Behavior of Geotextile-Reinforced Clay with a Coarse Material Sandwich Technique under Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents a series of unconsolidated-undrained (UU) triaxial compression tests for investigating the behavior and failure mechanism of geotextile-reinforced clay and the effects of sandwiching nonwoven geotextile in a thin layer of sand (sandwich technique) on improving the shear strength of reinforced clay. Test variables include confining pressures, the number of geotextile layers, and thicknesses of the sand layers. The mobilized tensile strain of reinforcements, estimated according to the residual tensile strain by using a digital image–processing technique, was used to directly quantify the effects of soil-geotextile interaction on the shear-strength improvement. The test results showed that the shear strength of reinforced clay increased as the number of geotextile layers was increased. Failure patterns were changed from classical Rankine-type failures for unreinforced soil specimens to bulging (barrel-shaped) failures between adjacent geotextile layers. The effectiveness of reinforcing clay by applying nonwoven geotextile can be attributed to an increase in the apparent cohesion of the reinforced clay specimen. Regarding the sandwich technique, the test results revealed that layers of sand encapsulating the reinforcement can effectively provide an improved soil-geotextile interaction, thereby enhancing the shear behavior of reinforced clay. The shear strength increased as the thickness of the sand layer was increased. An optimal value of sand-layer thickness for maximum shear-strength improvement was not observed at large confining pressures. An appreciable shear-strength improvement was still observed when the sand-layer thickness was increased from 15 to 20 mm at σ3 > 100 kPa. The sandwich technique contributes to shear-strength improvement by increasing the friction angle of reinforced specimens. The mobilized tensile strain and force of the geotextile increased as the number of geotextile layers, thicknesses of the sand layers, and confining pressure were increased. The mobilized tensile strain and force were strongly correlated to the strength difference between reinforced and unreinforced soil. This experimental finding demonstrated that mobilized tensile strain and force directly contribute to the shear-strength improvement of reinforced clay.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The financial support for this research was from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under grant no. NSC102-2221-E-011-057-MY3. Financial support for the second and third authors during their graduate study was provided by the Taiwan Ministry of Education under a grant for the “Aim for the Top-Tier University Project.” The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports.
References
AASHTO. (2002). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th Ed., Washington, DC.
Abdi, M. R., and Arjomand, M. (2011). “Pullout tests conducted on clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand.” Geotext. Geomem., 29(6), 588–595.
Abdi, M. R., Sadrnejad, A., and Arjomand, M. A. (2009). “Strength enhancement of clay by encapsulating geogrids in thin layers of sand.” Geotext. Geomem., 27(6), 447–455.
Abdi, M. R., and Zandieh, A. R. (2014). “Experimental and numerical analysis of large scale pull out tests conducted on clays reinforced with geogrids encapsulated with coarse material.” Geotext. Geomem., 42(5), 494–504.
Al-Omari, R. R., Al-Dobaissi, H. H., Nazhat, Y. N., and Al-Wadood, B. A. (1989). “Shear strength of geomesh reinforced clay.” Geotext. Geomem., 8(4), 325–336.
Al-Omari, R. R., and Hamodi, F. J. (1991). “Swelling resistant geogrid–A new approach for the treatment of expansive soils.” Geotext. Geomem., 10(4), 295–317.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils.” ASTM D422, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007a). “Standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils.” ASTM D2850, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007b). “Standard test methods for water permeability of geotextiles by permittivity.” ASTM D4491, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009). “Standard test method for the static puncture strength of geotextiles and geotextile-related products using a 50-mm probe.” ASTM D6241, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method.” ASTM D4595, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort.” ASTM D698, Conshohocken, PA.
Berg, R., Christopher, B. R., and Samtani, N. (2009). “Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes.” Vol.I and II. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-10-024, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Bergado, D. T., Youwai, S., Hai, C. N., and Voottipruex, P. (2001). “Interaction of nonwoven needle-punched geotextiles under axisymmetric loading conditions.” Geotext. Geomem., 19(5), 299–328.
Chen, J., and Yu, S. (2011). “Centrifugal and numerical modeling of a reinforced lime-stabilized soil embankment on soft clay with wick drains.” Int. J. Geomech., 167–173.
