Evaluating the Effect of Fiber Reinforcement on the Anisotropic Undrained Stiffness and Strength of Peat
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 9
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an investigation into the role of peat fibers in the development of anisotropic stiffness and strength within peat samples taken from below three Canadian National Railway embankments across Canada. These sites include two from northern Alberta on the Edson and Lac-La-Biche subdivisions and one from the Lévis subdivision in southern Quebec. The peat samples were collected in Shelby tubes and were subjected to a program of consolidated undrained triaxial testing. These samples represented a wide variation in fiber content and degree of humification. The measured pore-pressure response during undrained loading indicated that the peat samples were undergoing an anisotropic elastic response to loading. This pore-pressure response was similar in the peat from all three sites, with an anisotropic pore-pressure parameter, , of approximately 0.3. The stiffness and strength of the different peats were also similar, with an elastic modulus of approximately 1.7–2.2 MPa and an effective shear strength of 38°. The yielding behavior of the laboratory specimens suggested that plastic yielding occurs without the development of distinct failure planes and is accompanied by strain hardening. The combined effect of the effective strength parameters and the anisotropic pore-pressure response on the reinforcement provided by the peat fibers is also presented. This analysis showed that the net effect is dependent on the initial stress state of the peat. Under elevated mean effective stresses and low deviatoric stresses, the fibers may have a detrimental effect on strength.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the contribution of the Canadian National Railways for providing both the project and funding. The authors thank Tom Edwards for support of this project. This research was made possible through the Canadian Railway Ground Hazard Research Program, funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian National, Canadian Pacific Rail, and Transport Canada.
References
Adams, J. L. (1965). “The engineering behaviour of a Canadian Muskeg.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 3–7.
ASTM. (1988). “Standard test methods consolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils.” D4767, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (1990). “Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils.” D2435, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (1991). “Standard test method for laboratory determination of the fiber content of peat samples by dry mass.” D1997, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.” D2974, West Conshohocken, PA.
Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F., Jr., Torres, R. A., and Driller, M. W. (1998). “Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 12–20.
Dhowian, A. W. (1978). “Consolidation effects on properties of highly compressive soils—Peats.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Edil, T. B., and Wang, X., eds. (2000). “Shear strength and of peats and organic soils.” ASTM STP 1374: Geotechnics of High Water Content Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 209–225.
Elsayed, A. A. (2003). “The characteristics and engineering properties of peat in bogs.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA.
Farrell, E. R., and Hebib, S. (1998). “The determination of the geotechnical parameters of organic soils.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Problematic Soils, E. Yanagisawa, N. Moroto, and T. Mitachi, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 33–36.
GeoStudio 2007:SIGMA/w 7.17 [Computer software]. Calgary, AB, Canada, GeoSlope International.
Graham, J., and Houlsby, G. T. (1983). “Anisotropic elasticity of a natural clay.” Géotechnique, 33(2), 165–180.
Hanrahan, E. T., Dunne, J. M., and Sodha, V. G. (1967). “Shear strength of peat.” Proc., Geotechnical Congress Oslo 1967: On shear strength properties of natural soils and rocks, Vol. 1, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway, 193–198.
Hanrahan, E. T., and Walsh, J. A. (1965). “Investigation of the behaviour of peat under varying conditions of stress and strain.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 226–230.
Hebib, S. (2001). “Experimental investigation on the stabilisation of Irish peat.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Hendry, M. T., Barbour, S., and Martin, C. D. (2011a). “An evaluation of real-time deformation monitoring using motion capture instrumentation and its application in monitoring railway foundations.” Geotech. Test. J., 34(6), 1–11.
Hendry, M. T., Edwards, T., Martin, C. D., and Barbour, S. L. (2011b). “Assessing the condition of peat subgrades subjected to heavy axle loads: Effectiveness of the use of piles to strengthen embankments.” Proc., Int. Heavy Haul Association Conf.: Railroading in Extreme Conditions, International Heavy Haul Association, Virginia Beach, VA.
