Membrane Behavior of Compacted Clay Liners
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 10
Abstract
The containment function of clay barriers used for waste containment applications (e.g., landfills) can be enhanced if such clays exhibit membrane behavior or the ability to restrict the migration of solutes (e.g., contaminants). In this regard, compacted specimens of a locally available natural clay known as Nelson Farm Clay (NFC), as well as NFC amended with 5% (dry weight) sodium bentonite, were evaluated for hydraulic conductivity, , and the potential for membrane behavior. The membrane efficiencies of specimens of both soils compacted such that was less than were measured by establishing steady salt (KCl) concentration differences, , ranging from 3.9 to 47 mM across the specimens in a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions. The measured membrane efficiency for the unamended NFC was negligible (i.e., ), even though the was suitably low (i.e., ). In contrast, compacted specimens of the bentonite amended NFC exhibited not only lower but also significant membrane behavior, with membrane efficiencies as high as 97.3% for of 3.9-mM KCl. The results suggest that natural clays typically suitable for use as compacted clay liners (CCLs) are not likely to behave as semipermeable membranes unless the clay is amended with bentonite or the clay is inherently rich in high swelling clay minerals (e.g., sodium smectite). The potential benefit resulting from membrane behavior in a CCL constructed with the bentonite amended NFC is illustrated analytically in terms of liquid flux.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this study was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), Arlington, Va., under Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDCMS-0099430 entitled “Membrane Behavior of Clay Soil Barrier Materials” and Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDCMS-0624104 entitled “Enhanced Clay Membrane Barriers for Sustainable Waste Containment.” The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the writers and are not necessarily consistent with the policies or opinions of the NSF. The writers also express appreciation to Petra Braun, an undergraduate exchange student from ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, and Dr. Jae-Myung Lee of the California Department of Transportation for their assistance in conducting the hydraulic conductivity tests reported in this study.
References
Bader, S., and Heister, K. (2006). “The effect of membrane potential on the development of chemical osmotic pressure in compacted clay.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 297(1), 329–340.
Barbour, S. L., and Fredlund, D. G. (1989). “Mechanisms of osmotic flow and volume change in clay soils.” Can. Geotech. J., 26(4), 551–562.
Benson, C. H., Daniel, D. E., and Boutwell, G. P. (1999). “Field performance of compacted clay liners.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125(5), 390–403.
Daniel, D. E. (1994). “State-of-the-art: Laboratory hydraulic conductivity test for saturated soils.” Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, D. E. Daniel and S. J. Trautwein, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 30–78.
Daniel, D. E., and Benson, C. H. (1990). “Water content-density criteria for compacted soil liners.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 116(12), 1811–1830.
Dominijanni, A., and Manassero, M. (2005). “Modelling osmosis and solute transport through clay membrane barriers.” Geo-Frontiers 2005, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Evans, J. C., Shackelford, C. D., Yeo, S. -S., and Henning, J. (2008). “Membrane behavior of soil-bentonite slurry-trench cutoff walls.” Soil Sediment Contam., 17(4), 316–322.
Henning, J. T. (2004). “Chemico-osmotic efficiency of two real world SB slurry trench cutoff wall backfills.” MS thesis, Bucknell Univ., Lewisburg, Pa.
Henning, J. T., Evans, J. C., and Shackelford, C. D. (2006). “Membrane behavior of two backfills from field-constructed soil-bentonite cutoff walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132(10), 1243–1249.
Howell, J. L., Shackelford, C. D., Amer, N. H., and Stern, R. T. (1997). “Compaction of sand-processed clay soil mixtures.” Geotech. Test. J., 20(4), 443–458.
Kang, J. B. (2008). “Membrane behavior of clay liner materials.” Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Kang, J. B., and Shackelford, C. D. (2009). “Clay membrane testing using a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions.” Appl. Clay Sci., 44(1–2), 43–58.
Keijzer, Th. J. S., Kleingeld, P. J., and Loch, J. P. G. (1999). “Chemical osmosis in compacted clayey material and the prediction of water transport.” Eng. Geol., 53(2), 151–159.
Keijzer, Th. J. S., and Loch, J. P. G. (2001). “Chemical osmosis in compacted dredging sludge.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65(4), 1045–1055.
