long-term degree of densification noted using the CPT. Measured pre- and postinstallation shear wave velocities indicated that the soil fabric of the previously aged sands was effectively destroyed and that a reduction of small strain stiffness is possible in tandem with densification. The experimental findings in this paper may be broadly applied to displacement piles constructed of materials other than timber.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the sponsors of this research, which includes the IDEA Program of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Academy of Science, under Grant NCHRP-180, and the South Carolina chapter of the Pile Driving Contractors Association (PDCA). The authors gratefully acknowledge the significant effort by Van Hogan, formerly of the PDCA, as well as the member firms that have contributed materials, labor, and equipment: Pile Drivers, S&ME, Soil Consultants, Chuck Dawley Surveying, Cox Wood Industries, and Hayward Baker.

References

Andrus, R. D., et al. (2008). “Characterizing the liquefaction resistance of aged soils: Summary of selected first year findings.” Proc., NSF Engineering Research and Innovation Conf, National Science Foundation (NSF), Washington, DC.
Andrus, R. D., Hayati, H., and Monahan, N. P. (2009). “Correcting liquefaction resistance for aged sands using measured to estimated velocity ratio.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 735–744.
Baez, J. I. (1995). “A design model for the reduction of soil liquefaction by vibro-stone columns.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.”, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Boulanger, R. W., Idriss, I. M., Stewart, D., Hasbash, Y., and Schmidt, B. (1998). “Drainage capacity of stone columns or gravel drains for mitigating liquefaction.” ASCE, Reston, VA.
Bowman, E. T., and Soga, K. (2005). “Mechanisms of setup of displacement piles in sand: Laboratory creep tests.” Can. Geotech. J., 42(5), 1391–1407.
Broms, B. (1966). “Methods of calculating the ultimate capacity of piles—A summary.” Sols-Soils, 5(18–19), 21–32.
Collin, J., Watson, C., and Han, J. (2005). “Column-supported embankment solves time constraint for new road construction.” Contemporary issues in foundation engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Doar, R. D., and Kendall, C. G. (2014). “An analysis and comparison of observed Pleistocene South Carolina (USA) shoreline elevations with predicted elevations derived from marine oxygen isotope stages.” Quat. Res., 82(1), 164–174.
Dobson, T. (1987). “Case histories of the vibro systems to minimize the risk of liquefaction.” ASCE, Reston, VA.
Filz, G., Sloan, J., McGuire, M., Collin, J., and Smith, M. (2012). “Column-supported embankments: Settlement and load transfer.” Geotechnical engineering state of the art and practice, ASCE, Reston VA, 54–77.
Gianella, T. N. (2015). “Ground improvement and liquefaction mitigation using driven timber piles.” M.S. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
Gianella, T. N., Stuedlein, A. W., and Canivan, G. J. (2015). “Densification of liquefiable soils using driven timber piles.” 6th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Hagerty, D. J., and Peck, R. B. (1971). “Heave and lateral movements due to pile driving.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(11), 1513–1531.
Hayati, H., and Andrus, R. D. (2009). “Updated liquefaction resistance correction factors for aged sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1683–1692.
Hayati, H., Andrus, R. D., Gassman, S. L., Hasek, M., Camp, W. M., and Talwani, P. (2008). “Characterizing the liquefaction resistance of aged soils.” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Holtz, R. D., and Boman, P. (1974). “A new technique for reduction of excess pore pressures during pile driving.” Can. Geotech. J., 11(3), 423–430.
Hossain, A. M., et al. (2014), “In situ seismic crosshole testing of six natural sand deposits in the South Carolina coastal plain.” Geo-characterization and modeling for sustainability, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1142–1156.
Karimpour, H., and Lade, P. V. (2010). “Time effects relate to crushing in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1209–1219.
Karimpour, H., and Lade, P. V. (2013). “Creep behavior in Virginia beach sand.” Can. Geotech. J., 50(11), 1159–1178.
Kitazume, M. (2005). The sand compaction pile method, Taylor and Francis Group, PLC, London.
Klohn, E. J. (1963). “Pile heave and redriving.” Trans. ASCE, 128(1), 557–577.
Lade, P. V., and Karimpour, H. (2015). “Stress relaxation behavior in Virginia beach sand.” Can. Geotech. J., 52(7), 813–835.
