Two Different Approaches for Collapse of Nonsymmetric Masonry Arches: Monasterio’s Treatment versus Limit Equilibrium Analysis
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 10
Abstract
This research can be viewed as a development of the critical review of the Monasterio’s manuscript Nueva teórica sobre el empuje de bóvedas, proposed by the authors in previous studies; this unpublished manuscript is devoted to the collapse of nonsymmetric masonry arches, modeled as an assemblage of rigid voussoirs, infinitely resistant to compression, and characterized by nil strength to tension and finite friction. As its starting point, the current work examines the conditions identified by Monasterio for the activation of the pure sliding collapse mechanism: his approach is applied to a case study, i.e., a nonsymmetric arch of a given geometry, by showing some critical aspects related to the apparent independence of the collapse from the thickness of the arch. Thus, an alternative formulation based on an appositely developed mixed approach is proposed that allows for identifying under the hypothesis of finite friction some critical issues related to nonstandard behavior. This approach shows that the search for the various collapse mechanisms depends on the general equilibrium conditions of the arch, expressed as a function of the internal reactions—that is thrust and shear acting at the key joint—by extending Coulomb’s method of maximis and minimis to the case of nonsymmetric arches. The activation of the various collapse mechanisms—in particular those by pure sliding and mixed type—is therefore identified only after having determined the rotational equilibrium domain and its intersection with the sliding domain allowed by friction performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Aita, D., R. Barsotti, and S. Bennati. 2019. “Looking at the collapse modes of circular and pointed masonry arches through the lens of Durand-Claye’s stability area method.” Arch. Appl. Mech. 89 (8): 1537–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-019-01526-z.
Aita, D., and A. Sinopoli. 2020. “Revisiting Monasterio’s unpublished manuscript: A critical review of the collapse modes analysis of non-symmetric and symmetric masonry arches.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 14 (5): 762–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1648586.
Baggio, C., and P. Trovalusci. 1998. “Limit analysis for no-tension and frictional three-dimensional discrete systems.” Mech. Struct. Mach. 26 (Feb): 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905459708945496.
Baggio, C., and P. Trovalusci. 2000. “Collapse behaviour of three-dimensional brick-block systems using nonlinear programming.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 10 (2): 181–195. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.10.2.181.
Bagi, K. 2014. “When Heyman’s safe theorem for rigid block systems fails: Non-Heymanian collapse modes of masonry structures.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 (Jan): 2696–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.041.
Beatini, V., G. Royer-Carfagni, and A. Tasora. 2018. “The role of frictional contact of constituent blocks on the stability of masonry domes.” Proc. R. Soc. A 474 (2209): 20170740. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0740.
Beatini, V., G. Royer-Carfagni, and A. Tasora. 2019. “Modeling the shear failure of segmental arches.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 158 (Feb): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.023.
Casapulla, C. 2001. “Dry rigid block masonry: Safe solutions in presence of Coulomb friction.” Trans. Built Environ. 55 (May): 23. https://doi.org/10.2495/STR010251.
Casapulla, C., and F. Lauro. 2000. “A simple computation tool for the limit-state analysis of masonry arches.” In Proc., 5th Int. Congress Restoration of Architectural Firenze Heritage 2000, 2056–2064. Florence, Italy: Università di Firenze.
Cocchetti, G., and E. Rizzi. 2020a. “Static upper/lower thrust and kinematic work balance stationarity for least-thickness circular masonry arch optimization.” J. Optim. Theory Appl. 187 (2): 707–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01772-0.
Cocchetti, G., and E. Rizzi. 2020b. “Nonlinear programming numerical formulation to acquire limit self-standing conditions of circular masonry arches accounting for limited friction.” Int. J. Masonry Res. Innov. 5 (4): 569–617. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2020.111806.
Coulomb, C. A. 1776. “Essai sur une application des règles de maximis et minimis à quelques problèmes de statique, relatifs a l’architecture.” In Vol. 7 of Mémoires de mathématique & de physique, présentés à l’Academie Royale des Sciences par divers savans, 343–382. Paris: De l’Imprimerie Royale.
