Technical Papers
Apr 21, 2021

Semianalytical Analysis of Overexcavation and Critical Support Pressure for Support Design in TBM Tunneling through Squeezing Rock Condition

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 7

Abstract

Support damage is a typical hazard scenario associated with tunnel boring machine (TBM) drives in the squeezing rock condition. The stress release of the rock mass and the improvement of the support capacity are two effective methods to prevent support damage. The stress in the rock mass can be released by allowing a certain amount of overexcavation. The support capacity can be evaluated by solving the required support pressures corresponding to different critical strain levels. This paper aims to achieve a better understanding of preventing support damage for TBMs in the squeezing condition by quantitatively analyzing the overexcavation and the required support pressure. A semianalytical solution of the ground reaction curve is obtained. A simplified method of solving the support pressure with specific rock displacement is proposed. Based on the two solutions, the procedures for solving for the overexcavation and the critical support pressure are presented. Corresponding to the critical strain levels of 1%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%, the response surfaces for critical support pressures in relation to the Geological Survey Index (GSI) and in situ stress are obtained via the nonlinear regression method. The influences of GSI, in situ stress, and the mechanical parameters of the concrete lining and shield on the size of the overexcavation are comprehensively investigated. A method to guide support design in the squeezing rock mass is proposed. Three tunnel cases are presented to demonstrate the application of the method, and three case histories that encounter support failures are discussed to illustrate the appropriate design measures through the proposed method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52009129, 51909248, and 51909259), Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (Grant No. 201704), and Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering (Grant No. LP2012).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
E1
elastic modulus of the shield;
E2
elastic modulus of the concrete lining;
Er
elastic modulus of the rock mass;
f
failure criterion;
f0
displacement reduction ratio;
g
flow potential;
K1
stiffness of the shield;
K2
stiffness of the concrete lining;
Kψ
dilatancy coefficient;
mb, s, a
strength constants in the Hoek-Brown failure criterion;
n
number of annuli in the plastic zone by the finite difference method;
pi
support pressure;
pi,1
contacting pressure between the shield and the rock mass;
pi,cri1
required critical support pressure corresponding to ɛi,cri1 = 1%;
pi,cri2
required critical support pressure corresponding to ɛi,cri2 = 2.5%;
pi,cri3
required critical support pressure corresponding to ɛi,cri3 = 5.0%;
pi,cri4
required critical support pressure corresponding to ɛi,cri4 = 10%;
pi,fic
fictitious support pressure added on the tunnel periphery;
pi,fin
contacting pressure between the concrete lining and the rock mass;
pi,max
maximum capacity of the support;
R
location of the rock mass to the center of the circular opening;
R*
normalized plastic radius;
R0
radius of the circular opening;
Rp
radius of the plastic zone;
Rpmax
maximum plastic radius;
r(i)
radial distance to the center of a circular opening at the inner boundary of the ith annulus;
t1
thickness of the shield;
t2
thickness of the shotcrete;
u
radial displacement;
u0
radial displacement at the tunnel periphery;
u0,1
rock displacement at the tunnel periphery when the rock mass and the shield reach an equilibrium;
u0,fin
rock displacement at the tunnel periphery when the rock mass and the concrete lining reach an equilibrium;
u0,fin1
u0,fin solved by the FDM analysis;
u0,fin2
u0,fin solved by the proposed solution;
u0,ini
initial radial displacement at the tunnel face;
u0,max
maximum radial displacement;
ur(i)
radial displacement at r = r(i);
Δr
radial increment in the plastic zone;
ΔR0
size of the overexcavation;
Δt1
deformation of the shield;
Δt2
deformation of the lining;
ɛr
radial strain;
εre
elastic radial strain;
εrp
plastic radial strain;
ɛθ
tangential strain;
ɛθ(i)
tangential strain at r = r(i);
ɛθ,cri1
critical strain level of 1%;
ɛθ,cri2
critical strain level of 2.5%;
ɛθ,cri3
critical strain level of 5%;
ɛθ,cri4
critical strain level of 10%;
ɛθ,fin
tunnel strain corresponding to u0,fin, ɛθ,fin = u0,fin/R0;
ɛθ,ini
tunnel strain corresponding to u0,ini, ɛθ,ini = u0,ini/R0;
εθe
elastic tangential strain;
εθp
plastic tangential strain;
μ1
Poisson's ratio of the shield;
μ2
Poisson's ratio of the concrete lining;
σ0
in situ stress field;
σ1
major principal stress;
σ3
minor principal stress;
σc,max
compressive strength of the concrete lining;
σci
compressive strength of the intact rock;
σcm
compressive strength of the rock mass;
σr
radial stress of the rock mass;
σr2
radial stress at the elastoplastic boundary;
σθ
tangential stress of the rock mass; and
ψ
dilatancy angle.

