Case Studies
Feb 22, 2019

Stability Assessment and Support Design for Underground Tunnels Located in Complex Geologies and Subjected to Engineering Activities: Case Study

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19, Issue 5

Abstract

A good understanding of rock mass behavior around underground tunnels is necessary for stability assessment and support design. This paper presents a three-dimensional (3D) numerical analysis to support the aforementioned statement for an underground mine by using the distinct element method. Geological and engineering complexities simulated in the numerical model include large-scale faults and a nonplanar weak interlayer, as well as open and backfilled tunnels. Sequential excavation, backfilling, and delayed supporting were simulated according to the field construction process. Numerical analysis investigated the effect of complex geologies and engineering activities on tunnel stability. Deformations and strength degradation areas around the tunnels are illustrated and analyzed at different locations. Based on the rock mass behavior and the failure conditions of the applied rock supports, useful suggestions are made on the selection of appropriate tunnel support for this underground mine. These suggestions shared similarities and slight differences with the guidelines suggested by an empirical method. The accuracy of the numerical results is verified by comparing with the field deformation data. This study provides a comprehensive procedure for stability assessment and support design for similar underground rock mass projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the Contract 200-2011-39886. The support provided by the mining company through providing geological and geotechnical data, rock core and mine technical tours, and allowing access to the mine to perform field investigations is very much appreciated. The first author is grateful to the Chinese Scholarship Council and the University of Arizona Graduate College for providing scholarships to conduct the research described in this paper first as a visiting research student and then as a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona.

