Minimization of Power Usage in a Compressor Station with Multiple Compressors
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 4
Abstract
In natural-gas transmission, a compressor station often consists of multiple types of compressors. For any given suction pressure, discharge pressure, and total mass flow, an operation manager needs to decide the set of compressors to work, the rotation speed of each working compressor, and the natural-gas flow allocation among all the working compressors. In this paper, two solution approaches are investigated and compared: mixed-integer linear programming and dynamic programming. Both approaches require the discretization of actual volumetric flow. Numerical results reveal that when the discrete interval is , dynamic programming takes less computation time than mixed-integer linear programming does. However, this order is reversed when the discrete interval is 0.01 or .
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grants 71401086, 71332005, and 71361130017).
References
Borraz-Sánchez, C., and Haugland, D. (2011). “Minimizing fuel cost in gas transmission networks by dynamic programming and adaptive discretization.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 61(2), 364–372.
Borraz-Sánchez, C., and Ríos-Mercado, R. Z. (2009). “Improving the operation of pipeline systems on cyclic structures by tabu search.” Comput. Chem. Eng., 33(1), 58–64.
Carter, R. G., et al. (1998). “Pipeline optimization: Dynamic programming after 30 years.” PSIG Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston.
ILOG CPLEX version 12.5 [Computer software]. IBM, Armonk, NY.
Krishnaswami, P., et al. (2004). “Compressor station optimization for linepack maintenance.” PSIG Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston.
Luongo, C., Gilmour, B., and Schroeder, D. (1989). “Optimization in natural gas transmission networks: A tool to improve operational efficiency.” 3rd SIAM conf. on optimization, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia.
Mahmoudimehr, J., and Sanaye, S. (2013). “Minimization of fuel consumption of natural gas compressor stations with similar and dissimilar turbo-compressor units.” J. Energy Eng., 04013001.
Nguyen, H. H., Uraikul, V., Chan, C. W., and Tontiwachwuthikul, P. (2008). “A comparison of automation techniques for optimization of compressor scheduling.” Adv. Eng. Software, 39(3), 178–188.
Osiadacz, A. (1980). “Nonlinear programming applied to the optimum control of a gas compressor station.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 15(9), 1287–1301.
Ríos-Mercado, R. Z., and Borraz-Sánchez, C. (2015). “Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems: A state-of-the-art review.” Appl. Energy, 147(1), 536–555.
Ríos-Mercado, R. Z., Kim, S., and Boyd, E. A. (2006). “Efficient operation of natural gas transmission systems: A network-based heuristic for cyclic structures.” Comput. Oper. Res., 33(8), 2323–2351.
Wong, P., and Larson, R. (1968a). “Optimization of natural-gas pipeline systems via dynamic programming.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 13(5), 475–481.
Wong, P. J., and Larson, R. E. (1968b). “Optimization of tree-structured natural-gas transmission networks.” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 24(3), 613–626.
Wu, S., Rios-Mercado, R. Z., Boyd, E. A., and Scott, L. R. (2000). “Model relaxations for the fuel cost minimization of steady-state gas pipeline networks.” Math. Comput. Modell., 31(2–3), 197–220.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 29, 2015
Accepted: Sep 9, 2015
Published online: Nov 12, 2015
Discussion open until: Apr 12, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.