Kemper, W. D., and Rollins, J. B. (1966). “Osmotic efficiency coefficients across compacted clays.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 30(5), 529–534.
Kharaka, Y. K., and Smalley, W. C. (1976). “Flow of water and solutes through compacted clays.” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 60(6), 973–980.
Kodikara, J. K., and Rahman, F. (2002). “Effects of specimen consolidation on the laboratory hydraulic conductivity measurement.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(4), 908–923.
Lu, N., Olsen, H. W., and Likos, W. J. (2004). “Appropriate material properties for advective-diffusive solute flux in membrane soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(12), 1341–1346.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2002a). “Chemico-osmotic efficiency of a geosynthetic clay liner.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(2), 97–106.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2002b). “Coupling effects during steady-state solute diffusion through a semipermeable clay membrane.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(6), 1312–1319.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2004a). “Explicit and implicit coupling during solute transport through clay membrane barriers.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 72(1–4), 259–285.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2004b). “Predicting solute flux through a clay membrane barrier.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(5), 477–487.
Malusis, M. A., Shackelford, C. D., and Olsen, H. W. (2001). “A laboratory apparatus to measure chemico-osmotic efficiency coefficients for clay soils.” Geotech. Test. J., 24(3), 229–242.
Malusis, M. A., Shackelford, C. D., and Olsen, H. W. (2003). “Flow and transport through clay membrane barriers.” Eng. Geol., 70(3–4), 235–248.
Manassero, M., and Dominijanni, A. (2003). “Modelling the osmosis effect on solute migration through porous media.” Geotechnique, 53(5), 481–492.
McKelvey, J. G., and Milne, I. H. (1960). “The flow of salt solutions through compacted clay.” Clays and Clay Minerals, 9(1), 248–259.
Milne, I. H., McKelvey, J. G., and Trump, R. P. (1962). “Permeability and salt-filtering properties of compacted clay.” Clays and Clay Minerals, 11(1), 250–251.
Olsen, H. W., Yearsley, E. N., and Nelson, K. R. (1990). “Chemico-osmosis versus diffusion-osmosis.” Transportation Research Record No. 1288, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 15–22.
Rolfe, P. F., and Aylmore, L. A. G. (1981). “Water and salt flow through compacted clays: II. Electrokinetics and salt sieving.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 79(2), 301–307.
Shackelford, C. D. (1994). “Waste-soil interactions that alter hydraulic conductivity.” Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, D. E. Daniel and S. J. Trautwein, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 111–168.
Shackelford, C. D., and Lee, J. -M. (2003). “The destructive role of diffusion on clay membrane behavior.” Clays Clay Miner., 51(2), 186–196.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., Majeski, M. J., and Stern, R. T. (1999). “Electrical conductivity breakthrough curves.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125(4), 260–270.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., and Olsen, H. W. (2001). “Clay membrane barriers for waste containment.” Geotech. News, 19(2), 39–43.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., and Olsen, H. W. (2003). “Clay membrane behavior for geoenvironmental containment.” Soil and Rock America Conf. 2003, P. J. Culligan, H. H. Einstein, and A. J. Whittle, eds., Vol. 1, Verlag Glückauf GMBH, Essen, Germany, 767–774.
Van Impe, P. O. (2002). “Consolidation, contaminant transport and chemico-osmotic effects in liner materials.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Whitworth, T. M., and Fritz, S. J. (1994). “Electrolyte-induced solute permeability effects in compacted smectite membranes.” Appl. Geochem., 9(5), 533–546.
Whitworth, T. M., and Ghazifard, A. (2009). “Membrane effects in clay-lined inward gradient landfills.” Appl. Clay Sci., 43(2), 248–252.
Yeo, S. -S. (2003). “Hydraulic conductivity, consolidation, and membrane behavior of model backfill-slurry mixtures for vertical cutoff walls.” MS thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Yeo, S. -S., Shackelford, C. D., and Evans, J. C. (2005). “Membrane behavior of model soil-bentonite backfills.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(4), 418–429.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: May 20, 2009
Accepted: Mar 23, 2010
Published online: Sep 15, 2010
Published in print: Oct 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.