Technical Papers
Oct 23, 2020

Response and Stability of Piles Subjected to Excavation Loading

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper develops new models and normalized solutions to capture the response of piles subjected to a mixed translation–rotational soil movement. A flexible pile is divided into upper and lower portions, which join together by a rotational spring. The upper (rigid) portion rotates about the depth of the maximum bending moment at a constant stiffness (BiP–kθ model), or a constant rotation ratio between the bi-portions (BiP–η model), or it is restrained by elastic lower portion (R–E model). The theoretical relationship between the stiffness (kθ) and the rotation ratio (η) is established, along with the limits of the stiffness and the ratio. Response amplification is detected for inward rotating bi-portions, and quantified by new singularity stiffness(s). The three BiP models are adopted to capture the response of piles subjected to excavation loading in centrifuge tests. The impact of the five input parameters [i.e., limiting force per unit length (FPUL), modulus of subgrade reaction, modulus ratio of stable over sliding layers, and rotational stiffness of each portion] on the predictions is elaborated. Use of reduced values of the modulus, modulus ratio, and limiting FPUL, in particular, the rigid-pile-based 2-layer model also captures well the response of flexible piles, while a variable stress factor is used to model response profiles. Inward rotating bi-portions may amplify the pile response, and pull the maximum bending moment up into weak layer(s), and incur an unexpected failure. Centrifuge tests on anchored-piles are modeled using the BiP–η model to show the impact of inward rotation of the bi-portions. The new models and solutions are useful for the design of piles adjacent to excavation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the comments by the reviewers, and the (associate) editors.

Notation

The following symbols are used in the paper:
d
diameter of an equivalent solid cylinder pile (L);
EI
flexural stiffness of pile (FL2);
Ep
Young's modulus of an equivalent solid, cylindrical pile (FL−2);
Es
Young's modulus of sand or clay (FL−2);
FPUL
force per unit length (FL−1);
Gs, G*
shear modulus of soil, and G* (1 + 0.75vs)Gs (FL−2);
H
shear force at a depth of a or just about a sliding layer (F);
Kp
coefficient of passive earth pressure of sliding layer;
kG, kT, kθ
rotational stiffness of a pile-cap (or a nonliquefied layer), a stable layer (e.g., underlying a liquefied layer), and total rotational stiffness of a pile, respectively;
ks
modulus of subgrade reaction of the sliding layer (FL−2);
ksprofile
ks deduced from response profiles (FL−2);
kθ,kT
stiffness kθ and kθB that cause singularity and amplified response of piles;
Le
length of elastic, lower segment (L);
l, lm
length of pile embedment, and thickness of final moving layer, respectively (L);
le
effective pile length (L);
lexc
depth of excavation (L);
ls
loading depth (L);
ls
on-pile loading (slide) depth (for stepwise calculation) (L);
M(z)
bending moment at depth z (FL−2);
ML
M¯Lpsl2, calculation parameter (FL−2);
Mm (Mo)
maximum bending moment within a pile (or at the mudline level) (FL−2);
m
ratio of the subgrade modulus of the stable layer ks2 over that of the sliding layer ks;
P
vertical load on passive piles (F);
Ph
H + lsps, calculation parameter (F);
p(z), pi(z)
net on-pile force per unit length at a depth z (FL−1); on-pile force per unit length at a depth z calculated for sliding (i 1), and stable (i 2) layer, respectively using the elastic solutions (FL−1);
ps
limiting force per unit length in sliding layer due to soil movement (≥ws* = ps/ks) (FL−1);
pub (pb)
limiting force per unit length at tip-level of a free-head pile during passive loading, and pb αpub (FL−1);
Qm
maximum shear force within a pile (maximum of Qm1 and Qm2) (F);
Qm1, Qm2
peak shear force in sliding layer and stable layer, respectively (F);
Q(z)
shear force at depth z (F);
su
undrained shear strength of clay (FL−2);
wg
pile displacement at GL (L);
wh
pile displacement at depth of zm (i.e., joint of two segments) (L);
wL
a fictitious pile displacement at GL projected along the low segment (L);
ws
ws (=ws* ps/ks), effective soil movement (L);
w(z), w′(z)
displacement (L) and rotation at depth z;
x
z−zm, depth measured from zm (R-E model) (L);
z
depth (L);
zm
depth of maximum bending moment (L);
αs
a factor for nonhomogeneous soil movement profile, or on-pile pressure;
βs
1.08αs, a factor for quantifying depth of soil deformation (of βslexc);
γ
effective unit weight of clay or sand (FL−3);
η
ωr/ωrL, ratio of rotation angle of upper over lower segments;
νs
Poisson's ratio of soil;
σv
effective overburden stress (FL−2);
ϕ
effective angle of internal friction;
ϕd
angle of dilatancy;
ϕi
effective angle of sliding interface;
ωr
rotation angle of pile of upper segment (also at ground-level);
ωrL
rotation angle of lower segment of pile;
ωs
rotation angle of soil movement profile.