References

Alonso, E., L. R. Alejano, F. Varas, G. Fdez-Manin, and C. Carranza-Torres. 2003. “Ground response curves for rock masses exhibiting strain-softening behaviour.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 27 (13): 1153–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.315.
Aydan, O., T. Akagi, and T. Kawamoto. 1996. “The squeezing potential of rock around tunnels: Theory and prediction with examples taken from Japan.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 29 (3): 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01032650.
Barla, G. 2001. “Tunnelling under squeezing rock conditions.” In Eurosummer-School in tunnel mehchanics, edited by Kolymbas, 169–268. Innsbruck, Austria: Logos Verlag Berlin.
Barla, G., M. Bonini, and M. Semeraro. 2011. “Analysis of the behaviour of a yield-control support system in squeezing rock.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 26 (1): 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.08.001.
Barla, G., D. Debernardi, and D. Sterpi. 2012. “Time dependent modeling of tunnels in squeezing conditions.” Int. J. Geomech. 12 (6): 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000163.
Bilgin, N., and M. Algan. 2012. “The performance of a TBM in a squeezing ground at Uluabat, Turkey.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 32: 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.05.004.
Boissonnas, Y. 2008. “Gotthard based tunnel—Experience of a TBM excavation with large overburden.” In Building Underground for the Future. AFTES Int. Congress, 247–250. Limonest, France: Specifique.
Cantieni, L., and G. Anagnostou. 2009. “The interaction between yielding supports and squeezing ground.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 24 (3): 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.10.001.
Carranza-Torres, C., and C. Fairhurst. 1999. “The elasto-plastic response of underground excavations in rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 36 (6): 777–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00047-9.
Carranza-Torres, C., and C. Fairhurst. 2000. “Application of the convergence-confinement method of tunnel design to rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 15 (2): 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00046-8.
Chern, J. C., C. W. Yu, and F. Y. Shiao. 1998. “Tunnelling in squeezing ground and support estimation.” In Regional Symp. Sedimentary Rock Engineering, 192–202. Taipei, Taiwan: Public Construction Commission.
Cividini, A., A. Contini, L. Locatelli, and G. Gioda. 2012. “Investigation on the cause of damages of a deep tunnel.” Int. J. Geomech. 12 (6): 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000108.
Cui, L., Q. Sheng, J. J. Zheng, Z. Cui, A. Wang, and Q. Shen. 2019. “Regression model for predicting tunnel strain in strain-softening rock mass for underground openings.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 119: 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.04.014.
Cui, L., J. J. Zheng, Y. K. Dong, B. Zhang, and A. Wang. 2017. “Prediction of critical strains and critical support pressures for circular tunnel excavated in strain-softening rock mass.” Eng. Geol. 224: 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.022.
Cui, L., J. J. Zheng, R. J. Zhang, and Y. K. Dong. 2015. “Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening in rock mass with confining stress-dependent strain-softening behaviour.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 50: 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.07.001.
Ehrbar, H., I. Schallibaum, and J. Kalin. 2001. “Gotthard base tunnel, construction lot Sedrun, a challenge for tunnel construction.” In ITA World Tunnel Congress. Regensdorf, Switzerland: Swiss Tunnelling Society (STS).
Flury, S., and A. Priller. 2008. “Gotthard base tunnel—part—section Faido.” Tunnel 8 (4): 47–51.
Galvan, A., F. Pena, and J. Y. Moreno-Martinez. 2017. “Effect of TBM advance in the structural response of segmental tunnel lining.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (9): 04017056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000941.
Goel, R. K., J. L. Jethwa, and A. G. Paithankar. 1995. “Tunnelling through the young himalayas—A case history of the maneri-uttarkashi power tunnel.” Eng. Geol. 39 (1–2): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)00002-J.
Gollegger, J., A. Priller, and M. Rausch. 2009. “The use of open tunnel boring machines in squeezing rock in the Gotthard Based Tunnel.” Geomech. Tunnelbau 2 (5): 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.200900049.
Gschwandtner, G. G., and R. Galler. 2012. “Input to the application of the convergence confinement method with time-dependent material behaviour of the support.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 27 (1): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.06.003.
Hasanpour, R., J. Rostami, and G. Barla. 2015. “Impact of advance rate on entrapment risk of a double-shielded TBM in squeezing ground.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 48 (3): 1115–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0645-2.
Hasanpour, R., J. Rostami, and Y. Ozcelik. 2016. “Impact of overcut on interaction between shield and ground in the tunneling with a double-shield TBM.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (5): 2015–2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0823-x.
Hasanpour, R., J. Rostami, and B. Unver. 2014. “3D finite difference model for simulation of double shield TBM tunneling in squeezing grounds.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 40: 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.09.012.
Hasanpour, R., J. Schmitt, Y. Ozcelik, and J. Rostami. 2017. “Examining the effect of adverse geological conditions on jamming of a single shielded TBM in Uluabat tunnel using numerical modelling.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 9 (6): 1112–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.05.010.
Herrenknecht, M., O. Bockli, and K. Bappler. 2009. “Gotthard-base tunnel, section Faido, previous experience with the use of the TBM.” In Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conf., 1182–1205. Littleton, CO: SME.
Hoek, E. 1998. “Tunnel support in weak rock.” In Symp. of Sedimentary Rock Engineering, 20–22.
Hoek, E. 1999. “Support for very weak rock associated with faults and shear zone.” In Distinguished Lecture for the Opening of the Int. Symp.on Rock Support and Reinforcement Practice in Mining, 14–19. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Hoek, E. 2001. “Big tunnels in bad rock.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (9): 726–740. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:9(726).
