Technical Papers
Aug 6, 2021

Three-Dimensional Face Stability Analysis of Deep and Shallow Tunnels in Rock Masses

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 10

Abstract

Face stability is a critical issue in the stability analysis of tunnels, especially in soft soils and crushed rock masses. In this paper, considering two three-dimensional collapse mechanisms, upper-bound solutions are presented for determining the face pressure of deep and shallow tunnels excavated in rock masses. The Hoek–Brown failure criterion was considered for the rock mass surrounding the tunnel. The proposed upper-bound formulations were compared with three-dimensional finite-element simulations and also with centrifuge test results available in the literature. The obtained results showed that the face pressure decreases with increasing σci, mi, and geological strength index. Besides, increasing the tunnel diameter and the rock mass density led to an increase in the face pressure, where for larger tunnels, the effect of the density became more pronounced. Finally, some charts were presented to specify the range of applicability of the concepts of deep and shallow tunnels. The results obtained from these charts demonstrated that the reduction in the Hoek–Brown parameters of the rock mass results in spreading the collapse mechanism from the tunnel face to the ground surface.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (MATLAB codes and Excel source files).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Ai and Ai+1
base area of the ith and (i + 1)th elliptical cones;
C
height of the tunnel cover;
ci and ci,i+1
tangential cohesions corresponding to ϕi and ϕi,i+1, respectively;
ct
tangential cohesion corresponding to ϕt;
D
disturbance coefficient;
d
diameter of the tunnel;
mb
value of the Hoek–Brown constant, m for rock masses;
mi
value of m for intact rocks;
s and a
Hoek–Brown constants that depend upon the characteristics of rock masses;
Si
lateral area of the ith sliding block;
Ui
absolute velocity of the ith sliding block;
Ur(i) or Ui,i+1
relative velocity between the ith and (i + 1)th sliding blocks;
Vi
volume of the ith sliding block;
ϕi
tangential friction angle along the lateral surface of the ith elliptical cone;
ϕi,i+1
relative tangential friction angle between the ith and (i + 1)th sliding blocks;
ϕt
tangential friction angle;
γ
unit weight of rock masses;
σ1 and σ3
major and minor effective principal stresses at failure, respectively;
σci
uniaxial compressive strength of intact rocks;
σp
tunnel face pressure;
σs
surcharge applied to the ground surface; and
ψi
angle between the absolute velocity of the ith sliding block and the vertical direction.