References

Barton, N. 2002. “Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (2): 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00011-4.
Barton, N., R. Lien, and J. Lunde. 1974. “Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support.” Rock Mech. 6 (4): 189–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239496.
Bieniawski, Z. T. 1976. “Rock mass classifications in rock engineering.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Symp. on Exploration for Rock Engineering, 97–106. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Bieniawski, Z. T. 1988. “The rock mass rating (RMR) system (Geomechanics classification) in engineering practice.” Rock Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes, 17–34. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Bieniawski, Z. T. 1989. Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cai, M. 2008. “Influence of stress path on tunnel excavation response—Numerical tool selection and modeling strategy.” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 23 (6): 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.11.005.
Cantieni, L., and G. Anagnostou. 2009. “The effect of the stress path on squeezing behavior in tunneling.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 42 (2): 289–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-008-0018-9.
Choi, S. O., and H. S. Shin. 2004. “Stability analysis of a tunnel excavated in a weak rock mass and the optimal supporting system design.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41 (S1): 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.03.151.
Chu, B. L., S. C. Hsu, Y. L. Chang, and Y. S. Lin. 2007. “Mechanical behavior of a twin-tunnel in multi-layered formations.” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 22 (3): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.06.003.
Coggan, J., F. Gao, D. Stead, and D. Elmo. 2012. “Numerical modelling of the effects of weak immediate roof lithology on coal mine roadway stability.” Int. J. Coal Geol. 90–91 (Feb): 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2011.11.003.
Cundall, P. A. 1988. “Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part I. A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Sci. Geomech. 25 (3): 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(88)92293-0.
Eberhardt, E. 2001. “Numerical modelling of three-dimension stress rotation ahead of an advancing tunnel face.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 38 (4): 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00017-X.
Hao, Y. H., and R. Azzam. 2005. “The plastic zones and displacements around underground openings in rock masses containing a fault.” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 20 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.05.003.
Hart, R., P. A. Cundall, and J. Lemos. 1988. “Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part II. Mechanical calculations for motion and interaction of a system composed of many polyhedral blocks.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 25 (3): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(88)92294-2.
Hoek, E. 1994. “Strength of rock and rock masses.” ISRM News J. 2 (2): 4–16.
Hoek, E., and E. T. Brown. 1997. “Practical estimates of rock mass strength.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (8): 1165–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X.
Hoek, E., C. Carranza-Torres, and B. Corkum. 2002. “Hoek-Brown criterion—2002 ed.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., NARMS-TAC Conf., 267–273. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hoek, E., and M. S. Diederichs. 2006. “Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43 (2): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005.
Hsiao, F. Y., C. L. Wang, and J. C. Chern. 2009. “Numerical simulation of rock deformation for support design in tunnel intersection area.” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 24 (1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.01.003.
Huang, F., H. Zhu, Q. Xu, Y. Cai, and X. Zhuang. 2013. “The effect of weak interlayer on the failure pattern of rock mass around tunnel—Scaled model tests and numerical analysis.” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 35 (Apr): 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.014.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. 1998. UDEC, version 3.0. Minneapolis: Itasca.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. 2007. 3DEC, version 4.1. Minneapolis: Itasca.
Janin, J. P., D. Dias, F. Emeriault, R. Kastner, H. Bissonnais, and A. Guilloux. 2015. “Numerical back-analysis of the southern Toulon tunnel measurements: A comparison of 3D and 2D approaches.” Eng. Geol. 195 (Sept): 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.028.
Jing, L. 2003. “A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40 (3): 283–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00013-3.
Kaiser, P. K., S. Yazici, and S. Maloney. 2001. “Mining induced stress change and consequences of stress path on excavation stability—A case study.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 38 (2): 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00038-1.
Kanik, M., and Z. Gurocak. 2018. “Importance of numerical analyses for determining support systems in tunneling: A comparative study from the trabzon-gumushane tunnel, Turkey.” J. Afr. Earth Sci. 143 (Jul): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.03.032.
Marinos, P., and E. Hoek. 2000. “GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation.” In Proc., GeoEng2000 at the Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1422–1446. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishers.
Ng, C. W. W., K. M. Lee, and D. K. W. Tang. 2004. “Three-dimensional numerical investigations of new Austrian tunnelling method (NATM) twin tunnel interactions.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (3): 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-008.
Palmström, A. 1995. “RMi—A rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dep. of Geology, Univ. of Oslo.
Palmström, A. 2000. “Recent developments in rock support estimates by the RMi.” J. Rock Mech. Tunnelling Technol. 6 (1): 1–19. https://www.rockmass.net/ap/66_Palmstrom_on_Recent_developments_RMi.pdf.
Riedmüller, G., and W. Schubert. 1999. “Critical comments on quantitative rock mass classifications.” Felsbau 17 (3): 164–167. https://pure.tugraz.at/ws/portalfiles/portal/1660025/6549.pdf.
Rocscience. 2011. Phase2, Version 8.0. Toronto: Rocscience Inc.
Sari, Y. D., A. G. Pasamehmetoglu, E. Cetiner, and S. Donmez. 2008. “Numerical analysis of a tunnel support design in conjunction with empirical methods.” Int. J. of Geomech. 8 (1): 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:1(74).
Shreedharan, S., and P. H. S. W. Kulatilake. 2016. “Discontinuum-equivalent continuum analysis of the stability of tunnels in a deep coal mine using the distinct element method.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (5): 1903–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0885-9.
Stille, H., and A. Palmström. 2003. “Classification as a tool in rock engineering.” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 18 (4): 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00106-2.
Vardakos, S. S., M. S. Gutierrez, and N. R. Barton. 2007. “Back-analysis of Shimizu Tunnel No. 3 by distinct element modeling.” Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 22 (4): 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.10.001.
Xing, Y., P. H. S. W. Kulatilake, and L. A. Sandbak. 2018a. “Investigation of rock mass stability around tunnels in an underground mine in USA using three-dimensional numerical modeling.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51 (2): 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1336-6.
Xing, Y., P. H. S. W. Kulatilake, and L. A. Sandbak. 2018b. “Effect of rock mass and discontinuity mechanical properties and delayed rock supporting on tunnel stability in an underground mine.” Eng. Geol. 238 (May): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.010.
Yalcin, E., Z. Gurocak, R. Ghabchi, and M. Zaman. 2016. “Numerical analysis for a realistic support design: Case study of the Komurhan Tunnel in Eastern Turkey.” Int. J. of Geomech. 16 (3): 05015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000564.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19Issue 5May 2019

History

Received: Jun 8, 2018
Accepted: Oct 26, 2018
Published online: Feb 22, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yan Xing, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China Univ. of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Mining and Geological Engineering, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
P. H. S. W. Kulatilake, F.ASCE
Academic Director and Distinguished Professor, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jiangxi Univ. of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China; formerly, Professor, Rock Mass Modeling and Computational Rock Mechanics Laboratories, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
L. A. Sandbak
Senior Geotechnical Engineer, Barrick Gold, Inc., Turquoise Ridge Joint Venture, Golconda, NV 89414.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share