Modeling Cyclic Embedment of Deep-Water Pipelines Using Large Displacement Limit Analysis
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19, Issue 6
Abstract
The as-laid embedment is a key design element of deep-water pipelines, as it significantly affects the longitudinal and transverse pipe–soil interaction and thermal insulation. Due to the small-amplitude oscillations driven by the sea state as well as lay vessel motions, the as-laid embedment is significantly greater than the predictions derived from static penetration analyses. This paper presents a numerical study into the cyclic embedment behavior of deep-water pipelines in soft clay using a recently developed sequential limit analysis (SLA) technique. It directly models the evolution of model geometry and material properties through a consecutive series of small displacement analyses and incorporates the effect of strain softening and strain rate on soil strength. A rigid plane-strain pipe section is pushed-in-place and then subjected to small-amplitude cyclic lateral displacements, with an accumulated lateral pipe displacement of up to 60 diameters. Careful comparisons between the numerical results with published centrifuge data are provided to demonstrate the robustness of SLA, in terms of pipe invert trajectory and soil resistance, followed by an extensive parametric study investigating the effect of strain rate, strain softening, oscillation amplitude, and loading history. More detailed aspects of the cyclic loading behavior are discussed with reference to soil failure mechanisms and bearing capacity yield envelopes. A strong correlation between accumulated lateral pipe displacement and pipe embedment is identified, regardless of the varying oscillation amplitudes, and soil buoyancy is found to play the most significant role in determining the final pipe embedment. The present study aims to assist the development of a macro-element plasticity pipe–soil model that can be incorporated into simplified three-dimensional (3D) pipeline–seabed models, as well as to promote the application of SLA to model complex large-displacement pipe–soil interaction problems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The support from Professor Chris Martin and Professor Byron Byrne at University of Oxford on the development and validation of the SLA method is highly appreciated. In particular, the authors would very much like to extend sincere gratitude to Professor Chris Marin for providing the FELA software OxLim, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 51809232 and 51679211) for the fund.
References
Aubeny, C. P., H. Shi, and J. D. Murff. 2005. “Collapse loads for a cylinder embedded in trench in cohesive soil.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 320–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(320).
Biscontin, G., and J. M. Pestana. 2001. “Influence of peripheral velocity on vane shear strength of an artificial clay.” Geotech. Test. J. 24 (4): 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11140J.
Bruton D., D. J. White, C. Y. Cheuk, M. D. Bolton and M. C. Carr. 2006. “Pipe-soil interaction behaviour during lateral buckling, including large amplitude cyclic displacement tests by the SAFEBUCK JIP.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Chatterjee, S., M. F. Randolph, and D. J. White. 2012. “The effects of penetration rate and strain softening on the vertical penetration resistance of seabed pipelines.” Géotechnique 62 (7): 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.075.
Cheuk, C. Y., and D. J. White. 2011. “Modelling the dynamic embedment of seabed pipelines.” Géotechnique 61 (1): 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.148.
Dingle, H. R. C., D. J. White, and C. Gaudin. 2008. “Mechanisms of pipe embedment and lateral breakout on soft clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (5): 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-009.
Dutta S., B. Hawlader, and R. Phillips. 2013. “Numerical investigation of dynamic embedment of offshore pipelines.” In Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2347–2350. Paris: Le Palais des Congrès de Paris.
Dutta, S., B. Hawlader, and R. Phillips. 2015. “Finite element modeling of partially embedded pipelines in clay seabed using Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian method.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0045.
Einav, I., and M. F. Randolph. 2005. “Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 63 (14): 1991–2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1350.
Hodder, M. S., and B. W. Byrne. 2010. “3D experiments investigating the interaction of a model SCR with the seabed.” Appl. Ocean Res. 32 (2): 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2009.09.004.
Hu, Y., and M. F. Randolph. 1998. “A practical numerical approach for large deformation problems in soil.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 22 (5): 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199805)22:5%3C327::AID-NAG920%3E3.0.CO;2-X.
Kong, D. 2015. “Large displacement numerical analysis of offshore pipe-soil interaction on clay.” D.Phil. thesis, Dept. of Engineering Science, Univ. of Oxford.
Kong, D., C. Martin, and B. Byrne. 2017. “Modelling large plastic deformations of cohesive soils using sequential limit analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 41 (18): 1781–1806. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2700.
Kong, D., C. Martin, and B. Byrne. 2018. “Sequential limit analysis of pipe–soil interaction during large-amplitude cyclic lateral displacements.” Géotechnique 68 (1): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.256.
Lund K. M. 2000. “Effect of increase in pipeline soil penetration from installation.” In Proc., ETCE/OMAE2000 Joint Conf. Energy for the New Millennium, 14–17. New Orleans: ASME.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and C. M. Martin. 2006. “Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive frictional materials using second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 66 (4): 604–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1567.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and C. M. Martin. 2007. “Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 31 (6): 835–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.567.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and C. M. Martin. 2008. “Upper bound limit analysis using discontinuous quadratic displacement fields.” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 24 (11): 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.998.
Martin, C. M., and M. F. Randolph. 2006. “Upper bound analysis of lateral pile capacity in cohesive soil.” Géotechnique 56 (2): 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.2.141.
Martin, C. M., and D. J. White. 2012. “Limit analysis of the undrained bearing capacity of offshore pipelines.” Géotechnique 62 (9): 847–863. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.OG.016.
Merifield, R. S., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2009. “Effect of surface heave on response of partially embedded pipelines on clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (6): 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000070.
Murff, J. D., D. A. Wagner, and M. F. Randolph. 1989. “Pipe penetration in cohesive soil.” Géotechnique 39 (2): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1989.39.2.213.
Randolph, M. F., and G. T. Houlsby. 1984. “The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil.” Géotechnique 34 (4): 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1984.34.4.613.
Randolph M. F., and D. J. White. 2008. “Pipeline embedment in deep water: processes and quantitative assessment.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Shewchuk, J. R. 2014. “Delaunay refinement algorithms for triangular mesh generation.” Comput. Geom. 47 (7): 741–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2014.02.005.
Wang D., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2009. “Numerical simulations of dynamic embedment during pipe laying on soft clay.” In Proc., ASME 2009 28th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 119–127. Honolulu: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division.
Wang, D., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2010. “Large-deformation finite element analysis of pipe penetration and large-amplitude lateral displacement.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (8): 842–856. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-147.
Westgate, Z. J., M. F. Randolph, D. J. White, and S. Li. 2010. “The influence of sea state on as-laid pipeline embedment: A case study.” Appl. Ocean Res. 32 (3): 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2009.12.004.
Westgate Z. J., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2009. “Video observations of dynamic embedment during pipelaying on soft clay.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., ASME 2009 28th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 699–707. Honolulu: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division.
Westgate, Z. J., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2013. “Modelling the embedment process during offshore pipe-laying on fine-grained soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0185.
White D. J., Z. J. Westgate, J. C. Ballard, C. Brier, and M. F. Bransby. 2015. “Best practice geotechnical characterization and pipe-soil interaction analysis for HPHT pipeline design.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Zhou, H., and M. F. Randolph. 2007. “Computational techniques and shear band development for cylindrical and spherical penetrometers in strain softening clay.” Int. J. Geomech. 7 (4): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:4(287).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19 • Issue 6 • June 2019
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 29, 2018
Accepted: Nov 29, 2018
Published online: Apr 11, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.