TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 15, 2010

Membrane Behavior of Compacted Clay Liners

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 10

Abstract

The containment function of clay barriers used for waste containment applications (e.g., landfills) can be enhanced if such clays exhibit membrane behavior or the ability to restrict the migration of solutes (e.g., contaminants). In this regard, compacted specimens of a locally available natural clay known as Nelson Farm Clay (NFC), as well as NFC amended with 5% (dry weight) sodium bentonite, were evaluated for hydraulic conductivity, k , and the potential for membrane behavior. The membrane efficiencies of specimens of both soils compacted such that k was less than 107cm/s were measured by establishing steady salt (KCl) concentration differences, ΔCo , ranging from 3.9 to 47 mM across the specimens in a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions. The measured membrane efficiency for the unamended NFC was negligible (i.e., 1.4% ), even though the k was suitably low (i.e., k<107cm/s ). In contrast, compacted specimens of the bentonite amended NFC exhibited not only lower k but also significant membrane behavior, with membrane efficiencies as high as 97.3% for ΔCo of 3.9-mM KCl. The results suggest that natural clays typically suitable for use as compacted clay liners (CCLs) are not likely to behave as semipermeable membranes unless the clay is amended with bentonite or the clay is inherently rich in high swelling clay minerals (e.g., sodium smectite). The potential benefit resulting from membrane behavior in a CCL constructed with the bentonite amended NFC is illustrated analytically in terms of liquid flux.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this study was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), Arlington, Va., under Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDCMS-0099430 entitled “Membrane Behavior of Clay Soil Barrier Materials” and Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDCMS-0624104 entitled “Enhanced Clay Membrane Barriers for Sustainable Waste Containment.” The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the writers and are not necessarily consistent with the policies or opinions of the NSF. The writers also express appreciation to Petra Braun, an undergraduate exchange student from ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, and Dr. Jae-Myung Lee of the California Department of Transportation for their assistance in conducting the hydraulic conductivity tests reported in this study.

