Technical Papers
Jan 5, 2022

Dynamics and Seismic Performance of Asymmetric Rocking Bridges

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

The governing equations of motion for bridges with rocking piers of unequal height and unequal span lengths are derived accounting for the effect of the end joint gaps and the abutment-backfill system. The attenuation of the rocking motion stems from the impacts at the rocking interfaces, described through the coefficient of restitution, and also from the impacts (pounding) of the superstructure on the abutment backwalls. This is the first study to the author’s knowledge that combines both energy-dissipation sources in the analytical derivation of the equations of motion. The results of response-history analysis of bridges with different levels of asymmetry in their pier height show that the performance of both the symmetric and asymmetric configurations is very similar with regard to longitudinal displacements. Although the studied bridges safely resisted ground motions with an intensity about twice that of the design earthquake, regardless of the degree of asymmetry, it was found that the higher the difference in the pier height, the larger the rotation of the superstructure due to the differential uplift of the piers, a point that must be addressed in seismic design for rocking response.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data of the structures analyzed that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Acikgoz, S., and M. J. DeJong. 2014. “The rocking response of large flexible structures to earthquakes.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (2): 875–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9538-0.
Agalianos, A., A. Psychari, M. F. Vassiliou, B. Stojadinovic, and I. Anastasopoulos. 2017. “Comparative assessment of two rocking isolation techniques for a motorway overpass bridge.” Front. Built Environ. 3 (47): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00047.
Bachmann, J. A., M. Strand, M. F. Vassiliou, M. Broccardo, and B. Stojadinovic. 2018. “Is rocking motion predictable?” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (2): 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2978.
Ceh, N., G. Jelenic, and N. Bicanic. 2018. “Analysis of restitution in rocking of single rigid blocks.” Acta Mech. 229 (11): 4623–4642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-018-2246-8.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chatzis, M. N., and A. W. Smyth. 2012a. “Modeling of the 3D rocking problem.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 47 (4): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.02.004.
Chatzis, M. N., and A. W. Smyth. 2012b. “Robust modeling of the rocking problem.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (3): 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000329.
Cheng, C.-T. 2007. “Energy dissipation in rocking bridge piers under free vibration tests.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (4): 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.640.
DeJong, M. J., and E. G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2014. “Dynamically equivalent rocking structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (10): 1543–1563. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2410.
Di Egidio, A., and A. Contento. 2009. “Base isolation of slide-rocking non-symmetric rigid blocks under impulsive and seismic excitations.” Eng. Struct. 31 (11): 2723–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.021.
Dimitrakopoulos, E. G., and M. J. DeJong. 2012. “Overturning of retrofitted rocking structures under pulse-type excitations.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (8): 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000410.
Dimitrakopoulos, E. G., and A. I. Giouvanidis. 2015. “Seismic response analysis of the planar rocking frame.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (7): 04015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000939.
Drosos, V. A., and I. Anastasopoulos. 2014. “Shaking table testing of multi-drum columns and portals.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (11): 1703–1723. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2418.
ElGawady, M. A., Q. Ma, J. W. Butterworth, and J. Ingham. 2011. “Effects of interface material on the performance of free rocking blocks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (4): 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1025.
Housner, G. W. 1963. “The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 53 (2): 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020403.
Jankowski, R. 2007. “Theoretical and experimental assessment of parameters for the non-linear viscoelastic model of structural pounding.” J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 45 (4): 931–942.
Jeong, M. J., K. Suzuki, and C-S. Yim. 2003. “Chaotic rocking behaviour of freestanding objects with sliding motion.” J. Sound Vib. 262 (5): 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01087-8.
Kalliontzis, D., S. Sritharan, and A. Schultz. 2016. “Improved coefficient of restitution estimation for free rocking members.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (12): 06016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001598.
Kappos, A. J., P. Potikas, and A. G. Sextos. 2007. “Seismic assessment of an overpass bridge accounting for non-linear material and soil response and varying boundary conditions.” In Proc., ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Rethymno, Greece: European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences.
Makris, N., and G. Kampas. 2016. “Size versus slenderness: Two competing parameters in the seismic stability of free-standing rocking columns.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 106 (1): 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150138.
Makris, N., and Y. Roussos. 2000. “Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions.” Géotechnique 50 (3): 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.3.243.
Makris, N., and M. F. Vassiliou. 2013. “Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (3): 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2222.
Makris, N., and M. F. Vassiliou. 2014. “Are some top-heavy structures more stable?” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (5): 06014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000933.
Makris, N., and J. Zhang. 2001. “Rocking response of anchored blocks under pulse-type motions.” J. Eng. Mech. 127 (5): 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:5(484).
Mathey, C., C. Feau, I. Politopoulos, D. Clair, L. Baillet, and M. Fogli. 2016. “Behavior of rigid blocks with geometrical defects under seismic motion: An experimental and numerical study.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (15): 2455–2474. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2773.
Muthukumar, S., and R. DesRoches. 2006. “A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (7): 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
Mylonakis, G., S. Nikolaou, and G. Gazetas. 2006. “Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (9): 824–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.005.
Psycharis, I., D. Papastamatiou, and A. Alexandris. 2000. “Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 (8): 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200008)29:8%3C1093::AID-EQE953%3E3.0.CO;2-S.
Roh, H., and A. M. Reinhorn. 2010. “Nonlinear static analysis of structures with rocking columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (5): 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000154.
Shi, Z., and E. G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2017. “Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges.” Eng. Struct. 148 (Oct): 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077.
Taniguchi, T. 2002. “Non-linear response analyses of rectangular rigid bodies subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motion.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (8): 1481–1500. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.170.
Thiers-Moggia, R., and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2018. “Seismic protection of rocking structures with inerters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (5): 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3147.
Thomaidis, I. M. 2020. “Analytical and numerical investigation of the seismic behaviour of bridges with rocking piers.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, Univ. of London.
Thomaidis, I. M., A. Camara, and A. J. Kappos. 2018. “Simulating the rocking response of rigid bodies using general-purpose finite element software.” In Proc., 16th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece: European Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Thomaidis, I. M., A. J. Kappos, and A. Camara. 2020a. “Dynamics and seismic performance of rocking bridges accounting for the abutment-backfill contribution.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (12): 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3283.
Thomaidis, I. M., A. J. Kappos, and A. Camara. 2020b. “Rocking vs conventional seismic isolation: Comparative assessment of asymmetric bridges in a design context.” In Proc., 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Sendai, Japan: International Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Vassiliou, M. F. 2018. “Seismic response of a wobbling 3D frame.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (5): 1212–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3013.
Vassiliou, M. F., and N. Makris. 2012. “Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (2): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1124.
Vassiliou, M. F., and N. Makris. 2015. “Dynamics of the vertically restrained rocking column.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (12): 04015049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000953.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Jul 30, 2021
Accepted: Oct 21, 2021
Published online: Jan 5, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ioannis M. Thomaidis, Ph.D.
School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, Univ. of London, EC1V 0HB London, UK.
Alfredo Camara
Lecturer, School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City, Univ. of London, EC1V 0HB London, UK.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, Khalifa Univ., 127788 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-5021. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Intensity measures, fragility analysis and dimensionality reduction of rocking under far‐field ground motions, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10.1002/eqe.3740, 51, 15, (3639-3657), (2022).
  • Uniform risk spectra for rocking structures, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10.1002/eqe.3691, 51, 11, (2610-2626), (2022).
  • Finite element modeling of free‐standing cylindrical columns under seismic excitation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10.1002/eqe.3651, 51, 9, (2016-2035), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share