Technical Papers
Sep 15, 2021

Shaking Table Test on the Seismic Response of a Frame-Type Subway Station in Composite Soil

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 11

Abstract

With the development of urbanization, numerous underground structures were constructed in composite soil. It is common that the aseismic capacity of the underground structure is influenced by the soil. Hence, during the seismic design, the underground structure located at the composite soil should be noticed. In this study, the seismic response of a frame-type subway station located in composite soil was explored by shaking table tests. The acceleration response, the strain distribution, and the earth-pressure distribution of the model system under the motion of the Kobe wave and the Chongqing artificial wave were obtained and interpreted. The test results demonstrated that the peak acceleration response of the model soil and the model structure increases with the input acceleration and the distance to the shaking table. The acceleration response of the model soil is influenced by the location of the model structure, and the model soil can determine the seismic response of the model structure. The strong strain response of the model structure occurred when the peak accelerations of both input waves were greater than 0.4g. Under the action of major earthquakes (e.g., PGA = 0.4g, 0.8g, and 1.0g), the strain at the top of the upper intermediate column and the bottom of the lower intermediate column is significantly greater than that of other components. It is suggested that the ductility of the intermediate columns ought to focus on the seismic design of the frame-type station located in composite soil. The maximum earth-pressure occurs in the middle of the external side wall. The earth-pressure pattern demonstrates a U-type distribution in the X-direction, and the distribution characteristics are more significant as the input peak acceleration increases.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51578091), and the authors are very grateful to the editors and reviewers for their kind and invaluable comments.

