Technical Papers
May 6, 2021

Axial Pullout Behavior of Buried Medium-Density Polyethylene Gas Distribution Pipes

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 7

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation into the axial pullout behavior of buried medium-density polyethylene (MDPE) pipes under various pulling rates. Tests were conducted in a facility developed at the Memorial University of Newfoundland. During the tests, pipe elongations and axial strains were measured to examine the mobilization of axial force with leading end displacement, and circumferential strains were measured to capture the effects of pipe diameter change. Finite-element (FE) modeling of the tests was used to evaluate the interface friction angle and the effect of diameter changes on the normal stresses on the pipe surface, which influence the pullout resistance of the soil. The results indicated that the pipes’ elongation, diameter decrease, and pulling rate significantly influence the pullout forces for buried MDPE pipes subjected to axial ground movement. FE analysis with interface friction angles of 0.75ϕ, 0.86ϕ, and 0.9ϕ was found to successfully simulate the test conditions under pulling rates of 0.5, 1, and 2 mm/min, respectively. Based on the study, simplified methods were proposed to calculate the mobilized frictional length and pipe wall strain from the leading end displacement.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The Collaborative Research and Development Grant program of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Innovate NL program of the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, FortisBC Energy, and WSP Canada are gratefully acknowledged for providing the financial and/or in-kind support for this research. The authors are thankful for the technical assistance of Jason Murphy, Shawn Organ, and Matt Curtis in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at the Memorial University of Newfoundland. Undergraduate students Alex David McNeil and Shadi Soliman helped with instrumentation and pipe installation and deinstallation during the tests.