References

Bader, S., and Heister, K. (2006). “The effect of membrane potential on the development of chemical osmotic pressure in compacted clay.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 297(1), 329–340.
Barbour, S. L., and Fredlund, D. G. (1989). “Mechanisms of osmotic flow and volume change in clay soils.” Can. Geotech. J., 26(4), 551–562.
Benson, C. H., Daniel, D. E., and Boutwell, G. P. (1999). “Field performance of compacted clay liners.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125(5), 390–403.
Daniel, D. E. (1994). “State-of-the-art: Laboratory hydraulic conductivity test for saturated soils.” Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, D. E. Daniel and S. J. Trautwein, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 30–78.
Daniel, D. E., and Benson, C. H. (1990). “Water content-density criteria for compacted soil liners.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 116(12), 1811–1830.
Dominijanni, A., and Manassero, M. (2005). “Modelling osmosis and solute transport through clay membrane barriers.” Geo-Frontiers 2005, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Evans, J. C., Shackelford, C. D., Yeo, S. -S., and Henning, J. (2008). “Membrane behavior of soil-bentonite slurry-trench cutoff walls.” Soil Sediment Contam., 17(4), 316–322.
Henning, J. T. (2004). “Chemico-osmotic efficiency of two real world SB slurry trench cutoff wall backfills.” MS thesis, Bucknell Univ., Lewisburg, Pa.
Henning, J. T., Evans, J. C., and Shackelford, C. D. (2006). “Membrane behavior of two backfills from field-constructed soil-bentonite cutoff walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132(10), 1243–1249.
Howell, J. L., Shackelford, C. D., Amer, N. H., and Stern, R. T. (1997). “Compaction of sand-processed clay soil mixtures.” Geotech. Test. J., 20(4), 443–458.
Kang, J. B. (2008). “Membrane behavior of clay liner materials.” Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Kang, J. B., and Shackelford, C. D. (2009). “Clay membrane testing using a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions.” Appl. Clay Sci., 44(1–2), 43–58.
Keijzer, Th. J. S., Kleingeld, P. J., and Loch, J. P. G. (1999). “Chemical osmosis in compacted clayey material and the prediction of water transport.” Eng. Geol., 53(2), 151–159.
Keijzer, Th. J. S., and Loch, J. P. G. (2001). “Chemical osmosis in compacted dredging sludge.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65(4), 1045–1055.
Kemper, W. D., and Rollins, J. B. (1966). “Osmotic efficiency coefficients across compacted clays.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 30(5), 529–534.
Kharaka, Y. K., and Smalley, W. C. (1976). “Flow of water and solutes through compacted clays.” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 60(6), 973–980.
Kodikara, J. K., and Rahman, F. (2002). “Effects of specimen consolidation on the laboratory hydraulic conductivity measurement.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(4), 908–923.
Lu, N., Olsen, H. W., and Likos, W. J. (2004). “Appropriate material properties for advective-diffusive solute flux in membrane soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(12), 1341–1346.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2002a). “Chemico-osmotic efficiency of a geosynthetic clay liner.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(2), 97–106.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2002b). “Coupling effects during steady-state solute diffusion through a semipermeable clay membrane.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(6), 1312–1319.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2004a). “Explicit and implicit coupling during solute transport through clay membrane barriers.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 72(1–4), 259–285.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2004b). “Predicting solute flux through a clay membrane barrier.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(5), 477–487.
Malusis, M. A., Shackelford, C. D., and Olsen, H. W. (2001). “A laboratory apparatus to measure chemico-osmotic efficiency coefficients for clay soils.” Geotech. Test. J., 24(3), 229–242.
Malusis, M. A., Shackelford, C. D., and Olsen, H. W. (2003). “Flow and transport through clay membrane barriers.” Eng. Geol., 70(3–4), 235–248.
Manassero, M., and Dominijanni, A. (2003). “Modelling the osmosis effect on solute migration through porous media.” Geotechnique, 53(5), 481–492.
McKelvey, J. G., and Milne, I. H. (1960). “The flow of salt solutions through compacted clay.” Clays and Clay Minerals, 9(1), 248–259.
Milne, I. H., McKelvey, J. G., and Trump, R. P. (1962). “Permeability and salt-filtering properties of compacted clay.” Clays and Clay Minerals, 11(1), 250–251.
Olsen, H. W., Yearsley, E. N., and Nelson, K. R. (1990). “Chemico-osmosis versus diffusion-osmosis.” Transportation Research Record No. 1288, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 15–22.
Rolfe, P. F., and Aylmore, L. A. G. (1981). “Water and salt flow through compacted clays: II. Electrokinetics and salt sieving.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 79(2), 301–307.
Shackelford, C. D. (1994). “Waste-soil interactions that alter hydraulic conductivity.” Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, D. E. Daniel and S. J. Trautwein, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 111–168.
Shackelford, C. D., and Lee, J. -M. (2003). “The destructive role of diffusion on clay membrane behavior.” Clays Clay Miner., 51(2), 186–196.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., Majeski, M. J., and Stern, R. T. (1999). “Electrical conductivity breakthrough curves.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125(4), 260–270.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., and Olsen, H. W. (2001). “Clay membrane barriers for waste containment.” Geotech. News, 19(2), 39–43.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., and Olsen, H. W. (2003). “Clay membrane behavior for geoenvironmental containment.” Soil and Rock America Conf. 2003, P. J. Culligan, H. H. Einstein, and A. J. Whittle, eds., Vol. 1, Verlag Glückauf GMBH, Essen, Germany, 767–774.
Van Impe, P. O. (2002). “Consolidation, contaminant transport and chemico-osmotic effects in liner materials.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Whitworth, T. M., and Fritz, S. J. (1994). “Electrolyte-induced solute permeability effects in compacted smectite membranes.” Appl. Geochem., 9(5), 533–546.
Whitworth, T. M., and Ghazifard, A. (2009). “Membrane effects in clay-lined inward gradient landfills.” Appl. Clay Sci., 43(2), 248–252.
Yeo, S. -S. (2003). “Hydraulic conductivity, consolidation, and membrane behavior of model backfill-slurry mixtures for vertical cutoff walls.” MS thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Yeo, S. -S., Shackelford, C. D., and Evans, J. C. (2005). “Membrane behavior of model soil-bentonite backfills.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(4), 418–429.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 136Issue 10October 2010
Pages: 1368 - 1382

History

Received: May 20, 2009
Accepted: Mar 23, 2010
Published online: Sep 15, 2010
Published in print: Oct 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jong-Beom Kang, Ph.D. [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Geotechnical Engineer, Engineering Analytics, Inc., 1600 Specht Point Rd., Suite 209, Fort Collins, CO 80525; formerly, Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372. E-mail: [email protected]
Charles D. Shackelford, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E., M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., 1372 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share