Technical Papers
Jul 12, 2022

Enhanced Fractional Model for Soil–Structure Interface Considering 3D Stress State and Fabric Effect

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148, Issue 9

Abstract

Engineering structures in the field are exposed to three-dimensional (3D) stress-displacement conditions with fabric evolution occurring within the soil–structure interface. Upon 3D shearing, the fabric of the interface would change with shear displacement, which influences the dilatancy or plastic flow response of the interface. To consider the 3D stress state and fabric effect, an enhanced fractional model for the interface under monotonic and cyclic loads is developed by using a multiaxial loading vector, a fabric-dependent plastic flow vector, and a kinematic hardening rule. The developed model has three key features: (1) 3D stress-displacement response with shear coupling in different directions is considered by the 3D elastoplastic relation; (2) fabric-dependent dilatancy state line of the interface is captured via a fabric scalar; and (3) dependence of particle breakage on the critical state line of the interface is also considered by introducing a shift stress. To validate the proposed model, a series of test results obtained from the interface direct shear test and simple shear test are simulated. Discussions on model performances with and without considering the fabric effect are then carried out. It is found that the developed model can capture the key features, e.g., hardening/softening, dilatancy/contraction, and strength degradation, of different soil–structure interfaces. The evolution of the fabric scalar mobilized the dilatancy state of the interface under cyclic loads, through which the remarkable normal contraction response under cyclic loading is successfully captured when compared to those without considering fabric effect.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to Prof. Wen Chen for his invaluable inspiration. The financial supports provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51890912 and 51878247), the National Science Centre, Poland (Grant No. 2017/27/B/ST8/00351), and the Ulam Program (Grant No. PPN/ULM/2020/1/00026) are appreciated.

