Technical Notes
May 19, 2012

Performance Monitoring of a Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bar Soil Nail during Laboratory Pullout Test Using FBG Sensing Technology

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 13, Issue 4

Abstract

In this paper, the stress–strain state and the effectiveness of shear resistance of a glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar soil nail in a pullout test was studied in laboratory using fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensing measurement. Both experimental study and numerical simulation were carried out and results are compared in this paper. In the pullout test, cement slurry was grouted into one predrilled borehole with a GFRP bar in a completely decomposed granite (CDG) soil mass, forming a cement-grouted GFRP bar soil nail. This GFRP bar soil nail was pulled out from the CDG soil mass in laboratory to investigate the performance of the GFRP bar soil nail during the pullout test process. Three loading cycles were applied to pull the GFRP bar soil nail out. Compared with traditional electricity-based strain gauges, FBG sensing technique is a relative novel technology to geotechnical structures health monitoring and has a number of advantages including high accuracy, multiplexing, electromagnetic interference resistance, and good repeatability. In the current study, one fiber line had a series of FBG strain sensors with a sequence of initial wavelengths. This fiber line with five FBG strain sensors was adhered on the pregrooved GFRP bar before grouting and was used to measure the strain distribution along this GFRP bar with cement grout during a pullout test. The mechanical behavior of the GFRP bar soil nail is evaluated by using the measured strain results in the paper. It is found that the pullout results of the GFRP bar soil nail are in good agreement with numerical calculation results. Test results also show that the FBG sensors are reliable for measuring the strain variation at all measured points under different loading stages. Furthermore, a simplified pullout resistance model originally proposed for GFRP pipe soil nails was employed to examine the laboratory pullout results of a GFRP bar soil nail. It is found that the simplified pullout resistance model is also applicable for the GFRP bar soil nail.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support provided by Hong Kong Polytechnic University (1-BB7U and G-U960) and a General Research Fund (B-Q12W) of Research Grants Council (RGC) of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abolmaali, A., and Kararam, A. (2012). “Nonlinear finite element modeling analysis of soil–pipe interaction.” Int. J. Geomech., 13(3), 197–204.
Ashford, S. A., and Jakrapiyanun, W. (2001). “Drivability of glass FRP composite piling.” J. Compos. Constr., 5(1), 58–60.
Bakis, C. E., Nanni, A., Terosky, J. A., and Koehler, S. W. (2001). “Self-monitoring, pseudoductile, hybrid FRP reinforcement rods for concrete application.” Compos. Sci. Technol., 61(6), 815–823.
Cheng, Y. M., Choi, Y. K., Yeung, A. T., Tham, L. G., Au, S. K., and Chen, J. (2009). “New soil nail material: Pilot study of grouted GFRP pipe nails in Korea and Hong Kong.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 21(3), 93–102.
Chu, L. M., and Yin, J. H. (2005). “Comparison of interface shear strength of soil nails measured by both direct shear box tests and pullout tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(9), 1097–1107.
Dunnicliff, J. (1993). Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, Wiley, New York.
Hill, K. O., Fujii, F., Johnson, D. C., and Kawasaki, B. S. (1978). “Photosensitivity on optical fiber waveguides: Application to reflection filter fabrication.” Appl. Phys. Lett., 32(10), 647–649.
Hong, C. Y., Yin, J. H., Jin, W., Wang, C., Zhou, W. H., and Zhu, H. H. (2010). “Comparative study on the elongation measurement of a soil nail using optical lower coherence interferometry method and FBG method.” Adv. Struct. Eng., 13(2), 309–318.
Hong, Y. S., Wu, C. S., and Yang, S. H. (2003). “Pullout resistance of single and double nails in a model sandbox.” Can. Geotech. J., 40(5), 1039–1047.
Iskander, M., and Hassan, M. (1998). “State of the practice review: FRP composite piling.” J. Compos. Constr., 2(3), 116–120.
Junaideen, S. M., Tham, L. G., Law, K. T., Lee, C. F., and Yue, Z. Q. (2004). “Laboratory study of soil–nail interaction in loose, completely decomposed granite.” Can. Geotech. J., 41(2), 274–286.
Lau, K. T., Yuan, L., Zhou, L. M., Wu, J., and Woo, C. H. (2001). “Strain monitoring in FRP laminates and concrete beams using FBG sensors.” Comp. Struct., 51(1), 9–20.
Luo, S. Q., Tan, S. A., and Yong, K. Y. (2000). “Pull-out resistance mechanism of a soil nail reinforcement in dilative soils.” Soils Found., 40(1), 47–56.
Meltz, G., Morey, W. W., and Glenn, W. H. (1989). “Formation of Bragg gratings in optical fibers by a transverse holographic method.” Opt. Lett., 14(15), 823–825.
Micron Optics, Inc. (2007). Sm125 optical sensing interrogator instruction manual, Atlanta.
Milligan, G. W. E., and Tei, K. (1998). “The pull-out resistance of model soil nails.” Soils Found., 38(2), 179–190.
Othonos, A., and Kalli, K. (1999). Fiber Bragg gratings: Fundamentals and applications in telecommunications and sensing, Artech House, London.
Pradhan, B., Tham, L. G., Yue, Z. Q., Junaideen, S. M., and Lee, C. F. (2006). “Soil–nail pullout interaction in loose fill materials.” Int. J. Geomech., 6(4), 238–247.
Sawicki, A. (2000). Mechanics of reinforced soil, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Singhvi, A., and Mirmiran, A. (2002). “Creep and durability of environmentally conditioned FRP-RC beams using fiber optic sensors.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 21(4), 351–373.
Su, L. J., Chan, T. C. F., Yin, J. H., Shiu, Y. K., and Chiu, S. L. (2008). “Influence of overburden pressure on soil–nail pullout resistance in a compacted fill.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 134(9), 1339–1347.
Xue, X., Yang, X., and Liu, E. (2012). “Application of modified Goodman model in soil nailing.” Int. J. Geomech., 13(1), 41–48.
Yeung, A. T., Cheng, Y. M., Tham, L. G., Au, A. S. K., So, S. T. C., and Choi, Y. K. (2007). “Field evaluation of a glass-fiber soil reinforcement system.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 21(1), 26–34.
Zhang, B., Benmokrane, B., and Ebead, U. A. A. (2006). “Design and evaluation of fiber-reinforced polymer bond-type anchorages and ground anchors.” Int. J. Geomech., 6(3), 166–175.
Zhu, H. H., Yin, J. H., Yeung, A. T., and Jin, W. (2011). “Field pullout testing and performance evaluation of GFRP Soil Nails.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 137(7), 633–642.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 13Issue 4August 2013
Pages: 467 - 472

History

Received: May 26, 2011
Accepted: May 16, 2012
Published online: May 19, 2012
Published in print: Aug 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jianhua Yin, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Honghu Zhu
Associate Professor, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing Univ., Nanjing 210046, China.
Chengyu Hong
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share