Technical Notes
Jun 17, 2016

New Stress Reduction Coefficient Relationship for Liquefaction Triggering Analyses

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 11

Abstract

Since its inception in the early 1970s, the stress-based simplified procedure has become the standard of practice worldwide for evaluating liquefaction triggering potential. Central to this procedure is the stress reduction coefficient, rd, which allows the estimation of the seismically induced stresses at depth in a soil profile without the need to perform a numerical site response analysis. Proposed herein is a new rd relationship that was developed from equivalent-linear site response analyses performed on soil profiles representative of those in the liquefaction case history databases. The input motions used in the analyses are representative of those from shallow crustal earthquakes. Two variants of the rd relationship are presented that allow it to be used when the profile’s shear-wave velocities are either known or unknown, with the former yielding values having less uncertainty. Additionally, calibration coefficients are provided for both active and stable continental tectonic regimes. In comparison with other rd relationships that are commonly used, the relationship proposed herein should yield values that have less bias and uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is based on work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) grants CMMI-1030564 and CMMI-1435494, and U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) grant W912HZ-13-C-0035. The authors gratefully acknowledge this funding. However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or ERDC.

References

Boore, D. M. (1983). “Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73(6A), 1865–1894.
Boore, D. M. (1986). “Short-period P- and S-wave radiation from large earthquakes: Implications for spectral scaling relations.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 76(1), 43–64.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.”, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Brune, J. N. (1970). “Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes.” J. Geophys. Res., 75(26), 4997–5009.
Brune, J. N. (1971). “Correction.” J. Geophys. Res., 76(20), 5002.
Cetin, K. O. (2000). “Reliability-based assessment of seismic soil liquefaction initiation hazard.” Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Cetin, K. O., et al. (2004). “Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1314–1340.
Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., and Silva, W. (2008). “NGA project strong-motion database.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 23–44.
Hanks, T. C., and McGuire, R. K. (1981). “The character of high-frequency strong ground motion.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 71(6), 2071–2095.
Horton, J. W., Chapman, M. C., and Green, R. A. (2015). “The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake, and its significance for seismic hazards in eastern North America.” Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
Idriss, I. M. (1999). “An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential.” Proc., TRB Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction Analysis, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. W. (2008). “Soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Jones, E., et al. (2001). “SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python.” 〈http://www.scipy.org/〉 (May 18, 2015).
Kayen, R., et al. (2013). “Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 407–419.
Lee, J., and Green, R. A. (2014). “An empirical significant duration relationship for stable continental regions.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 12(1), 217–235.
Lee, J., and Green, R. A. (2015). “Empirical predictive relationship for seismic lateral displacement of slopes.” Geotechnique, 65(5), 374–390.
Liao, S. S. C., and Whitman, R. V. (1986). “Catalogue of liquefaction and non-liquefaction occurrences during earthquakes.” Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
McGuire, R. K., Becker, A. M., and Donovan, N. C. (1984). “Spectral estimates of seismic shear waves.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74(4), 1427–1440.
McGuire, R. K., Silva, W. J., and Costantino, C. J. (2001). “Technical basis for revision of regulatory guidance on design ground motions: Hazard- and risk-consistent ground motion spectra guidelines.” Division of Engineering Technology, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Moss, R. E., Seed, R. B., Kayen, R. E., Stewart, J. P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Cetin, K. O. (2006). “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1032–1051.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Schneider, J. F., Silva, W. J., and Stark, C. (1993). “Ground motion model for the 1989 M 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake including effects of source, path, and site.” Earthquake Spectra, 9(2), 251–287.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(9), 1249–1273.
Silva, W. J. (1993). “Factors controlling strong ground motion and their associated uncertainties.” Dynamic analysis and design considerations for high-level nuclear waste repositories, Q. A. Hossain, ed., ASCE, New York.
Silva, W. J., and Lee, K. (1987). “WES RASCAL code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions: State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States.”, U.S. Army Engineering, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Youd, T. L., et al. (2001). “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 817–833.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 142Issue 11November 2016

History

Received: Jun 6, 2015
Accepted: Mar 1, 2016
Published online: Jun 17, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Nov 17, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Samuel J. Lasley, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]
Russell A. Green, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share