References

AlKhafaji, H., M. Imani, and A. Fahimifar. 2020. “Ultimate bearing capacity of rock mass foundations subjected to seepage forces using modified Hoek–Brown criterion.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 53 (1): 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01905-6.
Anagnostou, G. 2012. “The contribution of horizontal arching to tunnel face stability.” Geotechnik 35 (1): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/gete.201100024.
Anagnostou, G., and K. Kovári. 1994. “The face stability of slurry-shield-driven tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 9 (2): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(94)90028-0.
Broere, W. 2001. “Tunnel face stability and new CPT applications.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Geoscience and Engineering, Delf University Press.
Broms, B. B., and H. Bennermark. 1967. “Stability of clay at vertical opening.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 93 (SM1): 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000946.
Brown, E. T., and E. Hoek. 1978. “Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 15 (4): 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)91227-5.
Chambon, P., and J. F. Corté. 1994. “Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: Stability of tunnel face.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (7): 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:7(1148).
Chen, W. F. 1975. Vol. 7 of Chap. 3 in Limit analysis and soil plasticity, 47–106. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Davis, E. H., M. J. Gunn, R. J. Mair, and H. N. Seneviratne. 1980. “The stability of shallow tunnels and underground openings in cohesive material.” Géotechnique 30: 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.4.397.
González de Vallejo, L. I., and T. Hijazo. 2008. “A new method of estimating the ratio between in situ rock stresses and tectonics based on empirical and probabilistic analyses.” Eng. Geol. 101: 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.05.003.
Guglielmetti, V., P. Grasso, A. Mahtab, and S. Xu. 2008. Chap. 5 in Mechanized tunneling in urban areas: Design methodology and construction control, 113–235. London: Taylor & Francis.
Han, K., C. Zhang, and D. Zhang. 2016. “Upper-bound solutions for the face stability of a shield tunnel in multilayered cohesive–frictional soils.” Comput. Geotech. 79: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.05.018.
Herrenknecht, M., and U. Rehm. 2002. “Newest development in mechanized tunneling.” Journées d’études Internationales, 201–206. Toulouse: AFTES.
Hoek, E., C. T. Corranza-Torres, and B. Corkum. 2002. “Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 Edition.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symp., 267–273. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hoek, E., and M. S. Diederichs. 2006. “Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43 (2): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005.
Horn, M. 1961. “Horizontal earth pressure on perpendicular tunnel face.” In Proc., Hungarian National Conf. of the Foundation Engineer Industry, 7–16. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Association of Engineers.
Huang, F., Y. Feng, Z. Zhang, X. Yang, and T. Ling. 2019. “Upper bound solution of the safety factor for a shield tunnel face subjected to the Hoek–Brown failure criterion.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 17 (12): 1941–1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00416-3.
Indiger, G., P. Aklik, W. Wu, and R. I. Borja. 2011. “Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel.” Acta Geotech. 6: 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-011-0139-2.
Jancsecz, S., and W. Steiner. 1994. “Face support for a large mix-shield in heterogeneous ground conditions.” In Tunnelling ’94: Papers Presented at the 7th Int. Symp., 531–550. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer US.
Khezri, N., H. Mohamad, and B. Fatahi. 2016. “Stability assessment of tunnel face in a layered soil using upper bound theorem of limit analysis.” Geomech. Eng. 11 (4): 471–492. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.4.471.
Kirsch, A. 2009. “On the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand.” In Vol. 16 of Advances in geotechnical engineering and tunelling. Berlin: Logos.
Leca, E., and L. Dormieux. 1990. “Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material.” Géotechnique 40 (4): 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.4.581.
Mair, R. J., and R. N. Taylor. 1997. “Bored tunneling in the urban environment.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 14th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2353–2385. Hamburg, Germany: Balkema.
Mao, N., T. Al-Bittar, and A. H. Soubra. 2012. “Probabilistic analysis and design of strip foundations resting on rocks obeying Hoek–Brown failure criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 49: 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.005.
Mollon, G., D. Dias, and A. H. Soubra. 2009a. “Probabilistic analysis and design of circular tunnels against face stability.” Int. J. Geomech. 9 (6): 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:6(237).
Mollon, G., D. Dias, and A. H. Soubra. 2009b. “Probabilistic analysis of circular tunnels in homogeneous soil using response surface methodology.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (9): 1314–1325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000060.
Mollon, G., D. Dias, and A. H. Soubra. 2010. “Face stability analysis of circular tunnels driven by a pressurized shield.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000194.
Mollon, G., D. Dias, and A. H. Soubra. 2011a. “Rotational failure mechanisms for the face stability analysis of tunnels driven by a pressurized shield.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 35 (12): 1363–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.962.
Mollon, G., K. K. Phoon, D. Dias, and A. H. Soubra. 2011b. “Validation of a new 2D failure mechanism for the stability analysis of a pressurized tunnel face in a spatially varying sand.” J. Eng. Mech. 137 (1): 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000196.
Mollon, G., D. Dias, and A. H. Soubra. 2013. “Continuous velocity fields for collapse and blowout of a pressurized tunnel face in purely cohesive soil.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 37 (13): 2061–2083. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2121.
Murayama, S., M. Endo, T. Hashiba, K. Yamamoto, and H. Sasaki. 1966. “Geotechnical aspects for the excavating performance of the shield machines.” In Proc., 21st Annual Lecture in Meeting of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 265–265. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
Ngan Vu, M. N., W. Broere, and J. W. Bosch. 2017. “Structural analysis for shallow tunnels in soft soils.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (8): 04017038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000866.
Pan, Q., and D. Dias. 2017. “Upper-bound analysis on the face stability of a non-circular tunnel.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 62: 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.010.
Pan, Q., and D. Dias. 2018. “Three-dimensional static and seismic stability analysis of a tunnel face driven in weak rock masses.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (6): 1–10.
Saada, Z., S. Maghous, and D. Garnier. 2008. “Bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rocks obeying a modified Hoek–Brown failure criterion.” Comput. Geotech. 35: 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.003.
Saada, Z., S. Maghous, and D. Garnier. 2012. “Stability analysis of rock slopes subjected to seepage forces using the modified Hoek–Brown criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 55: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.06.010.
Senet, S., G. Mollon, and R. Jimenez. 2013. “Tunnel face stability in heavily fractured rock masses that follow the Hoek–Brown failure criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 60: 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.004.
Shamloo, S., and M. Imani. 2021. “Upper bound solution for the bearing capacity of two adjacent footings on rock masses.” Comput. Geotech. 129: 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103855.
Sloan, S. W., and A. Assadi. 1994. “Undrained stability of a plane strain heading.” Can. Geotech. J. 31: 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-051.
Vásárhelyi, B. 2009. “A possible method for estimating the Poisson’s rate values of the rock masses.” Acta Geod. Geophys. Hung. 44 (3): 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.44.2009.3.4.
Vermeer, P. A., N. Ruse, and T. Marcher. 2002. “Tunnel heading stability in drained ground.” Felsbau 20 (6): 8–18.
Yang, X. L., and J. H. Yin. 2005. “Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity with a modified Hoek–Brown failure criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 42: 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.03.002.
Zamora Hernández, Y., A. Durand Farfán, and A. Pacheco de Assis. 2019. “Three-dimensional analysis of excavation face stability of shallow tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 92: 103062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103062.
Zhang, C., K. Han, and D. Zhang. 2015. “Face stability analysis of shallow circular tunnels in cohesive–frictional soils.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 50: 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.007.
Zhao, L., D. Li, L. Li, F. Yang, X. Cheng, and W. Lou. 2017. “Three-dimensional stability analysis of a longitudinally inclined shallow tunnel face.” Comput. Geotech. 87: 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.01.015.
Zou, J., G. Chen, and Z. Qian. 2019. “Tunnel face stability in cohesion–frictional soils considering the soil arching effect by improved failure models.” Comput. Geotech. 106: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.10.014.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Oct 27, 2020
Accepted: May 24, 2021
Published online: Aug 6, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.Sc. Graduate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir Univ. of Technology, Garmsar Campus, Garmsar 35818-67461, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1113-9318. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir Univ. of Technology, Garmsar Campus, Garmsar 35818-67461, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-5262. Email: [email protected]
Ahmad Fahimifar [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir Univ. of Technology, Tehran 15875-4413, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Model test and numerical analysis for the face failure mechanism of large cross-section tunnels under different ground conditions, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104735, 130, (104735), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share