D’Ayala, D. F., and E. Tomasoni. 2011. “Three-dimensional analysis of masonry vaults using limit state analysis with finite friction.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 5 (2): 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050903367595.
Drucker, D. C. 1954. “Coulomb friction, plasticity and limit loads.” J. Appl. Mech. 21 (1): 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010821.
Gilbert, M., C. Casapulla, and H. M. Ahmed. 2006. “Limit analysis of masonry block structures with non-associative frictional joints using linear programming.” Comput. Struct. 84 (Mar): 873–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.005.
Gilbert, M., and C. Melbourne. 1994. “Rigid block analysis of masonry structures.” Struct. Eng. 72 (21): 356–361.
Grillanda, N., A. Chiozzi, G. Milani, and A. Tralli. 2021. “Tilting plane tests for the ultimate shear capacity evaluation of perforated dry joint masonry panels. Part II: Numerical analyses.” Eng. Struct. 228 (Feb): 111460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111460.
Huerta, S., and F. Foce. 2003. “Vault theory in Spain between XVIIIth and XIXth century: Monasterio’s unpublished manuscript ‘Nueva teórica sobre el empuje de bóvedas.” In Proc., 1st Int. Congress on Construction History, 1155–1166. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Juan de Herrera, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura.
Livesley, R. K. 1978. “Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 12 (Mar): 1853–1871. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620121207.
Palmer, A. C. 1966. “A limit theorem for materials with non-associated flow laws.” Journal de Mécanique 5 (2): 217–222.
Radenkovic, D. 1961. “Théorèmes limites pour un matériau de Coulomb à dilatation non standardisée.” Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sci. 252: 4103–4104.
Rizzi, E., G. Colasante, A. Frigerio, and G. Cocchetti. 2012. “On the mixed collapse mechanism of semi-circular masonry arches.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, 541–549. Wrocław, Poland: Wrocław Univ. of Science and Technology.
Simon, J., and K. Bagi. 2016. “Discrete element analysis of the minimum thickness of oval masonry domes.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 10 (4): 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2014.996921.
Sinopoli, A. 2002. “A re-examination of some theories on vaulted structures: The role of geometry from Leonardo to De La Hire.” In Towards a history of construction, series between mechanics and architecture, edited by Becchi, A., M. Corradi, F. Foce, and O. Pedemonte, 601–624. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
Sinopoli, A. 2003. “The role of geometry in the theories on vaulted structures by Lorenzo Mascheroni.” In Proc., 1st Int. Congress on Construction History, edited by S. Huerta, 1865–1873. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Juan de Herrera.
Sinopoli, A., D. Aita, and F. Foce. 2007. “Further remarks on the collapse of masonry arches with Coulomb friction.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Arch Bridges, edited by P. B. Lourenço, D. V. Oliveira, and A. Portela, 649–657. Guimarães, Portugal: Multicomp.
Sinopoli, A., M. Corradi, and F. Foce. 1997. “A modern formulation for pre-elastic theories on masonry arches.” J. Eng. Mech. 123 (3): 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(204).
Stockdale, G., V. Sarhosis, and G. Milani. 2020. “Seismic capacity and multi-mechanism analysis for dry-stack masonry arches subjected to hinge control.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 18 (2): 673–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00583-7.
Stockdale, G., S. Tiberti, D. Camilletti, G. Sferrazza Papa, A. Basshofi Habieb, E. Bertolesi, G. Milani, and S. Casolo. 2018. “Kinematic collapse load calculator: Circular arches.” SoftwareX 7 (56): 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2018.05.006.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 23, 2020
Accepted: May 24, 2021
Published online: Jul 30, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 30, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Vasilis Sarhosis, Jose V. Lemos, Katalin Bagi, Gabriele Milani, Recent Advances on the Mechanics of Masonry Structures, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002112, 148, 6, (2022).
- Danila Aita, Revisiting Classic Methods for the Equilibrium Analysis of Masonry Arches and Domes, From Corbel Arches to Double Curvature Vaults, 10.1007/978-3-031-12873-8_6, (123-168), (2022).