Technical Papers
Jun 22, 2020

Shakedown Analysis of Unsaturated Soils Considering the Variation of Hydraulic States

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20, Issue 9

Abstract

Long-term stability evaluation of unsaturated earth structures has always been one of the most important issues in geotechnical engineering. Most available methods are appropriate for calculating the maximum loads that the structures can resist when the hydraulic state is fixed, and the external loads are monotonically increased. In practical engineering, however, the hydraulic condition is ever changing, and so are the matric suction and the shearing strength of unsaturated soils. In this situation, the obtained minimized collapse loads can no longer be used as reference for the design criterion, which may greatly overestimate the stability of the structures. Classical shakedown analysis is a more appropriate method, which can only consider the variation of the loads but not the variation of hydraulic states. This paper presents a novel formulation for shakedown analysis of unsaturated soils considering both the variation of external loads and the variation of the shearing strength caused by drying–wetting cycles. By using the suction stress-based effective stress of unsaturated soils, the three-phased mixture is dealt with as a single-phased material. The suction-stress equivalent forces are established, and the variation of the hydraulic state is dealt with as the variation of equivalent forces. Numerical formulations are then developed by the combination of the finite-element method and the second-order cone programming. Some shakedown problems are solved, and the effect of hydraulic state variation on the shakedown limits of foundations, pavements, and slopes is studied in detail. It is shown that the neglection of moisture content variation would greatly overestimate the safety of earth structures, and the produced errors become more significant with the increase of the suction-stress increment and the decrease of the shearing strength. The shakedown limit reaches the smallest when both external loads and suction stress are varying. When the variation of equivalent forces is complicated, the loading domain can be approximated by a polyhedron using a uniform distribution of sampling points, and the shakedown factor of safety converges to the true value with the increase of the number of sampling points. Shakedown analysis is necessary in engineering designs when several wetting and drying cycles happen.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The present investigation was performed with the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51908053) and Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No. 2018JQ5098).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A
area of the element;
B
strain matrix;
Bd
deviatoric strain matrix;
Bm
volumetric strain matrix;
c
effective cohesion;
c~
reduced effective cohesion;
D(ε˙p)
rate of plastic dissipation;
E
Young's modulus;
ered
deviatoric plastic strain;
e¯red
modified deviatoric plastic strain;
F
factor of safety;
Flim
factor of safety obtained by limit analysis;
Fsd
shakedown factor of safety;
f
body force;
f¯
equivalent body force;
H
total hydraulic head of the pore water;
I
identity vector;
L
differential operator relating the strain and the displacement;
Le
differential operator of the deviatoric strain;
Lm
differential operator of the volumetric strain;
N
number of load vertexes;
Nel
number of elements;
Nu
coefficient matrix consisting of shape functions of the displacement;
Nɛ
coefficient matrix consisting of shape functions of the strain;
n~
normal of the interface between soil layers;
n
outward normal of the stress boundary;
Pk
load vertex;
q
surface force;
q¯
equivalent surface force;
T
period of a loading cycle;
t
time;
t¯
equivalent surface force across the soil layers;
u˙
velocity of the soil skeleton;
ua
pore air pressure;
ue
element displacement vector;
uw
pore water pressure;
v
Poisson's ratio;
α, n
parameters of the soil water characteristic curve;
Γs
portion of boundary where surface forces are specified;
Γu
portion of boundary where displacement is specified;
γw
unit weight of the pore water;
Δu
displacement increment over a loading cycle;
Δug
global displacement vector;
u)l
displacement increment at the lth node;
Δɛp
accumulated plastic strain over a loading cycle;
Δσs
discontinuity of suction stress across the interface between soil layers;
ε˙
strain rate;
ɛpe
element strain vector;
εkp
produced plastic strain increment by the load vertex;
ε˙p
plastic strain rate;
ε˙v
volumetric strain rate;
εvp
plastic volumetric strain;
εxxp and εxyp
components of the plastic strain;
θp
plastic volumetric strain;
λ
load multiplier;
λsd
shakedown load multiplier;
σ
total stress;
σ
effective stress;
σke
fictious elastic stress produced by the load vertex;
σn
normal effective stress on the failure surface;
σe
fictious elastic stress;
σs
suction stress;
τf
tangential stress on the failure surface;
τk
time increment of a load vertex;
φ
effective angle of internal friction;
φ~
reduced angle of internal friction; and
Ωi
domain of the ith element.