References

Armstrong, R. J., R. W. Boulanger, and M. H. Beaty. 2014. “Equivalent static analysis of piled bridge abutments affected by earthquake-induced liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (8): 04014046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001152.
Boulanger, R. W., B. L. Kutter, S. J. Brandenberg, P. Singh, and D. Chang. 2003. Pile foundations in liquefied and laterally spreading ground during earthquakes: Centrifuge experiments and analyses. Rep. No. UCD/CGM-03/01. Davis, CA: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California.
Bourne-Webb, P. J., D. M. Potts, D. Konig, and D. Rowbottom. 2011. “Analysis of model sheet pile walls with plastic hinges.” Géotechnique 61 (6): 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.061.
Chai, J. C., S. L. Shen, W. Q. Ding, H. H. Zhu, and J. P. Carter. 2014. “Numerical investigation of the failure of a building in Shanghai, China.” Comput. Geotech. 55: 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.10.001.
Cubrinovski, M., T. Kokushob, and K. Ishihara. 2006. “Interpretation from large-scale shake table tests on piles undergoing lateral spreading in liquefied soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.018.
de Alba, P., and T. P. Ballestero. 2006. “Residual strength after liquefaction: A rheological approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.011.
Dobry, R., T. Abdoun, T. D. O’Rourke, and S. H. Goh. 2003. “Single piles in lateral spreads: Field bending moment evaluation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (10): 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:10(879).
Frank, R., and P. Pouget. 2008. “Experimental pile subjected to long duration thrusts owing to a moving slope.” Géotechnique 58 (8): 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.8.645.
Franke, K. W., and K. M. Rollins. 2013. “Simplified hybrid p-y spring model for liquefied soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (4): 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000750.
Goh, A. T. C., C. I. Teh, and K. S. Wong. 1997. “Analysis of piles subjected to embankment induced lateral soil movements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (9): 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:9(792).
González, L., T. Abdoun, and R. Dobry. 2009. “Effect of soil permeability on centrifuge modeling of pile response to lateral spreading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (1): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:1(62).
Guo, W. D. 2012. Theory and practice of pile foundations. London: CRC Press.
Guo, W. D. 2013. “Pu based solutions for slope stabilising piles.” Int. J. Geomech. 13 (3): 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000201.
Guo, W. D. 2014. “Elastic models for nonlinear response of rigid passive piles.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 38 (18): 1969–1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2292.
Guo, W. D. 2015. “Nonlinear response of laterally loaded rigid piles in sliding soil.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (7): 903–925. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0168.
Guo, W. D. 2016. “Response of rigid piles during passive dragging.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 40 (14): 1936–1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2490.
Guo, W. D. 2020a. “Response amplification of back-rotated piles.” Can. Geotech. J.. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0583.
Guo, W. D. 2020b. “Instability of back-rotated piles with near singularity stiffness.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (9): 6020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001829.
Guo, W. D., and E. H. Ghee. 2004. “Model tests on single piles in sand subjected to lateral soil movement.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 18th Australasian Conf. on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, edited by A. J. Deeks and H. Hao, 991–1003. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Guo, W. D., H. Y. Qin, and E. H. Ghee. 2017. “Modeling single piles subjected to evolving soil movement.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (4): 4016111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000803.
Haskel, J. J. M., S. P. G. Madbhushi, M. Cubrinovski, and A. Winkley. 2013. “Lateral spreading-induced abutment rotation in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake: Observations and analysis.” Géotechnique 63 (15): 1301–1327. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.174.
Imamura, S., T. Hagiwara, Y. Tsukamoto, and K. Ishihara. 2004. “Response of pile groups against seismically induced lateral flow in centrifuge model tests.” Soils Found. 44 (3): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.44.3_39.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351.
Jeong, S., D. Seo, J. Lee, and J. Park. 2004. “Time-dependent behavior of pile groups by staged construction of an adjacent embankment on soft clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (4): 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-024.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2002. Specifications for highway bridges. Tsukuba, Japan: Public Works Research Institute (PWRI).
Karim, M. R. 2013. “Behaviour of piles subjected to passive subsoil movement due to embankment construction—A simplified 3D analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 53: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.04.004.
Lesniewska, D., and Z. Mroz. 2000. “Limit equilibrium approach to study the evolution of shear band systems in soils.” Géotechnique 50 (3): 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.5.521.
Leung, C. F., D. E. L. Ong, and Y. K. Chow. 2006. “Pile behavior due to excavation-induced soil movement in clay. II: Collapsed wall.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (1): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:1(45).
Leung, C. F., Y. K. Chow, and R. F. Shen. 2000. “Behaviour of pile subject to excavation-induced soil movement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 947–954. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(947).
McGann, C. R., P. Arduino, and P. Mackenzie-Helnwein. 2011. “Applicability of conventional p-y relations to the analysis of piles in laterally spreading soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (6): 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000468.
Mesri, G. 2007. “Yield strength and critical strength of liquefiable sands in sloping ground.” Géotechnique 57 (3): 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.3.309.
Milligan, G. W. E., and P. L. Bransby. 1976. “Combined active and passive rotational failure of a retaining wall in sand.” Géotechnique 26 (3): 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1976.26.3.473.
Miwaa, S., T. Ikedaa, and T. Satob. 2006. “Damage process of pile foundation in liquefied ground during strong ground motion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.05.001.
Motamed, R., and I. Towhata. 2010. “Shaking table model tests on pile groups behind quay walls subjected to lateral spreading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (3): 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000115.
Ong, D. E. L., C. F. Leung, and Y. K. Chow. 2003. “Piles subject to excavation-induced soil movement in clay.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 13th European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 777–782. London, UK: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Ong, D. E. L., C. F. Leung, and Y. K. Chow. 2006. “Pile behavior due to excavation-induced soil movement in clay. I: Stable wall.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:1(36).
Poulos, H. G., and E. H. Davis. 1980. Pile foundation analysis and design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Stewart, D. P., R. J. Jewell, and M. F. Randolph. 1993. “Numerical modelling of piled bridge abutments on soft ground.” Comput. Geotech. 15 (1): 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(93)90015-Y.
Whittle, A. J., and R. V. Davis. 2006. “Nicoll highway collapse: Evaluation of geotechnical factors affecting design of excavation support system.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Deep Excavations. Singapore: N.p.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Jan 21, 2020
Accepted: Jul 24, 2020
Published online: Oct 23, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share