Voids/Cement Ratio Controlling Tensile Strength of Cement-Treated Soils
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 11
Abstract
The improvement of locally available soils with cement can provide great advantages, including avoiding the need to borrow volumes of appropriate material and disposing of the local soil in deposits. This research aims to quantify the influence of the amount of cement, the porosity, and the voids/cement ratio in the assessment of splitting tensile strength (), also known as indirect diametrical tensile (IDT) strength, of three distinct soils from Brazil and Portugal. From Brazil, clayey sand derived from Botucatu sandstone and uniform Osorio sand were considered; from Portugal, silty sand derived from weathered Porto granite was studied. A number of splitting tensile strength tests were carried out. The results show that increased with the amount of cement () and decreases in porosity () for the three soil-cement mixtures. A power function was well-adapted to fit both and . Finally, the tensile strength was plotted against the porosity/volumetric cement content relationship (), in which volumetric cement content is adjusted by a different exponent depending on the soil (0.21 for Porto silty sand-cement mixtures, 0.28 for Botucatu clayey sand-cement mixtures, and 1.0 for Osorio sand-cement mixtures). These plots show unique correlations for each soil-cement mixture, indicating that the index property is a good parameter in the evaluation of the splitting tensile strength of the soils studied. As a consequence, for each of the three soil-cement mixtures studied, a target value could be obtained by both porosity reduction and cement increase. This experimental framework will enable a good definition of the mechanical parameters used in the design of foundations and subgrades of railways platforms, whose system failure mechanisms usually start under tensile stresses at the base of the improved layer, and in the execution quality control of such earthworks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Brazilian Research Council CNPq/MCT (projects Produtividade em Pesquisa, PNPD, INCT-Reageo, and Edital Universal), the Portuguese Research Council MCTES/FCT, and PRODOC CAPES for their financial support to the research group. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that improved the content of this manuscript. Particular thanks are also due to Mr. Bernardo Scapini Consoli for revising the English grammar.
References
ASTM. (2003). “Standard test method for measurement of soil suction using filter paper.” D5298-03, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes.” D2487-06, West Conshohocken, PA.
Brazilian Standard Association. (1983). “Mortar and concrete—Test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical specimens.” NBR 7222, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (in Portuguese).
British Standards Institution. (1990). “Methods for test for soils for civil engineering purposes.” BS 1377, London.
Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., Bachus, R. C., and Rad, N. S. (1981). “Cemented sands under static loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 107(6), 799–817.
Consoli, N. C., Cruz, R. C., Floss, M. F., and Festugato, L. (2010). “Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 136(5), 759–763.
Consoli, N. C., Dalla Rosa, F., and Fonini, A. (2009a). “Plate load tests on cemented soil layers overlaying weaker soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 135(12), 1846–1856.
Consoli, N. C., Foppa, D., Festugato, L., and Heineck, K. S. (2007). “Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(2), 197–205.
Consoli, N. C., Vendruscolo, M. A., Fonini, A., and Dalla Rosa, F. (2009b). “Fiber reinforcement effects on sand considering a wide cementation range.” Geotext. Geomembr., 27(3), 196–203.
Consoli, N. C., Viana da Fonseca, A., Cruz, R. C., and Heineck, K. S. (2009c). “Fundamental parameters for the stiffness and strength control of artificially cemented sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 135(9), 1347–1353.
Ladd, R. S. (1978). “Preparing test specimens using undercompaction.” Geotech. Test. J., 1(1), 16–23.
Mitchell, J. K. (1981). “Soil improvement—State-of-the-art report.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 4, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 509–565.
Moore, R. K., Kennedy, T. W., and Hudson, W. R. (1970). “Factors affecting the tensile strength of cement-treated materials.” Highway Research Record 315, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 64–80.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 9, 2010
Accepted: Feb 8, 2011
Published online: Feb 10, 2011
Published in print: Nov 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.