References

Bhattacharya, P., and J. Kumar. 2016. “Uplift capacity of anchors in layered sand using finite-element limit analysis: Formulation and results.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (3): 04015078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000560.
Camargo, J., R. Q. Velloso, and E. A. Vargas. 2016. “Numerical limit analysis of three-dimensional slope stability problems in catchment areas.” Acta Geotech. 11 (6): 1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0459-3.
Chen, J., J. H. Yin, and C. F. Lee. 2005. “A three-dimensional upper-bound approach to slope stability analysis based on RFEM.” Géotechnique 55 (7): 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.7.549.
Ciria, H., J. Peraire, and J. Bonet. 2008. “Mesh adaptive computation of upper and lower bounds in limit analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 75 (8): 899–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2275.
Collins, I. F., and M. Boulbibane. 2000. “Geomechanical analysis of unbound pavements based on shakedown theory.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:1(50).
Haldar, A. K., D. V. Reddy, and M. Arockiasamy. 1990. “Foundation shakedown of offshore platforms.” Comput. Geotech. 10 (3): 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(90)90037-V.
Hjiaj, M., A. V. Lyamin, and S. W. Sloan. 2005. “Numerical limit analysis solutions for the bearing capacity factor Nγ.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 42 (5–6): 1681–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.08.002.
Khatri, V. N., and J. Kumar. 2011. “Effect of anchor width on pullout capacity of strip anchors in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (3): 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1139/T10-082.
Koiter, W. T. 1960. “General theorems for elastic–plastic solids.” In Progress in solid mechanics, edited by I. N. Sneddon, and R. Hill, 165–221. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
König, J. A., and M. Kleiber. 1978. “On a new method of shakedown analysis.” Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Sér. Sci. Tech. 26 (4): 165–171.
Krabbenhøft, K., A. V. Lyamin, and S. W. Sloan. 2007. “Shakedown of a cohesive-frictional half-space subjected to rolling and sliding contact.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 (11–12): 3998–4008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.11.001.
Krabbenhøft, K., A. V. Lyamin, and S. W. Sloan. 2008. “Three-dimensional Mohr–Coulomb limit analysis using semidefinite programming.” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 24 (11): 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1018.
Kumar, J., and K. M. Kouzer. 2007. “Effect of footing roughness on bearing capacity factor Nγ.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (5): 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:5(502).
Li, A. J., R. S. Merifield, and A. V. Lyamin. 2009. “Limit analysis solutions for three dimensional undrained slopes.” Comput. Geotech. 36 (8): 1330–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.06.002.
Li, H. X., and H. S. Yu. 2006. “A nonlinear programming approach to kinematic shakedown analysis of frictional materials.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 43 (21): 6594–6614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.01.009.
Liu, S., J. Wang, H. S. Yu, and D. Wanatowski. 2016. “Shakedown solutions for pavements with materials following associated and non-associated plastic flow rules.” Comput. Geotech. 78: 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.05.005.
Lu, N., and J. Godt. 2008. “Infinite slope stability under steady unsaturated seepage conditions.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (11): W11404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006976.
Lu, N., J. W. Godt, and D. T. Wu. 2010. “A closed-form equation for effective stress in unsaturated soil.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (5): W05515. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008646.
Lu, N., and W. J. Likos. 2006. “Suction stress characteristic curve for unsaturated soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(131).
Lu, N., B. Şener-Kaya, A. Wayllace, and J. W. Godt. 2012. “Analysis of rainfall-induced slope instability using a field of local factor of safety.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (9): W09524. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011830.
Lyamin, A. V., and S. W. Sloan. 2002a. “Lower bound limit analysis using non-linear programming.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 55 (5): 573–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.511.
Lyamin, A. V., and S. W. Sloan. 2002b. “Upper bound limit analysis using linear finite elements and non-linear programming.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 26 (2): 181–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.198.
Lyamin, A. V., S. W. Sloan, K. Krabbenhøft, and M. Hjiaj. 2005. “Lower bound limit analysis with adaptive remeshing.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 63 (14): 1961–1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1352.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and C. M. Martin. 2006. “Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive-frictional materials using second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 66 (4): 604–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1567.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and C. M. Martin. 2007. “Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 31 (6): 835–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.567.
Melan, E. 1938. “Zur Plastizitat des raumlichen Kontinuums.” Ingenieur–Archiv 9 (2): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084409.
Mualem, Y. 1976. “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
Muñoz, J. J., J. Bonet, A. Huerta, and J. Peraire. 2009. “Upper and lower bounds in limit analysis: Adaptive meshing strategies and discontinuous loading.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 77 (4): 471–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2421.