Hoek, E., and E. T. Brown. 1997. “Practical estimates of rock mass strength.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (8): 1165–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X.
Hoek, E., and R. Guevara. 2009. “Overcoming squeezing in the Yacambu-Quibor tunnel, Venerzuela.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 42 (2): 389–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0175-5.
Hoek, E., and P. Marinos. 2000. “Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses.” Tunnels Tunnelling Int. 32 (11): 45–51; 32 (12): 34–36.
Huang, X., Q. S. Liu, X. X. Peng, G. F. Lei, and H. Liu. 2019. “Mechanism and forecasting model for shield jamming during TBM tunnelling through deep soft ground.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 23 (9): 1035–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1327895.
Kaliszky, S. 1989. Plasticity theory and engineering applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kovari, K., F. Amberg, and H. Ehrbar. 2000. “Mastering of squeezing rock in the gotthard based tunnel.” World Tunnelling 13 (5): 234–238.
Kovari, K., and J. Status. 1996. “Basic considerations on tunnelling in squeezing ground.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 29 (4): 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01042533.
Meguid, M. A., and R. K. Rowe. 2006. “Stability and D-shaped tunnels in Mohr-Coulomb material under anisotropic stress conditions.” Can. Geotech. J. 43 (3): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-004.
Oreste, P. P. 2003. “Analysis of structural interaction in tunnels using the convergence-confinement approach.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 18 (4): 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00004-X.
Park, K. H., and Y. J. Kim. 2006. “Analytical solution for a circular opening in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43 (4): 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.11.004.
Ramoni, M., and G. Anagnostou. 2010. “Thrust force requirements for TBMs in squeezing ground.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 25 (4): 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.02.008.
Ramoni, M., and G. Anagnostou. 2011. “The interaction between shield, ground and tunnel support in TBM tunneling through squeezing ground.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 44 (1): 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-010-0103-8.
Rodriguez, R., and M. B. Diaz-Aguado. 2013. “Deduction and use of an analytical expression for the characteristic curve of a support based on yielding steel ribs.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 33: 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.07.006.
Sakurai, S. 1986. “Field measurement and hazard warning levels in NATM.” Soil Found. 34 (2): 5–10.
Sakurai, S. 1997. “Lessons learned from field measurements in tunnelling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 12 (4): 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00004-2.
Singh, A. K., A. Negi, A. K. Verma, and S. Kumar. 2017. “Analysis of stresses induced due to a moving load on irregular initially stressed heterogeneous viscoelastic rock medium.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (9): 04017096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001307.
Singh, B., J. L. Jethwa, A. K. Dube, and B. Singh. 1992. “Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 7 (1): 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(92)90114-W.
Singh, M., B. Singh, and J. Choudhari. 2007. “Critical strain and squeezing of rock mass in tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 22 (3): 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.06.005.
Tian, H. M., W. Z. Chen, D. S. Yang, G. J. Wu, and X. J. Tan. 2016. “Numerical analysis on the interaction of the concrete liner with rock for yielding supports.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 54: 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.025.
Vlachopoulos, N., and M. S. Diederichs. 2009. “Improved longitudinal displacement profile for convergence confinement analysis of deep tunnels.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 42 (2): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0176-4.
Wen, S., S. Q. Yang, Z. F. Dong, and L. M. Zhao. 2015. “TBM jamming mechanism and control measures in deep buried tunnels.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 37 (7): 1272–1277.
Xu, Z. L. 2006. Elasticity. 4th ed. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Zhang, J. Z., and X. P. Zhou. 2017. “Time-dependent jamming mechanism for single-shield TBM tunneling in squeezing rock.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 69: 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.06.020.
Zhang, W. G., and A. T. C. Goh. 2015. “Regression models for estimating ultimate and serviceability limit states of underground rock caverns.” Eng. Geol. 188: 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.021.
Zhao, K., M. Janutolo, and G. Barla. 2012. “A completely 3D model for the simulation of mechanized tunnel excavation.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 45 (4): 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0224-3.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Jun 27, 2020
Accepted: Jan 17, 2021
Published online: Apr 21, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 21, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; School of Engineering Science, Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Underwater Tunnel Technology, Hubei, Wuhan 430071, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; School of Engineering Science, Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
You-Kou Dong [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Marine Science and Technology, China Univ. of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China. Email: [email protected]
Ming-Xing Xie [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan Univ. of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China. Email: [email protected]
Jue-Hao Huang [email protected]
Assistant Professor, State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; School of Engineering Science, Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Geo-Environmental Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Soft Soil Research Center, Ningbo Univ. of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Enhanced safety prediction of vault settlement in urban tunnels using the pair-copula and Bayesian network, Applied Soft Computing, 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109711, 132, (109711), (2023).
  • Construction analysis of Guiyang Metro passing across Guiyang Railway Station in karst zone, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104541, 126, (104541), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share