References

Ari, A., and S. Akbulut. 2021. “Evaluation of sand–geomembrane interface behavior using discrete element method.” Granular Matter 24 (1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-021-01183-6.
Bernhardt, M. L., G. Biscontin, and C. O’Sullivan. 2016. “Experimental validation study of 3D direct simple shear DEM simulations.” Soils Found. 56 (3): 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.002.
Dafalias, Y. F. 1986. “Bounding surface plasticity. I: Mathematical foundation and hypoplasticity.” J. Eng. Mech. 112 (9): 966–987. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:9(966).
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. T. Manzari. 2004. “Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (6): 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622).
DeJong, J. T., and Z. J. Westgate. 2009. “Role of initial state, material properties, and confinement condition on local and global soil-structure interface behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (11): 1646–1660. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:11(1646).
Desai, C. S., K. Pradhan Shashank, and D. Cohen. 2005. “Cyclic testing and constitutive modeling of saturated sand–concrete interfaces using the disturbed state concept.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(286).
Evgin, E., and K. Fakharian. 1996. “Effect of stress paths on the behaviour of sand-steel interfaces.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (6): 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-116-336.
Failla, G., and M. Zingales. 2020. “Advanced materials modelling via fractional calculus: Challenges and perspectives.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 378 (2172): 20200050. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0050.
Fakharian, K., and E. Evgin. 1997. “Cyclic simple-shear behavior of sand-steel interfaces under constant normal stiffness condition.” J. Geotech. Eng. 123 (12): 1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1096).
Fang, H., and W. Wang. 2020. “A three-dimensional multishear bounding surface model of granular soil–structure interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (7): 04020068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001796.
Gao, Y., N. Zhang, D. Li, H. Liu, Y. Cai, and Y. Wu. 2012. “Effects of topographic amplification induced by a U-Shaped canyon on seismic waves.” Bull. Seismolog. Soc. Am. 102 (4): 1748–1763. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110306.
Grabowski, A., M. Nitka, and J. Tejchman. 2021. “Comparative 3D DEM simulations of sand–structure interfaces with similarly shaped clumps versus spheres with contact moments.” Acta Geotech. 16 (11): 3533–3554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01255-0.
Jitsangiam, P., S. Pra-ai, M. Boulon, O. Jenck, X. Chen, and S. Techavorasinsakul. 2021. “Characterization of a soil-rough structure interface using direct shear tests with varying cyclic amplitude and loading sequences under a large cyclic testing cycle condition.” Acta Geotech. 2021 (Jul): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01289-4.
Lashkari, A. 2012. “A plasticity model for sand-structure interfaces.” J. Central South Univ. 19 (4): 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1115-1.
Lashkari, A., and V. Jamali. 2021. “Global and local sand–geosynthetic interface behavior.” Géotechnique 71 (4): 346–367. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.109.
Lashkari, A., and M. Kadivar. 2016. “A constitutive model for unsaturated soil–structure interfaces.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 40 (2): 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2392.
Li, X. S., and Y. F. Dafalias. 2012. “Anisotropic critical state theory: Role of fabric.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (3): 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000324.
Li, Y., Z. Guo, L. Wang, Z. Ye, C. Shen, and W. Zhou. 2021. “Interface shear behavior between MICP-treated calcareous sand and steel.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (2): 04020455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003549.
Ling, H. I., D. Yue, V. N. Kaliakin, and N. J. Themelis. 2002. “Anisotropic elastoplastic bounding surface model for cohesive soils.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (7): 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:7(748).
Liu, H., and H. I. Ling. 2008. “Constitutive description of interface behavior including cyclic loading and particle breakage within the framework of critical state soil mechanics.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (12): 1495–1514. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.682.
Liu, J., D. Zou, and X. Kong. 2014. “A three-dimensional state-dependent model of soil–structure interface for monotonic and cyclic loadings.” Comput. Geotech. 61 (5): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.05.012.
Liu, J., D. Zou, and X. Kong. 2020. “A two-mechanism soil–structure interface model for three-dimensional cyclic loading.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 44 (15): 2042–2069. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3118.
Lu, D., J. Liang, X. Du, C. Ma, and Z. Gao. 2019a. “Fractional elastoplastic constitutive model for soils based on a novel 3D fractional plastic flow rule.” Comput. Geotech. 105 (Oct) 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.10.004.
Lu, D., X. Zhou, X. Du, and G. Wang. 2019b. “A 3D fractional elastoplastic constitutive model for concrete material.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 165 (Feb): 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.004.
Maghsoodi, S., O. Cuisinier, and F. Masrouri. 2020. “Effect of temperature on the cyclic behavior of clay-structure interface.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (10): 04020103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002360.
Maghsoodi, S., O. Cuisinier, and F. Masrouri. 2021. “Non-isothermal soil-structure interface model based on critical state theory.” Acta Geotech. 16 (7): 2049–2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01133-1.
Manzari, M. T., and Y. F. Dafalias. 1997. “A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands.” Géotechnique 47 (2): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.2.255.
Martinez, A., and J. D. Frost. 2018. “Undrained behavior of sand-structure interfaces subjected to cyclic torsional shearing.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (9): 04018063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001942.
Mortara, G., A. Mangiola, and V. N. Ghionna. 2007. “Cyclic shear stress degradation and post-cyclic behaviour from sand–steel interface direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 44 (7): 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-019.
Patnaik, S., J. P. Hollkamp, and F. Semperlotti. 2020. “Applications of variable-order fractional operators: A review.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 476 (2234): 20190498. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0498.
