Lateral Response of Hollow Circular Caisson Embedded in Nonlinear Soils
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper presents the numerical analysis of the lateral response of hollow circular caisson embedded in nonlinear soils. The caisson–soil system is modeled by a three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element method. The caisson is considered as a linear elastic body, whereas the nonlinear behavior of the adjoining soil is defined by kinematic hardening-based multiyield surface plasticity model. The interface between the caisson and adjoining soil is modeled by a zero thickness contact element which is defined by the constitutive relationships capable of describing the relative sliding and the separation at the interface. The present study discusses the lateral response of the hollow caisson, which consists of the lateral load versus lateral displacement (P–Y) curves, mechanism of deformation of the caisson–soil system, and deformation profile of the hollow caisson. It also presents the effect of the D/B ratio, relative stiffness of the caisson–soil system, and the effect of the vertical load on the lateral response of the hollow caisson embedded in nonlinear soils. The present study indicates that the D/B ratio, relative stiffness of the caisson–soil system, and the vertical load have a significant effect on the lateral response of the caisson–soil system. This study reveals that there occurs elastoplastic deformation during the lateral loading of the caisson–soil system. Further, a simplified transitional plasticity-based constitutive law is proposed to model the lateral response of a caisson–soil system. The proposed model requires only three parameters, which can be calibrated using the lateral load versus lateral displacement curve obtained from the finite-element analysis or the field test. Furthermore, mathematical relationships between the model parameters and the material parameters defining the caisson–soil system are established using the least-squares regression analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anagnostopoulos, C., and M. Georgiadis. 1993. “Interaction of axial and lateral pile responses.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (4): 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:4(793).
Biswas, S., and D. Choudhury. 2020. “Behavior of caisson foundations under lateral loading in layered cohesive Soil.” In Geo-Congress 2020: Foundations, soil improvement, and erosion, edited by J. P. Hambleton, R. Makhnenko, and A. S. Budge, 23–32. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Broms, B. B. 1964. “Lateral resistance of piles in cohesive soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 90 (2): 27–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000611.
Gerolymos, N., and G. Gazetas. 2006a. “Winkler model for the lateral response of rigid caisson foundations in linear soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.003.
Gerolymos, N., and G. Gazetas. 2006b. “Development of Winkler model for static and dynamic response of caisson foundations with soil and interface nonlinearities.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.002.
Gerolymos, N., and G. Gazetas. 2006c. “Static and dynamic response of massive caisson foundations with soil and interface nonlinearities—Validation and results.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.001.
IRC (International Rescue Committee). 1972. Recommendations for estimating the resistance of soil below the maximum scour level in the design of caissons of bridges. IRC 45-1972. New Delhi: IRC.
IRC (International Rescue Committee). 1983. Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section: VII. Foundations and substructure. IRC 78-1983. New Delhi: IRC.
IRC (International Rescue Committee). 2000. Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section: VII. Foundations and substructure. IRC 78-2000. New Delhi: IRC.
IS (Indian Standard). 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete. Code of Practice (4th revision). IS:456-2000. New Delhi: IS.
Iwan, W. D. 1967. “On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems.” J. Appl. Mech. 34 (3): 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3607751.
Jain, S. K. 2016. “Earthquake safety in India: Achievements, challenges and opportunities.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (5): 1337–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9870-2.
Karapiperis, K., and N. Gerolymos. 2014. “Combined loading of caisson foundations in cohesive soil: Finite element versus Winkler modeling.” Comput. Geotech. 56: 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.11.006.
Kumar, N. D., and S. N. Rao. 2012. “Lateral load: Deflection response of an embedded caisson in marine clay.” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 30 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2011.562444.
McKenna, F., and G. Fenves. 2001. The OpenSees command language manual: Version 1.2. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Univ. of Calif. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/OpenSeesCommands.pdf.
Mondal, G., A. Prashant, and S. K. Jain. 2012. “Significance of interface nonlinearity on the seismic response of a well-pier system in cohesionless Soil.” Earthquake Spectra 28 (3): 1117–1145. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000074.
Mroz, Z. 1967. “On the description of anisotropic workhardening.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 15 (3): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(67)90030-0.
Parra-Colmenares, E. J. 1996. “Numerical modeling of liquefaction and lateral ground deformation including cyclic mobility and dilation response in soil systems.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Ponnuswamy, S. 2008. Bridge engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Prevost, J. H. 1985. “A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 4 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(85)90030-0.
Varun, D. Assimaki, and G. Gazetas. 2009. “A simplified model for the lateral response of large diameter caisson foundations—Linear elastic formulation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 29 (2): 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.02.001.
Yang, Z. 2000. Numerical modeling of earthquake site response including dilation and liquefaction. New York: Columbia Univ.
Yang, Z., J. Lu, and A. Elgamal. 2008. Opensees soil models and solid-fluid fully coupled elements: User’s manual. San Diego: Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California.
Zafeirakos, A., and N. Gerolymos. 2016. “Bearing strength surface for bridge caisson foundations in frictional soil under combined loading.” Acta Geotech. 11 (5): 1189–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0431-7.
Zienkiewicz, O. C. 1974. “Constrained variational principles and penalty function methods in finite element analysis.” In Conf. on the Numerical Solution of Differential Equations, 207–214. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 21, 2020
Accepted: Oct 11, 2021
Published online: Dec 1, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 1, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Maosong Huang, He Cui, Zhenhao Shi, Kanmin Shen, Bin Wang, Multi-directional T-EMSD-based p-y model for recent loading history effects on lateral response of short pile and caisson in undrained clays, Ocean Engineering, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113279, 267, (113279), (2023).
- An-Hui Wang, Yan-Fang Zhang, Fan Xia, Ru-Ping Luo, Ning Wang, Study of the Lateral Bearing Capacity and Optimization Reinforcement Scheme of an Open Caisson with Consideration of Soil Disturbance, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app12115498, 12, 11, (5498), (2022).