Hendry, M. T., Martin, C. D., Barbour, S. L., and Edwards, T. (2008). “Monitoring cyclic strain below a railway embankment overlying a peaty foundation using novel instrumentation.” Proc., 61st Canadian Geotechnical Conf., The Canadian Geotechnical Society, Richmond, BC, Canada, 1034–1041.
Hendry, M. T., Sharma, J. S., Martin, C. D., and Barbour, S. L. (2012). “Effect of fibre content and structure on anisotropic elastic stiffness and shear strength of peat.” Can. Geotech. J., 49(4), 403–415.
Hobbs, N. B. (1986). “Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 19(1), 7–80.
Konrad, J.-M., Grenier, S., and Garnier, P. (2007). “Influence of repeated heavy axle loading on peat bearing capacity.” Proc., 60th Canadian Geotechnical Conf., The Canadian Geotechnical Society, Richmond, BC, Canada, 1551–1558.
Kumar, A., Wailia, B. S., and Mohan, J. (2006). “Compressive strength of fiber reinforced highly compressible clay.” Constr. Build. Mater., 20(10), 1063–1068.
Landva, A. O., and La Rochelle, P. (1983). “Compressibility and shear characteristics of Radforth peats.” ASTM STP 820: Testing of Peats and Organic Soils, P. M. Jarret, ed., ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 157–191.
Landva, A. O., and Pheeney, P. E. (1980). “Peat fabric and structure.” Can. Geotech. J., 17(3), 416–435.
Li, J., and Ding, D. W. (2002). “Nonlinear elastic behavior of fiber-reinforced soil under cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 22(9–12), 977–983.
Long, M. (2005). “Review of peat strength, peat characterization and constitutive modelling of peat with reference to landslides.” Stud. Geotech. Mech., 27(3–4), 67–90.
Mesri, G., and Ajlouni, M. (2007). “Engineering properties of fibrous peats.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 850–866.
Michalowski, R. L., and Čermák, J. (2002). “Strength anisotropy of fiber-reinforced sand.” Comput. Geotech., 29(4), 279–299.
Michalowski, R. L., and Čermák, J. (2003). “Triaxial compression of sand reinforced with fibers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125–136.
Ozden, Z. S. (1967). “An investigation on the shear strength characteristics of peat.” M.Sc. thesis, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Radforth, N. W. (1969). “Classification of Muskeg.” Muskeg engineering handbook, I. C. MacFarlane, ed., University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 31–52.
Rowe, R. K., MacLean, M. D., and Soderman, K. L. (1984). “Analysis of a geotextile-reinforced embankment constructed on peat.” Can. Geotech. J., 21(3), 563–576.
Rowe, R. K., and Mylleville, B. L. J. (1996). “A geogrid reinforced embarkment on peat over organic silt: A case history.” Can. Geotech. J., 33(1), 106–122.
Sadek, S., Najjar, S. S., and Freiha, F. (2010). “Shear strength of fiber-reinforced sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 490–499.
Skempton, A. W. (1954). “The pore-pressure coefficients A and B.” Géotechnique, 4(4), 143–147.
Tan, Y. (2008). “Finite element analysis of highway construction in peat bog.” Can. Geotech. J., 45(2), 147–160.
Transportation Safety Board of Canada. (2008). “Railway investigation report R04Q0040.” Catalog No. TU3-6/04-2E, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
Wehling, T. M., Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F., Jr., and Driller, M. W. (2003). “Nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous organic soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 929–939.
Wood, D. M. (1990). Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Yamaguchi, H., Ohira, Y., Kogure, K., and Mori, S. (1985). “Undrained shear characteristics of normally consolidated peat under triaxial compression and extension conditions.” Soils Found., 25(3), 1–18.
Zwanenberg, C. (2005). “The influence of anisotropy on the consolidation behaviour of peat.” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140 • Issue 9 • September 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 3, 2012
Accepted: May 27, 2014
Published online: Jun 25, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 25, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.