Lewis, M. R., Arango, I., Kimball, J. K., and Ross, T. E. (1999). “Liquefaction resistance of old sand deposits.” Proc., 11th Pan-American Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 821–829.
Mahvelati, S., Coe, J. T., Stuedlein, A. W., Asabere, P., and Gianella, T. N. (2016). “Time-rate variation of shear wave velocity (site stiffness) following blast-induced liquefaction.” Sustainability, energy, and the geoenvironment, ASCE, Reston, VA, 10.
Maybin, G. R., and Nystrom, P. G. (1997). “Geologic and resource map of South Carolina.” SC Geological Survey, Clemson, SC.
Mayne, P. W. (2007). “NCHRP synthesis 368: Cone penetration testing.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
McCartan, L., Lemon, Jr., E. M., and Weems, R. E. (1984). “Geologic map of the area between Charleston and Orangeburg, South Carolina.” U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Meyerhof, G. G. (1959). “Compaction of sands and bearing capacity of piles.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 85(6), 1–30.
Mitchell, J. K. (1968). “In place treatment of foundation soils.” J. Soil Mech., Found. Div., 96(1), 73–110.
Mitchell, J. K., Baxter, C. D. P., and Munson, T. C. (1995). “Performance of improved ground during earthquakes.” Improvement for earthquake hazard mitigation, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Mitchell, J. K., and Solymar, Z. V. (1984). “Time-dependent strength gain in freshly deposited or densified sand.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1559–1576.
Narin Van Court, W. A., and Mitchell, J. K. (1995). “New insights into compaction of loose, saturated cohesionless soils.” ASCE, Reston, VA, 51–65.
Plantema, I. G., and Nolet, C. A. (1957). “Influence of pile driving on the sounding resistance in a deep sand layer.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Found Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 52–55.
Rayamajhi, D., et al. (2014). “Numerical study of shear stress distribution for discrete columns in liquefiable soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04013034.
Rayamajhi, D., et al. (2015). “Dynamic centrifuge tests to evaluate reinforcing mechanisms of soil-cement columns in liquefiable sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015015.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(3), 442–459.
Robinsky, E. I., and Morrison, C. F. (1964). “Sand displacement and compaction around model friction piles.” Can. Geo. J., 1(2), 81–93.
Robinson, K., Cubrinovski, M., and Bradley, B. A. (2013). “Sensitivity of predicted liquefaction induced lateral displacements from the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes.” Proc., 19th NZGS Geotechnical Symp., New Zealand Geotechnical Society, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rollins, K. M., Price, B. E., Dibb, E., and Higbee, J. B. (2006). “Liquefaction mitigation of silty sands in Utah using stone columns with wick drains.” Ground modification and seismic mitigation, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Rollins, K. M., Quimby, M., Johnson, S. R., and Price, B. (2009). “Effectiveness of stone columns for liquefaction mitigation of silty sands with and without wick drains.” Proc., US-China Workshop on Ground Improvement Technologies, ASCE, Reston, VA, 160–169.
Schaefer, V. R., and Berg, R. R. (2014). “Geotechnical solutions for soil improvement, rapid embankment construction, and stabilization of the pavement working platform.”, Second Strategic Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Siegel, T. C., Cargill, P. E., and NeSmith, W. M. (2007a). “CPT measurements near drilled displacement piles.” Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Siegel, T. C., NeSmith, W. M., and Cargill, P. E. (2007b). “Ground improvement resulting from installation of drilled displacement piles.” Proc., 32nd Annual DFI Conf., Deep Foundations Institute, Hawthorne, NJ.
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Thomann, T. G., and Hryciw, R. D. (1992). “Stiffness and strength changes in cohesionless soils due to disturbance.” Can. Geotech. J., 29(5), 853–861.
Youd, T. L. (1973). “Factors controlling maximum and minimum densities of sands.” Evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 142Issue 12December 2016

History

Received: Nov 10, 2015
Accepted: Apr 5, 2016
Published online: Jul 19, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Armin W. Stuedlein, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Tygh N. Gianella, S.M.ASCE
Staff Engineer, GeoEngineers, 1200 NW Naito Parkway, Suite 180, Portland, OR 97209.
Greg Canivan, M.ASCE
Senior Geotechnical Engineer, S&ME, 620 Wando Park Blvd., Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share