References

ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. “Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe.” Accessed January 14, 2020. https://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/Update061305.pdf.
Alam, S., and E. N. Alloche. 2010. “Experimental investigation of pipe soil friction coefficients for direct buried PVC pipes.” In Vol. 2 of Pipeline Division Specialty Conf. 2010, 1160–1169. Keystone, CO: ASCE.
Anderson, C., D. Wijewickreme, C. Ventura, and A. Mitchell. 2004. “Full-scale laboratory testing of buried polyethylene gas distribution pipelines subject to lateral ground displacements.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 33–37. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Association of Earthquake Engineering. Paper 1543.
ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. New York: ASCE.
ASTM. 2003. Standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM D698. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bilgin, Ö, and H. E. Stewart. 2009a. “Pullout resistance characteristics of cast iron pipe.” J. Transp. Eng. 135 (10): 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:10(730).
Bilgin, Ö, and H. E. Stewart. 2009b. “Design guidelines for polyethylene pipe interface shear resistance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (6): 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000030.
Brachman, R. W. I. 1999. “Structural performance of leachete collection pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Western Ontario.
CEPA (Canadian Energy Pipeline Association). 2016. “2016 Pipeline industry performance report.” Accessed January 14, 2020. www.aboutpipelines.com/en/pipeline-101/pipeline-history/.
CEPA (Canadian Energy Pipeline Association). 2017. “2017 Pipeline industry performance report.” Accessed January 14, 2020. www.pr17.cepa.com.
Cruden, D. M., and D. J. Varnes. 1996. Landslide types and processes. Landslides—Investigations and mitigation, 36–75, edited by A. K. Turner and R. L. Schuster. Special Rep. 247. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Dassault Systems. 2014. ABAQUS/CAE user’s guide. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia.
Daiyan, N., S. Kenny, R. Phillips, and R. Popescu. 2011. “Investigating pipeline–soil interaction under axial–lateral relative movements in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (11): 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-061.
Dhar, A. S., and I. D. Moore. 2001. “Liner buckling in profiled polyethylene pipes.” Geosynth. Int. 8 (4): 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.8.0197.
Dhar, A. S., and I. D. Moore. 2004. “Laboratory investigation of local bending in profiled thermoplastic pipes.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 7 (3): 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943304323213166.
Gerlach, T., and M. Achmus. 2018. “Numerical investigations on district heating pipelines under combined axial and lateral loading.” In 16th Int. Symp. on District Heating and Cooling, 435–444. Hamburg, Germany: HafenCity University.
Guo, P. J., and D. F. E. Stolle. 2005. “Lateral pipe–soil interaction in sand with reference to scale effect.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (3): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(338).
Hardin, B. O., and W. L. Black. 1966. “Sand stiffness under various triaxial stresses.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92 (2): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000865.
Janbu, N. 1963. “Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 19–25. Essen, Germany: German Society for Earthworks and Foundations.
Jung, J., T. O'Rourke, and N. Olson. 2013. “Uplift soil–pipe interaction in granular soil.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (7): 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0357.
Liu, R., L. Guo, S. Yan, and Y. Xu. 2011. “Studies on soil resistance to pipelines buried in sand.” Adv. Mater. Res. 243–249: 3151–3156. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.3151.
Meidani, M., M. A. Meguid, and L. E. Chouinard. 2017. “Evaluation of soil–pipe interaction under relative axial ground movement.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000269.
Muntakim, A. H., A. S. Dhar, and M. Rahman. 2017. “Pipeline behavior subjected to large ground movement.” In Proc., 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Vancouver, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Murugathasan, P., A. S. Dhar, and B. C. Hawlader. 2018. “A laboratory facility for studying pullout behavior of buried pipelines.” In Proc., 71st Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Alberta, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Murugathasan, P., A. S. Dhar, and B. C. Hawlader. 2020. “An experimental and numerical investigation of pullout behavior of ductile iron water pipes buried in sand.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 48 (2): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0366.
Phillips, P., A. Nobahar, and J. Zhou. 2004. “Combined axial and lateral pipe–soil interaction relationship.” In Proc., ASME. IPC2004, Int. Pipeline Conf., 299–303. New York: ASME.
PRCI (Pipeline Research Council International). 2009. Guidelines for constructing natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines through areas prone to landslide and subsidence hazards. Report prepared for the Design, Material, and Construction committee. Chantilly, VA: Pipeline Research Council International, Inc.
Roy, K., B. Hawlader, S. Kenny, and I. Moore. 2016. “Finite element modeling of lateral pipeline–soil interactions in dense sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (3): 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0171.
Saha, R. C., A. S. Dhar, and B. C. Hawlader. 2019. “Shear strength assessment of a well-graded clean sand.” In Proc., GeoSt.John's 2019, 72nd Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Scarpelli, G., E. Sakellariadi, and G. Furlani. 2003. “Evaluation of soil–pipeline longitudinal interaction forces.” Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 4 (3): 24–41.
Sheil, B. B., C. M. Martin, B. W. Byrne, M. Plant, K. Williams, and D. Coyne. 2018. “Full-scale laboratory testing of a buried pipeline in sand subjected to cyclic axial displacements.” Géotechnique 68 (8): 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.275.
Suleiman, M. T., and B. J. Coree. 2004. “Constitutive model for high density polyethylene material: Systematic approach.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 16 (6): 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(511).
Tognon, A. R., R. K. Rowe, and R. W. I. Brachman. 1999. “Evaluation of side wall friction for a buried pipe testing facility.” Geotext. Geomembr. 17: 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(99)00004-7.
Weerasekara, L. 2011. “Pipe–soil interaction aspects in buried extensible pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Weerasekara, L., and M. Rahman. 2019. “Framework for assessing integrity of natural gas distribution pipes in landslide areas.” In Proc., GeoSt.John’s 2019, 72nd Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Weerasekara, L., and D. Wijewickreme. 2008. “Mobilization of soil loads on buried polyethylene natural gas pipelines subject to relative axial displacements.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (9): 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-043.
Wijewickreme, D., H. Karimian, and D. Honegger. 2009. “Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to relative axial soil movement.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (7): 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-019.
Wijewickreme, D., and L. Weerasekara. 2015. “Analytical modeling of field axial pullout tests performed on buried extensible pipes.” Int. J. Geomech. 15 (2): 04014044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000388.
Yimsiri, S., K. Soga, K. Yoshizaki, G. R. Dasari, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2004. “Lateral and upward soil–pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(830).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Jan 15, 2020
Accepted: Mar 12, 2021
Published online: May 6, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 6, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1C 5S7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-2913. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1C 5S7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-3921. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Modeling of Polyethylene Pipes in Dense Sand Subjected to a Lateral Force, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1531, 15, 3, (2024).
  • Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand, Infrastructures, 10.3390/infrastructures6120168, 6, 12, (168), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share