Technical Papers
Mar 31, 2012

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Maximum Seismic Shear Stresses in Soils Using Improved Ground-Motion Parameters

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

Maximum seismic shear stresses (τmax) have been recognized as one of the important parameters in design practice. This study develops ground-motion parameters for τmax and implements these in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis to provide the τmax distribution of deep soil layers for design purposes. The application of improved ground-motion parameters for τmax is demonstrated at the Oakland International Airport, where a thick Young Bay Mud deposit exists under the artificial fill. Model biases in the predictive equations of seismic shear-stress reduction coefficients (rd) are evaluated by comparison with the site response analyses performed with a wide range of input ground motions. Based on these results, we introduce improved ground-motion parameters for τmax(Itau) as a linear combination of spectral accelerations, implemented in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis to calculate seismic hazard curves. Conditional mean spectra are calculated, given Itau at 10% in 50 years to illustrate the variations in frequency contents with depth compared with the uniform hazard spectra. Finally, τmax is calculated with depth by using hazard values of Itau and compared with the peak-ground-acceleration-based and uniform-hazard-spectra-based calculations. Analysis results show that τmax will be underestimated for deep soil layers by peak-ground-acceleration-based calculation if the median value of rd is used in design practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is partly supported by the Japan Science Technology and Japan International Corporation Agency. The authors acknowledge Ivan Wang at URS Corporation, Oakland for the fault systems in California. We also acknowledge Professor Yamazaki at Chiba University, Japan in providing the research environment of this study. The framework of this paper was primarily developed during the Ph.D. study at University of California, Davis in discussions with Professors Boulanger and Abrahamson. We acknowledge both professors for the valuable comments and precious inputs. Finally, we appreciate three anonymous reviewers for important critiques to improve the quality of the paper.

References

Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J. (2008). “Summary of the Abrahamson and Silva NGA ground-motion relations.” Earthq. Spectra, 24(1), 67–97.
Arulnathan, R., et al. (2009). “Vulnerability assessment of perimeter dike system at Oakland International Airport,” TCLEE 2009 Conf.: 7th Int. Conf. on Lifeline Earthquake Eng., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Baker, J. W. (2011). “Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection.” J. Struct. Eng., 137(3), 322–331.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006a). “Correlation of response spectral values for multi- component ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 215–227.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006b). “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 35(9), 1077–1095.
Baker, J. W., and Jayaram, N. (2008). “Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models.” Earthq. Spectra, 24(1), 299–317.
Bazzurro, P., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis,” 7th U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Eng. (7NCEE), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 1313–1322.
Cetin, K. O., et al. (2004). “Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(12), 1314–1340.
Cornell, C. A. (1968). “Engineering seismic risk analysis.” Bull. Seismic Soc. Amer., 58(5), 1583–1606.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (1993). “Guidelines for site-specific ground motions,” Rep. TR-102293, Palo Alto, CA.
Eubank, R. L. (1988). Spline smoothing and nonparametric regression, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Finn, W. D. L., Kramer, S. L., O’Rourke, T. D., and Youd, T. L. (2010). Ad Hoc Committee on Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 〈http://www.eeri.org/site/images/email_blasts/Final-Ad-Hoc-Committee-Report-16Aug10.pdf〉.
Golesorkhi, R. (1989). “Factors influencing the computational determination of earthquake-induced shear stresses in sandy soils,” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Gülerce, Z., and Abrahamson, N. A. (2010). “Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the effects of vertical ground motions on the seismic response of highway bridges.” Earthq. Spectra, 26(4), 999–1016.
Idriss, I. M. (1999). “An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential,” TRB Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction, Pub. No. FHWA-RD-99-165, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. B. (2010). “SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures,” Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California–Davis, Davis, CA.
Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I. (1991). “SHAKE91, a computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits,” Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California–Davis, Davis, CA.
Ishihara, K. (1977). “Simple method of analysis for liquefaction of sand deposits during earthquakes.” Soil Found., 17(3), 1–17.
Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., Tokida, K., and Yasuda, S. (1978). “A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan,” Proc., Second Int. Conf. on Microzonation for Safer Construction—Research and Application, Vol. 2, ASCE, Reston, VA, 885–896.
Kayen, R. E., and Mitchell, J. K. (1997). “Arias intensity assessment of liquefaction test sites on the east side of San Francisco Bay affected by the Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of 17 October 1989.” Nat. Hazards, 16(2–3) 243–265.
Kishida, T., Boulanger, R. W., Abrahamson, N. A., Driller, M. W., and Wehling, T. M. (2009a). “Site effects at the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.” Earthq. Spectra, 25(2), 301–322.
Kishida, T., Boulanger, R. W., Abrahamson, N. A., Driller, M. W., and Wehling, T. M. (2009b). “Seismic responses of levees at the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.” Earthq. Spectra, 25(3), 557–582.
Kramer, S. L., and Mayfield, R. T. (2007). “Return period of soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(7), 802–813.
McGuire, R. K. (1995). “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85(5), 1275–1284.
NEHRP. (2003). Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures with accompanying commentary, Building Seismic Safety Council for FEMA, Washington, D.C.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2005). “Next generation attenuation (NGA) strong ground motion database,” 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/index.html〉 (Nov. 1, 2010).
Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B. (1972). “SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites,” Rep. No. UCB/EERC- 2/12, Earthquake Eng. Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(9), 1249–1273.
Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R. (1991). “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng., 117(1), 89–107.
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. (2003). “Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region: 2002–2031,” USGS Open-File Rep. 03-214, 〈http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-214/〉.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 139Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 288 - 297

History

Received: Jul 18, 2011
Accepted: Mar 29, 2012
Published online: Mar 31, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tadahiro Kishida, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; formerly, JST-JICA Assistant Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Chiba Univ., Chiba 263-8522, Japan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Chi-Chin Tsai, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung 40227, Taiwan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share