Muñoz, J. J., A. V. Lyamin, and A. Huerta. 2013. “Stability of anchored sheet wall in cohesive-frictional soils by FE limit analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 37 (9): 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2090.
Qian, J., Y. Wang, J. Wang, and M. Huang. 2019. “The influence of traffic moving speed on shakedown limits of flexible pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (2): 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1293259.
Qian, Z. G., A. J. Li, A. V. Lyamin, and C. C. Wang. 2017. “Parametric studies of disturbed rock slope stability based on finite element limit analysis methods.” Comput. Geotech. 81: 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.012.
Shiau, J. S., A. V. Lyamin, and S. W. Sloan. 2003. “Bearing capacity of a sand layer on clay by finite element limit analysis.” Can. Geotech. J. 40 (5): 900–915. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-042.
Sloan, S. W. 1988. “A steepest edge active set algorithm for solving sparse linear programming problems.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 26 (12): 2671–2685. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620261207.
Sloan, S. W. 2013. “Geotechnical stability analysis.” Géotechnique 63 (7): 531–571. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.RL.001.
Sloan, S. W., and A. Assadi. 1991. “Undrained stability of a square tunnel in a soil whose strength increases linearly with depth.” Comput. Geotech. 12 (4): 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(91)90028-E.
Sun, Y. 2011. “Numerical methods of shakedown analysis with its application.” Doctoral thesis, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ.
Tang, Y., H. A. Taiebat, and A. R. Russell. 2017. “Bearing capacity of shallow foundations in unsaturated soil considering hydraulic hysteresis and three drainage conditions.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (6): 04016142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000845.
Taylor, D. W. 1948. “Stability of slopes.” In Fundamentals of soil mechanics, 406–479. New York: Wiley.
Tschuchnigg, F., H. F. Schweiger, and S. W. Sloan. 2015. “Slope stability analysis by means of finite element limit analysis and finite element strength reduction techniques. Part I: Numerical studies considering non-associated plasticity.” Comput. Geotech. 70: 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.06.018.
Vahedifard, F., B. A. Leshchinsky, K. Mortezai, and N. Lu. 2015. “Active earth pressures for unsaturated retaining structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (11): 04015048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001356.
Vahedifard, F., D. Leshchinsky, K. Mortezaei, and N. Lu. 2016. “Effective stress-based limit-equilibrium analysis for homogeneous unsaturated slopes.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (6): D4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000554.
van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (44): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
Vu, D. K. 2001. “Dual limit and shakedown analysis of structures.” Doctoral thesis, Division of ASMA-Fracture Mechanics, University of Liege.
Wang, J., S. Liu, and W. Yang. 2018. “Dynamics shakedown analysis of slab track substructures with reference to critical speed.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 106: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.004.
Wang, J., H. S. Yu, and H. X. Li. 2010. “Shakedown analysis of soil materials based on an incremental approach.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 1–6. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.
Xu, Q., Y. Lu, H. Yin, and Z. Li. 2010. “Shakedown analysis of a slope with cyclic groundwater level.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 34 (5): 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.822.
Yamamoto, K., A. V. Lyamin, D. W. Wilson, S. W. Sloan, and A. J. Abbo. 2011. “Stability of a circular tunnel in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading.” Comput. Geotech. 38 (4): 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.014.
Yang, F., and J. S. Yang. 2010. “Stability of shallow tunnel using rigid blocks and finite-element upper bound solutions.” Int. J. Geomech. 10 (6): 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000011.
Yu, H. S., and M. Z. Hossain. 1998. “Lower bound shakedown analysis of layered pavements using discontinuous stress fields.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 167 (3–4): 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00120-0.
Yu, S., X. Zhang, and S. W. Sloan. 2016. “A 3D upper bound limit analysis using radial point interpolation meshless method and second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 108 (13): 1686–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5273.
Yuan, S., and J. Du. 2018a. “Effective stress-based upper bound limit analysis of unsaturated soils using the weak form quadrature element method.” Comput. Geotech. 98: 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.02.008.
Yuan, S., and J. Du. 2018b. “Upper bound limit analysis using the weak form quadrature element method.” Appl. Math. Modell. 56: 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.015.
Yuan, S., and J. Du. 2020. “A lower-bound formulation for unsaturated soils.” Géotechnique 70 (2): 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.103.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: Nov 15, 2019
Accepted: Mar 9, 2020
Published online: Jun 22, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 22, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

School of Highway, Chang’an Univ., Xi’an 710064, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Xiaodong Si
School of Highway, Chang’an Univ., Xi’an 710064, PR China.
Senhao Zhang
School of Highway, Chang’an Univ., Xi’an 710064, PR China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share