Elias, V., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R. (2001). “Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design and construction guidelines.” Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-00-043, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Fabian, K. J., and Fourie, A. B. (1986). “Performance of geotextile-reinforced clay samples in undrained triaxial tests.” Geotext. Geomem., 4(1), 53–63.
Fourie, A. B., and Fabian, K. J. (1987). “Laboratory determination of clay geotextile interaction.” Geotext. Geomem., 6(4), 275–294.
Glendinning, S., Jones, C., and Pugh, R. (2005). “Reinforced soil using cohesive fill and electrokinetic geosynthetics.” Int. J. Geomech., 138–146.
Indraratna, B., Satkunaseelan, K. S., and Rasul, M. G. (1991). “Laboratory properties of a soft marine clay reinforced with woven and nonwoven geotextiles.” Geotech. Testing J., 14(3), 288–295.
Ingold, T. S. (1983). “Reinforced clay subject to undrained traxial loading.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 738–744.
Ingold, T. S., and Miller, K. S. (1982). “The performance of impermeable and permeable reinforcement in clay subject to undrained loading.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 15(3), 201–208.
Ingold, T. S., and Miller, K. S. (1983). “Drained axi-symmetric loading of reinforced clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 883–898.
Jamei, M., Villard, P., and Guiras, H. (2013). “Shear failure criterion based on experimental and modeling results for fiber-reinforced clay.” Int. J. Geomech., 882–893.
Lin, C.-Y., and Yang, K.-H. (2014). “Experimental study on measures for improving the drainage efficiency of low-permeability and low-plasticity silt with nonwoven geotextile drains.” J. Chin. Inst. Civ. Hydraul. Eng., 26(2), 71–82 (in Chinese).
McGown, A., Andrawes, K. Z., Pradhan, S., and Khan, A. J. (1998). “Limit state design of geosynthetics reinforced soil structure.” Proc., Sixth Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics, Vol. 1, Industrial Fabrics Association International, Roseville, MN, 143–178.
Mitchell, J. K. (1995). “Reinforced soil structures with poorly draining backfills. Part II: Case histories and applications.” Geosynth. Int., 2(1), 265–307.
NCMA (National Concrete Masonry Association). (2010). Design manual for segmental retaining walls, Herndon, VA.
Nguyen, M. D., Yang, K. H., Lee, S. H., Tsai, M. H., and Wu, C. S. (2013). “Behavior of nonwoven-geotextile-reinforced sand and mobilization of reinforcement strain under triaxial compression.” Geosynth. Int., 20(3), 207–225.
Noorzad, R., and Mirmoradi, S. H. (2010). “Laboratory evaluation of the behavior of a geotextile reinforced clay.” Geotext. Geomem., 28(4), 386–392.
Raisinghani, D. V., and Viswanadham, B. V. S. (2010). “Evaluation of permeability characteristics of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil through laboratory tests.” Geotext. Geomem., 28(6), 579–588.
Schlosser, F., and Long, N. T. (1974). “Recent results of French research on reinforced earth.” J. Constr. Div., 100(3), 223–237.
Sridharan, A., Murthy, B. R. S., and Revanasiddappa, K. (1991). “Technique for using fine‐grained soil in reinforced earth.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1174–1190.
Taechakumthorn, C., and Rowe, R. (2012). “Performance of reinforced embankments on rate-sensitive soils under working conditions considering effect of reinforcement viscosity.” Int. J. Geomech., 381–390.
Unnikrishnan, N., Rajagopal, K., and Krishnaswamy, N. R. (2002). “Behaviour of reinforced clay under monotonic and cyclic loading.” Geotext. Geomem., 20(2), 117–133.
Zornberg, J. G., and Mitchell, J. K. (1994). “Reinforced soil structures with poorly draining backfills. Part I: Reinforcement interactions and functions.” Geosynth. Int., 1(2), 103–148.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 16 • Issue 3 • June 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 17, 2015
Accepted: Sep 2, 2015
Published online: Dec 16, 2015
Discussion open until: May 16, 2016
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.