Analytical Study of Forces on a Glass Sphere under the Effects of Fluid's Viscosity, pH, and Ionic Strength for Flow-Induced Particle Mobilization
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 7
Abstract
This paper presents an analytical study on the roles of fluid viscosity, pH, and ionic strength in the variations of the interparticle forces and the force equilibrium of a spherical particle resting on a particle bed. The purpose of this analytical study is to provide a theoretical explanation of the observed trends of the effects of viscosity, pH, and ionic strength on the particle mobilization under laminar flow conditions in an experimental program. Viscosity affects the mobilizing hydraulic shear force, while pH and ionic strength affect the interparticle surface forces (i.e., van der Waals force and electrostatic force) between a particle and the particle bed. In this paper, the experimental program and the observations on particle mobilization under the effects of viscosity, pH, and ionic strength are first overviewed; then, the hydraulic dynamic force and interparticle surface forces in terms of van der Waals force and electrostatic force are computed. The study investigates the variations of the van der Waals force and electrostatic force with particle separation distance, pH, ionic strength, and temperature and how the variations affect the critical flow velocity, i.e., the flow velocity that induces particle mobilization. The following major conclusions are drawn from this analytical study. (1) As the pH increases and zeta potential decreases, the electrostatic force (repulsion) between a test particle and a bed of particles increases, and the test particle is more likely to mobilize; thus, the critical flow velocity decreases. (2) As the ionic strength increases, the repulsive electrostatic force generally decreases and could cause the net surface force on the test particle to change from repulsion to attraction; consequently, the test particle becomes less likely to mobilize; thus, the critical flow velocity increases. (3) The trend of electrostatic force variation with ionic strength remains the same when the fluid's zeta potential changes from −10 to −40 mV. As the zeta potential decreases from −10 to −40 mV and the pH increases, the electrostatic force can increase by one order of magnitude and becomes more significant when compared with the van der Waals force. (4) When the fluid temperature increases from 5°C to 50°C, the variation of the electrostatic force is not significant and is within one order of magnitude at various ionic strengths. However, the hydraulic shear force decreases significantly due to the significant decrease of viscosity when the fluid temperature increases from 5°C to 50°C; thus, it significantly increases the magnitude of critical velocity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation CMMI Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Program under award number CMMI 1200081 and Pennsylvania State University.
References
Anandarajah, A., and J. Chen. 1997. “Van der Waals attractive force between clay particles in water and contaminants.” Soils Found. 37 (2): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.2_27.
Briaud, J.-L., H.-C. Chen, A. V. Govindasamy, and R. Storesund. 2008. “Levee erosion by overtopping in New Orleans during the Katrina hurricane.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (5): 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:5(618).
Chen, J., and A. Anandarajah. 1996. “Van der Waals attraction between spherical particles.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 180 (2): 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.0332.
Churaev, N. V., B. V. Derjaguin, and V. M. Muller. 1987. Surface forces. Berlin: Springer.
Fournier, Z., et al. 2005. “Mechanical properties of wet granular materials.” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 (9): S477–S502. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/17/9/013.
Goldman, A. J., R. G. Cox, and H. Brenner. 1967. “Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall—II. Couette flow.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 22 (4): 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(67)80048-4.
Gu, Y., and D. Li. 2000. “The ζ-potential of glass surface in contact with aqueous solutions.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 226 (2): 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.6827.
Hubbe, M. A. 1985. “Detachment of colloidal hydrous oxide spheres from flat solids exposed to flow 2. Mechanism of release.” Colloids Surf. 16 (3–4): 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(85)80257-2.
Israelachvili, J. N. 2011. Intermolecular and surface forces. 3rd ed. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
Kolakowski, J. E., and E. Matijević. 1979. “Particle adhesion and removal in model systems. Part 1. Monodispersed chromium hydroxide on glass.” J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 F 75: 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1039/f19797500065.
Kuo, R. J., and E. Matijević. 1980. “Particle adhesion and removal in model systems: III. Monodispersed ferric oxide on steel.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 78 (2): 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90581-0.
Matthewson, M. J. 1988. “Adhesion of spheres by thin liquid films.” Philos. Mag. A 57 (2): 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418618808204510.
O’Neill, M. E. 1968. “A sphere in contact with a plane wall in a slow linear shear flow.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 23 (11): 1293–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(68)89039-6.
Santamarina, J. C. 2001. Soil behavior at the microscale: Particle forces, 25–56. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sharma, M. M., H. Chamoun, D. S. H. Sita Rama Sarma, and R. S. Scgechter. 1992. “Factors controlling the hydrodynamic detachment of particles from surfaces.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 149 (1): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(92)90398-6.
Tokunaga, T. K. 2011. “Physicochemical controls on adsorbed water film thickness in unsaturated geological media.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (8): W08514. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010676.
Visser, J. 1970. “Measurement of the force of adhesion between submicron carbon-black particles and a cellulose film in aqueous solution.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 34 (1): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(70)90254-7.
Visser, J. 1972. “On Hamaker constants: A comparison between Hamaker constants and Lifshitz–Van der Waals constants.” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 3 (4): 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(72)85001-2.
Visser, J. 1976. “The adhesion of colloidal polystyrene particles to cellophane as a function of pH and ionic strength.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 55 (3): 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(76)90077-1.
Xiao, M., A. Gholizadeh-Vayghan, B. T. Adams, and F. Rajabipour. 2018. “Relative and interactive effects of fluid’s physicochemical characteristics on the incipient motion of a granular particle under laminar flow condition.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 144 (5): 04018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001451.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 24, 2020
Accepted: Feb 25, 2021
Published online: Apr 28, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.