Numerical Analysis of Existing Foundations Underpinned by Micropiles
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17, Issue 6
Abstract
Micropiles of small diameter have been used in practice to increase load capacities of existing foundations on soft soil, which may resist additional loads from the vertical expansion of structures. Load transfer from the existing foundation to the micropiles is an important mechanism to consider when designing an existing foundation underpinned by micropiles. However, this mechanism has not been well investigated or understood. This paper presents a numerical study on an existing foundation underpinned by micropiles using three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference software. Verification of the numerical model was first achieved by comparing the results of the numerical model to those obtained from the full-scale loading test. In this verification, the numerical model was used to simulate an existing footing initially constructed on a natural soil to support a structure and later subjected to additional loads under two different conditions. Under the first condition, micropiles were installed without connection with the existing foundation. The existing foundation was subjected to initial loads, and then the micropiles were connected to the existing foundation for additional loads. Under the second condition, the foundation was first subjected to initial loads. Micropiles were installed and then connected to the foundation for additional loads. These two conditions were investigated further in a parametric study to understand the behavior of micropiles in the underpinned foundation under additional loading, including the load transfer between the existing foundation and the micropiles. This parametric study revealed that the installation sequence of micropiles had obvious effects on the vertical displacement of the footing, the percent load on the micropile, and the skin friction along the micropile. This study also revealed that the initial pressure ratio for underpinning and the length of micropiles had more effects on the behavior of the existing foundation underpinned by micropiles than the modulus of micropiles.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Armour, T., Groneck, P., Keeley, J., and Sharma, S. (2000). “Micropile design and construction guidelines—Implementation manual.” FHWA-SA-97-070, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Bruce, D. (1988). “Aspects of minipiling practice in the United States.” J. Ground Eng., 21(8), 20–33.
Bruce, D. (1989). “Aspects of minipiling practice in the United States.” J. Ground Eng., 22(1), 35–39.
Esmaeili, M., Nik, M., and Khayyer, F. (2013). “Experimental and numerical study of micropiles to reinforce high railway embankments.” Int. J. Geomech., 729–744.”
FLAC3D 3.0 [Computer software]. Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis.
Górski, K., Wierzbicki, J., Mazur, R., and Mazurkiewicz, J. (2013). “The numerical calculations of influence of underpinning on foundations settlement.” J. Stud. Geotech. Mech., 35(4), 47–64.
Gutierrez, A. (2004). Rep. on geotechnical investigation and foundation recommendations for the design of the proposed arts and science museum, Univ. of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, 42.
Han, J. (2015). Principles and practice of ground improvement, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Han, J., and Ye, S. L. (2006a). “A field study on the behavior of micropiles in clay under compression or tension.” J. Can. Geotech., 43, 19–23.
Han, J., and Ye, S. L. (2006b). “A field study on the behavior of a foundation underpinned by micropiles.” J. Can. Geotech., 43(1), 30–42.
Itasca. (2005). FLAC3D 3.0 user’s guide, 2nd Ed., Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis.
Liew, S., and Fong, C. (2003). Design & construction of micropiles, Geotechnical Course of Pile Foundation Design & Construction, Ipoh, Malaysia.
Lizzi, F. (1980). “The use of root pattern piles in the underpinning of monuments and old buildings and in the consolidation of historic centres.” J. L’Industria Costruzioni, 110, 25.
Makarchian, M., and Poulos, H. (1996). “Simplified method for design of underpinning piles.” J. Geotech. Eng., 745–751.
PLAXIS 3D [Computer software]. Plaxis bv, Delft, Netherlands.
Pearlman, S. L. (2001). “Pin piles for structural underpinning.” Proc., Ohio River Valley Solis Seminar XXXII, Nicholson Construction Company, Cuddy, PA.
Shu, S., Muhunthan, B., and Li, X. (2011). “Numerical simulation of the influence of initial state of sand on element tests and micropile performance.” Int. J. Geomech., 370–380.
Thorburn, S., and Hutchison, J. (1985). Underpinning, Surrey Univ. Press, Glasgow, U.K.
Tomosawa, F., Noguchi, T., and Onoyama, K. (1990). “Investigation of fundamental mechanical properties of high-strength concrete.” Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan, Summaries of Technical Papers, Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, 497–498.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (1990). “Engineer manual.” 1110-1-1904; DC 20314-1000, Washington, DC.
Ye, S. L., Han, J., and Ye, G. (1994). Soil improvement and underpinning technologies, 2nd Ed., Chinese Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Ye, S. L., Han, J., Zhan, J., and Yang, W. (1993). “Experimental and theoretical studies of micropiles and their applications.” Research Reps. 1 and 2, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, China (in Chinese).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17 • Issue 6 • June 2017
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 3, 2016
Accepted: Sep 13, 2016
Published online: Oct 20, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 20, 2017
Published in print: Jun 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.