References

An, X., A. A. Shawky, and K. Maekawa. 1997. “The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin earthquake.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 19 (3): 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00014-0.
Chen, G., S. Chen, C. Qi, X. Du, Z. Wang, and W. Chen. 2015a. “Shaking table tests on a three-arch type subway station structure in a liquefiable soil.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (6): 1675–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9675-0.
Chen, G., S. Chen, X. Zuo, X. Du, C. Qi, and Z. Wang. 2015b. “Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 76: 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.012.
Chen, G., Z. Wang, X. Zuo, X. Du, and H. Gao. 2013. “Shaking table test on the seismic failure characteristics of a subway station structure on liquefiable ground.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (10): 1489–1507. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2283.
Chen, J., H. Yu, A. Bobet, and Y. Yuan. 2020a. “Shaking table tests of transition tunnel connecting TBM and drill-and-blast tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 96: 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103197.
Chen, J., Y. Yuan, and H. Yu. 2020b. “Dynamic response of segmental lining tunnel.” Geotech. Test. J. 43 (3): 20170419. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170419.
Chen, S., H. Zhuang, D. Qu, J. Yuan, K. Zhao, and B. Ruan. 2019. “Shaking table test on the seismic response of large-scale subway station in a loess site: A case study.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 123: 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.023.
Chen, Z. Y., W. Chen, Y. Li, and Y. Yuan. 2016. “Shaking table test of a multi-story subway station under pulse-like ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 82: 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.002.
Chen, Z. Y., and Z. Liu. 2019. “Effects of pulse-like earthquake motions on a typical subway station structure obtained in shaking-table tests.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109557.
Huo, H. 2005. “Seismic design and analysis of rectangular underground structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ.
Huo, H., A. Bobet, G. Fernández, and J. Ramírez. 2005. “Load transfer mechanisms between underground structure and surrounding ground: Evaluation of the failure of the daikai station.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (12): 1522–1533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1522).
Hushmand, A., S. Dashti, C. Davis, B. Hushmand, J. S. McCartney, J. Hu, and Y. Lee. 2016. “Seismic performance of underground reservoir structures: Insight from centrifuge modeling on the influence of backfill soil type and geometry.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (11): 04016058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001544.
Iida, H., T. Hiroto, N. Yoshida, and M. Iwafuji. 1996. “Damage to Daikai subway station.” Soils Found. 36: 283–300. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.Special_283.
Ishibashi, T., and H. Okamura. 1997. “Study on the design earthquake resistance and degree of earthquake damage of reinforced concrete viaducts.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 19 (3): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00017-6.
Iwatate, T., Y. Kobayashi, and H. Kusu. 2000. “Investigation and shaking table tests of subway structures of the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake.” In Proc.,12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1043–1051. Pittsburgh, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Lemnitzer, A., L. Keykhosropour, Y. Kawamata, and I. Towhata. 2017. “Dynamic response of underground structures in sand: Experimental data.” Earthquake Spectra 33 (1): 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1193/032816eqs048dp.
Liu, T., S. Zheng, X. Tang, and W. Xu. 2019. “Experimental study on seismic response of a large-span and column-free subway station in composite strata.” Shock Vib. 2019: 8412390. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8412390.
Liu, Z., Z. Chen, S. Liang, and C. Li. 2020. “Isolation mechanism of a subway station structure with flexible devices at column ends obtained in shaking-table tests.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 98: 103328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103328.
Lu, C. C., and J. H. Hwang. 2019. “Nonlinear collapse simulation of Daikai subway in the 1995 Kobe earthquake: Necessity of dynamic analysis for a shallow tunnel.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 87: 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.02.007.
Matsui, J., K. Ohtomo, and K. Kanaya. 2004. “Development and validation of nonlinear dynamic analysis in seismic performance verification of underground RC structures.” J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2 (1): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.2.25.
Meymand, P. J. 1998. “Shaking table scale model test of nonlinear soil–pile–superstructure interaction in soft clay.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Owen, G. N., and R. Schott. 1981. Earthquake engineering of large Underground structures. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Tang, B., X. Li, S. Chen, H. Zhuang, and H. P. Chen. 2020. “Investigations of seismic response to an irregular-section subway station structure located in a soft clay site.” Eng. Struct. 217: 110799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110799.
Tao, L., P. Ding, C. Shi, X. Wu, S. Wu, and S. Li. 2019. “Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 91: 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.102994.
Wang, G., M. Yuan, Y. Miao, J. Wu, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Experimental study on seismic response of underground tunnel–soil–surface structure interaction system.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 76: 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015.
Wu, W., S. Ge, Y. Yuan, W. Ding, and I. Anastasopoulos. 2020. “Seismic response of subway station in soft soil: Shaking table testing versus numerical analysis.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 100: 103389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103389.
Yu, H., X. Yan, A. Bobet, Y. Yuan, G. Xu, and Q. Su. 2018. “Multi-point shaking table test of a long tunnel subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (2): 1041–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0223-6.
Yuan, Y., H. Yu, C. Li, X. Yan, and J. Yuan. 2018. “Multi-point shaking table test for long tunnels subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings—Part I: Theory and validation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 108: 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.017.
Yue, C., and Y. Zheng. 2019. “Shaking table test study on seismic behavior of underground structure with intermediate columns enhanced by concrete-filled steel tube (CFT).” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 127: 105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105838.
Zhao, H., Y. Yuan, Z. Ye, H. Yu, and Z. Zhang. 2019. “Response characteristics of an atrium subway station subjected to bidirectional ground shaking.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 125: 105737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105737.
Zhong, Z., Y. Shen, M. Zhao, L. Li, and H. Hao. 2020. “Seismic fragility assessment of the daikai subway station in layered soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 132: 106044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106044.
Zhuang, H., G. Chen, Z. Hu, and C. Qi. 2016. “Influence of soil liquefaction on the seismic response of a subway station in model tests.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 75 (3): 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0777-y.
Zhuang, H., X. Wang, Y. Miao, S. Chen, B. Ruan, and G. Chen. 2019a. “Seismic responses of a subway station and tunnel in a slightly inclined liquefiable ground through shaking table test.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 116: 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.051.
Zhuang, H. Y., J. S. Fu, X. Yu, S. Chen, and X. H. Cai. 2019b. “Earthquake responses of a base-isolated structure on a multi-layered soft soil foundation by using shaking table tests.” Eng. Struct. 179: 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.060.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Aug 31, 2020
Accepted: Jul 29, 2021
Published online: Sep 15, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China. Email: [email protected]
Xiaoguang Jin [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China; Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China; State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Hubei Center for Patent Examination Cooperation of the Patent Office of the State Intellectual Property Office, Wuhan 43000, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Dynamic Response of Rectangular Tunnels Embedded at Various Depths in Spatially Variable Soils, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app122110719, 12, 21, (10719), (2022).
  • Comparison of seismic responses of atrium-style and frame-box metro stations in soft soil in shaking table testing, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.079, 45, (912-931), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share