Case Studies
Apr 18, 2014

Stochastic, Multiobjective, Mixed-Integer Optimization Model for Wastewater-Derived Energy

Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 1

Abstract

Assessing investment decisions in wastewater treatment can be difficult given that operators face large fixed and variable costs as well as large amounts of uncertainty in the amount of wastewater inflow as well as other factors. Decision makers can solve these problems by implementing operations research models that capture environmental engineering and economics aspects of the problem. Perfect decisions require perfect information but decisions makers can use stochastic models to hedge their decisions against an uncertain future. This paper presents a stochastic, multiobjective, mixed-integer optimization model for a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The WWTP can convert the solid end product from wastewater into methane to produce revenue and renewable energy credits. Alternatively, the solids can be used as biosolids for land application, agricultural markets, or compressed natural gas transportation markets. This stochastic optimization model explicitly considers probabilistic information, and the expected value of perfect information and the value of the stochastic solution provide important information for decision makers. As such, the model considers many aspects of the Smart Grid such as integration between energy and transportation, electricity generation by atypical prosumers (producer and consumer), and overall system planning to reduce negative environmental externalities, to name a few. It is shown that a significant trade-off exists between operational and investment costs and the associated carbon dioxide emissions. The WWTP could reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions but the operational and investment costs would be increased. One of the results determined in this paper is that to reduce 1 t of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (given average energy consumption levels) requires $36, $173, or $371 per day when the range of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions is (177,202] t CO2e for the first portion, (160, 177] for the second portion, and [154,160] for the third portion, respectively. Additional alternatives include investments in other renewable energy sources such as solar or processing waste from outside sources for revenue and other benefits.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J., and Dewil, R. (2008). “Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge.” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 34(6), 755–781.
Birge, J. R., and Louveaux, F. V. (1997). Introduction to stochastic programming, Springer, New York.
Bonmat, A., Flotats, X., Mateu, L., and Campos, E. (2001). “Study of thermal hydrolysis as a pretreatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion of pig slurry.” Water Sci. Technol., 44(4), 109–116.
Bonmati, A., Flotats, X., Mateu, L., and Campos, E. (2001). “Study of thermal hydrolysis as a pretreatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion of pig slurry.” Water Sci. Technol., 44(4), 109–116.
Brown, S. (2007). “Green incineration.” Biocycle, 48(7), 21.
Brown, S., Beecher, N., and Carpenter, A. (2010). “Calculator tool for determining greenhouse gas emissions for biosolids processing and end use.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(24), 9509–9515.
Brown, S., and Leonard, P. (2004). “Building carbon credits with biosolids recycling.” BioCycle, 45(9), 25–29.
Chang, N.-B., and Wang, S. (1996). “Solid waste management system analysis by multiobjective mixed integer programming model.” J. Environ. Manage., 48(1), 17–43.
Cohon, J. L. (2003). Multiobjective programming and planning, Academic, New York.
Conejo, A. J., Carrion, M., and Morales, J. M. (2010). Decision making under uncertainty in electricity markets, Springer, New York.
Crowe, J., Hambrick, R., Snell, J., and Rickerson, W. (2009). “Wastewater plants as green power producers.” BioCycle, 50(11), 36–39.
DeCarolis, J. F., Hunter, K., and Sreepathi, S. (2012). “The case for repeatable analysis with energy economy optimization models.” Energy Econ., 34(6), 1845–1853.
Dupačová, J., Gröwe-Kuska, N., and Römisch, W. (2003). “Scenario reduction in stochastic programming.” Math. Program., 95(3), 493–511.
Escudero, L. F., Garín, A., Merino, M., and Pérez, G. (2007). “The value of the stochastic solution in multistage problems.” Top, 15(1), 48–64.
Filipiak, K. A., Abdel-Malek, L., Hsieh, H.-N., and Meegoda, J. N. (2009). “Optimization of municipal solid waste collection system: Case study.” Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioactive Waste Manage., 210–216.
Flores-Alsina, X., Rodriguez-Roda, I., Sin, G., and Gernaey, K. V. (2008). “Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.” Water Res., 42(17), 4485–4497.
