Linking Site Investigation Efforts to Final Design Savings with Simplified Reliability-Based Design Methods
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 3
Abstract
This study aims to address how efforts spent in geotechnical site investigation can be linked in an objective and defensible way to the final design dimensions of a geotechnical structure. A previously developed pad foundation example is adopted for illustration. Three aspects of geotechnical information are addressed: a variety of in situ and laboratory tests, precision of the tests, and local experiences in the estimation of soil properties that permit reduction of transformation uncertainties between test indexes and design parameters. Four simplified reliability-based design methods based on partial factors and quantiles are calibrated for the pad foundation. Their performances in linking site investigation efforts to final design savings are studied. Among these methods, the quantile methods are found to be the most responsive to the availability of geotechnical information, whether in the form of site investigation efforts or local experiences. The quantile methods can fill a critical gap in current design practice, that is, to monetize the value of geotechnical information in the form of an increase/reduction of construction costs associated with changes in design dimensions in an objective and defensible way that can be communicated to nonengineers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2012). “American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.” AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
British Standards Institute. (2004). “Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design—Part 1: General rules.” BS EN 1997-1:2004, London.
Ching, J., Chen, J. R., Yeh, J. Y., and Phoon, K. K. (2012). “Updating uncertainties in friction angles of clean sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 217–229.
Ching, J., and Phoon, K. K. (2011). “A quantile-based approach for calibrating reliability-based partial factors.” Struct. Saf., 33(4–5), 275–285.
Ching, J., and Phoon, K. K. (2012a). “Modeling parameters of structured clays as a multivariate normal distribution.” Can. Geotech. J., 49(5), 522–545.
Ching, J. and Phoon, K. K. (2012b). “Quantile value method versus design value method for calibration of reliability-based geotechnical codes.” Struct. Saf., 44, 47–58.
Ching, J., and Phoon, K. K. (2012c). “Value of geotechnical site investigation in reliability-based design.” Adv. Struct. Eng., 15(11), 1935–1945.
Ching, J., Phoon, K. K., and Chen, Y. C. (2010). “Reducing shear strength uncertainties in clays by multivariate correlations.” Can. Geotech. J., 47(1), 16–33.
Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. (1996). Structural reliability methods, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
European Committee for Standardization. (2011). “Geotechnical design ETC10 Design Example 2.2. Pad foundation with inclined eccentric load on boulder.” ETC10, Brussels, Belgium.
Goldsworthy, J. S., et al. (2007). “Measuring the risk of geotechnical site investigations.” Proc., Geo-Denver 2007, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–12.
Jaksa, M. B., et al. (2005). “Towards reliable and effective site investigations.” Geotechnique, 55(2), 109–121.
Jaksa, M. B., Kaggwa, W. S., Fenton, G. A., and Poulos, H. G. (2003). “A framework for quantifying the reliability of geotechnical investigations.” Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP9, Vol. 2, Millpress, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1285–1291.
Kulhawy, F. H., Phoon, K. K., and Wang, Y. (2012). “Reliability-based design of foundations—A modern view.” Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice—Keynote Lectures from GeoCongress 2012, GSP 266, ASCE, Reston, VA, 102–121.
Ladd, C. C., and Foott, R. (1974). “New design procedure for stability in soft clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 100(7), 763–786.
Phoon, K. K., Kulhawy, F. H., and Grigoriu, M. D. (2003a). “Development of a reliability-based design framework for transmission line structure foundations.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 798–806.
Phoon, K. K., Kulhawy, F. H., and Grigoriu, M. D. (2003b). “Multiple resistance factor design (MRFD) for spread foundations.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 807–818.
Sørensen, J. D. (2002). “Calibration of partial safety factors in Danish structural codes.” Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, 1–9.
Szechy, K., and Varga, L. (1978). Foundation engineering—Soil exploration and spread foundations, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
Terzaghi, K., and Peck, R. B. (1967). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, International Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). “Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 103(11), 1227–1246.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140 • Issue 3 • March 2014
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 21, 2012
Accepted: Oct 2, 2013
Published online: Oct 4, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 29, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.