Monotonic Behavior of Mississippi River Valley Silt in Triaxial Compression
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 4
Abstract
The static behavior of Mississippi River Valley silt was characterized using triaxial compression testing. Silt specimens, especially overconsolidated ones, showed dilation behavior. There was no unique critical state among specimens with different overconsolidation ratios (OCRs). With OCRs of 1, 2, and 8, the specimens exhibited normal behavior and dilated more as effective consolidation pressure dropped. However, for an OCR of 4, the specimens showed opposite behavior and dilated more as effective consolidation pressure rose. The friction angle of the silt was computed on the basis of several failure criteria, and the limiting strain was found to be the best one owing to better consistency and rational results of the friction angle. The silt showed a unique behavior compared with sand and clay: The critical state line was not parallel to the normal consolidation curve in the space; the stress-strain behavior can be normalized by effective consolidation pressure. The normalized shear strength of overconsolidated specimens was correlated to that of a normally consolidated specimen using Ladd et al.’s equation with an value of 0.58 for low-plasticity silts. However, the normalized shear strength of overconsolidated silts cannot be related to OCR directly. It was indicated that at least the normalized shear strength of a normally consolidated specimen needs to be tested for low-plasticity silts to obtain the normalized shear strength of overconsolidated specimen using Ladd et al.’s equation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank their colleagues Dr. Richard W. Stephenson and Dr. Louis Ge at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. They provided comments and recommendations throughout this research, especially during the testing program and critical state analysis. Additionally, the instrumental and skilled laboratory technicians Gary Abbott and Brian Swift made this experimental research run smoothly.
References
Arulmoli, K., Muraleetharan, K. K., Hossain, M. M., and Fruth, L. S. (1992). “Verification of liquefaction analysis by centrifuge studies laboratory testing program.” Soil data report, Earth Technology Corporation, Irvine, CA.
ASTM. (2007). Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. D422-63, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009). Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. D1557, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. D4318, West Conshohocken, PA.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2006). “Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 132(11), 1413–1426.
Bradshaw, A. S., and Baxter, C. D.P. (2007). “Sample preparation of silts for liquefaction testing.” Geotech. Test. J.GTJODJ, 30(4) 324–332.
Brandon, T. L., Rose, A. T., and Duncan, J. M. (2006). “Drained and undrained strength interpretation for low-plasticity silts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 132(2), 250–257.
Carraro, J. A. H., and Prezzi, M. (2007). “A new slurry-based method of preparation of specimen of sand containing fines.” Geotech. Test. J.GTJODJ, 31(1), 1–11.
Fleming, L. N., and Duncan, J. M. (1990). “Stress-deformation characteristics of Alaskan silt.” J. Geotech. Eng.JGENDZ, 116(3), 377–393.
Hoeg, K., Dyvik, R., and Sandbækken, G. (2000). “Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 126(7), 606–617.
Holtz, R. D., and Kovacs, W. D., and Sheahan, T. C. (2010). An introduction to geotechnical engineering, 2nd Ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hyde, A. F. L., Higuchi, T., and Yasuhara, K. (2006). “Liquefaction, cyclic mobility, and failure of silt.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 132(6), 716–725.
Ishihara, K., Sodekawa, M., and Tanaka, Y. (1978). “Effects of overconsolidation on liquefaction characteristics of sands containing fines.” Dynamic geotechnical testing, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 246–264.
Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F., and Yasuda, S. (1975). “Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses.” Soils Found.SOIFBE, 15(1), 29–44.
Izadi, A. (2006). “Static behavior of silts.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO.
Izadi, A. (2008). “Liquefaction and post-liquefaction behavior of low plasticity silts using cyclic triaxial tests.” Ph.D. dissertation, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO.
Koester, J. P. (1992). “The influence of test procedure on correlation of atterberg limits with liquefaction in fine-grained soils.” Geotech. Test. J.GTJODJ, 15(4), 352–361.
Kuerbis, R. H., and Vaid, Y. P. (1988). “Sand sample preparation: The slurry deposition method.” Soils Found.SOIFBE, 28 (4), 107–118.
Ladd, C. C. (1991). “Stability evaluation during staged construction.” J. Geotech. Eng.JGENDZ, 117(4), 540–615.
Ladd, C. C., and Foott, R. (1974). “New design procedure for stability of soft clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div.AJGEB6, 100(7), 763–786.
Ladd, C. C., Foott, R., Ishihara, K., Schlosser, F., and Poulos, H. G. (1997). “Stress-deformation and strength characteristics.” Proc, 9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2, 421–494.
Nocilla, A., Coop, M. R., and Colleselli, F. (2006). “The mechanics of an italian silt: An example of ‘Transitional’ behavior.” GeotechniqueGTNQA8, 56(4), 261–271.
Penman, A. D. M. (1953). “Shear characteristics of a saturated silt, measured in triaxial compression.” GeotechniqueGTNQA8, 3(8), 312–328.
Polito, C. P., and Martin, J. R. (2001). “Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 127(5), 408–415.
Prakash, K., and Sridharan, A. (2006). “Critical appraisal of the cone penetration method of determining soil plasticity.” Can. Geotech. J., 43(8), 884–888.CGJOAH
Puri, V. K. (1984). “Liquefaction behavior and dynamic properties of loessial (silty) soils.” Ph.D. disseratation, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO.
Romero, S. (1995). “The behavior of silt as clay content is increased.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of California-Davis, Davis, CA.
Sridharan, A., and Prakash, K. (2000). “Percussion and cone methods of determining the liquid limit of soils: Controlling mechanisms.” Geotech. Test. J.GTJODJ, 23(2), 242–250.
Yamamuro, J., and Lade, P. V. (1998). “Steady-state concepts and static liquefaction of silty sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 124(9), 868–877.
Yasuhara, K., Murakami, S., Song, B. W., Yokokawa, S., and Hyde, A. F. L. (2003). “Postcyclic degradation of strength and stiffness for low plasticity silt.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.JGGEFK, 129(8), 756–769.
Wang, J. L., Vivatrat, V., and Rusher, J. R. (1982). “Geotechnical properties of Alaska OCS silt.” Proc., 4th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 415–420.
Wang, L., Sun, H., Yuan, Z., and Deng, J. (2010). “Criterions, prediction and prevention of loess liquefaction.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 4 • April 2012
Pages: 516 - 525
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 7, 2010
Accepted: Jul 21, 2011
Published online: Jul 25, 2011
Published in print: Apr 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.