Gabriel, S. A., Zhuang, J., and Egging, R. (2009). “Solving stochastic complementarity problems in energy market modeling using scenario reduction.” Eur. J. Operat. Res., 197(3), 1028–1040.
GAMS/SCENRED2 [Computer software]. GAMS Development, Washington, DC.
Greer, D. (2008). “The whey to renewable energy.” Biocycle, 49(2), 40–44.
Heitsch, H., and Römisch, W. (2003). “Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming.” Comput. Optim. Appl., 24(2–3), 187–206.
Heitsch, H., and Römisch, W. (2009). “Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming.” Comput. Manage. Sci., 6, 117–133.
Høyland, K., and Wallace, S. W. (2001). “Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems.” Manage. Sci., 47(2), 295–307.
Kaushal, R. K., and Nema, A. K. (2012). “Strategic analysis of computer waste management options: Game-theoretic approach.” J. Environ. Eng., 241–249.
Keefer, D. L. (1994). “Certainty equivalents for three-point discrete-distribution approximations.” Manage. Sci., 40(6), 760–773.
Metcalf&Eddy, and AECOM. (2008). Biosolids management program summary report for the Blue Plains AWTP.
Morales, J. M., Pineda, S., Conejo, A. J., and Carrion, M. (2009). “Scenario reduction for futures market trading in electricity markets.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 24(2), 878–888.
Oleszkiewicz, J., and Mavinic, D. (2002). “Wastewater biosolids: an overview of processing, treatment, and management.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 1(2), 75–88.
Perlack, R. D., and Willis, C. E. (1985). “Multi-objective decision-making in waste disposal planning.” J. Environ. Eng., 373–385.
Peters, G. M., and Rowley, H. V. (2009). “Environmental comparison of biosolids management systems using life cycle assessment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(8), 2674–2679.
Rawal, N., Singh, R. M., and Vaishya, R. (2011). “Optimal management methodology for solid wastes in Urban Areas.” J. Hazard. Toxic. Radioactive Waste, 26–38.
Rosso, D., and Stenstrom, M. K. (2008). “The carbon-sequestration potential of municipal wastewater treatment.” Chemosphere, 70(8), 1468–1475.
Schwarz, H.-G. (2005). “Modernisation of existing and new construction of power plants in Germany: Results of an optimisation model.” Energy Econ., 27(1), 113–137.
The Climate Registry. (2008). General reporting protocols for the voluntary reporting program, version 1.1, Los Angeles, CA.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). (2009). “Impacts of a 25-percent renewable electricity standard as proposed in the American Clean Energy and Security Act discussion draft.” Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). (2012). Annual energy outlook 2012, 〈http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo〉 (Jun. 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (1994). Land application of sewage sludge: A guide for land appliers on the requirements of the federal standards for the use or disposal of sewage sludge, 40 CFR Part503 (Rep. no. EPA 831-B-93-002b), Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2005). “Auxiliary and supplemental power fact sheet: Microturbines.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2006)., Office of Inspector General, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2011). Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the united states: Facts and figures in 2010 (EPA-530-F-11-005). 〈http://www.epa.gov/waste/nonhaz/municipal/pubs/msw_2010_rev_factsheet.pdf〉 (Dec. 2011).
U-tapao, C. (2013). “Optimization and equilibrium modeling for renewable energy: Focus on wastewater-to-energy applications.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Wang, L. K., Pereira, N. C., and Hung, Y. T. (2009). Biological treatment processes, Vol. 8, Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Energy Engineering
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 141Issue 1March 2015

History

Received: May 29, 2013
Accepted: Feb 24, 2014
Published online: Apr 18, 2014
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chalida U-tapao, Ph.D. [email protected]
Civil Systems Program, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Steven A. Gabriel [email protected]
Professor, Civil Systems Program, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. E-mail: [email protected]
Christopher Peot [email protected]
P.E.
Biosolids Manager, District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, 5000 Overlook Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20032. E-mail: [email protected]
Mark Ramirez [email protected]
Biosolids Process Engineer, District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, 5000 Overlook Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20032. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share