Petalas, A. L., Y. F. Dafalias, and A. G. Papadimitriou. 2020. “SANISAND-F: Sand constitutive model with evolving fabric anisotropy.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 188–189 (Sep): 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.09.005.
Saberi, M., C. Annan, and J. Konrad. 2018. “On the mechanics and modeling of interfaces between granular soils and structural materials.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 18 (4): 1562–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.06.003.
Saberi, M., C. Annan, and J. Konrad. 2020. “Three-dimensional constitutive model for cyclic behavior of soil–structure interfaces.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 134 (Feb): 106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106162.
Saberi, M., C. Annan, J. Konrad, and A. Lashkari. 2016. “A critical state two-surface plasticity model for gravelly soil-structure interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading.” Comput. Geotech. 80 (Sep): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.011.
Sterling, R., H. Admiraal, N. Bobylev, H. Parker, J. Godard, I. Vähäaho, C. D. F. Rogers, X. Shi, and T. Hanamura. 2012. “Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Design Plann. 165 (4): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.10.00020.
Stutz, H., and D. Mašín. 2017. “Hypoplastic interface models for fine-grained soils.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 41 (2): 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2561.
Stutz, H. H., and A. Martinez. 2021. “Directionally dependent strength and dilatancy behavior of soil–structure interfaces.” Acta Geotech. 16 (2): 2805–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01199-5.
Stutz, H. H., and F. Wuttke. 2018. “Hypoplastic modeling of soil-structure interfaces in offshore applications.” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 19 (8): 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700469.
Sumelka, W. 2014. “Fractional viscoplasticity.” Mech. Res. Commun. 56 (Nov): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.11.005.
Sumelka, W., and M. Nowak. 2018. “On a general numerical scheme for the fractional plastic flow rule.” Mech. Mater. 116 (Feb): 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.02.005.
Sun, Y., and W. Sumelka. 2021. “Multiaxial stress-fractional plasticity model for anisotropically overconsolidated clay.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 205 (21): 106598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106598.
Sun, Y., W. Sumelka, and Y. Gao. 2020. “Reformulated fractional plasticity for soil-structure interface.” Mech. Res. Commun. 108 (Sep): 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103580.
Sun, Y., W. Sumelka, Y. Gao, and S. Nimbalkar. 2021. “Phenomenological fractional-order stress-dilatancy model for granular soil and soil-structure interface under monotonic and cyclic loads.” Acta Geotech. 16 (10): 3115–3132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01190-0.
Sun, Y., and Y. Xiao. 2017. “Fractional order plasticity model for granular soils subjected to monotonic triaxial compression.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 118–119 (Jul): 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.005.
Torabi, H., and M. T. Rayhani. 2014. “Three dimensional finite element modeling of seismic soil–structure interaction in soft soil.” Comput. Geotech. 60 (Jul): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.03.014.
Wang, H., W. Zhou, Z. Yin, and X. Jie. 2019. “Effect of grain size distribution of sandy soil on shearing behaviors at soil–structure interface.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (10): 04019238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002880.
Wang, P., Z. Yin, W. Zhou, and W. Chen. 2021. “Micro-mechanical analysis of soil–structure interface behavior under constant normal stiffness condition with DEM.” Acta Geotech. 17: 2711–2733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01374-8.
Wang, Y., Y. Gao, B. Li, L. Guo, Y. Cai, and A. H. Mahfouz. 2018. “Influence of initial state and intermediate principal stress on undrained behavior of soft clay during pure principal stress rotation.” Acta Geotech. 14 (23): 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0735-5.
Xiao, H., F. H. Lee, and Y. Liu. 2017. “Bounding surface Cam-Clay model with cohesion for cement-admixed clay.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (1): 04016026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000671.
Yang, J., and Z. Y. Yin. 2021. “Soil-structure interface modeling with the nonlinear incremental approach.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 45 (10): 1381–1404. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3206.
Yang, L., X. Li, H. Yu, and D. Wanatowski. 2016. “A laboratory study of anisotropic geomaterials incorporating recent micromechanical understanding.” Acta Geotech. 11 (5): 1111–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0423-7.
Zhang, G., L. Wang, and J. M. Zhang. 2011. “Dilatancy of the interface between a structure and gravelly soil.” Géotechnique 61 (1): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.051.
Zhang, G., and J. Zhang. 2008. “Unified modeling of monotonic and cyclic behavior of interface between structure and gravelly soil.” Soils Found. 48 (2): 231–245. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.231.
Zhao, C., A. Alimardani Lavasan, T. Barciaga, and T. Schanz. 2019. “Mechanized tunneling induced ground movement and its dependency on the tunnel volume loss and soil properties.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 43 (4): 781–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2890.
Zhou, W., X. Jing, Z. Yin, and X. Geng. 2019. “Effects of particle sphericity and initial fabric on the shearing behavior of soil–rough structural interface.” Acta Geotech. 14 (6): 1699–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00781-2.
Zhu, H., W. Zhou, X. Jing, and Z. Yin. 2019. “Observations on fabric evolution to a common micromechanical state at the soil-structure interface.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 43 (15): 2449–2470. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2989.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Jan 13, 2022
Accepted: Apr 18, 2022
Published online: Jul 12, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210024, China; Visiting Scholar, Institute of Structural Analysis, Poznan Univ. of Technology, Piotrowo 5, Poznan 60-965, Poland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8135-1467. Email: [email protected]
Wojciech Sumelka, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Structural Analysis, Poznan Univ. of Technology, Piotrowo 5, Poznan 60-965, Poland. Email: [email protected]
Shaoheng He [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China; Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany. Email: [email protected]
Yufeng Gao, Ph.D. [email protected]
Distinguished Professor, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share