Technical Papers
Aug 28, 2017

Rigid Retaining Walls with Narrow Cohesionless Backfills under Various Wall Movement Modes

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17, Issue 11

Abstract

Spaces for backfills are often constrained and limited to a narrow width when retaining walls must be built close to existing stable walls in urban areas or near rock faces in mountainous areas. Estimation of lateral earth pressure acting on the back of the retaining wall has been typically based on classical earth-pressure theories such as Coulomb’s theory or Rankine’s theory, which assumes that the backfill is sufficiently wide to allow the full development of failure planes in the backfill. It has been generally recognized that the classical earth-pressure theories tend to significantly overestimate the lateral pressures for retaining walls with narrow backfill width. However, data from experimental studies are scarce, preventing a close examination of how narrow backfill spaces and various wall movement modes impact the forming of the failure surfaces and the distribution of lateral pressure acting on the retaining wall. In this study, a rigid retaining wall model was custom designed and built to investigate the effects of narrow backfill spaces on lateral pressures and backfill failure under active earth-pressure conditions. A series of tests was conducted on combinations of different backfill widths and wall movement modes [translation (T) mode, rotation about bottom (RB) mode, and rotation about top (RT) mode]. The failure surfaces in the backfill and distribution of lateral pressures acting on the back of the wall were recorded for each of the tests. Results of the tests demonstrated that the failure surfaces were continuous and nonlinear and limited by the width of narrow backfills. It was also found that the mode of retaining wall movement plays a role in forming the failure surfaces and mobilizing the lateral pressures. The coefficient of active pressure Ka based on measured lateral pressure decreases along with the depth. Whereas the RT mode showed much higher Ka values at the upper part of the wall, Ka values for the T mode and RB mode were smaller than those found by Coulomb’s theory. The resultant of lateral pressure for all three wall movement modes was significantly smaller than that of Coulomb’s solution, with its point of application generally higher than one-third from the wall base. A simple and practically useful analytical solution of the lateral pressure based on arching theory is presented in this article and shows a reasonably good agreement with the measured lateral pressure for the translation and rotation about the bottom modes of retaining wall movements.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Contract 51278184.

References

Benmebarek, N., Labdi, H., and Benmebarek, S. (2016). “A numerical study of the active earth pressure on a rigid retaining wall for various modes of movements.” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 53(1), 39–45.
Fan, C.-C., and Fang, Y.-S. (2010). “Numerical solution of active earth pressures on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces.” Comput. Geotech., 37(7–8), 1023–1029.
Fang, Y.-S., and Ishibashi, I. (1986). “Static earth pressure with various wall movements.” J. Geotechn. Engrg., 317–333.
Frydman, S., and Keissar, I. (1987). “Earth pressures on retaining walls near rock faces.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 586–599.
Ghosh, S., and Saha, A. (2014). “Nonlinear failure surface and pseudodynamic passive resistance of a battered-faced retaining wall supporting c-φ backfill.” Int. J. Geomech., 1–9.
Goel, S., and Patra, N. R. (2008). “Effect of arching on active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls considering translation mode.” Int. J. Geomech., 123–133.
Greco, V. R. (2009). “Seismic active thrust on cantilever walls with short heel.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 29(2), 249–252.
Greco, V. R. (2013). “Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width.” Comput. Geotech., 50, 66–78.
Jaky, J. (1948). “Pressure in silos.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Balkema, Lisse, Netherlands, Vol. 1, 103–107.
Janssen, H. A. (1896). “Versuche uber Getreidedruck in Silozellen.” Z. Ver. Deut. Ingr., 39(35), 1045–1049.
Lawson, C. R., and Yee, T. W. (2005). “Reinforced soil retaining walls with constrained reinforced fill zones.” Proc., GeoFrontiers 2005, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2721–2734.
Lee, S.-G., and Hencher, S. R. (2009). “The repeated failure of a cut-slope despite continuous reassessment and remedial works.” Eng. Geol., 107(1–2), 16–41.
Leshchinsky, D., Hu, Y., and Han, J. (2004). “Limited reinforced space in segmental retaining walls.” Geotext. Geomembr., 22(6), 543–553.
Nadukuru, S. S., and Michalowski, R. L. (2012). “Arching in distribution of active load on retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 575–584.
Paik, K. H., and Salgado, R. (2003). “Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects.” Géotechnique, 53(7), 643–653.
Rao, P., Chen, Q., Zhou, Y., Nimbalkar, S., and Chiaro, G. (2016). “Determination of active earth pressure on rigid retaining wall considering arching effect in cohesive backfill soil.” Int. J. Geomech.,.
Singh, S., Sivakugan, N., and Shukla, S. K. (2010). “Can soil arching be insensitive to φ?” Int. J. Geomech., 124–128.
Spangler, M. G., and Handy, R. L. (1982). Soil engineering, Harper & Row, New York.
Take, W. A., and Valsangkar, A. J. (2001). “Earth pressures on unyielding retaining walls of narrow backfill width.” Can. Geotech. J., 38(6), 1220–1230.
Terzaghi, K. (1934). “Large retaining-wall tests.” Eng. News Rec., 112(20), 136–140.
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics, Wiley, New York.
Tsagareli, Z. V. (1965). “Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with a vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface.” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 2(4), 197–200.
Wang, Y.-Z. (2000). “Distribution of earth pressure on retaining wall.” Géotechnique, 50(1), 83–88.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17Issue 11November 2017

History

Received: Jan 6, 2017
Accepted: May 25, 2017
Published online: Aug 28, 2017
Published in print: Nov 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jan 28, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Minghui Yang [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha, Hunan Province 410082, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Widener Univ., Chester, PA 19013 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7357-8864. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share