Technical Papers
Jan 11, 2019

Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Pullout Response of Soil Nails in Cohesionless Medium

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19, Issue 3

Abstract

Soil nailing is a popular in situ reinforcement technique that is widely used to stabilize unstable slopes and vertical faces of excavations and tunnels. The pullout capacity of soil nails is a governing design parameter for the soil-nailing technique. Therefore, the determination of accurate pullout capacity is necessary to ensure adequate internal stability of the stabilized structures. The article presents a laboratory investigation on the pullout force–displacement behavior of the soil nails installed in a dry, cohesionless medium. The study describes the effects of surface roughness, surcharge pressure, and relative density on the pullout response of soil nails. The results show that with an increase in the roughness, there was an increase of more than twofold in the mobilized maximum pullout resistance of the soil nails. Furthermore, the relative density was found to have a significant influence on the pullout capacity and the mobilized peak interface friction angle of the soil nails. The pullout force–displacement behavior of the smooth surface soil nail was found to be elastic–perfectly plastic in nature, whereas a strain-softening behavior was observed for the soil nails with a rough surface. The experimental data were used to formulate an empirical model (substantiated by the previously published data) that can predict the peak and residual shear strength of the nail–soil interface at different combinations of surface roughness and surcharge pressure. The proposed empirical model was then incorporated into the existing constitutive models to reproduce the observed (experimentally) pre and postpeak pullout force–displacement response of the soil nails. The simulated results are in good agreement with the experimental observations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the director, CSIR-CBRI, for providing financial support and other infrastructural facilities. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and advice.

References

BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2002. Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. IS 1498. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2013. Methods of test for soils, Part 28: Determination of dry density of soils, in-place, by the sand replacement method. IS 2720. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Chu, L.-M. 2003. “Study on the interface shear strength of soil nailing in completely decomposed granite CDG Soil.” M.Phil. thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ.
Chu, L.-M., and J.-H. Yin. 2005. “Comparison of interface shear strength of soil nails measured by both direct shear box tests and pullout tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (9): 1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1097).
Chu, L.-M., and J.-H. Yin. 2006. “Study on soil–cement grout interface shear strength of soil nailing by direct shear box testing method.” Geomech. Geoeng. 1 (4): 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020601091742.
Gurung, N. 2001. “1-D analytical solution for extensible and inextensible soil/rock reinforcement in pull-out tests.” Geotext. Geomembr. 19 (4): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00008-5.
Hong, C.-Y., J.-H. Yin, W.-H. Zhou, and H.-F. Pei. 2012. “Analytical study on progressive pullout behavior of a soil nail.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (4): 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000610.
Junaideen, S. M., L. G. Tham, K. T. Law, C. F. Lee, and Z. Q. Yue. 2004. “Laboratory study of soil nail interaction in loose, completely decomposed granite.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (2): 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-094.
Kondner, R. L. 1963. “Hyperbolic stress-strain response: Cohesive soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89 (1): 115–143.
Lee, C.-J., and K. H. Chiang. 2007. “Responses of single piles to tunneling-induced soil movements in sandy ground.” Can. Geotech. J. 44 (10): 1224–1241. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-050.
Madhav, M. R., N. Gurung, and Y. Iwao. 1998. “A theoretical model for the pull-out response of geosynthetic reinforcement.” Geosynth. Int. 5 (4): 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.5.0128.
Milligan, G. W. E., and K. Tei. 1998. “The pull-out resistance of model soil nails.” Soils Found. 38 (2): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.2_179.
Misra, A., C.-H. Chen, R. Oberoi, and A. Kleiber. 2004. “Simplified analysis method for micropile pullout behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (10): 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:10(1024).
Pradhan, B., L. G. Tham, Z. Q. Yue, S. M. Junaideen, and C. F. Lee. 2006. “Soil–nail pullout interaction in loose fill materials.” Int. J. Geomech. 6 (4): 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:4(238).
Samanta, M., P. Punetha, and M. Sharma. 2018a. “Effect of roughness on interface shear behavior of sand with steel and concrete surface.” Geomech. Eng. 14 (4): 387–398.
Samanta, M., P. Punetha, and M. Sharma. 2018b. “Influence of surface texture on sand–steel interface strength response.” Géotechnique Lett. 8 (1): 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.17.00135.
Samanta, M., M. Sharma, P. Punetha, and S. Sarkar. 2017. “Pullout capacity of soil nails in cohesionless soil and its constitutive modeling.” In Proc., Conf. on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, 327–334. Roorkee, India: Indian Institute of Technology.
Sawicki, A. 1998. “Modelling of geosynthetic reinforcement in soil retaining walls.” Geosynth. Int. 5 (3): 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.5.0124.
Sharma, M., M. Samanta, and S. Sarkar. 2017. “Laboratory study on pullout capacity of helical soil nail in cohesionless soil.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (10): 1482–1495. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0243.
Sharma, M., M. Samanta, and S. Sarkar. 2018. “Novel laboratory pullout device for conventional and helical soil nails.” Geotech. Test. J. 42 (5): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170319.
Sharma, M., M. Samanta, and S. Sarkar. 2019. “Soil nailing: An effective slope stabilization technique.” In Vol. 50 of Landslides: Theory, practice and modelling. Advances in natural and technological hazards research, edited by S. Pradhan, V. Vishal, and T. Singh, 173–199. Berlin: Springer.
Srivastav, A., and P. K. Basudhar. 2010. “Modeling of soil–woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results.” Geotext. Geomembr. 28 (4): 403–408.
Srivastav, A., and H. Wu. 2015. “Modelling of non-linear shear displacement behavior of soil–geotextile interface.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 1 (2): 1–10.
Su, L.-J., T. C. F. Chan, J.-H. Yin, Y. K. Shiu, and S. L. Chiu. 2008. “Influence of overburden pressure on soil–nail pullout resistance in a compacted fill.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (9): 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:9(1339).
Subba Rao, K. S., M. M. Allam, and R. G. Robinson. 1998. “Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 131 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/igeng.1998.30112.
Uesugi, M., and H. Kishida. 1986. “Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands.” Soils Found. 26 (2): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.2_33.
Wang, Z., and W. Richwien. 2002. “A study of soil-reinforcement interface friction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (1): 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(92).
Yin, J.-H., C.-Y. Hong, and W.-H. Zhou. 2012. “Simplified analytical method for calculating the maximum shear stress of nail-soil interface.” Int. J. Geomech. 12 (3): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000151.
Yin, J.-H., and W.-H. Zhou. 2009. “Influence of grouting pressure and overburden stress on the interface resistance of a soil nail.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (9): 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000045.
Zhang, C.-C., Q. Xu, H.-H. Zhu, B. Shi, and J.-H. Yin. 2014. “Evaluations of load-deformation behavior of soil nail using hyperbolic pullout model.” Geomech. Eng. 6 (3): 277–292. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.3.277.
Zhou, W.-H., and J.-H. Yin. 2008. “A simple mathematical model for soil nail and soil interaction analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 35 (3): 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.07.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19Issue 3March 2019

History

Received: Mar 7, 2018
Accepted: Sep 14, 2018
Published online: Jan 11, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mahesh Sharma, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Trainee Scientist, Geotechnical Engineering Group, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Central Building Research Institute (CBRI), Roorkee 247667, India; Trainee Scientist, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India. Email: [email protected]
Manojit Samanta [email protected]
Scientist, Geotechnical Engineering Group, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Central Building Research Institute (CBRI), Roorkee 247667, India; Scientist, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Piyush Punetha, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Research Scholar, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies (FEIT), Univ. of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share